Search

A hybrid model based on the positive matrix factorization (PMF) model and the health risk assessment model for assessing risks associated with sources of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in water was established and applied at Dianchi Lake to test its applicability. The new method contains 2 stages: 1) the sources of PFASs were apportioned by the PMF model and 2) the contribution of health risks from each source was calculated by the new hybrid model. Two factors were extracted by PMF, with factor 1 identified as aqueous fire-fighting foams source and factor 2 as fluoropolymer manufacturing and processing and perfluorooctanoic acid production source. The health risk of PFASs in the water assessed by the health risk assessment model was 9.54 × 10−7 a−1 on average, showing no obvious adverse effects to human health. The 2 sources' risks estimated by the new hybrid model ranged from 2.95 × 10−10 to 6.60 × 10−6 a−1 and from 1.64 × 10−7 to 1.62 × 10−6 a−1, respectively. The new hybrid model can provide useful information on the health risks of PFAS sources, which is helpful for pollution control and environmental management. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:107-115. © 2017 SETAC [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Based on the source apportionment by positive matrix factorization (PMF) model, we analyze the main sources and characteristics of aerosol fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) during winter and summer in the Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos region, China. We found that organic (19.9%-44.6%) and crustal compositions (9.7%-46.2%) accounted for a large proportion of aerosol PM 2.5 according to the results of mass closure. The results of source apportionment showed that the contribution of sources rank as:secondary inorganic aerosol (26.7%) > coal (26.1%) > motor vehicle (19.1%) > dust (18.1%) during winter, and as:secondary inorganic aerosol (26.7%) > dust (22.3%) > coal (16.6%) > vehicle exhaust (15.1%) > SOC (8.7%) during summer. Findings suggest that the contribution of sources with secondary inorganic aerosol were the largest sources both in winter and summer, and that the Hohhot-Baotou-Ordos region was also affected by coal during the winter and dust during the summer. Corresponding to the source apportionment, analysis of typical heavy pollution episodes in winter and summer showed that the pollution sources during the winter were mainly secondary inorganic aerosol and coal, whereas they were mainly secondary inorganic aerosol during the summer.

Recently, a new method combining positive matrix factorization (PMF) and heavy metal health risk (HMHR) assessment was proposed to apportion sources of heavy metals in ambient particulate matter and the associated heavy metal cancer health risk (HMCR), which has been applied to data collected in Yangzhou, China. The annual average concentrations of six measured heavy metals were Pb (64.4 ng·m -3 ), followed by Cr (25.24 ng·m -3 ), As (6.36 ng·m -3 ), Ni (5.36 ng·m -3 ), Cd (3.34 ng·m -3 ), and Co (1.21 ng·m -3 ). The results showed that the major sources of PM 2.5 were secondary sources (37.7%), followed by coal combustion (19.4%), resuspended dust (17.5%), vehicle emissions (16.9%), construction dust (5.2%), and industrial emissions (3.4%). As was primarily emitted from coal combustion, vehicle emissions, and resuspended dust. Co originated from industry emissions. Pb was mainly emitted from coal combustion. Ni and Cd were from industrial emissions. The major sources that contributed to HMCR were resuspended dust, coal combustion, vehicle emissions, industry emissions, and construction dust. The high contributions of resuspended dust and coal to HMCR were likely due to the high heavy metals concentrations in coal and the resuspended dust profile as well as high emissions of these sources.