Search

Debranching thoracic endovascular aortic repair (d-TEVAR) for zone 0 landing (Z0-TEVAR) remained challenging in aortic arch aneurysms. This study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes between Z0-TEVAR and Z1/2-TEVAR to assess the appropriateness of Z0-TEVAR as the first-line therapy for aortic arch aneurysms in high-risk patients.Medical records of 200 patients who underwent d-TEVAR from 2007 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 40 patients who underwent Z0-TEVAR (70% males; the median age of 82 years) and 160 Z1/2-TEVAR (78% males; the median age of 77 years) were compared. In each group, 39 patients were matched using propensity scores (PS) to adjust for differences in patient backgrounds.Freedom from all-cause mortality (p 0.001), aorta-related mortality (p 0.001), and stroke (p = 0.001) were significantly lower in Z0-TEVAR than in Z1/2-TEVAR. Freedom from reintervention was similar between the two groups (p = 0.326). Type A dissection post-TEVAR was observed in 3 (7.5%) of Z0-TEVAR, but none in Z1/2-TEVAR (p = 0.006). Pneumonia was also more frequent in Z0-TEVAR (n = 8, 30%) than Z1/2-TEVAR (n = 4, 2.5%) (p 0.001). PS matching also yielded worse outcomes (all-cause mortality, p = 0.017; aorta-related mortality, p = 0.046; and stroke, p = 0.027) in Z0-TEVAR than Z1/2-TEVAR.Higher mid-term mortality and stroke rates after Z0-TEVAR were confirmed by PS matching. Z0-TEVAR would be an alternative for high-risk patients with arch aneurysms requiring zone 0 landing but not a reliable method.

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to reveal the association between lower-profile stent graft (LPSG) and embolism during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for non-dissecting distal arch and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm. METHODS This study reviewed data of 35 patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with LPSG (27 males; age: 77 ± 9.2 years) and 312 who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with conventional-sized stent graft (CSSG) (247 males; age: 77 ± 7.4 years) from 2009 to 2021. RESULTS The rate of total embolic events was significantly lower in the LPSG group (0/35 [0%]) than the CSSG group (34/312 [11.2%]) (P = 0.035). Shaggy aorta (odds ratio: 5.220; P CONCLUSIONS LPSG usage could reduce embolism in thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and the difference was more pronounced in patients with the shaggy aorta. LPSG might be beneficial in preventing embolism in thoracic endovascular aortic repair for patients with a shaggy aorta.

OBJECTIVES The optimal treatment for acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) with thrombosed false lumen (T-FL) of the ascending aorta remains controversial. The goal of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes of initial medical treatment (IMT) and the effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for AAAD with T-FL. METHODS We retrospectively analysed 60 patients with AAAD with T-FL. Emergency aortic repair was performed in 33 patients, and IMT was selected in 27 uncomplicated patients with ascending aortic diameter < 50 mm and ascending T-FL thickness ≤ 10 mm. RESULTS Among the 27 patients who received IMT, 14 had intramural haematomas at admission; however, new ulcer-like projections appeared in 7 (50%) during hospitalization. Before discharge, 12 (44%) were given medical treatment only, and 15 (56%) required delayed aortic repair including TEVAR in 8 and open repair in 7. The median interval from onset to delayed repair was 9 days, and significantly more patients received TEVAR compared to those receiving emergency repair (53% vs 21%; P = 0.043). Between the TEVAR (n = 15) and the open repair (n = 33) groups, 1 (7%) 30-day death occurred in the TEVAR group, whereas no in-hospital deaths occurred in the open repair group. During the median follow-up time of 24.8 months, no aorta-related death was observed, and there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of freedom from aortic events (TEVAR: 92.8%/3 years vs open repair: 88.4%/3 years; P = 0.871). CONCLUSIONS Our management, using a combination of emergency aortic repair, IMT and delayed aortic repair for AAAD with T-FL, achieved favourable clinical outcomes. Among the selected Japanese patients, IMT with repeated multidetector computed tomography could detect a new intimal tear that could be closed by TEVAR in some cases. Using EVAR for this pathology resulted in acceptable early and midterm outcomes. Further investigations are required to validate the safety and efficacy of this management procedure.

The rationale for thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B aortic dissection depends on the phase of disease: acute phase, which is ‘complicated’, subacute to early chronic phase, which requires ‘preemptive TEVAR’ and chronic phase, which entails ‘prevention of further dilatation and rupture’. Low operative mortality and morbidity after TEVAR for complicated acute type B aortic dissection have been reported with significant improvement during midterm survival. ‘Retrograde’ type A dissection, which can be described as type B0,X (X>3) according to a new reporting standard, has reportedly been treated with TEVAR with less invasiveness. TEVAR is the first and possibly the only effective strategy for acute type B dissection, so that expansion of indications for type B0,X, as described in the new reporting standard has been validated.

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of a valve-sparing root replacement using the reimplantation technique for annuloaortic ectasia in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) and in those with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS). METHODS We reviewed 103 patients with MSF with mutations in the fibrillin-1 gene and 28 patients with LDS with mutations in the transforming growth factor-beta receptor and 2, SMAD3 and transforming growth factor beta-2 from 1988 to 2020. RESULTS Forty-four (42.7%) patients with MFS [26 men, 31 (7.6) years] and 10 (35.7%) patients with Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) [7 men, 22 (standard deviation: 8.6) years] who had no aortic dissection and underwent valve-sparing root replacement were included. The preoperative sinus diameter [46 (45–50.5) mm in those with MFS vs 48 (47–50) mm in those with LDS, p = 0.420] and the percentage of aortic insufficiency > grade 2+ [31.8% (10/44) in patients with MFS vs 10.0% (1/10) in those with LDS, p = 0.667] revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups. The cumulative incidences of aortic insufficiency greater than grade 1 (p = 0.588) and aortic valve reoperation (p = 0.310) were comparable between the 2 groups. Patients with LDS had a higher tendency towards aortic dissection after the initial operation (p = 0.061) and a significantly higher cumulative incidence of aortic reoperation (p = 0.003) versus those with MFS. CONCLUSIONS Patients with MFS and those with LDS showed similar cumulative incidences of recurrent aortic valve insufficiency and aortic valve reoperation. Those with LDS revealed a higher cumulative incidence of aortic reoperation and a greater tendency towards aortic dissection after the initial operation compared with those with MFS.

To investigate the relationships between indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection and clinical outcomes, and complications specific to thoracic endovascular aortic repair.The J-predictive study retrospectively collected data of patients treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection at 20 institutions from January 2012 to March 2017. From the database, those treated for acute/subacute complicated Stanford type B aortic dissection were extracted (n = 118; 96 men; average age, 66.1 years; standard deviation, ± 13) and classified into groups 1, 2, and 3 according to thoracic endovascular aortic repair indications (rupture, superior mesenteric artery malperfusion, and renal or lower extremity malperfusion, respectively). Primary and secondary measures were mortality (overall and aortic-related) and complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair, respectively. For each outcome, the risks of being in groups 1 and 2 were statistically compared with that of being in group 3 as a control using Fisher's exact test.Mortality rate (odds ratio, 5.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-20.53) and prevalence of paraparesis/paraplegia (odds ratio, 30.46; confidence interval, 1.71-541.77) were higher in group 1 than in group 3. Compared to group 3, group 2 showed no statistically significant differences in mortality or complications related to thoracic endovascular aortic repair.Rupture as an indication for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection was more likely to result in worse mortality and high prevalence of spinal cord ischemia.Level 4, Case series.

This observational retrospective study aimed to identify preoperative blood test data capable of predicting preoperative shock in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA).A total of 104 patients who underwent surgery for rAAA between 2007 and 2018 were reviewed. Preoperative shock, defined as a shock index (heart rate/blood pressure) exceeding 1.5 or a maximum blood pressure 80 mmHg, was observed in 44 patients (42%).Blood sugar (BS) (odds ratio [OR] 1.02; p 0.001), C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR 0.57; p = 0.005), and hemoglobin (OR 0.60; p = 0.001) levels were identified as independent positive predictors of preoperative shock, and a BS level ≥ 300 mg/dl (OR 13.2; 95% CI 3.56-48.6; p 0.001) was identified as a positive predictor of preoperative shock. The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis for BS showed that the area under the curve for the predicted probabilities was 0.84, and at a cut-off value of 215 mg/dl, the sensitivity of minimum BS for predicting preoperative shock was 86% with a specificity of 79%.The BS level is as an independent predictor of preoperative shock in patients with rAAA. Patients with preoperative BS levels ≥ 300 mg/dl have an extremely high risk of preoperative shock.

OBJECTIVES The optimal indications and contraindications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of retrograde Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (R-AAAD) are not well known. The goal of this study was to determine the outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for R-AAAD at our institution and to discuss optimal indications. METHODS The medical records of 359 patients admitted to our institution for R-AAAD between December 2016 and December 2022 were reviewed, and 83 patients were finally diagnosed with R-AAAD. We selected thoracic endovascular aortic repair as an alternative, considering the anatomy of aortic dissection and the risk to patients undergoing open surgery. RESULTS Nineteen patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair for R-AAAD. No in-hospital deaths or neurologic complications occurred. A type Ia endoleak was detected in 1 patient. All other primary entries were successfully closed. All dissection-related complications, such as cardiac tamponade, malperfusion distal to the primary entry and abdominal aortic rupture, were resolved. One patient required open conversion for intimal injury at the proximal edge of the stent graft; all other ascending false lumens were completely thrombosed and contracted at discharge. During the follow-up period, no aortic-related deaths or aortic events proximal to the stent graft occurred. CONCLUSIONS The indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair were expanded to low-risk and emergency cases at our institution. The early- and midterm outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for R-AAAD were acceptable. Further long-term follow-up is required.

Identification of the Adamkiewicz’s artery (AKA) prior to the operation is one of the spinal cord ischaemia preventive measures. A 75-year-old man presented with the rapid expansion of thoracic aortic aneurysm. Collateral vessels from the right common femoral artery to the AKA were observed on preoperative computed tomography angiography. The stent graft was successfully deployed through the contralateral side via a pararectal laparotomy to avoid collateral vessel injury supplying the AKA. This case highlights the significance of preoperative identification of collateral vessels to the AKA.

Acquired coarctation of the aorta (CoA) following total aortic arch replacement (TAR) is a rare complication inducing left ventricular (LV) dysfunction probably due to increased LV afterload and secondary hypertension caused by increased upper body and decreased renal blood flow. We describe a case of a 35-year-old male who developed atypical CoA with severe LV dysfunction with LV ejection fraction of 10%, but without secondary hypertension after TAR using conventional elephant trunk (ET) technique for acute aortic dissection. Computed tomography revealed near-occlusive CoA due to narrowed distal ET. Because the myocardial histological findings were mild, and he had no cardiac failure history, we determined that LV function might be reversible. He underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), resulting in restored LV function. However, as the descending aortic false lumen distally to the end of ET was rapidly dilated, probably due to increased cardiac output and lower body blood flow, he underwent descending aortic replacement 3 months after TEVAR. In conclusion, a narrowed distal ET may cause LV dysfunction early after TAR, even without secondary hypertension. TEVAR may be a useful therapeutic option for a narrowed distant ET but can induce distal aortic dilatation.

OBJECTIVES We investigated whether prophylactic preoperative cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) was effective in preventing spinal cord ischemia (SCI) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair of degenerative descending thoracic aortic aneurysms, excluding dissecting aneurysms. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair involving proximal landing zones 3 and 4 between 2009 and 2020. RESULTS Eighty-nine patients with preemptive CSFD [68 men; median (range) age, 76.0 (71.0–81.0) years] and 115 patients without CSFD [89 men; median (range) age, 77.0 (74.0–81.5) years] were included in this study. Among them, 59 from each group were matched based on propensity scores to regulate for differences in backgrounds. The incidence rate of SCI was similar: 8/89 (9.0%) in the CSFD group and 6/115 (5.2%) in the non-CSFD group (P = 0.403). Shaggy aorta (odds ratio, 5.13; P = 0.004) and iliac artery access (odds ratio, 5.04; P = 0.005) were identified as positive predictors of SCI. Other clinically important confounders included Adamkiewicz artery coverage (odds ratio, 2.53; P = 0.108) and extensive stent graft coverage (>8 vertebrae) (odds ratio, 1.41; P = 0.541) were not statistically significant. Propensity score matching yielded similar incidence of SCI: 4/59 (6.8%) in the CSFD group and 3/59 (5.1%) in the non-CSFD group (P = 0.697). CONCLUSIONS Aggressive use of prophylactic CSFD was not supportive in patients without complex risks of SCI.

Although endovascular repair has become an alternative treatment for coarctation of the aorta (CoA) in adults, open repair provides concomitant repair of other cardiac complications, including post-stenotic aneurysm, ascending aortic aneurysm, and intracardiac diseases. We evaluated open anatomical repair for CoA repair in adults. Eleven patients (6 men, age range 21–63 years) underwent primary CoA repair. Complicating conditions included post-stenotic aortic aneurysm in the descending aorta in 5 patients (45.5%) and ascending aortic aneurysm in 3 (27.3%). Two patients (18.2%) had a bicuspid aortic valve, and one (9.1%) had a quadricuspid aortic valve. Ventricular septal defect was detected in 1 patient (9.1%). Eight patients (72.7%) underwent descending aorta replacement through a left thoracotomy, comprising partial cardiopulmonary bypass in 4 and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in 4. Of those, the left subclavian artery was reconstructed in 4 patients. The remaining 3 patients (27.3%) underwent total arch replacement, through a median sternotomy in 1 and using a combination of median sternotomy and thoracotomy in 2. No in-hospital mortality was observed. No spinal cord ischemia or neurological events were encountered, but 1 patient (9.1%) who underwent CoA repair via median sternotomy and thoracotomy required prolonged ventilatory support for more than 48 h. During the follow-up of 90 months (interquartile range 65–124 months), no patient died or required reintervention for the repaired segment. CoA in adults could be anatomically repaired with graft replacement both through the median sternotomy, the left thoracotomy, and the combination of both approaches, according to the complicated aortic or intracardiac lesions.

Left coronary artery malperfusion is a fatal complication of acute type A aortic dissection. However, effective treatment strategies have not yet been established. Herein, we report two cases of left coronary artery malperfusion successfully treated with different preoperative catheter interventions, followed by a central aortic repair. Preoperative coronary intervention ensuring the blood flow to the left coronary artery might be essential if a coronary angiogram was performed prior to the diagnosis and treatment.

PURPOSE To identify differences in surgical outcomes between patients with transforming growth factor-beta receptor (TGFBR) 1 and TGFBR2 mutations in Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS). METHODS In all, 22 LDS patients between 1998 and 2015 were divided into the two groups: TGFBR1 (n = 11) and TGFBR2 mutation (n = 11). RESULTS The freedom from aortic reoperation was similar between the two groups (p = 0.19, log-rank). In the subanalysis, the freedom from aortic reoperation was lower in female patients with TGFBR2 mutations (n = 6) than in other patients (p = 0.08). The freedom from aortic dissection (AD) after the initial surgery was also lower in female patients with TGFBR2 mutation than in other patients (p = 0.025). All patients with TGFBR2 mutations revealed grade III cystic medial necrosis (CMN), whereas 67% of patients with TGFBR1 mutations showed CMN (p = 0.033) and only one patient had grade III (p

The early and long-term outcomes after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) have been established by several high-volume centers, but the impact of postoperative residual pulmonary hypertension affecting postoperative clinical parameters remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the institutional surgical results of PEA and to evaluate the efficacy of additional balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) for residual pulmonary hypertension.We retrospectively reviewed 222 patients (57.7 ± 12.9 years old, 141 female) who underwent PEA for CTEPH at the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center between 2000 and 2020.The preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) was 45.6 ± 9.7 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was 1062 ± 451 dyne*sec/cmPEA provided immediate and substantial improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics and favorable long-term survival. In addition, postoperative BPA improved postoperative clinical parameters for eligible patients regardless of the presence of residual PH.

Background: The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) after open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is reportedly higher than the incidence after general surgery. Amino acid infusion has been shown to increase renal blood flow, thus protecting the kidneys. Therefore, we hypothesized that intraoperative amino acid infusion, which was used to maintain body temperature, is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative AKI. The aim of this study was to validate this hypothesis. Methods: In this retrospective, observational, single-center cohort study, we included patients who underwent open AAA repair between January 2007 and April 2019. Perioperative data were abstracted from medical records. The primary outcome was AKI diagnosed according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Secondary outcomes were creatinine-AKI diagnosed based on serum creatinine alone and postoperative serum creatinine trajectory. A Fine and Gray proportional hazards regression analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between amino acid infusion and AKI. Similarly, multivariable logistic regression was performed for creatinine-AKI. Postoperative serum creatinine trajectory was assessed using a multivariable non-linear regression model with the Huber-White method.Results: Of 696 patients, 310 patients received an amino acid infusion. Most patients received an amino acid infusion of 20 g. The amino acid group had a lower prevalence of AKI (24.7% vs. 25.3%; adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR)=0.86; 95% CI, 0.67–1.11; P=0.24) and creatinine-AKI (23.5% vs. 19.2%; adjusted odds ratio (OR)=0.84; 95% CI, 0.50–1.43; P=0.52) than the control group, but the differences were not statistically significant. Postoperative serum creatinine levels were significantly lower in the amino acid infusion group on postoperative days 5 and 6.Conclusions: Intraoperative amino acid infusion has a tendency to reduce the incidence of postoperative AKI among patients undergoing open AAA repair. However, we could not show a statistically significant difference.Trial registration: UMIN000038527, 09/11/2019

OBJECTIVES Resection of a primary entry tear is essential for the treatment of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (AAAD). In DeBakey type III retrograde AAAD (DBIII-RAAAD), resection of the primary entry tear in the descending aorta is sometimes difficult. The frozen elephant trunk technique and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) enable the closure of the primary entry in the descending aorta. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of resection or closure of primary entry, i.e. entry exclusion, in patients with DeBakey type III retrograde-AAAD. METHODS The medical records of 654 patients with AAAD who underwent emergency surgery between January 2000 and March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed, and 80 eligible patients with DeBakey type III retrograde-AAAD were divided into the excluded (n = 50; age, 62 ± 12 years) and residual (n = 30; age, 66 ± 14 years) groups according to postoperative computed tomography angiographic data of the false lumen around the primary entry. The excluded group was defined as having a postoperative false lumen at the level of the elephant trunk or thrombosis of the endograft including primary entry. Patients with early false lumen enhancement around the elephant trunk or an unresected primary entry tear after isolated hemiarch replacement were included in the residual group. The early and long-term surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS The in-hospital mortality rate was 8% (6/80), with no significant difference observed between the excluded and the residual groups (10% and 7%, respectively; P > 0.99). Ninety-five percentage of the patients (20/21) achieved entry exclusion with stent grafts including the frozen elephant trunk procedure and TEVAR. Spinal cord ischaemia was not observed in either group. The cumulative overall survival at 5 years was comparable between the 2 groups (76% and 81% in the excluded and residual groups, respectively; P = 0.93). The 5-year freedom from distal aortic reoperation rate was significantly higher in the excluded group (97%) than in the residual group (97% vs 66%; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Not only resection but also closure using the entry exclusion approach for DeBakey type III retrograde-AAAD utilizing new technologies including the frozen elephant trunk technique and TEVAR might mitigate dissection-related reoperations.

Background: Despite recent advances in the diagnosis and management, the mortality of acute aortic dissection remains high. This study aims to clarify the current status of the management and outcome of acute aortic dissection in Japan. Methods: A total of 18,348 patients with acute aortic dissection (type A: 10,131, type B: 8217) in the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases database between April 2012–March 2015 were studied. Characteristics, clinical presentation, management, and in-hospital outcomes were analyzed. Results: Seasonal onset variation (autumn- and winter-dominant) was found in both types. More than 90% of patients underwent computed tomography for primary diagnosis. The overall in-hospital mortality of types A and B was 24.3% and 4.5%, respectively. The mortality in type A patients managed surgically was significantly lower than in those not receiving surgery (11.8% (799/6788) vs 49.7% (1663/3343); p Conclusions: This nationwide study elucidated the clinical features and outcomes in contemporary patients with acute aortic dissections in real-world clinical practice in Japan.

Objective: This study aims to determine how instructions for use affect the occurrence of aneurysm sac growth and endoleaks after an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Materials and Methods: We reviewed 302 patients who underwent EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm between 2007 and 2013, and we were able to enroll 159 patients (74% men, mean age 78±7 years) with adequate data (mean follow-up; 48±20 months). Results: The angle of the proximal landing zone (LZ) (hazard ratio: 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 1.00–1.03, p=0.01) was recognized as an independent risk factor of sac growth (≥5 mm). The receiver operating characteristics curve (area under the curve: 0.72) showed a cutoff value of 47° of the minimum angle of the proximal LZ to predict sac growth. Freedom rates for persistent type Ia endoleaks were also found to be lower in the angulated group than those in the other groups (p=0.0095, log-rank). Conclusion: The angle of the proximal LZ was identified as an independent risk factor for sac growth post-EVAR. The incidence of persistent type Ia endoleaks was significantly higher in the angulated group.

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in 8 patients with acute type A aortic dissection with an entry tear in the descending aorta. From January 2016 to December 2018, eight patients (mean age 76 years; range 54–92 years) were treated by thoracic endovascular aortic repair due to high operative risk for conventional open repair. All patients had significant comorbidities, and two had critical organ malperfusion due to aortic dissection. Surgical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed. All procedures were technically successful with complete coverage of the entry tear. The proximal landing zone was Zone 1 in 2, Zone 2 in 1, Zone 3 in 4, and Zone 4 in 1 patient. Patients requiring Zone 1 and 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair underwent aortic arch bypass simultaneously. Mean operation time was 132 min. There were no hospital deaths and no serious complications, including stroke and spinal cord ischemic injury. All patients had complete thrombosis and shrinkage of the false lumen in the ascending aorta before discharge. During up to 36-month follow-up (mean 20 ± 12 months), there were no adverse aortic events except one who died due to ischemic colitis 4 months after the procedure. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair could be a useful alternative surgical option for patients with retrograde acute type A aortic dissection with an entry in the descending aorta who are not suitable for conventional open surgery. Careful follow-up of such patients is mandatory.

Because endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR) lowers the lumbar arterial blood flow, we hypothesized that the volume of the psoas muscle decreases after surgery. When internal iliac artery (IIA) embolization is performed, the lumbar arterial blood flow further decreases; therefore, we also hypothesized that the decrease in the volume of the psoas muscle becomes more significant. This study was performed to assess the volume change in the psoas muscle after EVAR.Fifty-three consecutive patients who underwent EVAR from January 2016 to December 2016 were included. The psoas muscle volume was measured by preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT). Postoperative CT scans were performed 6-12 months after EVAR. Axial CT images with a 2-mm slice thickness were used to measure the psoas muscle volume. Data were transferred to a 3-dimensional workstation, and the psoas muscle volume was measured.In the EVAR group, the volume of the psoas muscle decreased by an average of 5.8 mL (4.6%) from 114.8 ± 32.0 mL preoperatively to 109.0 ± 30.3 mL postoperatively (P 0.01). There was a significant difference in the change in the psoas muscle volume between patients with and without IIA embolization (embolization group: preoperative 118.1 ± 31.0 mL, postoperative 107.5 ± 29.2 mL, mean volume change rate -8.8%; nonembolization group: preoperative 114.0 ± 32.3 mL, postoperative 109.4 ± 30.7 mL, mean volume change rate -3.6%; P 0.05).The psoas muscle volume is reduced with EVAR. Moreover, when the IIA is embolized, the psoas muscle volume is further reduced.

We reviewed the results of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients from the Japanese Committee for Stentgraft Management registry to determine the significance of persistent type II endoleak (p-T2EL) and the risk of late adverse events, including aneurysm sac enlargement.The prospectively captured medical records of 17 099 patients75 years of age who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm from 2006 to 2015 were reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups (with or without p-T2EL) and compared to examine the correlation between p-T2EL and the occurrence of aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular aneurysm repair.Of the patients, 4957 (29.0%) had p-T2EL and 12 142 (71.0%) had no p-T2EL (non-T2EL). Mean age was significantly higher (The Japanese Committee for Stentgraft Management registry data show a correlation between p-T2EL and late adverse events, including aneurysm sac enlargement, reintervention, rupture, and abdominal aortic aneurysm-related mortality after endovascular aneurysm repair. Besides p-T2EL, older age, female sex, chronic kidney disease, and dilated proximal neck were associated with sac enlargement.

Primary aortoduodenal fistula (ADF) is a relatively rare and morbid diagnosis. A 91-year-old man who developed hematemesis and melena was transferred from a community hospital with the diagnosis of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Computed tomography revealed an irregular-shaped AAA with cavities enhanced near the duodenum, with suspected ADF. The patient was initially treated with emergency endovascular aneurysm repair. Duodenoscopy showed defects of the mucosa. ADF was diagnosed, and fistulas were closed with endoscopic clipping. This case highlights the success of ADF endovascular repair.

OBJECTIVES The management of acute type A aortic dissection with malperfusion syndrome remains challenging. To evaluate preoperative condition, symptoms might be subjective and objective evaluation of cerebral artery has not yet been established. For quantitative evaluation, this study focused on brain computed tomography perfusion (CTP), which has been recommended by several guidelines of acute ischaemic stroke. METHODS In the last 2 years, 147 patients hospitalized due to acute type A aortic dissection were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 23 (16%) patients with cerebral malperfusion, 14 who underwent brain CTP (6 preoperative and 8 postoperative) were enrolled. CTP parameters, including regional blood flow and time to maximum, were automatically computed using RApid processing of Perfusion and Diffusion software. The median duration from the onset to hospital arrival was 129 (31–659) min. RESULTS Among the 6 patients who underwent preoperative CTP, 4 with salvageable ischaemic lesion (penumbra: 8–735 ml) without massive irreversible ischaemic lesion (ischaemic core: 0–31 ml) achieved acceptable neurological outcomes after emergency aortic replacement regardless of preoperative neurological severity. In contrast, 2 patients with an ischaemic core of >50 ml (73, 51 ml) fell into a vegetative state or neurological death due to intracranial haemorrhage. CTP parameters guided postoperative blood pressure augmentation without additional supra-aortic vessel intervention in the 8 patients who underwent postoperative CTP, among whom 6 achieved normal neurological function regardless of common carotid true lumen stenosis severity. CONCLUSIONS CTP was able to detect irreversible ischaemic core, guide critical decisions in preoperative patients and aid in determining the blood pressure augmentation for postoperative management focusing on residual brain ischaemia.

Background:An aortic graft implantation is an effective therapeutic method for various aortic diseases. However, it is known that sometimes these implanted grafts can be the foci of infections. Here we report a rare case of graft infection that presented multiple embolisms of aortic branches and peripheral organs., Case presentation:A 63-year-old Japanese woman with a history of aortic graft implantation presented with occlusions of large arteries in different loci and time points, with elevation of non-specific inflammatory markers. Thoracic contrast-computed tomography (CT) captured vegetation in the descending aortic graft and the [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) showed accumulation of FDG in the same site, suggesting a graft infection. Despite all these suspicious findings, repeated blood culture examinations never detected any microorganisms. A diagnosis of Aspergillus graft infection was made based on an elevated serum β-D glucan (βDG) and a positive Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) antigen test. The patient subsequently had surgery with replacement of the descending aortic graft and anti-fungal drugs were instituted with significant improvement noted., Conclusion:In the present case, the patient's specific feature in the anatomical vascular construction, past operation, and basal fundamental diseases collaboratively contributed to the pathogenesis of the present infection. It is important to recognize the risk of graft infection and conduct imaging studies when indicative symptoms emerge. The negativity in blood culture studies often makes detection of pathogenic microbes extremely difficult. This case suggests that non-cultural tests such as bDG and GM can be useful for diagnosis and starting appropriate anti-fungal drugs in the early stages.

Objective We performed a multicenter prospective comparative study to determine the impact of a Japanese frozen elephant trunk device on total arch replacement compared with conventional repair without it. Methods Between 2016 and 2019, a total of 684 patients (frozen elephant trunk procedure; n = 369; conventional repair, n = 315) from 41 institutions were enrolled. The 2 procedures were selected according to each center's strategy. Results The frozen elephant trunk procedure was applied more for aortic dissection, whereas the conventional repairs were predominantly performed for aneurysms. In the former, only hypothermic circulatory arrest time was reduced among the intraoperative parameters. Although there were no differences in the 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates (0.8% and 1.6%, respectively, for the frozen elephant trunk procedure vs 0.3% and 0.6%, respectively, for conventional repair), the neurologic complication rates were significantly higher in stroke (5.7% vs 2.2%; P = .022) and paraplegia (1.6% vs 0%; P = .023). In the propensity score matching analyses using 11 variables, statistical significance disappeared in the differences for mortality and neurologic morbidity (stroke and paraplegia/paraparesis) rates of 194 patients of each group, although they were still higher for the frozen elephant trunk procedure. Conclusions The early outcomes of total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk procedure were acceptable despite its higher prevalence of emergency or redo surgery, which was comparable to that of the conventional repair. This procedure had higher rates of spinal cord injury than the conventional repair, which is a disadvantage of this approach.

The study objective was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the second-generation, low-profile RelayPro (Terumo Aortic) thoracic endograft for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysm or penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer.A prospective, international, nonblinded, nonrandomized, pivotal trial analyzed a primary safety end point of major adverse events at 30 days (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, renal/respiratory failure, paralysis, bowel ischemia, procedural blood loss) and a primary effectiveness end point of treatment success at 1 year (technical success, patency, absence of aneurysm rupture, type I/III endoleaks, stent fractures, reinterventions, aneurysm expansion, and migration) compared with performance goals from the previous generation Relay pivotal study. The study was conducted in 36 centers in the United States and Japan and enrolled participants between 2017 and 2019.The study population of 110 patients had a median (interquartile range) age of 76 (70-81) years, 69 (62.7%) were male, and 43 (39.1%) were Asian. Patients were treated for 76 fusiform aneurysms (69%), 24 saccular aneurysms (22%), and 10 penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (9%). Most patients (82.7%) were treated with a non-bare stent configuration. Technical success was 100%. The median (interquartile range) procedure time was 91 (64-131) minutes, and the deployment time was 16 (10-25) minutes. A total of 50 patients (73.5%) in the US cohort had percutaneous access, whereas centers in Japan used only surgical cutdown. The 30-day composite major adverse events rate was 6.4% (95% upper confidence interval, 11.6%; P = .0002): 2 strokes, 2 procedural blood losses greater than 1000 mL requiring transfusion, 2 paralysis events, and 1 renal failure. Primary effectiveness was 89.2% (lower 95% confidence interval, 81.8%; P = .0185). Nine subjects experienced 11 events (1 aneurysm expansion, 6 secondary interventions, and 4 type I endoleaks). There was no loss of stent-graft patency, no rupture, no fractures, and no migration.The low-profile RelayPro thoracic endograft met the study primary end points and demonstrated satisfactory 30-day safety and 1-year effectiveness for the treatment of patients with aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta or penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers. Follow-up is ongoing to evaluate longer-term outcomes and durability.

A 72-year-old man presenting with lower body malperfusion and complete paralysis was transferred for emergency treatment of a complicated acute type B aortic dissection. Enhanced computed tomography showed occlusion of the true lumen inside the abdominal aorta due to compression of the false lumen, accompanied by a Crawford extension type IV thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm. The primary entry tear was located at the level of the tenth thoracic vertebra above the aneurysm. Emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed to cover the entry tear and to regain perfusion of the lower body. Efforts to perform retrograde insertion of a guidewire from the femoral arteries to pass the occluded abdominal aorta were unsuccessful. A through-and-through guidewire technique between the left brachial artery and the right femoral artery was performed to deliver a Zenith TX-2 stent graft from the right femoral artery. After closure of the primary entry tear, complete recovery from the occlusion of the abdominal aorta was obtained 6 h after the onset. His paralysis recovered completely, and the postoperative course was uneventful without reperfusion injury.

We report a case of a patient with type IIIB endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair that remained undetected by computed tomography and was first diagnosed during open conversion surgery. The aneurysm enlarged gradually from 60 to 78 mm without type I and type II endoleaks during 3 to 6 years after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Type IIIB endoleaks from nitinol stent suture lines were detected, and the endograft was then explanted and replaced by a vascular graft. Keywords: Type IIIB endoleak, Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair, Endograft