Search

Glioblastoma angiogenesis is critical for tumor growth, making it an appealing target for treatment development. BAY1143269 is a novel inhibitor of mitogen‐activated protein kinase interacting serine/threonine‐protein kinase 1 (MKN1) and has potent anti‐cancer activity. We identified BAY1143269 as an angiogenesis inhibitor, by in vitro and in vivo glioblastoma angiogenesis models. BAY1143269 inhibited the capillary network formation of glioblastoma microvascular endothelial cells (GMECs), particularly the early stage of tubular structure formation. It also inhibited migration and proliferation, and induced apoptosis of GMECs isolated from glioblastoma patients. We found that BAY1143269 acted on GMECs by suppressing the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) and eIF4E‐mediated expression of oncogenic proteins, including those involved in cell cycle, epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT), and pro‐survival. In addition, BAY1143269 suppressed eIF4E phosphorylation, inhibited proliferation, and induced apoptosis of glioblastoma cells. Interestingly, it reduced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level in tumor cells and culturing medium, demonstrating the inhibitory effect of BAY1143269 on tumor proangiogenic microenvironment. We finally challenged BAY1143269 on the glioblastoma xenograft mice model and observed a significant tumor growth reduction without toxicity in mice receiving oral BAY1143269. Immunoblotting analysis demonstrated significantly less phosphorylated‐eIF4E (p‐eIF4E), cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31) (microvascular endothelial cell marker), and VEGF in tumors from drug‐treated mice. In summary, the inhibition of glioblastoma angiogenesis with BAY1143269 may provide an alternative approach for anti‐glioblastoma therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The treatment of posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms is controversial. Recently, flow diverters have emerged as an attractive treatment option. Here, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the angiographic and clinical outcomes of flow diverter-treated posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms. Methods: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases for studies published from inception to January 2021. We included studies that described flow diverters procedures for posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms with ≥2 patients. The outcomes were the complete occlusion rate and flow diverter-related complication rate. Meta-analysis was performed using a random or fixed effects model based on heterogeneity. Results: We included six studies involving 46 posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms. There were 14 ruptured aneurysms. All flow diverters were successfully released and the technical success rate was 100%. The complete occlusion rate was 81% (95% confidence interval = 65–93%; I 2 = 0.00%; P < 0.01). The flow diverter-related complication rate was 18% (95% confidence interval = 5–36%; I 2 = 0.00%; P < 0.01). One patient died of rebleeding. The mortality rate was <1% (95% confidence interval = -1–1%; I 2 = 0.00%; P = 0.951). Conclusions: Treatment of posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms with flow diverters is feasible and carries a high degree of technical success. However, this treatment is underutilized in patients with posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms due to a higher complication rate and lower occlusion rate compared with clipping and traditional endovascular treatment. Further well-designed prospective and randomized studies are required to fully understand the effects of flow diverters especially in posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms patients requiring endovascular treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Parkinsonism has been reported as a complication of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) or clinical symptoms of chronic subdural haematoma (CSDH). We report an interesting case of parkinsonism in a patient with CSDH secondary to placement of a VPS for obstructive hydrocephalus, and we discuss the possible pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Flow diverter devices (FDs) are increasingly used for treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs), but limited studies compared different FDs., Objective: To conduct a propensity score matched analysis comparing the Pipeline embolization device (PED) and Tubridge embolization device (TED) for UIAs., Methods: Patients with UIAs treated with either PED or TED between July 2016 and July 2022 were included. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for age, sex, comorbidities, smoking, drinking, aneurysm size, morphology, neck, location, parent artery diameter, adjunctive coiling, and angiographic follow-up duration. Perioperative complications and clinical and angiographic outcomes were compared after matching., Results: 735 patients treated by PED and 290 patients treated by TED were enrolled. Compared with the PED group, patients in the TED group had a greater number of women and patients with ischemia, a smaller proportion of vertebrobasilar and non-saccular aneurysms, a smaller size and neck, and fewer adjunctive coils and overlapping stents, but a larger parent artery diameter and lumen disparities. After adjusting for these differences, 275 pairs were matched. No differences were found in perioperative complications (4.4% vs 2.5%, P=0.350), in-stent stenosis (16.0% vs 15.6%, P>0.999), or favorable prognosis (98.9% vs 98.5%, P>0.999). However, PED showed a trend towards better complete occlusion over a median 8-month angiographic follow-up (81.8% vs 75.3%, P=0.077)., Conclusion: Compared with PED, TED provides a comparable rate of perioperative and short-term outcomes. Nevertheless, a better occlusion status in the PED group needs to be further verified over a longer follow-up period., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Previous randomized controlled trials have reported a significantly higher occlusion rate of large and giant aneurysms when utilizing the Tubridge flow diverter (FD). In the present trial, the safety and efficacy of the Tubridge FD in treating unruptured internal carotid artery (ICA) or vertebral artery (VA) aneurysms were assessed in a real-world setting., Methods: The Intracranial Aneurysms Managed by Parent Artery Reconstruction Using Tubridge Flow Diverter (IMPACT) study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial assessing the efficacy of the Tubridge FD in the management of unruptured aneurysms located in the ICA or VA. The primary endpoint was the complete occlusion (Raymond-Roy class 1) rate at the 1-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints included the technical success rate, the successful occlusion rate of the aneurysm, which is the degree of aneurysm embolization scored as Raymond-Roy class 1 or 2, major (> 50%) in-stent stenosis, and incidence of disabling stroke or neurological death associated with the target aneurysms., Results: This study included 14 interventional neuroradiology centers, with 200 patients and 240 aneurysms. According to angiographic core laboratory assessment, 205 (85.4%) aneurysms were located in the ICA, 34 (14.2%) in the VA, and 1 (0.4%) in the middle cerebral artery. Additionally, 189 (78.8%) aneurysms were small (< 10 mm). At the 12-month follow-up, the total occlusion rate was 79.0% (166/210, 95% CI 72.91%-84.34%). Additionally, the occurrence of disabling stroke or neurological death related to the specified aneurysms was 1% (2/200)., Conclusions: The 1-year results from the IMPACT trial affirm the safety record of use of the Tubridge FD in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in real-world scenarios. These results reveal low morbidity and mortality rates of 3.5% and 1.5%, respectively. Furthermore, they provide evidence of the effectiveness of the Tubridge FD, as demonstrated by the complete occlusion achieved in 166 of 210 (79%) cases.