Search

Nonidiopathic scoliosis encompasses a group of diagnoses, including neuromuscular scoliosis, syndromic scoliosis and congenital scoliosis. The objective of this study was to compare the preoperative and postoperative clinical differences in pediatric nonidiopathic scoliosis patients with neuromuscular scoliosis vs. syndromic scoliosis/congenital scoliosis. This is a single-center retrospective review of all pediatric patients undergoing spinal instrumentation for nonidiopathic scoliosis during a 5-year period. Neuromuscular scoliosis patients ( n  = 144), syndromic scoliosis patients ( n  = 44) and congenital scoliosis patients ( n  = 52) were compared. Demographics, patient characteristics and outcomes were compared. Neuromuscular scoliosis patients had lower BMI z-scores and were more likely to have pulmonary disease, technology dependence and seizure disorder. Additionally, neuromuscular scoliosis patients underwent bigger procedures with more levels fused and a higher rate of pelvis fixation. By direct comparison, neuromuscular scoliosis patients tended to have more complications including deep surgical site infections, readmission in 30 days, return to operating room in 90 days and emergency care visits in 90 days. When controlling for the differences in their preexisting conditions and surgical procedure, we found that pelvic fixation was a major confounding factor, whereas the others had no effect. We further subanalyzed cerebral palsy patients and found this group to exhibit no difference in complications compared to other neuromuscular scoliosis subtypes. Neuromuscular scoliosis patients have different characteristics and subsequent postoperative complications than those with syndromic scoliosis and congenital scoliosis. The difference in complication profile is mainly due to differences in surgical procedure and a higher rate of pelvic fixation. This should be considered when planning nonidiopathic scoliosis surgery among multidisciplinary teams., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective comparative study., Objectives: To compare complications before and after implementation of the Multi-D screening protocol in complex pediatric patients undergoing spinal instrumentation for non-idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatric patients undergoing surgery for non-idiopathic scoliosis experience significantly more complications than those with idiopathic scoliosis. Operating on these patients can lead to serious complications including death. Recent reports have demonstrated the benefits of establishing a multidisciplinary-based system to reduce complications in adult spinal deformity during the perioperative period. However, there are limited studies examining these benefits in a complex pediatric spine population., Methods: This was a retrospective review of all cases involving spinal instrumentation at our institution for 2 years before and after the initiation of our Neuromuscular Spine Surgery Care Plan in July 2014. Study sample was n = 129 cases (107 patients) prior to the initiation of the process and n = 122 cases (109 patients) thereafter. Primary outcome measures included: mortality at 30 days and 1 year; post-operative neurologic deficit, and surgical site infections (SSI). Secondary outcome measures included: instrument failure in 1 year; readmission in 30 days; return to OR in 90 days., Results: The study populations were matched by age and gender. Patients passing the Multi-D conference had higher BMI. Implementation of the Multi-D conference reduced mortality at 30 days (2 vs 0, p = 0.17) and at 1 year (4 vs 0, p = 0.04), as well as reduced post-operative neurologic deficit (2 vs 0, p = 0.17). The rate of SSI remained unchanged. All other secondary outcome measures also remained unchanged., Conclusions: Implementation of a Multi-D conference led to a significant reduction in mortality at 1 year, and is an important safety process to reduce serious complications after non-idiopathic scoliosis surgery., Level of Evidence: Level III.

Background: Consensus is lacking regarding the lengthening procedures in magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), and no studies have compared the outcome between different distraction principles. The purpose of the present study was to compare distraction-to-stall with targeted distraction and identify variables associated with achieved distraction., Methods: We performed a 2-center retrospective study of all children treated with MCGR from November 2013 to January 2019, having a minimum of 1-year follow-up and undergoing a minimum of 3 distractions. Exclusion criteria were single-rod constructs and conversion cases. In group 1 (21 patients), we used a distraction-to-stall (maximum force) principle where each rod was lengthened until the internal magnetic driver stopped (clunking). In group 2 (18 patients), we used a targeted distraction principle, where the desired distraction was entered the remote control before distraction. In both groups we aimed for maximal distraction and curve correction at index surgery. Achieved distraction was measured on calibrated radiographs and compared between the 2 groups using a linear mixed effects model. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with achieved distraction within the first year., Results: Mean age at surgery was 9.5±2.0 years. Etiology of the deformity was congenital/structural (n=7), neuromuscular (n=9), syndromic (n=3), or idiopathic (n=20). Demographics and preoperative characteristics including spinal height (T1T12 and T1S1) did not differ significantly between the groups (P≥0.13). Time interval between distractions were mean 18 days (95% confidence interval: 10-25) shorter in group 1. Implant-related complications occurred in 10/39 patients, 5 in each group. We found no difference in achieved distraction between the groups in the linear mixed effects model. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative major curve angle was the only independent variable associated with achieved distraction., Conclusions: In 2 comparable and consecutive cohorts of patients treated with MCGR, we found no difference in achieved distraction between a distraction-to-stall and a targeted distraction principle. Preoperative major curve angle was the only independent predictor of achieved distraction., Level of Evidence: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to validate a new spinal sagittal classification., Methods: We retrospectively included 105 consecutive AIS patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion. Preoperative long-standing EOS radiographs were available on all patients. Patients were classified according to the four suggested sagittal patterns: type 1, 2a, 2b or 3. Several predetermined sagittal parameters were compared between the groups., Results: The mean preoperative Cobb angle was 64° ± 12°, and 73% of the patients were female. Of 105 patients, 51 were type 1, 14 were type 2a, one was type 2b and 39 were type 3. The distribution of the four sagittal patterns was significantly different compared with the original publication (p < 0.05). However, the two study populations were comparable in terms of Lenke and Roussouly types (p = 0.49 and 0.47, respectively). In our study population, the sagittal groups differed significantly in terms of thoracic kyphosis, length of thoracic and lumbar curves, lumbar lordosis, thoracic slope, C7 slope, pelvic incidence and sacral slope (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: The distribution of the four sagittal patterns varies between AIS cohorts. Type 2b was rare, which limits the clinical applicability. Contrary to the original publication, we found that the spinopelvic parameters lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence and sacral slope were significantly different between the Abelin-Genevois types. Hence, the corrective surgical strategy may need to incorporate these spinopelvic parameters to achieve a balanced spine requiring a minimum of energy expenditure. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

The aim of this paper is to establish guidelines for the management of extendedspectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) associated prosthetic joint infections (PJI). This study reviewed 21 patients in the literature documented with ESBL associated PJI. Literature suggests that patients with ESBL PJI are stratified into either early infections (<3 weeks) or late infections (>3 weeks), for which, appropriate laboratory and imaging studies need to be completed. Favorable outcomes require a two-stage revision with an antibiotic-impregnated spacer and a prolonged course of intravenous carbapenem antibiotic., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Background: Use of intra-articular antibiotics for the treatment of arthroplasty infections has gained some interest over the last few years., Objective: Some data exists on its use with bacterial arthroplasty infections., Method: We used intra-articular amphotericin B in an attempt to cure these joint infections and perform a one stage revision., Results: Two patients were treated with intra-articular amphotericin B for 6 weeks followed by suppressive fluconazole for 4 months. Intra-articular joint fluid was cultured during this process for re-growth of fungus., Conclusion: Both patients were treated successfully with the method with follow up showing no evidence of recurrence. IA administration of amphotericin B may be an alternative treatment in these patients., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.org.)

Background: Patients with pelvic ring displacement and instability can benefit from surgical reduction and instrumentation to stabilize the pelvis and improve functional outcomes. Current treatments include iliosacral screw or transsacral-transiliac screw, which provides greater biomechanical stability. However, controversy exists regarding the effects of placement of a screw across an uninjured sacroiliac joint for pelvis stabilization after trauma., Questions/purposes: Does transsacral-transiliac screw fixation of an uninjured sacroiliac joint increase pain and worsen functional outcomes at minimum 1-year followup compared with patients undergoing standard iliosacral screw fixation across the injured sacroiliac joint in patients who have sustained pelvic trauma?, Methods: All patients between ages 18 and 84 years who sustained injuries to the pelvic ring (AO/OTA 61 A, B, C) who were surgically treated between 2011 and 2013 at an academic Level I trauma center were identified for selection. We included patients with unilateral sacroiliac disruption or sacral fractures treated with standard iliosacral screws across an injured hemipelvis and/or transsacral-transiliac screws placed in the posterior ring. Transsacral-transiliac screws were generally more likely to be used in patients with vertically unstable sacral injuries of the posterior ring as a result of previous reports of failures or in osteopenic patients. We excluded patients with bilateral posterior pelvic ring injuries, fixation with a device other than a screw, previous pelvic or acetabular fractures, associated acetabular fractures, and ankylosing spondylitis. Of the 110 patients who met study criteria, 53 (44%) were available for followup at least 12 months postinjury. Sixty patients were unable to be contacted by phone or mail and seven declined to participate in the study. Outcomes were obtained by members of the research team using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score for both posterior sacroiliac joints, Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), and Majeed scores. Patients completed the forms by themselves when able to return to the clinic. A phone interview was performed for others after they received the outcome forms by mail or email., Results: There were no differences between iliosacral and transsacral-transiliac in terms of VAS injured (2.9 ± 2.9 versus 3.0 ± 2.8, mean difference = 0.1 [95% confidence interval, -1.6 to 1.7], p = 0.91), VAS uninjured (1.8 ± 2.4 versus 2.0 ± 2.6, mean difference = 0.2 [-1.3 to 1.6], p = 0.82), Majeed (80.3 ± 19.9, 79.3 ± 17.5, mean difference = 1.0 [-11.6 to 9.6], p = 0.92), SMFA Function (22.8 ± 22.2, 21.0 ± 17.6, mean difference = 1.8 [-13.2 to 9.6], p = 0.29, and SMFA Bother (24.3 ± 23.8, 29.7 ± 23.4, mean difference = 5.4 [-7.8 to 18.6], p = 0.42)., Conclusions: Placement of fixation across a contralateral, uninjured sacroiliac joint resulted in no differences in pain and function when compared with standard iliosacral screw placement across an injured hemipelvis at least 1 year after instrumentation. When needed for biomechanical stability, transsacral-transiliac fixation across an uninjured sacroiliac joint can be used without expectation of positive or negative effects on pain or functional outcomes at minimum 1-year followup., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) infection are most commonly due Staphylococcus aureus followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci, and streptococci, while gram-negative rods are seldom isolated.(1,3,4) In the last 20 years, cases of Pasteurella multocida TKA and total hip arthroplasty (THA) infection resulting from cat and dog bites, scratches, or licks have been published reporting varying presentations and treatment options. Most commonly, P. multocida infected arthroplasties result in local tenderness, cellulitis, and purulent discharge followed by regional adenopathy, and in immunocompromised patients it may progress to septicemia, meningitis, and septic arthritis.(5) Treatment antibiotics include penicillins or 2nd and 3rd generation cephalosporins, and surgical options involve one-stage, or two-stage revision arthroplasties.(6,9,17,19) We report a case of P. multocida TKA infection in a patient who was treated successfully with a 3rd generation cephalosporin, synovectomy and tibial interspacer exchange, along with a review of the literature published in the last 10 years. Our findings show that there is usually a history of exposure to the animal, early appearance of cat bite related infections, and multifactorial decision making for the treatment of P. multocida joint infections., (Copyright © 2010 International Society for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The effect of amphotericin B on hepatic microsomal cytochrome P-450 (P-450) concentration was measured in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo in the rat. In vitro, both amphotericin B (0-500 micrograms/ml) and its vehicle, sodium deoxycholate (0-410 micrograms/ml), caused similar dose-dependent decreases of P-450 concentrations and glucose-6-phosphatase activity. Intravenous amphotericin B (3 mg/kg) given daily for 3 days decreased antipyrine clearance from control values of 1.24 +/- 0.24 ml/min to 0.67 +/- 0.12 ml/min (p less than 0.001); whereas antipyrine clearance was unchanged by sodium deoxycholate. The P-450 concentration on the third day was reduced from 0.74 +/- 0.14 nmol/mg protein in control rats to 0.33 +/- 0.09 nmol/mg protein in rats treated with amphotericin B (p less than 0.001). Sodium deoxycholate had no effect on P-450 concentration. In contrast, amphotericin B had no effect on either antipyrine clearance or P-450 concentration following enzyme induction by phenobarbital. Amphotericin B had no effect on microsomal glucose-6-phosphatase activity in vivo. Neither amphotericin B nor sodium deoxycholate induced lipid peroxidation, measured as malondialdehyde production. These results show that amphotericin B decreases hepatic cytochrome P-450 content and function in the rat. These effects can not be observed in the enzyme induced state. Amphotericin B has no effect on glucose-6-phosphatase in vivo, the key enzyme of the gluconeogenesis, indicating selective effects on hepatic microsomal function.

In a study of the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective surgery, 466 procedures were surveyed over a four-year period. It is difficult to prove the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis when the rate of infection is so low, and, although not statistically significant, there is no difference in the infection rate whether the antibiotics are given intraoperatively only or for 48 hours, three days, or seven days. Per 100,000 patients, the cost savings of giving antibiotics intraoperatively rather than for 48 hours would have been $7,700,000; with the reduction from seven days to one-dose antibiotics, the savings would have been $29,700,000.