Search

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Background: "Financial Toxicity" (FT) is the financial burden imposed on patients due to disease and its treatment. Approximately 50% of gynecologic oncology patients experience FT. This study describes the implementation and outcomes of a novel financial navigation program (FNP) in gynecologic oncology., Methods: Patients presenting for initial consultation with a gynecologic oncologist from July 2022 to September 2023 were included. A FNP was launched inclusive of hiring a financial navigator (FN) in July 2022, and implementing FT screening in October 2022. We prospectively captured patient referrals to the FN, collecting clinical, demographic, financial and social needs information, along with FN interventions and institutional support service referrals. Referrals to the FN and support services were quantified before and after screening implementation., Results: There were 1029 patients with 21.6% seen before and 78.4% after screening initiation. Median age was 58 (IQR 46-68). The majority were non-Hispanic white (60%) with private insurance (61%). A total of 10.5% patients were referred to the FN. Transportation (32%), financial assistance (20.5%) and emotional support (15.4%) were the most common needs identified. A higher proportion of patients referred to the FN identified as Black, had government-funded insurance or diagnoses of uterine or cervical cancers (p < 0.05). Post-screening referrals to FN increased (5% vs. 12.9%, p < 0.001), while referrals to other support services decreased (9.5% vs. 2.9%, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Implementation of the FNP was feasible, though presence of both a FN and FT screening maximized its effectiveness. Further investigation is needed to understand screening barriers and evaluate longer-term impact., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest There are no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The effects of COVID-19 vaccination on short-term and long-term cerebrovascular risks among COVID-19 survivors remained unknown. We conducted a national multi-center retrospective cohort study with 151 597 vaccinated and 151 597 unvaccinated COVID-19 patients using the TriNetX database, from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2023. Patients baseline characteristics were balanced with propensity score matching (PSM). The outcomes were incident cerebrovascular diseases occurred between 1st and 30th days (short-term) after COVID-19 diagnosis. Nine subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential effect modifications. We performed six sensitivity analyses, including evaluation of outcomes between 1st to 180th days, accounting for competing risk, and incorporating different variant timeline to test the robustness of our results. Kaplan-Meier curves and Log-Rank tests were performed to evaluate survival difference. Cox proportional hazards regressions were adopted to estimate the PSM-adjusted hazard ratios (HR). The overall short-term cerebrovascular risks were lower in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.56-0.77), specifically cerebral infarction (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.48-0.79), occlusion and stenosis of precerebral arteries (HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.53-0.98), other cerebrovascular diseases (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.77), and sequelae of cerebrovascular disease (HR: 0.39, 95% CI:0.23-0.68). Similarly, the overall cerebrovascular risks were lower in those vaccinated among most subgroups. The long-term outcomes, though slightly attenuated, were consistent (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.73-0.87). Full 2-dose vaccination was associated with a further reduced risk of cerebrovascular diseases (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.80) compared to unvaccinated patients. Unvaccinated COVID-19 survivors have significantly higher cerebrovascular risks than their vaccinated counterparts. Thus, clinicians are recommended to monitor this population closely for stroke events during postinfection follow-up., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: Our objective was to estimate the association between in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy and adverse pregnancy outcomes during delivery hospital admission in a contemporary, nation-wide cohort of births in the United States., Study Design: This retrospective, population-based cohort study used the National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients discharged from the hospital following delivery from 2014 to 2019. IVF pregnancies were identified using the International Classification of Disease-Revision 9/10 codes. Crude and adjusted odds ratios of preterm birth and other clinically significant adverse pregnancy outcomes were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression models. Trends in preterm birth and multiple pregnancy were estimated over the study period. The contribution of multiple pregnancy to preterm birth in IVF pregnancy was estimated in a mediation analysis., Results: Among 4,451,667 delivery-related discharges, IVF pregnancies were associated with 3.25 times the odds of preterm birth (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.05-3.46, p  < 0.001) compared with non-IVF pregnancy deliveries. Odds of preterm birth in IVF pregnancy delivery discharges decreased over the study period ( p -value for linear trend = 0.009). The proportion of multiple pregnancies decreased in IVF pregnancy delivery discharges but remained stable in non-IVF pregnancy deliveries. The proportion of the adjusted effect of IVF pregnancy on preterm birth mediated through multiple pregnancy was 67.6% (95% CI: 62.6-72.7%)., Conclusion: While the odds of adverse pregnancy outcomes are increased compared with non-IVF pregnancies, the odds of preterm birth and multiple gestation have decreased among IVF pregnancies in the United States., Key Points: · Pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF) are at significantly higher risk of multiple gestation, preterm birth, and other pregnancy complications.. · Recent guidelines for artificial reproductive treatments recommend single-embryo transfer in IVF.. · Using population-wide data, we demonstrate a significant gradual decline in the rates of preterm birth and other pregnancy complications following IVF in the last decade, mostly mediated by a reduction in multiple pregnancies.., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Previous research has explored theories regarding the vertical transmission of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and its association with adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. However, the impact of maternal HPV infection on congenital anomalies (CAs) in offspring remains relatively understudied. We conducted a population-based cohort study linking the Taiwan Birth Registry, Taiwan Death Registry, and National Health Insurance Research Database, in which newborns born in Taiwan between 2009 and 2015 were included. We established a maternal HPV infection cohort comprising 37 807 newborns and matched them with a comparison group of 151 228 newborns at a 1:4 ratio based on index year, age, and sex. The study examined a composite outcome and subgroups of different types of congenital malformations. Differences in cumulative incidence of CAs were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regressions. No significant association was found between HPV infection and the broad spectrum of CAs (aHR: 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-1.10; log-rank test p = 0.14). However, we observed a 19% increased risk of musculoskeletal CAs in the maternal HPV infection group (aHR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.05-1.34) compared to those without maternal HPV exposure. Other factors, including the type of HPV (aHR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.16-2.63), the timing of exposure (during or before pregnancy), and maternal age (aHR for <30 years: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.94-1.1; aHR for 30-39 years: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.99-1.11; aHR for ≥40 years: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.67-1.17), did not significantly affect the risk for any CA. In conclusion, gestation detection of HPV infection was associated with musculoskeletal CAs but not other major CAs. Prospective studies are warranted to elucidate the necessity of prenatal screening in populations at risk., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: Previous studies have indicated a bidirectional correlation between diabetes and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. However, no investigation has comprehensively explored the potential of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination to reduce the risk of new-onset diabetes in infected individuals., Research Design and Methods: In the first of 2 cohorts, we compared the risk of new-onset diabetes between individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 and noninfected individuals (N = 1,562,606) using the TriNetX database to validate findings in prior literature. For the second cohort, we identified 83,829 vaccinated and 83,829 unvaccinated COVID-19 survivors from the same period. Diabetes, antihyperglycemic drug use, and a composite of both were defined as outcomes. We conducted Cox proportional hazard regression analysis for the estimation of hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to calculate the incidence of new-onset diabetes. Subgroup analyses based on age (18-44, 45-64, ≥65 years), sex (female, male), race (White, Black or African American, Asian), and BMI categories (<19.9, 20-29, 30-39, ≥40), sensitivities analyses, and a dose-response analysis were conducted to validate the findings., Results: The initial cohort of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 had a 65% increased risk (HR 1.65; 95% CI 1.62-1.68) of developing new-onset diabetes relative to noninfected individuals. In the second cohort, we observed that vaccinated patients had a 21% lower risk of developing new-onset diabetes in comparison with unvaccinated COVID-19 survivors (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.73-0.86). Subgroup analyses by sex, age, race, and BMI yielded similar results. These findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses and cross-validation with an independent data set from TriNetX., Conclusions: In conclusion, this study validates a 65% higher risk of new-onset diabetes in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals compared to noninfected counterparts. Furthermore, COVID-19 survivors who received COVID-19 vaccinations experienced a reduced risk of new-onset diabetes, with a dose-dependent effect. Notably, the protective impact of COVID-19 vaccination is more pronounced among the Black/African American population than other ethnic groups. These findings emphasize the imperative of widespread vaccination to mitigate diabetes risk and the need for tailored strategies for diverse demographic groups to ensure equitable protection., (© 2023 by the American Diabetes Association.)