Search

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are an emerging tool to predict the clinical phenotypes and outcomes of individuals. We propose PRSmix, a framework that leverages the PRS corpus of a target trait to improve prediction accuracy, and PRSmix+, which incorporates genetically correlated traits to better capture the human genetic architecture for 47 and 32 diseases/traits in European and South Asian ancestries, respectively. PRSmix demonstrated a mean prediction accuracy improvement of 1.20-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], [1.10; 1.3]; p = 9.17 × 10 -5 ) and 1.19-fold (95% CI, [1.11; 1.27]; p = 1.92 × 10 -6 ), and PRSmix+ improved the prediction accuracy by 1.72-fold (95% CI, [1.40; 2.04]; p = 7.58 × 10 -6 ) and 1.42-fold (95% CI, [1.25; 1.59]; p = 8.01 × 10 -7 ) in European and South Asian ancestries, respectively. Compared to the previously cross-trait-combination methods with scores from pre-defined correlated traits, we demonstrated that our method improved prediction accuracy for coronary artery disease up to 3.27-fold (95% CI, [2.1; 4.44]; p value after false discovery rate (FDR) correction = 2.6 × 10 -4 ). Our method provides a comprehensive framework to benchmark and leverage the combined power of PRS for maximal performance in a desired target population., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests P.N. reports grants from Allelica, Amgen, Apple, Boston Scientific, Genentech, and Novartis; is a consultant to Allelica, Apple, AstraZeneca, Blackstone Life Sciences, Foresite Labs, HeartFlow, Novartis, Genentech, and GV; reports scientific advisory board membership with Esperion Therapeutics, Preciseli, and TenSixteen Bio; is a scientific co-founder of TenSixteen Bio; and reports spousal employment at Vertex Pharmaceuticals, all unrelated to the present work., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Although preconception reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) is preferred to screening during pregnancy, population-wide preconception screening is not routinely performed in the United States. We explored the multilevel barriers to the widespread adoption of preconception RGCS in the United States via key informant interviews., Methods: Semi-structured virtual video interviews were conducted with 29 informants with a breadth of professional expertise between May and October 2022. Data collection and qualitative analyses were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and socioecological model. Analysis focused on identifying barriers to delivering preconception RGCS at and across different levels of health care and exploring potential facilitators of preconception RGCS delivery., Results: Barriers to preconception RGCS were identified at the levels of test characteristics, patients and couples, clinicians and care teams, and the external health care and policy environments. Across the different levels of care delivery, 3 themes of barriers emerged: (1) fragmentation and inconsistencies hinder care delivery, (2) gaps in knowledge, misconceptions, and uncertainties about RGCS are pervasive, and (3) expanding preconception RGCS in the diverse US population presents unique implementation challenges. Potential solutions were detailed by informants., Conclusion: Identifying individual and thematic barriers to preconception RGCS delivery may help to define strategies to alleviate obstacles., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

As patient access to laboratory testing outside the clinic grows, health care providers can expect to confront increasing questions about the utility and interpretation of consumer-initiated genetic testing for health risks. We sought to characterize the marketplace diversity of consumer-initiated germline genetic testing options. An environmental scan was conducted to identify germline genetic testing companies that offer testing for at least one diagnosable health condition and are available for purchase by consumers in the US market without a visit to one's health care provider. We limited our scope to tests available between October 1, 2019, and September 30, 2021. We characterized variability in the content and processes used by 21 companies offering 74 distinct test products that met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. A minority (8 of 21 companies) offered tests that assessed the presence of at least 1 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Tier 1 condition for which detection can impact an individual's clinical care and for which evidence-based guidelines for detection and management exist., (Copyright © 2023 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Given limited ambulatory access to genetics specialists, innovative service delivery solutions are needed. Electronic consultation (e-consult) programs are growing to connect clinicians to specialists. We explored the utilization and outcomes of a genetics and genomics e-consult program at Massachusetts General Hospital system in its first year., Methods: A retrospective observational analysis of genetics e-consults ordered between April 2021 and March 2022., Results: In its first year, the e-consult service triaged 153 requests and completed 122 in a median of 2.0 days. Of the 97 e-consults with actionable recommendations, there was documentation that most ordering clinicians followed through (82%). A variety of providers used the service, though the majority (77%) were generalists., Conclusion: e-Consult models should be considered as one way to increase access to genetics expertise., Competing Interests: HLR serves as a director of a not-for-profit clinical laboratory that offers genetic and genomic testing. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2023 The Authors.)

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are an emerging tool to predict the clinical phenotypes and outcomes of individuals. Validation and transferability of existing PRS across independent datasets and diverse ancestries are limited, which hinders the practical utility and exacerbates health disparities. We propose PRSmix, a framework that evaluates and leverages the PRS corpus of a target trait to improve prediction accuracy, and PRSmix+, which incorporates genetically correlated traits to better capture the human genetic architecture. We applied PRSmix to 47 and 32 diseases/traits in European and South Asian ancestries, respectively. PRSmix demonstrated a mean prediction accuracy improvement of 1.20-fold (95% CI: [1.10; 1.3]; P-value = 9.17 × 10 -5 ) and 1.19-fold (95% CI: [1.11; 1.27]; P-value = 1.92 × 10 -6 ), and PRSmix+ improved the prediction accuracy by 1.72-fold (95% CI: [1.40; 2.04]; P-value = 7.58 × 10 -6 ) and 1.42-fold (95% CI: [1.25; 1.59]; P-value = 8.01 × 10 -7 ) in European and South Asian ancestries, respectively. Compared to the previously established cross-trait-combination method with scores from pre-defined correlated traits, we demonstrated that our method can improve prediction accuracy for coronary artery disease up to 3.27-fold (95% CI: [2.1; 4.44]; P-value after FDR correction = 2.6 × 10 -4 ). Our method provides a comprehensive framework to benchmark and leverage the combined power of PRS for maximal performance in a desired target population., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST P.N. reports grants from Allelica, Amgen, Apple, Boston Scientific, Genentech, and Novartis, is a consultant to Allelica, Apple, AstraZeneca, Blackstone Life Sciences, Foresite Labs, HeartFlow, Novartis, Genentech, and GV, scientific advisory board membership to Esperion Therapeutics, Preciseli, and TenSixteen Bio, is a scientific co-founder of TenSixteen Bio, and spousal employment at Vertex Pharmaceuticals, all unrelated to the present work. Others declare no conflict of interest.

Innovative service delivery models are needed to increase access to genetics specialists. Electronic consultation (e-Consult) programs can connect clinicians with specialists. At Massachusetts General Hospital, an e-Consult service was created to address genomics-related questions. In its first year, the e-Consult service triaged 153 requests and completed 122 in an average of 3.2 days. Of the 95 e-Consults with actionable recommendations, there was documentation that most ordering clinicians followed through (82%). A variety of providers used the service, although the majority (77%) were generalists. E-Consult models should be considered as one way to increase access to genetics care., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract: Response to analgesic therapy is influenced by several factors including genetics and drug-drug interactions. Pharmacogenetic (PGx) variants in the CYP2D6 gene modify response to opioids by altering drug metabolism. We sought to determine the potential impact of PGx testing on the care of Veterans with noncancer pain prescribed opioids metabolized by CYP2D6 (codeine, hydrocodone, or tramadol). A retrospective analysis was performed within the Veterans Health Administration evaluating prescription records for pain medications metabolized by CYP2D6 and interacting drugs from 2012 to 2017. Among 2,436,654 Veterans Health Administration pharmacy users with at least 1 opioid prescription, 34% met the definition of chronic use (longer than 90 days with more than 10 prescriptions or 120 days-supply). Opioids were commonly coprescribed with antidepressants interacting with CYP2D6 (28%). An estimated 21.6% (n = 526,905) of these patients are at an elevated risk of an undesirable response to their opioid medication based on predicted phenotypes and drug-drug interactions: 3.5% are predicted CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers and at increased risk for toxicity, 5.4% are poor metabolizers at higher risk for nonresponse, and 12.8% are normal or intermediate metabolizers coprescribed a CYP2D6 inhibitor leading to phenoconversion into poor metabolizer. Despite the high rate of coprescription of opioids and interacting drugs, CYP2D6 testing was infrequent in the sample (0.02%), and chart review suggests that test results were used to optimize antidepressant treatments rather than pain medications. Using PGx testing combined with consideration of phenoconversion may allow for an enhanced precision medicine approach to pain management in Veterans., (Copyright © 2022 Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.)

Importance: Reproductive genetic carrier screening can be performed prior to or during pregnancy to assess a reproductive couple's risk of having a child with a recessively inherited disorder. Although professional societies endorse preconception screening as preferable to prenatal screening to allow for greater reproductive choice, implementation of preconception screening is challenging., Objective: To determine how carrier screening timing varies by multilevel factors associated with health care delivery including patient, clinician, and location across a large integrated health care system., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used a mixed-methods approach including (1) quantitative analysis of multilevel factors associated with the timing of reproductive carrier screening and (2) qualitative analyses of data from interviews conducted with clinicians ordering carrier screenings. The setting was the Mass General Brigham, a large integrated health care system in the greater Boston, Massachusetts area. Participants included adult female patients who completed reproductive carrier screening performed by Myriad Women's Health between October 1, 2018, to September 30, 2019., Exposures: Site of care (ordering clinical location and hospital affiliate), ordering clinician specialty, and patient characteristics, including age at date of test collection, self-reported race and ethnicity, primary insurance payor, and number of comorbidities., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the timing of carrier screening (preconception vs prenatal). A series of 4 multilevel logistic regression models were fitted to measure the relative contribution of site, clinician, and patient-level factors on the timing of screening. Interviews with ordering clinicians (N = 9) were analyzed using a framework approach to explore barriers to preconception screening., Results: Among 6509 adult female patients who completed carrier screenings, 770 (12%) were Asian, 352 (5%) were Hispanic, 640 (10%) were non-Hispanic Black, 3844 (59%) were non-Hispanic White, 858 (13%) were other or multiple races and ethnicities, and 2611 (40%) were aged 31 to 35 years; 4701 (63%) had prenatal screening and 2438 (37%) had preconception screening; screenings were ordered by 161 distinct clinicians across 32 clinical locations affiliated with 4 hospitals. In model 1, adjusted for hospital (fixed effect), clinic and clinician (random effects), 49% of the variability in timing was associated with clinician-level effects (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.49) and 28% was associated with clinic-level effects (ICC, 0.28). Clinician specialty explained the greatest amount of variation in screening timing. Interviewed clinicians (N = 9) supported preconception screening but cited several barriers to offering population-based preconception screening., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, multilevel factors were associated with carrier screening timing. These findings suggest that increasing access to preconception screening may involve engaging specific medical specialties.

Background: State-of-the-art genetic risk interpretation for a common complex disease such as coronary artery disease (CAD) requires assessment for both monogenic variants-such as those related to familial hypercholesterolemia-as well as the cumulative impact of many common variants, as quantified by a polygenic score., Objectives: The objective of the study was to describe a combined monogenic and polygenic CAD risk assessment program and examine its impact on patient understanding and changes to clinical management., Methods: Study participants attended an initial visit in a preventive genomics clinic and a disclosure visit to discuss results and recommendations, primarily via telemedicine. Digital postdisclosure surveys and chart review evaluated the impact of disclosure., Results: There were 60 participants (mean age 51 years, 37% women, 72% with no known CAD), including 30 (50%) referred by their cardiologists and 30 (50%) self-referred. Two (3%) participants had a monogenic variant pathogenic for familial hypercholesterolemia, and 19 (32%) had a high polygenic score in the top quintile of the population distribution. In a postdisclosure survey, both the genetic test report (in 80% of participants) and the discussion with the clinician (in 89% of participants) were ranked as very or extremely helpful in understanding the result. Of the 42 participants without CAD, 17 or 40% had a change in management, including statin initiation, statin intensification, or coronary imaging., Conclusions: Combined monogenic and polygenic assessments for CAD risk provided by preventive genomics clinics are beneficial for patients and result in changes in management in a significant portion of patients.

Purpose: Disparities in access to genetics services are well-documented. Family health history is routinely used to determine whether patients should be screened for heritable conditions. We sought to explore variation in levels of self-rated family health history knowledge as a possible contributer to this disparity., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of survey data from the All of Us Research Program. We compared the characteristics of participants who reported "None," "Some", and "A lot" of family health history knowledge using multinomial logistic regression., Results: Self-rated family health history data were available for 116,799 participants. A minority of survey participants (37%) endorsed "A lot" of knowledge about their family health history (n = 43,661). Most participants (60%) endorsed "Some" family health history knowledge (n = 69,914) and 3% (n = 3224) endorsed "None." In adjusted analyses, those who indicated "Some" family health history knowledge or "None" were more likely to be assigned male sex at birth, identify as possible gender and sexual minorities, have a self-reported race other than White, have a lower household annual income (<$25,000), or report lower educational attainment (

Hereditary transthyretin-mediated (hATTR) amyloidosis is an underdiagnosed, progressively debilitating disease caused by mutations in the transthyretin (TTR) gene. V122I, a common pathogenic TTR mutation, is found in 3-4% of individuals of African ancestry in the United States and has been associated with cardiomyopathy and heart failure. To better understand the phenotypic consequences of carrying V122I, we conducted a phenome-wide association study scanning 427 ICD diagnosis codes in UK Biobank participants of African ancestry (n = 6062). Significant associations were tested for replication in the Penn Medicine Biobank (n = 5737) and the Million Veteran Program (n = 82,382). V122I was significantly associated with polyneuropathy in the UK Biobank (odds ratio [OR] = 6.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6-15.6, p = 4.2 × 10 -5 ), which was replicated in the Penn Medicine Biobank (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.4, p = 6.0 × 10 -3 ) and Million Veteran Program (OR = 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8, p = 1.8 × 10 -4 ). Polyneuropathy prevalence among V122I carriers was 2.1%, 9.0%, and 4.8% in the UK Biobank, Penn Medicine Biobank, and Million Veteran Program, respectively. The cumulative incidence of common hATTR amyloidosis manifestations (carpal tunnel syndrome, polyneuropathy, cardiomyopathy, heart failure) was significantly enriched in V122I carriers compared with non-carriers (HR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.7-4.5, p = 2.6 × 10 -5 ) in the UK Biobank, with 37.4% of V122I carriers having at least one of these manifestations by age 75. Our findings show that V122I carriers are at increased risk of polyneuropathy. These results also emphasize the underdiagnosis of disease in V122I carriers with a significant proportion of subjects showing phenotypic changes consistent with hATTR amyloidosis. Greater understanding of the manifestations associated with V122I is critical for earlier diagnosis and treatment.

Background: Pharmacogenetic testing (PGx) has the potential to improve the quality of psychiatric prescribing by considering patients' genetic profile. However, there is limited scientific evidence supporting its efficacy or guiding its implementation. The Precision Medicine in Mental Health (PRIME) Care study is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a specific commercially-available pharmacogenetic (PGx) test to inform antidepressant prescribing at 22 sites across the U.S. Simultaneous implementation science methods using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) are integrated throughout the trial to identify contextual factors likely to be important in future implementation of PGx. The goal of this study was to understand providers' perceptions of PGx for antidepressant prescribing and implications for future implementation., Methods: Qualitative focus groups (n = 10) were conducted at the beginning of the trial with Primary Care and Mental Health providers (n = 31) from six PRIME Care sites. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed and data were analyzed using rapid analytic procedures organized by CFIR domains., Results: Analysis revealed themes in the CFIR Intervention Characteristics domain constructs of Evidence, Relative Advantage, Adaptability, Trialability, Complexity, and Design that are important for understanding providers' perceptions of PGx testing. Results indicate: 1) providers had limited experience and knowledge of PGx testing and its evidence base, particularly for psychiatric medications; 2) providers were hopeful that PGx could increase their precision in depression prescribing and improve patient engagement, but were uncertain about how results would influence treatment; 3) providers were concerned about potential misinterpretation of PGx results and how to incorporate testing into their workflow; 4) primary care providers were less familiar and comfortable with application of PGx testing to antidepressant prescribing than psychiatric providers., Conclusions: Provider perceptions may serve as facilitators or barriers to implementation of PGx for psychiatric prescribing. Incorporating implementation science into the conduct of the RCT adds value by uncovering factors to be addressed in preparing for future implementation, should the practice prove effective., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03170362 ; Registered 31 May 2017.

Pharmacogenetics (PGx) testing can be used for detecting genetic variations that may affect an individual's anticipated metabolism of, or response to, medications. Although several studies have focused on developing tools for delivering results from PGx testing, there is a relative dearth of information about how to design provider-friendly electronic order-entry systems for PGx. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is preparing to implement a new electronic health records system. In this study, VA PGx test end users were surveyed about their preferences for how electronic test orders for PGx should be structured, including the nomenclature that should be used to search for and identify PGx-test orders, whether to offer single- versus multigene tests, and whether information about test methodology should be included in the order name. Responses were analyzed systematically to identify areas of agreement and disagreement with the survey options, and areas where respondents' opinions diverged. End users endorsed preferences for flexible ways to identify and order PGx tests and multigene panel tests; opinions on whether test methodology should be included in the test name were divergent. The results could be used for both informing the VA's new electronic health records implementation (including how PGx tests are searched for and ordered) and for providing insights for other health systems implementing PGx-testing programs., (Copyright © 2020 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Describe the characteristics of providers ordering, patients receiving, and clinical impact of a psychotropic pharmacogenetic test on veteran care. Patients & methods: Observational cohort study linking veterans' laboratory results to electronic health record data. Changes in psychotropic medication prescribing were measured as a function of test results. Results:  A total of 38 providers tested 181 veterans between 10/6/2014 and 2/1/2018. Prescriptions for medications with severe gene-drug interactions decreased; however, 11 such medications were used after testing. For 43 patients, documentation of the results was missing. Conclusion: Most prescribing decisions were congruent with test results, but in a nontrivial number of cases, prescribers appeared not to act on the results. Poor result documentation impeded the potential of results to inform clinical care.

Importance: Implementation of pharmacogenetic testing to guide drug prescribing has potential to improve drug response and prevent adverse events. Robust data exist for more than 30 gene-drug pairs linking genotype to drug response phenotypes; however, it is unclear which pharmacogenetic tests, if implemented, would provide the greatest utility for a given patient population., Objectives: To project the proportion of veterans in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) with actionable pharmacogenetic variants and evaluate how testing might be associated with prescribing decisions., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included veterans who used national VHA pharmacy services from October 1, 2011, to September 30, 2017. Data analyses began April 26, 2018, and were completed February 6, 2019., Exposures: Receipt of level A drugs based on VHA pharmacy dispensing records., Main Outcomes and Measures: Projected prevalence of actionable pharmacogenetic variants among VHA pharmacy users based on variant frequencies from the 1000 Genomes Project and veteran demographic characteristics; incident number of level A prescriptions, and proportion of new level A drug recipients projected to carry an actionable pharmacogenetic variant., Results: During the study, 7 769 359 veterans (mean [SD] age, 58.1 [17.8] years; 7 021 504 [90.4%] men) used VHA pharmacy services. It was projected that 99% of VHA pharmacy users would carry at least 1 actionable pharmacogenetic variant. Among VHA pharmacy users, 4 259 153 (54.8%) received at least 1 level A drug with 1 188 124 (15.3%) receiving 2 drugs, and 912 189 (11.7%) receiving 3 or more drugs. The most common incident prescriptions during the study were tramadol (923 671 new recipients), simvastatin (533 928 new recipients), citalopram (266 952 new recipients), and warfarin (205 177 new recipients). Gene-drug interactions projected to have substantial clinical impacts in the VHA population include the interaction of SLCO1B1 with simvastatin (1 988 956 veterans [25.6%]), CYP2D6 with tramadol (318 544 veterans [4.1%]), and CYP2C9 or VKORC1 with warfarin (7 163 349 veterans [92.2%])., Conclusions and Relevance: Clinically important pharmacogenetic variants are highly prevalent in the VHA population. Almost all veterans would carry an actionable variant, and more than half of the population had been exposed to a drug affected by these variants. These results suggest that pharmacogenetic testing has the potential to affect pharmacotherapy decisions for commonly prescribed outpatient medications for many veterans.

Introduction: Ensuring guideline-concordant cancer care is a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) priority, especially as the number of breast cancer patients at VA medical centers (VAMCs) grows. We assessed the utilization and clinical impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score test, which predicts 10-year risk of breast cancer recurrence and the likelihood of chemotherapy benefit, on veterans newly diagnosed with breast cancer., Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using 2011-2012 VA Central Cancer Registry, chart review, and laboratory test data. Independent variables assessed included patient and site-of-care characteristics. The outcome of interest was whether newly diagnosed, eligible (node negative, hormone-receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2] negative) veterans underwent the 21-gene test. We performed descriptive statistics on all patients and multivariate logistic regression to determine associations. We correlated treatments received with test results., Results: Among 328 eligible veterans, 82 (25%) had the 21-gene test; 100 eligible veterans (30%) sought care at a VAMC where no tests were ordered. Receiving care at a VAMC that had women's health services (odds ratio [OR], 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-3.22) and having tumor characteristics meeting the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2010 test criteria (OR, 3.06, 95% CI, 1.69-5.57) were positive predictors of testing; increasing age (OR, 0.93, 95% CI, 0.91-0.96 per year) and fee-based care (OR, 0.46, 95% CI, 0.26-0.82) were negative predictors. The majority of tested patients received guideline-concordant care., Conclusion: Site of care and tumor characteristics were important predictors of test uptake. Facilitating delivery of guideline-concordant cancer care requires improved laboratory informatics and clinical decision support., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that primary care providers screen unaffected women with a family history of BRCA mutation-associated cancers, but without a personal history of BRCA-related cancer, for referral to genetic counseling and potential genetic testing., Methods: The 2015 National Health Interview Survey was analyzed in January 2017 to determine the rates at which unaffected adult women with a positive family history of BRCA-related cancers, assessed using the Family History Screen-7, reported discussing genetic testing with a provider, using genetic counseling services, and having genetic testing for increased cancer risk. Clinical correlates associated with these outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic regression (AOR with 95% CI)., Results: Among unaffected Family History Screen-7 screen-positive women, 9.5% reported discussing genetic testing with a provider, 5.1% reported genetic counseling, and 2.7% reported uptake of genetic testing. Younger women (aged 18-39 and 40-49 years) were more likely to discuss genetic testing than women aged ≥60 years (AOR=1.50, 95% CI=1.09, 2.06 and AOR=1.64, 95% CI=1.15, 2.33, respectively). Women of black race (AOR=1.50, 95% CI=1.09, 2.07) and women with greater than a high school education (AOR=1.85, 95% CI=1.41, 2.43) were more likely to discuss genetic testing than women of white race and women with a high school education or less, respectively. Among a higher risk subgroup with an even stronger family history of BRCA-associated cancers, 18.5% of women reported discussions., Conclusions: Despite a decade-old U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation, few unaffected women at risk for BRCA-associated cancer report discussing genetic testing with a provider., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)