1. Type 2 diabetes patients have accelerated cartilage matrix degeneration compared to diabetes free controls: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative
- Author
-
Neumann, J, Hofmann, FC, Heilmeier, U, Ashmeik, W, Tang, K, Gersing, AS, Schwaiger, BJ, Nevitt, MC, Joseph, GB, Lane, NE, McCulloch, CE, and Link, TM
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Sciences ,Women's Health ,Diabetes ,Arthritis ,Osteoarthritis ,Prevention ,Aging ,Musculoskeletal ,Cartilage ,Articular ,Diabetes Complications ,Diabetes Mellitus ,Type 2 ,Disease Progression ,Female ,Humans ,Longitudinal Studies ,Male ,Middle Aged ,Osteoarthritis ,Knee ,Prospective Studies ,Knee osteoarthritis ,Diabetes mellitus ,Cartilage imaging ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Biomarkers ,Biomedical Engineering ,Human Movement and Sports Sciences ,Arthritis & Rheumatology ,Clinical sciences ,Sports science and exercise - Abstract
PurposeOsteoarthritis (OA) and diabetes mellitus (DM) share common risk factors with a potential underlying relationship between both diseases. The purpose of this study was to investigate the longitudinal effects of DM on cartilage deterioration over 24-months with MR-based T2 relaxation time measurements.MethodsFrom the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) cohort 196 diabetics were matched in small sets for age, sex, BMI and Kellgren-Lawrence score with 196 non-diabetic controls. Knee cartilage semi-automatic segmentation was performed on 2D multi-slice multi-echo spin-echo sequences. Texture of cartilage T2 maps was obtained via grey level co-occurrence matrix analysis. Linear regression analysis was used to compare cross-sectional and changes in T2 and texture parameters between the groups.ResultsBoth study groups were similar in age (63.3 vs 63.0 years, P = 0.70), BMI (30.9 vs 31.2 kg/m2, P = 0.52), sex (female 53.6% vs 54.1%, P = 0.92) and KL score distribution (P = 0.97). In diabetics, except for the patella, all compartments showed a significantly higher increase in mean T2 values when compared to non-diabetic controls. Global T2 values increased almost twice as much; 1.77ms vs 0.98ms (0.79ms [CI: 0.39,1.19]) (P
- Published
- 2018