Search

Your search keyword '"Hofma, Sjoerd H."' showing total 223 results

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Author "Hofma, Sjoerd H." Remove constraint Author: "Hofma, Sjoerd H."
223 results on '"Hofma, Sjoerd H."'

Search Results

1. Bifurcation PCI with a hybrid strategy with drug- eluting balloons versus a stepwise provisional two- stent strategy: Rationale and design of the hybrid DEB study

4. Geographic Variations on the Safety and Efficacy of the Supreme Biodegradable Polymer DES: Results From PIONEER III

5. Angiography-derived physiology guidance vs usual care in an All-comers PCI population treated with the healing-targeted supreme stent and Ticagrelor monotherapy: PIONEER IV trial design

6. Efficacy and Safety of Stents in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

7. A sirolimus-eluting bioabsorbable polymer-coated stent (MiStent) versus an everolimus-eluting durable polymer stent (Xience) after percutaneous coronary intervention (DESSOLVE III): a randomised, single-blind, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial

8. The relationship of pre-procedural Dmax based sizing to lesion level outcomes in Absorb BVS and Xience EES treated patients in the AIDA trial

10. Effect of Post-Dilatation Following Primary PCI With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Versus Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stent Implantation: An Angiographic and Optical Coherence Tomography TROFI II Substudy

11. Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent)

14. The Impact of Patient and Lesion Complexity on Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes After Revascularization With Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Substudy of the RESOLUTE All Comers Trial (A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent With an Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention)

15. The Prognostic Utility of the SYNTAX Score on 1-Year Outcomes After Revascularization With Zotarolimus- and Everolimus-Eluting Stents: A Substudy of the RESOLUTE All Comers Trial

16. Feasibility and safety of cangrelor in patients with suboptimal P2Y12 inhibition undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the Dutch Cangrelor registry

17. Everolimus-eluting bioresorbable stent vs. durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results of the randomized ABSORB ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—TROFI II trial

18. The Influence of Implantation Techniques on Lesion-Oriented Outcomes in Absorb BVS and Xience EES Lesions Treated in Routine Clinical Practice at Complete Three-Year Follow-Up - AIDA Trial QCA Substudy

19. Clopidogrel in noncarriers of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles versus ticagrelor in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome: A pre-specified sub analysis from the POPular Genetics and POPular Age trials CYP2C19 alleles in elderly patients

20. Benefit and Risks of Aspirin in Addition to Ticagrelor in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Randomized GLOBAL LEADERS Trial

21. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and everolimus-eluting coronary stents

22. Outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting stents by coronary complexity: a sub-analysis of the AIDA trial

23. Three‐year clinical outcomes of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold compared to Xience everolimus‐eluting stent in routine PCI in patients with diabetes mellitus— AIDA sub‐study

24. Final 3-Year Outcomes of MiStent Biodegradable Polymer Crystalline Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Xience Permanent Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent

25. A paradox in sex-specific clinical outcomes after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: 2-year results from the AIDA trial

26. The influence of implantation techniques on lesion oriented-outcomes in Absorb BVS and Xience EES lesions treated in routine clinical practice at complete three year follow-up: AIDA trial QCA substudy

27. Four-Year Follow-Up of Absorb BVS Compared to Xience EES in Daily Clinical Practice Shows Continued Accrual of Events

28. TCT-636 Impact of Diabetes on the Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Analysis From the GLOBAL LEADERS Study

29. TCT-41 A Prospective Multicenter Randomized All-Comers Trial to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of the Ultra-Thin-Strut Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent Supraflex: 2-Year Results of the TALENT Trial

30. TCT-164 Clinical Outcomes at 3 Years of the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus Xience Drug-Eluting Metallic Stent in Patients With or Without Acute Coronary Syndrome: AIDA Trial Substudy

32. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent in routine PCI: three-year clinical outcomes from the AIDA trial

34. Three‐year clinical outcomes of the absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold compared to Xience everolimus‐eluting stent in routine PCI in patients with diabetes mellitus—AIDA sub‐study.

40. Clinical outcomes at 2 years of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the Xience drug‐eluting metallic stent in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome versus stable coronary disease—AIDA trial substudy

41. CLINICAL OUTCOMES AT 2 YEARS OF THE ABSORB BIORESORBABLE VASCULAR SCAFFOLD VERSUS THE XIENCE DRUG-ELUTING METALLIC STENT IN PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME VERSUS STABLE CORONARY DISEASE: AIDA TRIAL SUB-STUDY

42. 500.02 Clinical Outcomes At 2 Years of The Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Versus The Xience Drug-eluting Metallic Stent In Patients Presenting With Acute Coronary Syndrome Versus Stable Coronary Disease - Aida Trial Sub-study.

43. Three-year follow-up of the randomised comparison between an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold and a durable polymer everolimus-eluting metallic stent in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (TROFI II trial)

44. Clinical outcomes at 2 years of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold versus the Xience drug‐eluting metallic stent in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome versus stable coronary disease—AIDA trial substudy.

45. Complete two-year follow-up with formal non-inferiority testing on primary outcomes of the AIDA trial comparing the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold with the XIENCE drug-eluting metallic stent in routine PCI

46. Bioresorbable Scaffolds versus Metallic Stents in Routine PCI

47. TCT-430 Baseline and procedural characteristics in the Amsterdam Investigator-initiateD randomized Absorb Trial

48. TCT-161 5 years follow-up of biolimus eluting stents versus everolimus eluting in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction presenting patients: Results from Compare II trial

49. TCT-472 Comparison biolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents in patients with complex lesions. Five year follow-up from the COMPARE II trial

50. TCT-264 Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with diabetes. 5 years follow-up from the COMPARE II trial.

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources