Search

Background and Objectives: Serum neurofilament light (sNfL) is a biomarker for neuro-axonal damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Clinical implementation remains limited. We investigated the impact of implementation on clinical decisions using questionnaires at the MS Center Amsterdam, a tertiary outpatient clinic., Methods: sNfL assessments were added to routine clinical practice (August 2021-December 2022). Before and after the results, clinicians filled in questionnaires on context of testing, clinical decisions, certainty herein, expectation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, urgency, and motivation to receive the sNfL result and perceived value of sNfL., Results: sNfL was assessed in 166 cases (age 41 ± 12 years, 68% female, 64% disease-modifying therapy (DMT) use) for the following contexts: "DMT monitoring" (55%), "new symptoms" (18%), "differential diagnosis" (17%), and "DMT baseline" (11%). Clinical decisions changed in 19.3% of cases post-disclosure, particularly in context "new symptoms" (38%) and with higher sNfL levels (β = 0.03, p = 0.04). Certainty increased ( p = 0.004), while expectation of MRI activity decreased with disclosure of low sNfL levels ( p = 0.01). Motivation was highest in context "differential diagnosis" ( p < 0.001); perceived value and urgency were highest in context "new symptoms" ( p = 0.02)., Conclusion: In this study, sNfL implementation had considerable impact on clinical decision-making and certainty herein. Standard implementation may complement patient care but warrants caution and more exploration in diverse clinical settings., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Z.Y.G.J.v.L., M.H.J.W., W.M.L.L., B.M., S.N.H., and L.H. report no disclosures. B.A.d.J. receives research support from Dutch MS Research Foundation, National MS Foundation, Dutch MS Association, and Zorgverzekeraars Nederland (i.e. umbrella organization of health insurers in the Netherlands). N.M., L.A.M., B.W.v.O., N.S., Z.L.E.v.K., L.V., M.J.W., and E.M.M.S. report no disclosures. B.M.J.U. reports consultancy fees from Immunic Therapeutics. J.K. received research grants for multicentre investigator-initiated trials DOT-MS trial, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04260711 (ZonMW), and BLOOMS trial (ZonMW and Treatmeds), ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05296161; received consulting fees for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Biogen, Teva, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi/Genzyme (all payments to institution); reports speaker relationships with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Biogen, Immunic, Teva, Merck, Novartis, and Sanofi/Genzyme (all payments to institution); adjudication committee of MS clinical trial of Immunic (payments to institution only). C.E.T. reports funding from National MS Society (Progressive MS alliance) and Innovative Medicines Initiatives 3TR (Horizon 2020, grant no. 831434); has a research contract with Celgene; serves on editorial boards of Medidact Neurologie/Springer, Neurology: Neuroimmunology and Neuroinflammation, and is an editor of a Neuromethods book Springer.

B-cell depleting therapies are frequently used as high efficacy treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS). We will elaborate on current data and future perspectives of one of the most studied anti-CD20 therapies concerning personalization. Currently, multiple randomized controlled trails are recruiting patients, with three different treatment strategies concerning the dose or the dosing interval of ocrelizumab. These strategies involve higher dosing, B-cell tailored dosing and discontinuation of ocrelizumab. We propose a roadmap (Figure 1), that will incorporate results of current trials to address the current knowledge gaps in pursuit of a more efficient use of anti-CD20 therapies in MS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Laura Hogenboom and Zoé L.E. van Kempen declare that there is no conflict of interest. Tomas Kalincik served on scientific advisory boards for MS International Federation and World Health Organisation, BMS, Roche, Janssen, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, Merck and Biogen, steering committee for Brain Atrophy Initiative by Sanofi Genzyme, received conference travel support and/or speaker honoraria from WebMD Global, Eisai, Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva, BioCSL and Merck and received research or educational event support from Biogen, Novartis, Genzyme, Roche, Celgene and Merck. Amit Bar-Or: received personal fees for advisory board participation and/or consulting from Abata, Accure, Atara Biotherapeutics, Biogen, BMS/Celgene/Receptos, GlaxoSmithKline, Gossamer, Horizon Therapeutics, Immunic, Janssen/Actelion, Medimmune, Merck/EMD Serono, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Sangamo, Sanofi-Genzyme, Viracta; and grant support to the University of Pennsylvania from Biogen Idec, Roche/Genentech, Merck/EMD Serono and Novartis. J. Killestein: received research grants for multicentre investigator initiated trials DOT-MS trial, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04260711 (ZonMW) and BLOOMS trial (ZonMW and Treatmeds), ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05296161); received consulting fees for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Biogen, Teva, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi/Genzyme (all payments to institution); reports speaker relationships with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Biogen, Immunic, Teva, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi/Genzyme (all payments to institution); adjudication committee of MS clinical trials of Immunic (payments to institution only)., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent studies suggest that extended interval dosing of ocrelizumab, an anti-B cell therapy, does not affect its clinical effectiveness in most patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, it remains to be established whether certain B cell subsets are differentially repopulated after different dosing intervals and whether these subsets relate to clinical efficacy., Methods: We performed high-dimensional single-cell characterization of the peripheral immune landscape of patients with MS after standard (SID; n = 43) or extended interval dosing (EID; n = 37) of ocrelizumab and in non-ocrelizumab-treated (control group, CG; n = 28) patients with MS, using mass cytometry by time of flight (CyTOF)., Results: The first B cells that repopulate after both ocrelizumab dosing schemes were immature, transitional and regulatory CD1d + CD5 + B cells. In addition, we observed a higher percentage of transitional, naïve and regulatory B cells after EID in comparison with SID, but not of memory B cells or plasmablasts. The majority of repopulated B cell subsets showed an increased migratory phenotype, characterized by higher expression of CD49d, CD11a, CD54 and CD162. Interestingly, after EID, repopulated B cells expressed increased CD20 levels compared to B cells in CG and after SID, which was associated with a delayed repopulation of B cells after a subsequent ocrelizumab infusion. Finally, the number of/changes in B cell subsets after both dosing schemes did not correlate with any relapses nor progression of the disease., Conclusions: Taken together, our data highlight that extending the dosing interval of ocrelizumab does not lead to increased repopulation of effector B cells. We show that the increase of CD20 expression on B cell subsets in EID might lead to longer depletion or less repopulation of B cells after the next infusion of ocrelizumab. Lastly, even though extending the ocrelizumab interval dosing alters B cell repopulation, it does not affect the clinical efficacy of ocrelizumab in our cohort of patients with MS., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The majority of patients with multiple sclerosis on ocrelizumab have B-cell depletion after standard interval dosing of 26 weeks. With B-cell-guided dosing patients receive their next dose when B-cell repopulation occurs. Prediction of B-cell repopulation using ocrelizumab concentrations could aid in personalising treatment regimes. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the association between ocrelizumab drug concentration, antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and CD19 B-cell count, and to define a cut-off ocrelizumab concentration for start of B-cell repopulation (defined by ≥10 CD19+ B cells/µL)., Methods: In this investigator-initiated prospective study, blood samples at various time points during ocrelizumab treatment were collected from a biobank. Serum ocrelizumab concentrations and ADAs were measured with two different assays developed for this study. Data were analysed using linear mixed effect models. An receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine a cut-off ocrelizumab concentration for start of B-cell repopulation (defined by ≥10 cells/µL)., Results: A total of 452 blood samples from 72 patients were analysed. Ocrelizumab concentrations were detectable up until 53.3 weeks after last infusion and ranged between <0.0025 and 204 µg/mL after 1-67 weeks. Ocrelizumab concentration was negatively associated with B-cell count, with body mass index identified as effect modifier. We found a cut-off value of 0.06 µg/mL for start of B-cell repopulation of ≥10 cells/µL. Ocrelizumab ADAs were detectable in four patients (5.7%) with corresponding low ocrelizumab concentrations and start of B-cell repopulation., Conclusions: Serum ocrelizumab concentration was strongly associated with B-cell count. Measurement of ocrelizumab drug concentrations and ADAs could play an important role to further personalise treatment and predict the start of B-cell repopulation., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AAT: nothing to disclose. LH: nothing to disclose. KB: nothing to disclose. MK: nothing to disclose. NWMC: nothing to disclose. AW: nothing to disclose. BIL-W: nothing to disclose. EMMS: nothing to disclose. BMJU: received research support and/or consultancy fees from Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Teva and Immunic Therapeutics. TR: received funding for research from Genmab; consultancy fees from Novartis. JK: received research grants for multicentre investigator initiated trials DOT-MS trial, ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT04260711 (ZonMW) and BLOOMS trial (ZonMW and Treatmeds), ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT05296161); received consulting fees for F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Biogen, Teva, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi/Genzyme (all payments to institution); reports speaker relationships with F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Biogen, Immunic, Teva, Merck, Novartis and Sanofi/Genzyme (all payments to institution); adjudication committee of MS clinical trial of Immunic (payments to institution only). ZLEvK: nothing to disclose., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Ocrelizumab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, counteracts induction of humoral immune responses after severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccinations in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). We aimed to assess if serum ocrelizumab concentration measured at the time of vaccination could predict the humoral response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. In 52 patients with MS, we found ocrelizumab concentration at the time of vaccination to be a good predictor for SARS-CoV-2 IgG anti-RBD titers after vaccination (comparable to B-cell count). As the course of ocrelizumab concentration may be predicted using pharmacokinetic models, this may be a superior biomarker to guide optimal timing for vaccinations in B-cell depleted patients with MS. ANN NEUROL 2023;93:103-108., (© 2022 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)