Search

Ramp lesions are characteristic medial meniscus injuries seen in anterior cruciate ligament-injured knees. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries combined with ramp lesions increase the amount of anterior tibial translation and tibial external rotation. Therefore, the diagnosis and treatment of ramp lesions have received increasing attention. However, ramp lesions can be difficult to diagnose on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, ramp lesions are difficult to observe and treat intraoperatively in the posteromedial compartment. Although good results have been reported with the use of a suture hook through the posteromedial portal in the treatment of ramp lesions, the complexity and difficulty of the technique are further problems. The outside-in pie-crusting technique is a simple procedure that can enlarge the medial compartment and facilitate the observation and repair of ramp lesions. After this technique, ramp lesions can be properly sutured, using an all-inside meniscal repair device, without damaging the surrounding cartilage. A combination of the outside-in pie-crusting technique and an all-inside meniscal repair device (with only anterior portals) is effective in the repair of ramp lesions. This Technical Note aims to report in detail the flow of a series of techniques, including our diagnostic and therapeutic methods.

Background: The medial meniscus (MM) translates posteriorly and extrudes severely from the medial tibial plateau (MTP) during knee flexion in the MM posterior root tear (PRT) knee. Transtibial pullout repair of the MMPRT has been performed to regulate MM extrusion. This study aimed to evaluate pullout suture translation during knee flexion before and after posterior anchoring during pullout repair. We hypothesized that suture translation after posterior anchoring would be significantly decreased relative to that before posterior anchoring. Methods: Thirty-five patients who underwent MM posterior root repair were prospectively investigated. Pullout repair was performed using two cinch sutures (outer and inner sutures) and posterior anchoring through the MM posterior horn and an additional bone tunnel on the MTP. The translation of the outer suture from 0 degrees to 90 degrees of knee flexion was measured and compared before and after posterior anchoring intraoperatively. The MM morphologic features were measured using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and the correlation between these values and outer suture translation was evaluated. Results: The average outer suture translation after posterior anchoring (1.6 +/- 1.5 mm) was significantly decreased relative to that before posterior anchoring (2.5 +/- 1.7 mm, P < 0.01). No significant correlations were observed between the MM morphological features and outer suture translation. Conclusions: The posterior anchoring method with an MM posterior root repair is useful in decreasing posterior translation of the pullout suture during knee flexion, which might have an advantage in preventing suture pullout from the repaired MM, leading to good clinical outcomes.

Recently, transtibial pullout repair of the medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tear (PRT) has become widely accepted and provides satisfactory clinical outcomes. Widening after cyclic loading or ultimate failure load using different suture materials and configurations has been studied. However, no study has compared the clinical outcomes using different suture materials. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes after performing MMPRT pullout repair using different suture materials. We hypothesized that better clinical outcomes would be achieved using ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) tape compared with a normal polyester suture. Thirty-seven patients who underwent MM posterior root repair between November 2019 and May 2020 were retrospectively investigated. Pullout repair was performed using a hollow no. 0 polyester suture (n = 14) and UHMWPE tape (n = 23). Clinical outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively, using the Lysholm knee score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score. The meniscal healing status was assessed using an arthroscopic scoring system (range: 0–10). All clinical scores were improved significantly in both groups. However, significantly higher meniscal healing scores and decreased VAS pain scores were observed in the UHMWPE group (7.3 ± 0.9 and 7.7 ± 11.3, respectively) than in the polyester group (5.6 ± 2.1 and 18.4 ± 18.6, respectively; p < 0.01). Suture cut-out and loss of the root continuity were observed in some cases (three cases [21.4%] in the polyester suture group and one case [4.3%] in the UHMWPE tape group). Both suture materials led to satisfactory clinical outcomes at 1 year postoperatively, whereas the UHMWPE tape was useful for obtaining good meniscal healing and decreasing the VAS pain score.

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of different subtypes of type 2 medial meniscus posterior root tears following transtibial pullout repair. Methods In total, 147 patients (mean age: 66.2 +/- 8.3 years) who were diagnosed with type 2 medial meniscus posterior root tears and underwent transtibial pullout repair were included. Patients were divided into 2A (n = 31), 2B (n = 90), and 2C (n = 26) groups according to tear type. Clinical outcomes were assessed pre-operatively and at second-look arthroscopy using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. The meniscal healing status was evaluated at second-look arthroscopy. Medial meniscus extrusion was calculated using magnetic resonance imaging pre-operatively and at second-look arthroscopy. Results No significant differences in pre-operative or post-operative clinical scores were observed between each subtype, although clinical scores improved post-operatively for each subtype. Significant differences were noted in the anteroposterior width of the bridging tissues at second-look arthroscopy (2A, 7.1 +/- 1.2; 2B, 6.2 +/- 1.7; and 2C, 6.2 +/- 1.7 mm; p = 0.045); type 2A tears were the widest. There was a significant difference in post-operative medial meniscus extrusion (2A, 3.2 +/- 0.9; 2B, 4.0 +/- 1.2; and 2C, 4.0 +/- 1.4 mm; p = 0.004) and its progression (2A, 0.7 +/- 0.6; 2B, 1.2 +/- 0.8; and 2C, 1.2 +/- 0.8 mm; p= 0.008), and type 2A tears were the shortest. Conclusion Although there was no significant difference in the post-operative clinical scores among different type 2 tears in the short term, type 2A tears showed better healing and medial meniscus extrusion progression prevention, thus indicating the usefulness of classifying tear type in estimating post-operative outcomes.

Purpose Transtibial pullout repair improves the clinical outcomes of medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tears (PRTs); however, reducing MM extrusion remains challenging. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the role of additional posterior anchoring (PA) during pullout repair in reducing the severity of MM extrusion compared to pullout repair alone. Methods Patients who underwent pullout repair with two-cinch stitches (TCS) only or TCS combined with PA (TCSPA)-deployment of an additional suture anchor in the posteromedial corner of MM-were included retrospectively. MM medial and posterior extrusion (MMME and MMPE), MM extrusion and remaining volume (MMEV and MMRV), and corresponding ratios were evaluated pre-operatively and three months post-operatively using a three-dimensional meniscal model at 10 degrees and 90 degrees of knee flexion and compared within and between groups. Results A total of 15 and 16 patients treated with TCS and TCS-PA, respectively, were enrolled. At 90 degrees knee flexion, both techniques significantly reduced MMPE (TCS: 4.2 +/- 0.7 mm to 3.5 +/- 0.6 mm, p < 0.05; TCS-PA: 3.7 +/- 0.8 mm to 2.8 +/- 0.7 mm, p < 0.05) at three months post-operatively. TCS-PA reduced MMPE more significantly than TCS alone (p < 0.05). Only TCS-PA significantly improved the MMEV and MMRV ratios (39.6 +/- 8.9% to 28.1 +/- 6.0%, p < 0.05 and 60.4 +/- 8.9% to 71.9 +/- 6.0%, p < 0.05, respectively). Significance was not found in all other comparisons. Conclusions Both techniques improved MMPE at knee flexion at the three month follow-up, with TCS-PA providing significantly superior results. Our findings support the evidence that the application of PA may be an effective surgical option for alleviating persistent MMPE.

Lateral meniscus (LM) posterior root tear (LMPRT) is mainly caused by trauma, especially trauma associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Although a transtibial pullout repair or a side-to-side repair is commonly performed for LMPRT, to the best of our knowledge, there is no clinical report of LMPRT with tissue loss using the pullout technique. Thus, the purpose of this report was to describe a clinical, radiographic, and arthroscopic outcome after pullout repair for a case of LMPRT with a large defect with a chronic ACL tear and complex medial meniscus (MM) tears. A 31-year-old man complained of knee pain and restricted range of motion after twisting his knee when he stepped on an iron pipe. The patient had a football-related injury to his right knee 14 years before presentation, and since then, the patient's knee has given out more than 10 times but was left unassessed. Magnetic resonance imaging showed LMPRT with tissue loss, ACL tears, and complex MM tears. Transtibial pullout repair of the LMPRT with ACL reconstruction and MM repairs were performed. Following the pullout repair of the LMPRT, an approximately 6 mm gap remained between the LM posterior root and root insertion. However, magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy at 1 year postoperatively revealed meniscal healing, gap filling with some regeneration tissue, of the LM posterior root. Furthermore, the lateral meniscus extrusion in the coronal plane improved from 3.1 mm (preoperative) to 1.6 mm (1 year postoperatively). Transtibial pullout repair with the remaining gap could be a viable treatment option for LMPRT with tissue loss, combined with ACL reconstruction.