Search

Background & Aims: In a 2010 randomized trial (the PANTER trial), a surgical step-up approach for infected necrotizing pancreatitis was found to reduce the composite endpoint of death or major complications compared with open necrosectomy; 35% of patients were successfully treated with simple catheter drainage only. There is concern, however, that minimally invasive treatment increases the need for reinterventions for residual peripancreatic necrotic collections and other complications during the long term. We therefore performed a long-term follow-up study., Methods: We reevaluated all the 73 patients (of the 88 patients randomly assigned to groups) who were still alive after the index admission, at a mean 86 months (±11 months) of follow-up. We collected data on all clinical and health care resource utilization endpoints through this follow-up period. The primary endpoint was death or major complications (the same as for the PANTER trial). We also measured exocrine insufficiency, quality of life (using the Short Form-36 and EuroQol 5 dimensions forms), and Izbicki pain scores., Results: From index admission to long-term follow-up, 19 patients (44%) died or had major complications in the step-up group compared with 33 patients (73%) in the open-necrosectomy group (P = .005). Significantly lower proportions of patients in the step-up group had incisional hernias (23% vs 53%; P = .004), pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (29% vs 56%; P = .03), or endocrine insufficiency (40% vs 64%; P = .05). There were no significant differences between groups in proportions of patients requiring additional drainage procedures (11% vs 13%; P = .99) or pancreatic surgery (11% vs 5%; P = .43), or in recurrent acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, Izbicki pain scores, or medical costs. Quality of life increased during follow-up without a significant difference between groups., Conclusions: In an analysis of long-term outcomes of trial participants, we found the step-up approach for necrotizing pancreatitis to be superior to open necrosectomy, without increased risk of reinterventions., (Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Patients with breast cancer metastasized to the liver have a median survival of 4-33 months and treatment options are usually restricted to palliative systemic therapy. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of resection of liver metastases from breast cancer and to identify prognostic factors for overall survival., Methods: Patients were identified using the national registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands (PALGA). Included were all patients who underwent resection of liver metastases from breast cancer in 11 hospitals in The Netherlands of the last 20 years. Study data were retrospectively collected from patient files., Results: A total of 32 female patients were identified. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 3 and 11 patients, respectively. There was no postoperative mortality. After a median follow up period of 26 months (range, 0-188), 5-year and median overall survival after partial liver resection was 37% and 55 months, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival was 19% with a median time to recurrence of 11 months. Solitary metastases were the only independent significant prognostic factor at multivariate analysis., Conclusion: Resection of liver metastases from breast cancer is safe and might provide a survival benefit in a selected group of patients. Especially in patients with solitary liver metastasis, the option of surgery in the multimodality management of patients with disseminated breast cancer should be considered., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Treatment of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis has become more conservative and less invasive, but there are few data from prospective studies to support the efficacy of this change. We performed a prospective multicenter study of treatment outcomes among patients with necrotizing pancreatitis., Methods: We collected data from 639 consecutive patients with necrotizing pancreatitis, from 2004 to 2008, treated at 21 Dutch hospitals. Data were analyzed for disease severity, interventions (radiologic, endoscopic, surgical), and outcome., Results: Overall mortality was 15% (n=93). Organ failure occurred in 240 patients (38%), with 35% mortality. Treatment was conservative in 397 patients (62%), with 7% mortality. An intervention was performed in 242 patients (38%), with 27% mortality; this included early emergency laparotomy in 32 patients (5%), with 78% mortality. Patients with longer times between admission and intervention had lower mortality: 0 to 14 days, 56%; 14 to 29 days, 26%; and >29 days, 15% (P<.001). A total of 208 patients (33%) received interventions for infected necrosis, with 19% mortality. Catheter drainage was most often performed as the first intervention (63% of cases), without additional necrosectomy in 35% of patients. Primary catheter drainage had fewer complications than primary necrosectomy (42% vs 64%, P=.003). Patients with pancreatic parenchymal necrosis (n=324), compared with patients with only peripancreatic necrosis (n=315), had a higher risk of organ failure (50% vs 24%, P<.001) and mortality (20% vs 9%, P<.001)., Conclusions: Approximately 62% of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis can be treated without an intervention and with low mortality. In patients with infected necrosis, delayed intervention and catheter drainage as first treatment improves outcome., (Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the added value of plain radiographs on top of clinical assessment in unselected patients presenting with acute abdominal pain at the emergency department (ED)., Methods: In a multicenter prospective trial, patients with abdominal pain more than 2 hours and less than 5 days presented at the ED were evaluated clinically, and a diagnosis was made by the treating physician. Subsequently, all patients underwent supine abdominal and upright chest radiographs, after which the diagnosis was reassessed by the treating physician. A final (reference) diagnosis was assigned by an expert panel. The number of changes in the primary diagnosis, as well as the accuracy of these changes, was calculated. Changes in the level of confidence were evaluated for unchanged diagnoses., Results: Between March 2005 and November 2006, 1021 patients, 55% female, mean age 47 years (range, 19-94 years), were included. In 117 of 1021 patients, the diagnosis changed after plain radiographs, and this change was correct in 39 patients (22% of changed diagnoses and 4% of total study population). Overall, the clinical diagnosis was correct in 502 (49%) patients. The diagnosis after evaluation of the radiographs was correct in 514 (50%) patients, a nonsignificant difference (P = .14). In 65% of patients with unchanged diagnosis before and after plain radiography, the level of confidence of that diagnosis did not change either., Conclusion: The added value of plain radiographs is too limited to advocate their routine use in the diagnostic workup of patients with acute abdominal pain, because few diagnoses change and the level of confidence were mostly not affected., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Dendritic cells (DCs) are the professional antigen-presenting cells of the immune system. We have demonstrated that vaccination of autologous ex vivo cultured DCs results in the induction of tumor-specific immune responses in cancer patients, which correlates with clinical response. Optimization of antigen loading is one of the possibilities for further improving the efficacy of DC vaccination. Theoretically, transfection of DCs with RNA encoding a tumor-specific antigen may induce a broader immune response as compared to the most widely used technique of peptide pulsing., Patients and Methods: In this clinical study, RNA transfection was compared with peptide pulsing as an antigen loading strategy for DC vaccination. Patients with resectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer were vaccinated intravenously and intradermally 3 times weekly with either carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA)-derived HLA-A2 binding peptide-loaded or CEA mRNA electroporated DCs prior to surgical resection of the metastases. All DCs were loaded with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) as a control protein. Evaluation of vaccine-induced immune reactivity consisted of T-cell proliferative responses and B-cell antibody responses against KLH in peripheral blood. CEA reactivity was determined in T-cell cultures of biopsies of post-treatment delayed type hypersensitivity skin tests., Results: Sixteen patients were included. All patients showed T-cell responses against KLH upon vaccination. CEA peptide-specific T-cells were detected in 8 out of 11 patients in the peptide group, but in none of the 5 patients in the RNA group., Conclusion: In our study, DC CEA mRNA transfection was not superior to DC CEA peptide pulsing in the induction of a tumor-specific immune response in colorectal cancer patients.

During liver resection clamping of the hepato-duodenal ligament (the Pringle maneuver) is performed to reduce intraoperative blood-loss. During this maneuver acute portal hypertension may lead to spontaneous splenic rupture requiring rapid splenectomy in order to control blood loss. We present 2 case of patients with hemorrhage from the spleen during clamping for liver surgery. A review of the literature with an emphasis on the pathophysiology of splenic hemorrhage is presented.

Background: Necrotizing pancreatitis with infected necrotic tissue is associated with a high rate of complications and death. Standard treatment is open necrosectomy. The outcome may be improved by a minimally invasive step-up approach., Methods: In this multicenter study, we randomly assigned 88 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis and suspected or confirmed infected necrotic tissue to undergo primary open necrosectomy or a step-up approach to treatment. The step-up approach consisted of percutaneous drainage followed, if necessary, by minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy. The primary end point was a composite of major complications (new-onset multiple-organ failure or multiple systemic complications, perforation of a visceral organ or enterocutaneous fistula, or bleeding) or death., Results: The primary end point occurred in 31 of 45 patients (69%) assigned to open necrosectomy and in 17 of 43 patients (40%) assigned to the step-up approach (risk ratio with the step-up approach, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.38 to 0.87; P=0.006). Of the patients assigned to the step-up approach, 35% were treated with percutaneous drainage only. New-onset multiple-organ failure occurred less often in patients assigned to the step-up approach than in those assigned to open necrosectomy (12% vs. 40%, P=0.002). The rate of death did not differ significantly between groups (19% vs. 16%, P=0.70). Patients assigned to the step-up approach had a lower rate of incisional hernias (7% vs. 24%, P=0.03) and new-onset diabetes (16% vs. 38%, P=0.02)., Conclusions: A minimally invasive step-up approach, as compared with open necrosectomy, reduced the rate of the composite end point of major complications or death among patients with necrotizing pancreatitis and infected necrotic tissue. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN13975868.), (2010 Massachusetts Medical Society)

Background: To compare health related quality of life (HR-QoL) in patients surgically treated for secondary peritonitis to that of a healthy population. And to prospectively identify factors associated with poorer (lower) HR-QoL., Design: A prospective cohort of secondary peritonitis patients was mailed the EQ-5D and EQ-VAS 6-months following initial laparotomy., Setting: Multicenter study in two academic and seven regional teaching hospitals., Patients: 130 of the 155 eligible patients (84%) responded to the HR-QoL questionnaires., Results: HR-QoL was significantly worse on all dimensions in peritonitis patients than in a healthy reference population. Peritonitis characteristics at initial presentation were not associated with HR-QoL at six months. A more complicated course of the disease leading to longer hospitalization times and patients with an enterostomy had a negative impact on the mobility (p = 0.02), self-care (p < 0.001) and daily activities: (p = 0.01). In a multivariate analysis for the EQ-VAS every doubling of hospital stay decreases the EQ-VAS by 3.8 points (p = 0.015). Morbidity during the six-month follow-up was not found to be predictive for the EQ-5D or EQ-VAS., Conclusion: Six months following initial surgery, patients with secondary peritonitis report more problems in HR-QoL than a healthy reference population. Unfavorable disease characteristics at initial presentation were not predictive for poorer HR-QoL, but a more complicated course of the disease was most predictive of HR-QoL at 6 months.

Background: Reconstruction of giant midline abdominal wall hernias is difficult, and no data are available to decide which technique should be used. It was the aim of this study to compare the "components separation technique" (CST) versus prosthetic repair with e-PTFE patch (PR)., Method: Patients with giant midline abdominal wall hernias were randomized for CST or PR. Patients underwent operation following standard procedures. Postoperative morbidity was scored on a standard form, and patients were followed for 36 months after operation for recurrent hernia., Results: Between November 1999 and June 2001, 39 patients were randomized for the study, 19 for CST and 18 for PR. Two patients were excluded perioperatively because of gross contamination of the operative field. No differences were found between the groups at baseline with respect to demographic details, co-morbidity, and size of the defect. There was no in-hospital mortality. Wound complications were found in 10 of 19 patients after CST and 13 of 18 patients after PR. Seroma was found more frequently after PR. In 7 of 18 patients after PR, the prosthesis had to be removed as a consequence of early or late infection. Reherniation occurred in 10 patients after CST and in 4 patients after PR., Conclusions: Repair of abdominal wall hernias with the component separation technique compares favorably with prosthetic repair. Although the reherniation rate after CST is relatively high, the consequences of wound healing disturbances in the presence of e-PTFE patch are far-reaching, often resulting in loss of the prosthesis.

Background: Surgery in patients with obstructive jaundice caused by a periampullary (pancreas, papilla, distal bile duct) tumor is associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications than in non-jaundiced patients. Preoperative biliary drainage was introduced in an attempt to improve the general condition and thus reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. Early studies showed a reduction in morbidity. However, more recently the focus has shifted towards the negative effects of drainage, such as an increase of infectious complications. Whether biliary drainage should always be performed in jaundiced patients remains controversial. The randomized controlled multicenter DROP-trial (DRainage vs. Operation) was conceived to compare the outcome of a 'preoperative biliary drainage strategy' (standard strategy) with that of an 'early-surgery' strategy, with respect to the incidence of severe complications (primary-outcome measure), hospital stay, number of invasive diagnostic tests, costs, and quality of life., Methods/design: Patients with obstructive jaundice due to a periampullary tumor, eligible for exploration after staging with CT scan, and scheduled to undergo a "curative" resection, will be randomized to either "early surgical treatment" (within one week) or "preoperative biliary drainage" (for 4 weeks) and subsequent surgical treatment (standard treatment). Primary outcome measure is the percentage of severe complications up to 90 days after surgery. The sample size calculation is based on the equivalence design for the primary outcome measure. If equivalence is found, the comparison of the secondary outcomes will be essential in selecting the preferred strategy. Based on a 40% complication rate for early surgical treatment and 48% for preoperative drainage, equivalence is taken to be demonstrated if the percentage of severe complications with early surgical treatment is not more than 10% higher compared to standard treatment: preoperative biliary drainage. Accounting for a 10% dropout, 105 patients are needed in each arm resulting in a study population of 210 (alpha = 0.95, beta = 0.8)., Discussion: The DROP-trial is a randomized controlled multicenter trial that will provide evidence whether or not preoperative biliary drainage is to be performed in patients with obstructive jaundice due to a periampullary tumor.

Background: The initial treatment of acute necrotizing pancreatitis is conservative. Intervention is indicated in patients with (suspected) infected necrotizing pancreatitis. In the Netherlands, the standard intervention is necrosectomy by laparotomy followed by continuous postoperative lavage (CPL). In recent years several minimally invasive strategies have been introduced. So far, these strategies have never been compared in a randomised controlled trial. The PANTER study (PAncreatitis, Necrosectomy versus sTEp up appRoach) was conceived to yield the evidence needed for a considered policy decision., Methods/design: 88 patients with (suspected) infected necrotizing pancreatitis will be randomly allocated to either group A) minimally invasive 'step-up approach' starting with drainage followed, if necessary, by videoscopic assisted retroperitoneal debridement (VARD) or group B) maximal necrosectomy by laparotomy. Both procedures are followed by CPL. Patients will be recruited from 20 hospitals, including all Dutch university medical centres, over a 3-year period. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients suffering from postoperative major morbidity and mortality. Secondary endpoints are complications, new onset sepsis, length of hospital and intensive care stay, quality of life and total (direct and indirect) costs. To demonstrate that the 'step-up approach' can reduce the major morbidity and mortality rate from 45 to 16%, with 80% power at 5% alpha, a total sample size of 88 patients was calculated., Discussion: The PANTER-study is a randomised controlled trial that will provide evidence on the merits of a minimally invasive 'step-up approach' in patients with (suspected) infected necrotizing pancreatitis.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy on the development of gastric outlet obstruction and quality of life in patients with unresectable periampullary cancer found during explorative laparotomy., Summary Background Data: Several studies, including one randomized trial, propagate to perform a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy routinely in patients with periampullary cancer found to be unresectable during laparotomy. Others suggest an increase of postoperative complications. Controversy still exists in general surgical practice if a double bypass should be performed routinely in these patients., Methods: Between December 1998 and March 2002, patients with a periampullary carcinoma who were found to be unresectable during exploration were randomized to receive a double bypass (hepaticojejunostomy and a retrocolic gastrojejunostomy) or a single bypass (hepaticojejunostomy). Randomization was stratified for center and presence of metastases. Patients with gastrointestinal obstruction and patients treated endoscopically for more than 3 months were excluded. Primary endpoints were development of clinical gastric outlet obstruction and surgical intervention for gastric outlet obstruction. Secondary endpoints were mortality, morbidity, hospital stay, survival, and quality of life, measured prospectively by the EORTC-C30 and Pan26 questionnaires. It was decided to perform an interim analysis after inclusion of 50% of the patients (n = 70)., Results: Five of the 70 patients randomized were lost to follow-up. From the remaining 65 patients, 36 patients underwent a double and 29 a single bypass. There were no differences in patient demographics, preoperative symptoms, and surgical findings between the groups. Clinical symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction were found in 2 of the 36 patients (5.5%) with a double bypass, and in 12 of the 29 patients (41.4%) with a single bypass (P = 0.001). In the double bypass group, one patient (2.8%) and in the single bypass group 6 patients (20.7%) required (re-)gastrojejunostomy during follow-up (P = 0.04). The absolute risk reduction for reoperation in the double bypass group was 18%, and the numbers needed to treat was 6. Postoperative morbidity rates, including delayed gastric emptying, were 31% in the double versus 28% in the single bypass group (P = 0.12). Median postoperative length of stay was 11 days (range 4-76 days) in the double versus 9 days (range 6-20 days) in the single bypass group (P = 0.06); median survival was 7.2 months in the double versus 8.4 months in the single bypass group (P = 0.15). No differences were found in the quality of life between both groups. After surgery most quality of life scores deteriorated temporarily and were restored to their baseline score (t = -1) within 4 months., Conclusions: Prophylactic gastrojejunostomy significantly decreases the incidence of gastric outlet obstruction without increasing complication rates. There were no differences in quality of life between the two groups. Together with the previous randomized trial from the Hopkins group, this study provides sufficient evidence to state that a double bypass consisting of a hepaticojejunostomy and a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy is preferable to a single bypass consisting of only a hepaticojejunostomy in patients undergoing surgical palliation for unresectable periampullary carcinoma. Therefore, the trial was stopped earlier than planned.

Two men, aged 52 and 57 years, had vomited and then developed chest pain, dyspnoea and tachypnoea. After a myocardial infarction had been excluded in the cardiac emergency room, further examination revealed a rupture of the oesophagus. This was treated surgically with the ultimate creation of a tubular stomach. Both patients then recovered well. The Boerhaave's syndrome, a 'spontaneous' perforation of the oesophagus, is a rare and potentially lethal condition which should be diagnosed at an early stage. Pain in the chest, dyspnoea and vomiting are frequent symptoms. A cardiac cause is sometimes erroneously suspected. Subcutaneous emphysema is a major indication for a perforation of the oesophagus. The chest X-ray shows also mediastinal emphysema and infiltrative abnormalities; in case of doubt a second X-ray should be made some hours later.

The release of heparin has been mentioned as one of the causes of hypocoagulability after reperfusion of the liver graft. It has been ascribed to endogenous heparin released from the donor liver or to exogenous heparin in the preservation fluid that is released into the recipient after sequestration into the graft during preservation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether systemic administration of heparin to the donor before the hepatectomy contributes to the appearance of heparin in the recipient after reperfusion. We studied 20 patients undergoing an auxiliary heterotopic liver transplantation; 15 donors had received heparin immediately before circulation arrest (median 300 IU/kg body weight), but 5 had not. The thrombin time (TT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), and heparin neutralization test were determined at several intervals during the transplantation.

The major cause of the increased tissue-type plasminogen activator activity during orthotopic liver transplantation is still unclear. Both the lack of hepatic clearance of tissue-type plasminogen activator in the anhepatic period and increased endothelial release from the graft on reperfusion have been proposed as the major causes. Heterotopic liver transplantation avoids the resection of the host liver and is a useful model to help differentiate between these two possibilities. In this study the fibrinolytic system was evaluated in 10 orthotopic liver transplantations, 18 heterotopic liver transplantations and a control group of 10 partial hepatic resections. A marked increment in tissue-type plasminogen activator activity, from 0.2 to 5.2 IU/ml (p less than 0.02), was observed during the anhepatic period of orthotopic liver transplantation, which rapidly normalized after reperfusion. In contrast, tissue-type plasminogen activator activity levels remained normal in heterotopic liver transplantation and partial hepatic resections. In orthotopic liver transplantation and in heterotopic liver transplantation no increase occurred in tissue-type plasminogen activator activity after reperfusion. The first venous hepatic outflow after reperfusion did not contain elevated tissue-type plasminogen activator activity levels. Plasma degradation products of fibrin and fibrinogen increased during the anhepatic period of orthotopic liver transplantation (from 2.60 to 8.80 micrograms/ml [p less than 0.008] and from 0.40 to 1.60 micrograms/ml [p less than 0.04], respectively) and remained elevated thereafter. In heterotopic liver transplantation and partial hepatic resections these levels remained low. In conclusion, the lack of hepatic clearance during the anhepatic period is probably the most important factor in the evolution of increased tissue-type plasminogen activator activity during orthotopic liver transplantation.

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has greatly improved the chances of survival in patients with acute hepatic failure. However, this mode of treatment requires lifelong immunosuppressive medication and negates the potential recovery of the host liver. In theory, auxiliary heterotopic liver transplantation (HLT) offers the diseased host liver a chance to regenerate, so that immunosuppression can be tapered off and eventually stopped. In the University Hospital Rotterdam Dijkzigt OLT and HLT were performed in two patients, with acute and subacute hepatic failure respectively. The patient undergoing OLT recovered quickly but needed a successful re-OLT after a serious rejection episode. The removed diseased liver showed no signs of regeneration at histology. The patient undergoing HLT also recovered well. HIDA scanning as well as liver biopsies of the host liver and the grafted liver 1 and 6 months after transplantation indicated full recovery of the host liver, so that immunosuppression is being tapered off.

Auxiliary heterotopic liver transplantation (HLT), which avoids removal of the host liver, may improve the results of liver transplantation in patients with end-stage chronic liver disease. However, the results of HLT have so far been disappointing. In 1986 a program of HLT was started in the University Hospital Rotterdam-Dijkzigt. Eighteen patients with chronic liver failure underwent HLT. Twelve out of 18 (67%) patients were discharged 25 days after transplantation with normal liver function. Six patients died within 3 months after operation due to septic causes. Three months after transplantation ascites was no longer detectable and oesophageal varices had disappeared in all surviving recipients of HLT. The actuarial 3 and 12 months survival rate was 67%. Hepatitis B virus reinfection was seen in all patients. In two patients cirrhosis of the graft developed within one year. These data suggest that HLT in patients with chronic liver failure gives long-term metabolic support and adequate decompression of portal system, and is associated with a morbidity and mortality comparable to that of orthotopic liver transplantation.

In this study, performed to assess the effect of auxiliary heterotopic liver transplantation on portal hypertension and hypersplenism, eight patients with chronic liver disease who underwent the procedure and had functioning grafts for at least 6 months were analyzed. The transplantation resulted in (a) normalization of platelet and leukocyte counts, (b) reduction of splenomegaly by 20% +/- 3% (P less than 0.02), (c) disappearance of ascites, and (d) diminution of esophageal varices in all patients. Intraoperatively, the mean portacaval pressure gradient decreased with 54% +/- 7% after recirculation of the graft (P less than 0.05). In conclusion, a functioning auxiliary heterotopic liver graft decompresses portal hypertension and reverses hypersplenism.

Although auxiliary heterotopic liver transplantation offers theoretical advantages over orthotopic liver replacement, clinical results have heretofore been dismal. After development of a technique of reduced size liver grafts provided with portal and arterial blood and venous drainage via the suprahepatic V. cava (HLT) in experimental animals, this method was applied in 21 transplantations in 19 patients. 11 of 16 patients with chronic liver insufficiency and one of three patients with fulminant liver failure survived transplantation for at least 1 year. HLT was well tolerated even by high-risk patients. Possibilities and limitations of this novel approach are discussed.

The use of ultrasound-guided PTCD in 49 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma was evaluated. In 11 patients PTCD was performed as a preoperative measure either to outline tumor extension or to treat cholangitis. Postoperatively, the catheters were used to stent bilioenteric anastomoses and served to guide iridium wires for radiotherapy in nine patients with nonresectable tumor or tumor residue after resection. In 20 inoperable patients with tumor diameter smaller than 3 cm and in whom at least one catheter could be manipulated through the tumor, PTCD was combined with internal and external radiotherapy. The remaining 18 patients were palliated with PTCD only. In 29 patients (59%) complete drainage of the biliary system was achieved. Twenty-seven of these had complete internal drainage using endoprostheses. Two had a combination of an endoprosthesis and external catheter drainage. Of the 20 patients (41%) with incomplete drainage, 12 had endoprostheses, four had a catheter and an endoprosthesis, and in the remaining four external catheter drainage was the optimum result. PTCD was successful in treating eight of ten patients with cholangitis and 12 of 16 patients with pruritus. Procedure-related complication occurred in 11 patients (22%). With the exception of one, all complications could be classified as minor, requiring only conservative measures. A major complication was seen in a patient with ascitic fluid and severe cholangitis. PTCD caused a bacterial peritonitis, of which the patient died. The median survival of patients treated with PTCD alone only was 4 months. A significant increase in survival was noted in patients treated with PTCD and radiotherapy (median survival 8 months).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Twenty-seven patients with acute necrotizing pancreatitis were treated with the Lawson procedure, consisting of closed drainage of the lesser sac, cholecystostomy, gastrostomy and jejunostomy. Retrospectively, the effect of the treatment was judged in relation to mortality and morbidity. Thirteen patients (48%) died, all of them due to sepsis and multiple organ failure. This considerable mortality was undoubtedly also influenced by the serious condition of most patients as reflected by the number of positive Ranson criteria. Seven patients (26%) had to be reoperated on because of abscesses. The high incidence of abscesses and the sepsis in all deceased patients indicate an insufficient drainage of the lesser sac with this method. Of the three stomas only jejunostomy proved to be useful for quick resumption of enteral feeding.

Safely harvesting the liver as well as the whole pancreas from a single donor is not yet common practice in transplantation surgery, since these organs have a partially common blood supply. Two harvesting procedures are described followed by successful transplantation of five solid organs from each donor, including liver and whole pancreas. Important details of the preferred surgical technique are the division of the hepatic artery just distal to the splenic artery and keeping the aortic patch, including superior mesenteric artery and coeliac trunk with the pancreas graft. Using this technique the liver and the whole pancreas could be transplanted without extra vascular anastomoses, while vascular grafts were not necessary. The risk of thrombosis during pancreas and liver transplantation is minimized in this way, while the primary function of each of the five harvested organs was excellent.

We report two patients, who presented within six months with the classic clinical picture of 'spontaneous' oesophageal perforation, which was caused by a perforated Barrett's ulcer. These two cases underline the importance of postoperative endoscopy in ruling out intrinsic oesophageal disease as the cause of the rupture in every patient, who survives this life threatening condition.

An analysis was made of the causes of death in 22 of 50 patients receiving consecutive orthotopic liver transplants. A close look at the fatal course of these patients revealed three major patterns: surgical complications (27%), pathology of the hepatic artery anastomosis (23%), and cholestasis (32%). Technical factors were the major reasons for excessive peroperative blood loss, and not the coagulopathy accompanying the liver disease. The etiology of hepatic artery thrombosis is not known. It leads to irreversible damage of the graft, causing death due to acute hepatic failure or to cholangitis and sepsis. The only way to treat patients with this complication is retransplantation. Several factors can induce cholestasis. Retrospectively, it appears that this was mostly due to inappropriate immunosuppression, often a result of the difficult differential diagnosis between rejection and viral infection. Recognition of these three basic patterns should enable us to anticipate their subsequent complications. This may lead to a reduction in morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation.

In this retrospective study, we analyse the results of 94 partial liver resections performed between 1972 and January 1989. The resections were performed for malignant (48 patients) and benign (46 patients) liver tumours. Nine patients (9.6%) died of resection-related complications. Mortality was significantly lower in the patients with resections for benign liver tumours (2.2%) compared with patients with resections for malignant liver tumours (16.7%) (p less than 0.05). In the patients who survived the first 30 days, complications occurred in 25.9%. The 5-year survival of patients with a primary malignant liver tumour (57%) is significantly (p = 0.05) better than in patients with a secondary malignant liver tumour (19%). From this study we conclude that partial liver resections for primary or secondary liver tumours can be performed with an acceptable mortality and morbidity, and should be the therapy of choice for selected patients.

A retrospective study of 9 cases of extra-hepatic biliary cyst is presented. Prior to admission to our hospital, 5 patients had been operated upon elsewhere. This initial operation proved to be of great importance. In 4 patients initial excision of the cyst was performed resulting in complete regression of symptoms, and no further surgery was required. In 5 patients the cyst was not excised initially and cysto-enterostomy was performed. Recurrence of symptoms and complaints, with major morbidity, occurred in all but one of these patients. After several operations, only final excision of the cyst definitively suppressed the symptoms, but in one patient the cyst could no longer be excised. Cysto-enterostomy results in recurrent symptoms and cholangitis and should be avoided. Early excision of extra-hepatic biliary cysts should be performed whenever technically feasible, not only to prevent these complications but also because of the risk of malignant degeneration related to the cyst.