Original combination: Hetaerina infecta Calvert, 1901 Status: available species-group name; valid species Current combination: Hetaerina infecta Calvert, 1901 Type material. One male, one female; collecting locality: Atoyac, Veracruz, Mexico; collectors: Schumann and Herbert Huntingdon Smith Verbatim label data male 4a9513: (1) ��Atoyac, / Vera Cruz. / Schumann.�� [printed]; (2) ��Co-�� [handwritten] / �� Typus �� [printed]; (3) �� HETAERINA �� [printed] / ��♂�� [handwritten] / �� INFECTA CALV.�� [printed] / ��cotype�� [handwritten] / ��P. P. Calvert det.�� [printed], �� 1900 �� [handwritten]; (4) ��B. C. A. Neur., p.�� [printed], �� 39 �� [handwritten]; (5) ��http://coll.mfn-berlin. de/u/ 4a9513 �� [printed]. Verbatim label data female 4a950 b: (1) [a piece of abdomen adheres to the label]; (2) ��Atoyac, / Vera Cruz. / May. H. H. S.�� [printed]; (2) ��Co-�� [handwritten] / �� Typus �� [printed]; (3) �� HETAERINA �� [printed] / ��♀�� [handwritten] / �� INFECTA CALV.�� [printed] / ��cotype�� [handwritten] / ��P. P. Calvert det. �� [printed], �� 1900 �� [handwritten]; (4) ��B. C. A. Neur., p. �� [printed], �� 39 �� [handwritten]; (5) ��http://coll.mfn-berlin.de/u/ 4a950 b�� [printed]. Notes. Calvert (1901���1908: 39) wrote: ��Hab. Mexico, Presidio in Vera Cruz (Barrett, coll. P.P.C.: 1 ♀), Atoyac (H. H. Smith, Schumann: 24 ♂, 22 ♀);? Guatemala, Panima in Vera Paz (Champion: 2 ♀ of large size, one having hind wing 36 mm. long, may belong here).�� and described the two sexes in detail as well as their age related attributes (��young��, ��old��). Because the primary type concept was not considered as important at that time as it is nowadays, Calvert, like many other authors, did not designate a particular specimen as the type. After completing this seminal work (Calvert 1901��� 1908), in the concluding introduction that was written in November 1908, he designated several holotypes in the Biologia Centrali-Americana, including that of Hetaerina infecta Calvert, 1901 (Calvert 1908). Kimmins (1969: 305) accepted Calvert���s designations and subsequent authors have stretched the rules to accept this. The male and the female preserved in the Berlin collection should consequently be considered paratypes. Garrison (1990: 217) stated �� Types.��� Lectotype male in BMNH (examined). I also examined a paralectotype in the CM��. Since he examined the holotype, stated as lectotype in his Synopsis, he was unaware of the existence of ���cotypes��� housed in Berlin. After consulting Rosser Garrison, who revised his previous statement (pers. comm.), the two mentioned specimens should be considered paratypes and not paralectotypes. They have no name-bearing function in terms of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature., Published as part of M��lanie Turiault, 2016, The type material of Calopterygidae in the Museum f��r Naturkunde in Berlin (Odonata), pp. 95-106 in Odonatologica 45 (1) on pages 97-99, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.50852, {"references":["CalVert P. P. 1908. Introduction to the Odo- nata. In: Biologia Centrali-Americana. In- secta. Neuroptera: v-xxx. Porter & Dulau, London","Kimmins D. E. 1969. A list of the type-specimens of Odonata in the British","Garrison R. W. 1990. A synopsis of the ge- nus Hetaerina with descriptions of four new species (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Transactions of the American Entomologi- cal Society 116: 175 - 259"]}