1. Homoeopathy vs. conventional primary care in children during the first 24 months of life—a pragmatic randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Oberbaum, Menachem, Chaudhary, Anupriya, Ponnam, Hima Bindu, Krishnan, Reetha, Kumar, Dinesh V., Irfan, Mohammed, Nayak, Debadatta, Pandey, Swati, Archana, Akula, Bhargavi, Sai, Taneja, Divya, Datta, Mohua, Pawaskar, Navin, Pandey, Ravindra Mohan, Khurana, Anil, Singer, Shepherd Roee, and Manchanda, Raj Kumar
- Subjects
- *
THERAPEUTICS , *RANDOMIZED controlled trials , *PRIMARY care , *CLINICAL trials , *ACUTE diseases - Abstract
To compare the difference between primary homoeopathic and conventional paediatric care in treating acute illnesses in children in their first 24 months of life. One hundred eight Indian singleton newborns delivered at 37 to 42 weeks gestation were randomised at birth (1:1) to receive either homoeopathic or conventional primary care for any acute illness over the study period. In the homoeopathic group, conventional medical treatment was added when medically indicated. Clinicians and parents were unblinded. Children in the homoeopathic group experienced significantly fewer sick days than those in the conventional group (RR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.24–0.58; p < 0.001), with correspondingly fewer sickness episodes (RR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32–0.87; p =.013), as well as fewer respiratory illnesses over the 24-month period. They were taller (F (1, 97) = 8.92, p =.004, partial eta squared = 0.84) but not heavier than their conventionally treated counterparts. They required fewer antibiotics, and their treatment cost was lower. Conclusion: Homoeopathy, using conventional medicine as a safety backdrop, was more effective than conventional treatment in preventing sick days, sickness episodes, and respiratory illnesses in the first 24 months of life. It necessitated fewer antibiotics and its overall cost was lower. This study supports homoeopathy, using conventional medicine as a safety backdrop, as a safe and cost-effective primary care modality during the first 2 years of life. Trial registration: Clinical Trial Registry-India (2018/09/015641). https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php What is Known: • Due to their holistic nature, many Complementary and Alternative Medical (CAM) modalities are not readily amenable to assessment by head-to-head RCT for a given Indication. • We propose a pragmatic, RCT comparing homoeopathic with conventional medicine as a system. What is New: • Homoeopathic was apparently superior to conventional primary care in preventing sick days, sickness episodes, and respiratory illness episodes and was significantly associated with growth in height but not weight and required fewer antibiotics in children from birth to 24 months of age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF