1. The Type I+ Forehead in Facial Feminization Surgery
- Author
-
Moghadam, Shahrzad, Shariati, Kaavian, Huang, Kelly X, Chin, Madeline G, LaGuardia, Jonnby S, Bedar, Meiwand, Khetpal, Sumun, Cronin, Brendan J, and Lee, Justine C
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Cardiovascular Medicine and Haematology ,Humans ,Female ,Male ,Retrospective Studies ,Forehead ,Adult ,Feminization ,Frontal Sinus ,Osteotomy ,Plastic Surgery Procedures ,Transgender Persons ,Gender-Affirming Surgery ,Orbit ,Frontal Bone ,Young Adult ,Facial feminization surgery ,Feminizing forehead reconstruction ,Gender-affirming facial surgery ,Facial gender-affirmingsurgery ,Facial gender-affirming surgery ,Clinical Sciences ,Surgery ,Clinical sciences ,Dentistry - Abstract
BackgroundFeminizing fronto-orbital reconstruction involves one of four possibilities with the Ousterhout Type III anterior table frontal sinus osteotomy and setback performed in most patients while the Type I reduction recontouring is reserved for patients without frontal sinuses or thick anterior tables. However, patients with frontal sinuses and either a moderately thick anterior table or a shallow frontal sinus in the sagittal plane represent an intermediate morphology. For such morphologies, we introduce the novel Type I+ fronto-orbital reconstruction technique, consisting of frontal bone recontouring supplemented with anterior table reconstruction and split cranial bone graft.MethodsTransgender and gender non-conforming patients who underwent Type I+ or Type III feminizing fronto-orbital reconstruction (2019-2023) were included for retrospective review and comparison of techniques.ResultsIn the 123 patients (mean age 32.2 ± 9.5 years) included, 6.5% underwent Type I+ and 94.5% underwent Type III feminizing fronto-orbital reconstruction. Morphologically, Type I+ patients displayed a shallower frontal sinus compared to Type III patients (median anterior to posterior table depth 4.1[interquartile range, IQR, 1.1-5.0] versus 9.8[IQR 7.5-12.0]mm, p
- Published
- 2024