Search

Background eHealth provides a viable option to facilitate type-2 diabetes mellitus self-management and adherence. To this end, a web-based computer-tailored eHealth programme, My Diabetes Profile (MDP), was developed and implemented in Dutch diabetes care. To fully utilize the potential of eHealth, the reach of effective programmes like MDP should be maximized. Therefore, it is vital to explore perceptions of general practitioners (GPs) regarding eHealth and factors that influence GPs' decision to adopt eHealth programmes. Objective To shed light on Dutch GPs' perceptions towards eHealth in general and specifically, the adoption of MDP. Methods Interviews were conducted among a heterogeneous sample of 16 Dutch GPs. The interview guide, based on the Diffusion of Innovations Theory, addressed perceptions about eHealth in general, characteristics of MDP, organizational characteristics, and external influences on adoption. Audio-recordings were transcribed and analysed using deductive coding in NVivo. Results Nearly all GPs used some form of eHealth and listed many benefits and few drawbacks about eHealth. Sometimes, GPs were unaware of what eHealth encompassed; programmes resembling MDP were not mentioned. COVID-19 immensely increased eHealth uptake, especially for remote communication. Regarding MDP, the organizational and external influences on adoption were limited, while characteristics of the innovation were deemed more important. GPs expressed benefits of MDP (e.g. uncomplex, user-friendly, tailored) other than attributed to eHealth in general and fewer drawbacks. Conclusion While GPs' opinions about eHealth and MDP were positive, the concept of MDP was relatively unfamiliar. Future research should focus on targeting GPs' awareness of eHealth possibilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Kufa Journal for Nursing Sciences is the property of Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education & Scientific Research (MOHESR) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Viral infection is one of the postulated causes of neonatal cholestasis. In addition to earlier reports on the association of viral infection and intrahepatic cholestasis (IH), recent studies have suggested a similar link to extra hepatic biliary atresia (EHBA). The aim of this work was to evaluate the role of some viral infections in neonates presenting with cholestasis to the Neonatology Ward of Zagazig University Hospitals. Sixty-two neonates were included in the study (44 cholestatic neonates and 18 apparently healthy neonates as the control group). All neonates were subjected to full history taking and complete physical examination. Laboratory investigations included CBC, liver function tests, bleeding profile, blood cultures, abdominal ultrasound and detection of HBsAg and serum IgM antibodies against certain viruses (CMV, Reovirus III, HSV I, HSV II, Rubella virus) using ELISA. Radionuclide cholescintigraphy was performed for patients only. The study revealed that cholestatic neonates were significantly associated with dark urine, pale stool and hepatomegaly compared with the control (P<0.004, P<0.001, P<0.008, respectively). Quantitation of IgM antibody titre using ELISA revealed significantly higher levels of serum anti-CMV IgM and anti-Reovirus III IgM in cholestatic than in the control groups. No significant differences were found in levels of anti-HSV I, anti-HSV II or anti-rubella antibodies between cholestatic and control groups. HBsAg was negative for all neonates; cholestatic and control. Lastly, no significant differences were found between neonates with EHBA (7 cases) and Intrahepatic cholestasis (37 cases) regarding anti -CMV IgM or anti -Reo III IgM. It can be concluded that CMV and Reovirus type 3 infections of the neonates are associated with the development of cholestatic disorder, not only due to IH cholestasis but also due to the production of EHBA.