1. BK polyomavirus serotype-specific antibody responses in blood donors and kidney transplant recipients with and without new-onset BK polyomavirus-DNAemia: A Swiss Transplant Cohort Study.
- Author
-
Hillenbrand CA, Akbari Bani D, Follonier O, Kaur A, Weissbach FH, Wernli M, Wilhelm M, Leuzinger K, Binet I, Bochud PY, Golshayan D, Hirzel C, Manuel O, Mueller NJ, Schaub S, Schachtner T, Van Delden C, and Hirsch HH
- Abstract
BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) causes premature renal failure in 10% to 30% of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Current guidelines recommend screening for new-onset BKPyV-DNAemia/nephropathy and reducing immunosuppression to regain BKPyV-specific immune control. Because BKPyV encompasses 4 major genotype (gt)-encoded serotypes (st1,-2,-3,-4), st-specific antibodies may inform the risk and course of BKPyV-DNAemia/nephropathy. Using BKPyV st-virus-like particle (VLP) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, we analyzed plasma from 399 blood donors (BDs) and 428 KTRs (134 KTR-cases with BKPyV-DNAemia, 294 KTR-controls). BDs were anti-BKPyV-VLP immunoglobulin G-seropositive in 85% compared to 93% of KTRs at the timepoint at transplantation (T0) (P < .001). Anti-st1 was predominant in both groups followed by anti-st4, anti-st2, and anti-st3. Antibody levels and quadruple sero-reactivity at T0 were higher in KTR-controls than in KTR-cases (P = .026) or in BDs (P < .001). In KTR-cases, anti-st increased posttransplant (P < .0001) and independently of ongoing or cleared BKPyV-DNAemia. However, anti-st levels were significantly higher at T0 in KTR-cases able to clear at timepoint 6-month posttransplant or timepoint 12-month posttransplant. In 34 KTR-cases with deep genome sequencing, BKPyV-gtI was predominant, and anti-st1 and st1-neutralizing antibodies were significantly lower at T0 than in KTR-controls. Thus, BKPyV st-specific antibody levels at transplantation might reflect gt/st-BKPyV-specific immunity clearing or preventing BKPyV-DNAemia in KTR-cases or KTR-controls, respectively. Accordingly, active or passive immunization may be most efficient pretransplant or early posttransplant., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation. Maud Wilhelm is supported in part by a global scholarship from Moderna; Hans H. Hirsch received speaker honoraria from Astellas, Biotest, Eurofins, and Takeda, and consultant honoraria from Allovir, Moderna, and Roche Diagnostics. Authors Caroline A. Hillenbrand, Dorssa Akbar Bani, Océane Follonier, Amandeep Kaur, Fabian H. Weissbach, Marion Wernli, Karoline Leuzinger, Isabelle Binet, Pierre-Yves Bochud, Dela Golshayan, Cédric Hirzel, Oriol Manuel, Nicolas Mueller, Stefan Schaub, Thomas Schachtner, and Christian Van Delden have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF