Search

Contains fulltext : 219886.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) Background: Primary healthcare (PHC) is essential for equitable access and cost-effective healthcare. This makes PHC a key factor in the global strategy for universal health coverage (UHC). Implementing PHC requires an understanding of the health system under prevailing circumstances, but for most countries, no data are available.Objectives: This paper describes and analyses the health systems of Algeria, Kuwait, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Iraq to PHC.Methods: Data were collected during a workshop at the Wonca East Mediterranean Regional Conference in 2018. Academic family physicians (FP) presented their country; using the Wonca framework of 11 PowerPoint slides, with queries of the country demographics, main health challenges, and the position of PHC in the health system.Results: The six countries had achieved a significant improvement in populations' health but currently face challenges of health financing, a small number of certified FPs, difficulties in accessing services and bureaucratic procedures. Primary concerns were the absence of a family practice model, brain drain and immigration of FPs. Countries differed in building a coherent policy.Conclusion: Priorities should be focused on: developing PHC model in Eastern Mediterranean region with advocacy for community-based PHC to policymakers; capacity building for strengthening PHC-oriented health systems with FP specialty training and restrict practising to fully trained FPs; engage communities to improve understanding of PHC; adopt quality and accreditation policies for better services; validation of the referral and follow-up process; and, develop public-private partnership mechanisms to enhance PHC for UHC.

To evaluate the impact of diabetes self-management education (DSME) on diabetes control measured by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in nationals and expatriates with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Kuwait.A total of 291 patients with T2DM (intervention = 150, control = 141) were assessed in a single-center, controlled study to compare the impact of DSME sessions on HbA1c levels as a measure of metabolic control of diabetes mellitus. Measurements of HbA1c were taken at baseline, 6-months, and 12-months. Multiple explorative association tests and regression models were constructed to examine the intervention effects.Patients that received DSME sessions demonstrated better diabetes control with an average reduction of 1.3% (14 mmol/mol) HbA1c over 12-months compared to an average HbA1c increase of 1.1% (12 mmol/mol) in the control group (p 0.001). Using pairwise comparisons, young, male, and expatriate patients and patients with HbA1c above 7% demonstrated the highest improvements in HbA1c with DSME sessions. In multivariate regressions, DSME intervention was associated with a 1.7% (18 mmol/mol) HbA1c reduction indicating better control of diabetes (p 0.001).DSME sessions were associated with better glycemic control in patients with T2DM over 12 months. This study establishes the effectiveness of DSME sessions for both Kuwaiti nationals and expatriates, which represent a significant portion of the population in Kuwait and the Arabian Gulf region. The favorable impact of DSME suggests a promising cost-effective approach to reduce the risk of complication associationed with diabetes suitable for the unique demographic characteristics in the region.

Background: Family Medicine is growing rapidly across the Eastern Mediterranean Region. However, it needs support in terms of overall health system development. This will require strong leadership in family medicine to implement the change required to improve current conditions. Objective: To collect data that will support the development of a leadership program for the future family physicians in the region. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from July 2016 to September 2016 in eight countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region, (Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia). These countries were selected to obtain perceptions of Family Physicians (FPs) regarding the current leadership model and to explore the need for a new future innovative model in Family Medicine (FM) across the region. Results: The information of 68 family physicians was included in the final analysis. The majority of the FPs was females as compared to males (71% vs. 29%). Forty-four percent of the FPs had 10 to 19 years of experience. Almost all of the FPs (96%) had completed some training in family medicine after graduation. About three fifths of the FPs had completed postgraduate qualifications and out of those, 64% had passed Board or Membership Examinations. Twenty-one percent of them are currently in a leadership role and 45% who were not in any leadership role responded that the current situation of FM in their country is poor. All of the leaders believed that it is important to develop strong leadership in FM to take the specialty forward. Almost similar proportions (67% and 64%) of leaders and non-leaders thought that establishing regional associations would enhance the FM practice model. Approximately two thirds of leaders (67%) responded that the current role of decision makers in the Ministry of Health (MOH) regarding capacity building in FM is not effective. The majority of the FPs (54% and 38%) considers that the existing postgraduate curriculum does not address leadership skill development in FM. Eighty-eight percent of the FPs both from leadership and non-leadership groups agreed that academic institutions and practicing FPs can play an effective leadership role in taking FM forward. Conclusion: The Family Medicine specialty will have to develop leadership capabilities in line with today’s fast-moving changes in healthcare for it to obtain the due recognition in the healthcare delivery system.