195 results on '"Hospital Records legislation & jurisprudence"'
Search Results
2. [Measurement of Quality with Routine Data].
3. Open and shut case. Hospital deal creates debate over records law.
4. Use of digital health records raises ethics concerns.
5. [Medical biology accreditation at EFS].
6. A primer for protecting attorney-client work product documents and privileged information.
7. [Implementing new information technologies in nursing: legal aspects].
8. Professional practice solutions. CMS bans use of physician signature stamps.
9. [The act for protection of computer processed personal data held by administrative organs in hospital].
10. Peer review puzzle. Supreme Court sidesteps appeal to keep records closed.
11. Researchers and HIPAA.
12. Stroke in young adults who abuse amphetamines or cocaine: a population-based study of hospitalized patients.
13. [The juridical significance of primary medical documentation].
14. I want my information back: evidentiary privilege following the partial birth abortion cases.
15. [Management of the documentation and registries of the radiopharmacy units. General texts of the Royal Spanish Pharmacopeia with character of recommendation].
16. Notices of Privacy Practices: a survey of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 documents presented to patients at US hospitals.
17. The future for peer review. Florida's constitutional amendment chills quality community.
18. For the patient. Collecting cancer information in New Hampshire.
19. On the coding and reporting of race and ethnicity in New Hampshire for purposes of cancer reporting.
20. Medicare law motivates hospitals to report quality data. Changes to inpatient prospective payment system start October 1.
21. Does the privacy rule hinder patient care?
22. Confidential dilemma. Colo. hospital accused of using ethics rule as shield.
23. [Clinical performance measurement in surgery and orthopedics -- new aspects in 2004].
24. US judges seek medical records in abortion cases.
25. 'Lost' hospital records lead to default & 4 million-dollar award. Case on point: Keene v. Brigham and Women's Hospital, 755 N.E.2d 725 -MA (2002).
26. Patient balks at signing payment agreement. Euvrard v. Christ Hosp.
27. Evidentiary privilege for peer review documents rejected by the Fourth Circuit. Virmani v. Novant Health Inc.
28. Practice brief. Retaining healthcare business records. American Health Information Management Association.
29. Root-cause trouble. Court ruling in N.J. could set precedent for making JCAHO reports public.
30. [Responsibility circumvented with a set time for medical record keeping].
31. Identity theft: when bad things happen to your patients' and employees' good name.
32. Incident reports may be discoverable in Nebraska. Nebraska ex rel. AMISUB v. Buckley, 260 Neb. 596 (2000).
33. [Release of hospital discharge records to health insurance and medical offices of health insurance].
34. Sharps safety must involve the staff.
35. Hospital records as source material for African historical studies: C.M.S. Mengo Hospital case notes and admission register.
36. Are nurse managers' personal records of falls privileged? Case on point: State ex rel Amisub, Inc. v. Buckley, 618 N.W.2d 684-NE (2000).
37. Physicians denied access to credentialing file data. Amaral v. St. Cloud Hospital.
38. Evidence: Supreme Court of Georgia denies law firm access to hospital records.
39. New ruling in NC affirms peer review privacy.
40. [The duty of medical confidentiality in regard to the courts. The decision of the Social Court of Frankfurt a. M. of 24 September 1998].
41. Kansas ruling threatens peer review. Adams v. St. Francis Medical Center.
42. [Compliance with regulations for medical records in 15 Aquitaine public health facilities. Aquitaine DIM Physician's Group].
43. Incident reports protected from discovery and in camera review. Carr v. Howard.
44. [No access to hospital records to evaluate service misuse].
45. [The physician's responsibility for confidentiality in the hospital].
46. The confidentiality of peer review records: Adams vs St. Francis Hospital.
47. Child support enforcement program; state plan requirements, standards for program operations, and federal financial participation--Office of Child Support Enforcement, HHS. Notice of proposed rulemaking.
48. Courts interpret open records and open meeting laws.
49. Court decisions direct renewed attention to discovery issues. Klonski v. Mahlab; State ex rel. United Hosp. Ctr. v. Bedell.
50. [Interdisciplinary documentation, performance review and quality assurance in Austrian intensive care medicine].
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.