Search

Background: Actual and imagined cued gait trainings have not been compared in people with multiple sclerosis (MS)., Objective: To analyze the effects of cued motor imagery (CMI), cued gait training (CGT), and combined CMI and cued gait training (CMI-CGT) on motor, cognitive, and emotional functioning, and health-related quality of life in people with MS., Methods: In this double-blind randomized parallel-group multicenter trial, people with MS were randomized (1:1:1) to CMI, CMI-CGT, or CGT for 30 minutes, 4×/week for 4 weeks. Patients practiced at home, using recorded instructions, and supported by ≥6 phone calls. Data were collected at weeks 0, 4, and 13. Co-primary outcomes were walking speed and distance, analyzed by intention-to-treat. Secondary outcomes were global cognitive impairment, anxiety, depression, suicidality, fatigue, HRQoL, motor imagery ability, music-induced motivation, pleasure and arousal, self-efficacy, and cognitive function. Adverse events and falls were continuously monitored., Results: Of 1559 screened patients, 132 were randomized: 44 to CMI, 44 to CMI-CGT, and 44 to CGT. None of the interventions demonstrated superiority in influencing walking speed or distance, with negligible effects on walking speed (η 2  = 0.019) and distance (η 2  = 0.005) observed in the between-group comparison. Improvements in walking speed and walking distance over time corresponded to large effects for CMI, CMI-CGT, and CGT (η 2  = 0.348 and η 2  = 0.454 respectively). No severe study-related adverse events were reported., Conclusions: CMI-GT did not lead to improved walking speed and distance compared with CMI and CGT alone in people with MS. Lack of a true control group represents a study limitation., Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00023978., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Walking impairment is one of the most prevalent symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). In this study, we aimed to explore the usefulness of a simple walking test, the Timed 25 Foot Walk (T25FW), in detecting subtle differences in "fully ambulatory" pwMS compared to HC., Methods: We therefore investigated retrospective data from a clinical real-life cohort of 650 pwMS. We first analyzed the amount of patients showing clinically relevant impairment in the T25FW (T25FW > 6 s) within different levels of disability according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). For detailed analysis in "fully ambulatory" pwMS, we formed four groups according to the respective levels of disability (EDSS 0, EDSS 1, EDSS 1.5-2, EDSS 2.5-3), and compared their walking speed to age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC)., Results: In our cohort, the number of patients showing clinically relevant slowing in the T25FW ranged from 15% in "fully ambulatory" patients (EDSS 0-3) to 69% in patients with moderate (EDSS 3.5-5.5) and 100% in patients with severe impairment (EDSS ≥6). Further analyses in "fully ambulatory" patients revealed that all EDSS-subgroups showed significant slowing compared to HC. The mean difference to walking speed of HC became gradually more pronounced from 0.15 m/s in asymptomatic patients (EDSS 0) to 0.5 m/s in patients with EDSS 2.5-3., Conclusion: These findings underline the ability of the T25FW to detect slowing even in patients with minimal disability. While the difference to HC was slightly below clinical relevance in asymptomatic patients (EDSS 0), slowing gradually worsened from EDSS 1 onwards and exceeded published thresholds for clinical meaningfulness., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Bi.H. received speaker honoraria from Roche and Bristol-Myers Squibb, and travel funding from Janssen. D.P. received travel funding from Merck, Genzyme/Sanofi-Aventis and Biogen and speaker honoraria from Biogen, Novartis and Merck. S.H. received speaker honoraria from Roche and Bristol-Myers Squibb. G.B. has nothing to disclose. M.K. received travel funding and speaker honoraria from Bayer Schering Pharma, Novartis, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Biogen Idec and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., and a research grant from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Be.H. received travel funding or speaker honoraria from Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. A.D. received speaker honoraria from Sanofi-Aventis and travel funding from Novartis. A.P. has nothing to disclose. C.E. received travel funding and speaker honoraria from Biogen Idec, Bayer Schering Pharma, Merck Serono, Novartis, Genzyme and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd./Sanofi-Aventis, Shire and Janssen; has received research support from Merck Serono, Biogen Idec, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd./Sanofi-Aventis; and served on scientific advisory boards for Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Genzyme, Roche, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd./Sanofi- Aventis., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limited resources often hinder regular cognitive assessment of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) in standard clinical care. A self-administered iPad®-based cognitive screening-tool (Processing Speed Test; PST) might mitigate this problem., Objective: To evaluate the PST in clinical routine., Methods: We investigated the feasibility of the PST in both a quiet and a waiting room setting. We assessed the validity of the PST in comparison with the established Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). We explored associations between processing speed assessments and the Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters, and psychological factors. Additionally, we explored the ability of the PST to detect impairment in processing speed compared to the SDMT., Results: The PST was feasible in the waiting room setting. PST and SDMT correlated comparably with the BICAMS, MRI parameters, and psychological variables. Of 172 pwMS, 50 (30.8%) showed cognitive impairment according to the BICAMS; respective values were 47 (27.3%) for the SDMT and 9 (5.2%) for the PST., Conclusions: The PST performed in a waiting room setting correlates strongly with established cognitive tests. It thus may be used to assess processing speed in a resource-efficient manner and complement cognitive assessment in clinical routine. Despite comparable validity of the PST and SDMT, we identified more pwMS with impaired processing speed using normative data of the SDMT compared to the PST and advise caution, that the common cut-off score of - 1.5 SD from the current PST is not appropriate in Europe., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Brain viscoelasticity as assessed by magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) has been discussed as a promising surrogate of microstructural alterations due to neurodegenerative processes. Existing studies indicate that multiple sclerosis (MS) is associated with a global reduction in brain stiffness. However, no study to date systematically investigated the MS-related characteristics of brain viscoelasticity separately in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), deep gray matter (DGM) and T2-hyperintense white matter (WM) lesions., Methods: 70 MS patients and 42 healthy volunteers underwent whole-cerebral MRE using a stimulated echo sequence (DENSE) with a low-frequency mechanical excitation at 20 Hertz. The magnitude |G ∗ | (Pa) and phase angle φ (rad) of the complex shear modulus G ∗ were reconstructed by multifrequency dual elasto-visco (MDEV) inversion and related to structural imaging and clinical parameters., Results: We observed φ in the thalamus to be higher by 4.3 % in patients relative to healthy controls (1.11 ± 0.07 vs. 1.06 ± 0.07, p < 0.0001). Higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were negatively associated with φ in the basal ganglia (p = 0.01). We measured φ to be lower in MS lesions compared to surrounding NAWM (p = 0.001), which was most prominent for lesions in the temporal lobe (1.01 ± 0.22 vs. 1.06 ± 0.19, p = 0.003). Age was associated with lower values of |G ∗ | (p = 0.04) and φ (p = 0.004) in the thalamus of patients. No alteration in NAWM stiffness relative to WM in healthy controls was observed., Conclusion: Low-frequency elastography in MS patients reveals age-independent alterations in the viscoelasticity of deep gray matter at early stages of disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Besides demographics and clinical factors, psychological variables and brain-tissue changes have been associated with fatigue in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Identifying predictors of fatigue could help to improve therapeutic approaches for pwMS. Therefore, we investigated predictors of fatigue using a multifactorial approach., Methods: 136 pwMS and 49 normal controls (NC) underwent clinical, neuropsychological, and magnetic resonance imaging examinations. We assessed fatigue using the "Fatigue Scale for Motor and Cognitive Functions", yielding a total, motor, and cognitive fatigue score. We further analyzed global and subcortical brain volumes, white matter lesions and microstructural changes (examining fractional anisotropy; FA) along the cortico striatal thalamo cortical (CSTC) loop. Potential demographic, clinical, psychological, and magnetic resonance imaging predictors of total, motor, and cognitive fatigue were explored using multifactorial linear regression models., Results: 53% of pwMS and 20% of NC demonstrated fatigue. Besides demographics and clinical data, total fatigue in pwMS was predicted by higher levels of depression and reduced microstructural tissue integrity in the CSTC loop (adjusted R 2  = 0.52, p < 0.001). More specifically, motor fatigue was predicted by lower education, female sex, higher physical disability, higher levels of depression, and self-efficacy (adjusted R 2  = 0.54, p < 0.001). Cognitive fatigue was also predicted by higher levels of depression and lower self-efficacy, but in addition by FA reductions in the CSTC loop (adjusted R 2  = 0.45, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Our results indicate that depression and self-efficacy strongly predict fatigue in MS. Incremental variance in total and cognitive fatigue was explained by microstructural changes along the CSTC loop, beyond demographics, clinical, and psychological variables., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: S.H. has received speaking honoraria from Roche and Bristol-Myers Squibb. B.H. has received funding for travel from Janssen and speaking honoraria from Roche. I.K.P. has received honoraria for speaking at scientific meetings, serving at scientific advisory boards, and performing consulting activities, from Adamas Pharma, Almirall, Bayer Pharma, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Desitin, Sanofi-Genzyme, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Teva. She received research support from the German MS Society, Celgene, Novartis, Roche, and Teva. L.P. has no disclosures. V.F. has no disclosures. B.H. has no disclosures. S.R. has no disclosures. S.W. has no disclosures. A.D. has received speaker honoraria from Sanofi-Aventis and travel funding from Novartis. S.E. has no disclosures. R.D. has no disclosures. M.K. has received funding for travel and speaker honoraria from Bayer Schering Pharma, Novartis Genzyme, Merck Serono, Biogen Idec and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. And a research grant from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. D.P. has received funding for travel from merck, Genzyme/sanofi-Aventis and Biogen, as well as speaking honoraria from Biogen, Novartis and Merck. C.E. received funding for traveling and speaker honoraria from Biogen Idec, Bayer Schering Pharma, Merck Serono, Novartis, Genzyme and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd./Sanofi-aventis, Shire; received research support from Merck Serono, Biogen Idec, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd./Sanofi-aventis; and serves on scientific advisory boards for Bayer Schering Pharma, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, Genzyme, Roche, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd./Sanofi- Aventis., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: A contribution of neutrophil granulocytes to the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is recognized. Anti-CD20 treatments applied in these diseases are associated with infectious complications and neutropenia. No data is available about functional characteristics of neutrophils obtained from patients with anti-CD20 treatments., Methods: In neutrophils isolated from 13 patients with anti-CD20 treatment (9 MS, 4 NMOSD), 11 patients without anti-CD20 treatment (9 MS, 2 NMOSD) and 5 healthy controls, we analyzed chemotaxis, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), phagocytosis, and formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) in vitro., Results: Chemotaxis and ROS production were found unchanged between patients with and without anti-CD20 treatment or between patients and healthy controls. We found a higher proportion of non-phagocytosing cells in patients without anti-CD20 treatment compared to patients with anti-CD20 treatment and healthy controls. As compared to healthy controls, a higher proportion of neutrophils from patients without anti-CD20 treatments underwent NET formation, either unstimulated or stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 3-acetate for 3 h. In about half of patients with anti-CD20 treatment (n = 7), NET formation of unstimulated neutrophils occurred already within 20 min of incubation. This was not observed in patients without anti-CD20 treatment and healthy controls., Conclusion: Anti-CD20 treatment in MS and NMOSD patients does not alter chemotaxis and ROS production of neutrophils in vitro but might restore their impaired phagocytosis in these diseases. Our study reveals a predisposition to early NET formation in vitro of neutrophils obtained from patients with anti-CD20 treatment. This may contribute to associated risks of neutropenia and infections., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

B-cell depleting therapies result in diminished humoral immunity following vaccination against COVID-19, but our understanding on the impact on cellular immune responses is limited. Here, we performed a detailed analysis of cellular immunity following mRNA vaccination in patients receiving B-cell depleting therapy using ELISpot assay and flow cytometry. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain antibody assays were performed to elucidate B-cell responses. To complement our cellular analysis, we performed immunophenotyping for T- and B-cell subsets. We show that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination using mRNA vaccines elicits cellular T-cell responses in patients under B-cell depleting therapy. Some facets of this immune response including TNFα production of CD4 + T-cells and granzyme B production of CD8 + T-cells, however, are distinctly diminished in these patients. Consequently, it appears that the finely coordinated process of T-cell activation with a uniform involvement of CD4 + and CD8 + T-cells as seen in HCs is disturbed in autoimmune patients. In addition, we observed that immune cell composition does impact cellular immunity as well as sustainability of anti-spike antibody titers. Our data suggest disturbed cellular immunity following mRNA vaccination in patients treated with B-cell depleting therapy. Immune cell composition may be an important determinant for vaccination efficacy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 Institut Pasteur. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: COVID-19 continues to challenge neurologists in counselling persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) regarding disease-modifying treatment (DMT) and vaccination. The objective here was to characterize predictors of COVID-19 outcome in pwMS., Methods: We included pwMS with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis from a nationwide population-based registry. COVID-19 outcome was classified as either mild or severe. Impact of DMT, specifically anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, and vaccination on COVID-19 outcome was determined by multivariable models adjusted for a-priori-risk (determined by a cumulative risk score comprising age, disability and comorbidities)., Results: Of 317 pwMS with COVID-19 (mean age 41.8 years [SD 12.4], 72.9% female, median EDSS 1.5 [range 0-8.5], 77% on DMT [16% on antiCD20]), 92.7% had a mild course and 7.3% a severe course with 2.2% dying from COVID-19. Ninety-seven pwMS (30.6%) were fully vaccinated. After a median 5 months from vaccination to SARS-CoV-2 infection (range 1-9), severe COVID-19 occurred in 2.1% of fully vaccinated pwMS compared to 9.5% in unvaccinated pwMS (p=0.018). A-priori-risk robustly predicted COVID-19 severity (R 2 0.605; p<0.001). Adjusting for a-priori-risk, anti-CD20 treatment was associated with increased COVID-19 severity (odds ratio [OR] 3.3; R 2 0.113; p=0.003), but exposure to any other DMT was not. Fully vaccinated pwMS showed a significantly decreased risk for severe COVID-19 (OR 0.21, R 2 0.144, p<0.001)., Conclusions: In a population-based MS cohort, COVID-19 course is primarily predicted by a-priori-risk (depending on age, disability and comorbidities) explaining about 60% of variance. Anti-CD20 treatment is associated with a moderately increased risk, while reassuringly vaccination provides protection from severe COVID-19., (This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.)

Background: Long-term outcome after COVID-19 in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) is scarcely studied and controlled data are lacking., Objective: To compare long-term outcome after COVID-19 in pwMS to a matched control group of pwMS without COVID-19., Methods: We included pwMS with PCR-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 and ≥6 months of follow-up available and, as a control group, pwMS matched 1:1 for age, sex, disability level and disease-modifying treatment type., Results: Of 211 pwMS with COVID-19 (mean age 42.6 years [SD 12.2], 69% female, median EDSS 1.5 [range: 0-7.5], 16% antiCD20), 90.5% initially had a mild COVID-19 course. At follow-up, 70% had recovered completely 3 months (M3) after COVID-19, 83% after 6 months (M6) and 94% after 12 months (M12). Mild initial COVID-19 course was the only significant predictor of complete recovery (odds ratio [OR]: 10.5; p<0.001). Most frequent residual symptoms were fatigue (M3: 18.5%, M6: 13.7%, M12: 7.3%), hyposmia (M3: 13.7%, M6: 5.2%, M12: 1.7%) and dyspnea (M3: 7.1%, M6: 6.6%, M12: 2.8%). Compared to matched controls, fatigue, hyposmia and dyspnea were significantly more frequent at M3 and still slightly at M6, while there was no difference at M12. PwMS with COVID-19 had neither a significantly increased risk for relapses (OR 1.1; p=0.70) nor disability worsening (OR 0.96; p=0.60)., Discussion: Long-term outcome of COVID-19 is favourable in a large majority of pwMS with only a small proportion of patients suffering from persistent symptoms usually resolving after 3-6 months. COVID-19 is not associated with increased risk of relapse or disability., (This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.)

Background: Knowledge on immunity after SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) and the impact of disease-modifying treatment (DMT) is limited., Objective: To evaluate degree, duration and potential predictors of specific humoral immune response in pwMS with prior COVID-19., Methods: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing was performed in pwMS with PCR-confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic COVID-19 from a nation-wide registry. Predictors of seropositivity were identified by multivariate regression models., Results: In 125 pwMS (mean age = 42.4 years (SD = 12.3 years), 70% female), anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were detected in 76.0% after a median of 5.2 months from positive PCR. Seropositivity rate was significantly lower in patients on IS-DMT (61.4%, p  = 0.001) than without DMT or immunomodulatory DMT (80.6%; 86.0%, respectively). In multivariate analysis, IS-DMT was associated with reduced probability of seropositivity (odds ratio (OR): 0.51; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.17-0.82; p  < 0.001). Predefined subgroup analyses showed marked reduction of seropositivity in pwMS on rituximab/ocrelizumab (OR 0.15; 95% CI: 0.05-0.56; p  < 0.001). Rate of seropositivity did not change significantly over 6 months., Conclusions: Humoral immunity is stable after SARS-CoV-2 infection in MS, but is reduced by immunosuppressive DMT, particularly anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. This provides important evidence for advising pwMS as well as for planning and prioritizing vaccination.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic challenges neurologists in counselling patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) regarding their risk by SARS-CoV-2 and in guiding disease-modifying treatment (DMT)., Objective: To characterize the prevalence and outcome of COVID-19 in pwMS specifically associated with different DMT in a nationwide population-based study., Methods: We included patients aged ≥18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of MS and a diagnosis of COVID-19 established between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020. We classified COVID-19 course as either mild, severe or fatal. Impact of DMT and specifically immunosuppressants (alemtuzumab, cladribine, fingolimod, ocrelizumab or rituximab) on COVID-19 outcome was determined by multivariable models, adjusted for a-priori-risk., Results: Of 126 MS patients with COVID-19 (mean age 43.2 years [SD 13.4], 71% female), 86.5% had a mild course, 9.5% a severe course and 3.2% died from COVID-19. A-priori-risk significantly predicted COVID-19 severity (R2 0.814; p<0.001) and mortality (R2 0.664; p<0.001). Adjusting for this a-priori-risk, neither exposure to any DMT nor exposure to specific immunosuppressive DMT were significantly associated with COVID-19 severity (odds ratio [OR] 1.6; p = 0.667 and OR 1.9; p = 0.426) or mortality (OR 0.5; p = 0.711 and 2.1; 0.233) when compared to no DMT., Conclusions: In a population-based MS cohort, COVID-19 outcome was not associated with exposure to DMT and immunosuppressive DMT when accounting for other already known risk factors. This provides reassuring evidence that COVID-19 risk can be individually anticipated in MS and-except for a very small proportion of high-risk patients-treatment decisions should be primarily focused on treating MS rather than the pandemic., Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Gabriel Bsteh: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Roche and Teva. Hamid Assar: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. Harald Hegen: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Siemens and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Novartis and Teva. Bettina Heschl: has nothing to disclose. Fritz Leutmezer: has participated in meetings sponsored by or received honoraria for acting as an advisor/speaker for Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. Franziska Di Pauli: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche and Teva. Christiane Gradl: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, consultations) and/or travel funding from Biogen, D-Pharma, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Teva. Gerhard Traxler: has participated in meetings sponsored by, received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. Gudrun Zulehner: has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. Paulus Rommer: has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from AbbVie, Allmiral, Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, Roche. Peter Wipfler: has received funding for travel and honoraria (lectures, advisory boards) from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. Michael Guger: has received support and honoraria for research, consultation, lectures and education from Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Genzyme, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Shire and Teva. Christian Enzinger: has received funding for travel and speaker honoraria from Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Shire and Teva. has received research support from Biogen, Celgene, Merck, and Teva; is serving on scientific advisory boards for Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Teva. Thomas Berger: has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, Celgene, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Teva) and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.