Search

Objective: To determine if using spinal anesthesia (SA) for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) impacted the ability to perform same-day discharge (SDD) compared to a prostate volume-matched cohort undergoing HoLEP under general anesthesia (GA)., Methods: From January 1, 2021 to March 28, 2024, 995 men underwent HoLEP by a single surgeon. Three hundred eleven were identified who had SA and a recorded preoperative prostate volume. Propensity score matching based on prostate volume was performed with the remaining cohort who received GA in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was rate of SDD., Results: When comparing SDD between the two groups, 84% of SA patients had SDD compared to 74% of GA patients (P-value .002). The operative time for SA was significantly shorter than GA (89 vs 101 minutes P-value <.001). The total operating room time (wheels-in to wheels-out) including anesthesia induction for SA was significantly shorter than GA (119 vs 128 minutes P-value .0003). There were no significant differences in early catheter reinsertion, emergency department visits, complications, or postoperative serum prostate-specific antigen measured at 3months., Conclusion: Utilizing SA for HoLEP did not preclude SDD compared to a prostate volume-matched cohort who underwent HoLEP under GA. In fact, SDD were higher in the SA cohort without a corresponding increase in emergency department visits or catheter reinsertion., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Chandler Dora: CDD has been compensated for educational services for Boston Scientific/Lumenis and Cook Medical. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The presence of various growth factors in platelets makes platelet-rich plasma (PRP) a powerful tool in the stimulation of collagen regeneration in aging skin. The main objective of this study was to determine efficacy and safety of PRP compared with saline solution in women with aging skin of the hands., Methods: In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 18 women with hand aging received PRP injections every 4 weeks into the unilateral dorsal hand for 12 weeks total; with saline injections into the contralateral hand in a randomized, controlled, single-blind fashion. Physician assessment, photographs, and quality-of-life questionnaires were used for assessment at baseline and at 12-week and 24-week follow-up., Results: The majority of patients reported pain and discomfort along with a burning/stinging sensation in both PRP- and saline-treated hands, with no significant differences noted in any patient outcome measures between the 2 treatments (all P ≥ 0.25). No differences were reliably detected between the treatment hands by a blinded investigator comparing before-and-after clinical photographs of the hands., Conclusions: Three injections of PRP spaced 4 weeks apart did not appear to be effective for treatment of aging skin of the hands in women, with no noted difference as compared with baseline, or saline injection. Although age older than 45 years may be a factor accounting for nonresponse (ie, subtle skin changes are difficult to appreciate, and possible limited platelet regenerative capacity in advanced age), it appears that PRP is not a reliable cosmetic option for management of hand aging., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, II., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: The regenerative properties of platelet growth factors make platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) an attractive modality for treatment of aging skin. The main objective of this study was to determine efficacy and safety of PRP injections and microneedling compared with saline injections in women with aging skin of the face., Methods: In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 18 women with facial aging were randomized to receive either PRP injections to the unilateral face and saline injections to the contralateral side, or vice versa. Microneedling was performed after injections on the entire face. Physician assessment, photographs, and treatment satisfaction questionnaires were used for outcome assessment at baseline and 16- and 24-week follow-ups., Results: There was no evidence of improvement and suggestion of worsening in skin laxity and rhytides from baseline to weeks 4, 16, and 24 for PRP and saline (all P ≤ 0.004) and no notable difference in skin roughness between baseline and follow-up time points for PRP or saline (all P ≥ 0.19). The degree of change in skin laxity, rhytides, and skin roughness from baseline to follow-up time points was similar for PRP and saline. All patients experienced some degree of pain/discomfort and burning/stinging sensation at treatment weeks 4, 8, and 12 for both saline and PRP., Conclusions: PRP injections did not seem to be effective for treatment of aging skin of the face in women, with no notable macroscopic improvement in appearance when compared with baseline or saline injections. Advanced age of study participants (>45 years) and less-sensitive methods of evaluation may be potential contributing factors to the lack of detected response., Competing Interests: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. None of the authors has a financial interest in any of the products, devices, or drugs mentioned in this article., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Purpose: Examine MRI phenotypes of breast cancers arising in patients with various pathogenic variants, to assess for imaging trends and associations., Method: Multisite retrospective review evaluated 410 patients from 2001 to 2020 with breast cancer and a predisposing pathogenic variant who underwent breast MRI at time of cancer diagnosis. Dominant malignant lesion features were reported, including lesion type (mass versus non-mass enhancement), size, shape, margin, internal enhancement pattern, plus other features. Kruskal-Wallis test, Fisher's exact test, and pairwise comparisons performed comparing imaging manifestations for the most frequent genetic results., Results: BRCA1 (29.5 %) and BRCA2 (25.9 %) variants were most common, followed by CHEK2 (16.6 %), ATM (8.0 %), and PALB2 (6.3 %), with significant associated differences in race/ethnicity (p = 0.040), age at cancer diagnosis (p = 0.005), tumor shapes (p = 0.001), margins (p < 0.001), grade (p < 0.001), internal enhancement pattern (rim enhancement) (p < 0.001), kinetics (washout) (p < 0.001), and presence of necrosis (p < 0.001). CHEK2 and ATM tumors were often lower grade with spiculated margins (CHEK2: 47.1 %, ATM: 45.5 %), rarely exhibiting washout or tumor necrosis (p < 0.001), and were mostly comprised of luminal molecular subtypes (CHEK2: 88.2 %, ATM: 90.9 %). BRCA1 tumors had the highest proportions with round shape (31.4 %), circumscribed margins (24.0 %), rim enhancement (24.0 %), washout (58.7 %), and necrosis (19.8 %), with 47.9 % comprised of triple negative subtype. Bilateral mastectomy was performed in higher proportions of patients with BRCA1 (84.3 %) and BRCA2 (75.5 %) variants compared to others., Conclusions: Genetic and molecular profiles of breast cancers demonstrate reproducible MRI phenotypes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To explore trends in demographic characteristics of scleral lens (SL) practitioners and primary indications for SL fitting over 5 years., Methods: An online survey similar to the 2015 Scleral Lenses in Current Ophthalmic Practice Evaluation (SCOPE) study was designed and administered from November 8, 2019, through March 31, 2020, to attendees at two international contact lens meetings, members of the Scleral Lens Education Society, and participants in the 2015 SCOPE study. Practitioners reporting at least five completed SL fits were included in the analysis., Results: Of 922 respondents, 777 had fit at least five SLs: 63% from the United States (59 other countries were represented), findings similar to the 2015 survey, in which 799 respondents (72%) were US-based and 49 from other countries. Most practitioners were in community practice (76%) than academic practice (24%). In 2015, 64% were in community practice and 36% in academic practice. A median of 84% of SLs were fit for corneal irregularity, 10% for ocular surface disease, and 2% for uncomplicated refractive error. In comparison, the 2015 indications were 74%, 16%, and 10%, respectively. The median number of fits completed per practitioner was 100 (range, 5-10,000; mean [SD] 284 [717]; n=752). In 2015, the median was 36 (range, 5-3,600; mean [SD] 125 [299]; n=678)., Conclusions: The number of experienced SL practitioners is increasing, as is international representation. Most practitioners practice in community rather than academic settings. SLs continue to be primarily prescribed for corneal irregularity and are rarely used solely for correction of refractive error., Competing Interests: J. Harthan: Consulting for Allergan, Essilor, Euclid, International Keratoconus Academy, Metro Optics, and Visioneering Technologies, Inc.; Research for Bausch & Lomb, Kala Pharmaceuticals, Ocular Therapeutix, and Metro Optics. E. Shorter: Research grant from Johnson & Johnson. J. Fogt: Research funding from Nevakar, EyeNovia, Alcon, Innovega, and Contamac. Consulting for Alcon and Contamac. A. Nau: Paid lecturer for EyeEcco. Consulting for Oyster Point Pharmaceuticals. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists.)

Objectives: To compare scleral lenses (SLs) with a quadrant-specific (study lens) or a spherical (habitual lens) landing zone in a crossover study., Methods: Seven participants (eight eyes) wore each of two lenses for 2 weeks before measurements. We measured visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, intraocular pressure (IOP), fluid reservoir clearance, corneal thickness, tear exchange, and lens experience. Variables were compared between lenses and before and after 2 hr of wear., Results: The visual acuity was not different between the study lens, 0.12 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), and habitual lens, 0.18 logMAR (median, P = 1.0). Contrast sensitivity was 1.3% under the study lens and 1.6% under the habitual lens ( P = 0.94). IOP did not change after 2 hr of wear for either lens (study lens, P = 0.33 and habitual lens, P = 0.74), and corneal thickness did not change during wear of either lens ( P = 0.44). The fluorescein concentration under the study lens did not change after 2 hr (99% of initial concentration; P = 0.84) but decreased to 46% of initial concentration under the habitual lens ( P = 0.008). Lens comfort was slightly better with the study lens (5.0 vs. 4.0, respectively; P = 0.05)., Conclusions: SLs with spherical or quadrant-specific landing zones provide good vision and do not affect IOP or corneal thickness. However, tear exchange is greater under spherical lenses than under quadrant-specific lenses. The quadrant-specific lens provides greater patient comfort., (Copyright © 2022 Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists.)

Background: Menopause, defined by the complete cessation of menstrual cycles for 12 consecutive months, may occur at a younger age in women who have concomitant immune dysregulation. Our aim was to determine whether women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience an earlier onset of menopause compared to women without IBD., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a collaboration between clinics, hospitals, and medical facilities in Olmsted County, Minnesota. From these people, women who were diagnosed with IBD between 1970 and 2010 comprised the case cohort while the reference cohort included women with no diagnosis of IBD. Data including age, body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, smoking status, age at onset of menopause, and current use of hormone therapy were collected. Patients with history of hysterectomy or oophorectomy were excluded. Wilcoxon rank-sum test for numeric variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables were used to analyze the data., Results: A total of 171 women met criteria for inclusion (83 cases and 88 controls). Mean age of menopause in women with IBD was 50.0 years compared to 51.5 years in women with no IBD ( P = .006). There was no difference in BMI of women with and without IBD (28.7 versus 28.2 kg m -2 ; P = .9), respectively. There were more former smokers (33.7%) and current (6%) smokers in the IBD group ( P = .009) compared to the non-IBD group., Conclusions: IBD is associated with an earlier onset of menopause. Although it is unclear if this mean difference of 1.5 years is clinically relevant, it is known that early menopause is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease. Further research on the possible mechanisms is needed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation.)

Objective: To review the current state of radiation therapy for uveal melanoma and compare particle radiation and brachytherapy., Patients and Methods: The medical records of 156 patients treated for uveal melanoma between May 30, 2012, and March 16, 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Treatments consisted of either radioactive iodine 125 implant (RAI) or fractionated proton radiation (proton beam therapy [PBT]). Baseline characteristics were compared using a Wilcoxon rank sum test or χ 2 test. Outcomes were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression models or logistic regression models., Results: The median length of follow-up after treatment was 2.7 years (range, 0.5 to 9.0 years). Patients who underwent treatment with RAI were older (median age, 67 vs 59 years; P <.001) and had a lower tumor classification (American Joint Commission on Cancer; P=.001) compared with those who underwent PBT. There was no significant difference between RAI and PBT in the outcomes of liver metastases, death, enucleation, tearing, vision loss, retinal detachment, tumor thickness, conjunctivitis, optic neuropathy, iris neovascularization, or neovascular glaucoma (all P >.05). Patients who underwent RAI treatment had significantly higher risk of diplopia (P<.001), cataract progression (P<.001), and maculopathy (P=.03) compared with those who received PBT. Patients who underwent RAI were at higher risk of eyelash loss (P=.006) compared with the PBT group., Conclusion: Treatment with PBT and RAI has similar efficacy; however, there are differences in the adverse outcomes associated with these 2 modalities., (© 2021 The Authors.)