Search

Background: In the phase II/III RELATIVITY-047 trial, a novel fixed-dose combination (FDC) of nivolumab plus relatlimab (NIVO + RELA; a programmed death-1 and a lymphocyte-activation gene 3 inhibitor, respectively) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus NIVO in patients with previously untreated unresectable or metastatic melanoma (median follow-up, 13.2 months) with stable health-related quality of life (HRQoL), although grade three or four treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were more frequent with the combination. Updated HRQoL results (median follow-up, 19.3 months) are presented. Methods: Patients were randomised to receive intravenous NIVO + RELA (480 mg and 160 mg, respectively) or NIVO (480 mg) every 4 weeks. HRQoL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Melanoma (FACT-M) and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires at baseline, before dosing at each treatment cycle, and at follow-up (posttreatment) visits. Results: Consistent with the initial analysis, HRQoL remained stable with NIVO + RELA on treatment and was similar to that with NIVO. Mean changes from baseline did not exceed clinically meaningful thresholds. HRQoL results were consistent across instruments and scales/subscales. Despite an increased rate of grade three or four TRAEs with NIVO + RELA versus NIVO, the proportion of patients reporting that they were bothered 'quite a bit' or 'very much' by TRAEs was low and comparable between treatments. Conclusion: Results from the RELATIVITY-047 trial show that the PFS benefit with NIVO + RELA FDC over NIVO was obtained with stable patient-reported HRQoL, supporting NIVO + RELA as a first-line treatment option for patients with advanced melanoma.

Nearly half of advanced melanoma patients do not achieve a clinical response with anti-programmed cell death 1 protein (PD1) therapy (i.e. primary resistance) or initially achieve a clinical response but eventually progress during or following further treatment (i.e. secondary resistance). A consensus definition for tumor resistance to anti-PD1 monotherapy was published by Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer Immunotherapy Resistance Taskforce (SITC) in 2020. A systematic literature review (SLR) of clinical trials and observational studies was conducted to characterize the proportions of advanced melanoma patients who have progressed on anti-PD1 therapies. The SLR included 55 unique studies and the SITC definition of primary resistance was applied to 37 studies that specified disease progression by best overall response. Median and range of patients with primary resistance in studies that specified first-line and second-line or higher anti-PD1 monotherapy was 35.50% (21.19-39.13%; n = 4 studies) and 41.54% (30.00-56.41%, n = 3 studies); median and range of patients with primary resistance in studies that specified first-line and second-line or higher combination therapy was 30.23% (15.79-33.33%; n = 6 studies), and 70.00% (61.10-73.33%; n = 3 studies). Primary resistance to anti-PD1 monotherapies and when in combination with ipilimumab are higher in patients receiving second-line or higher therapies, in patients with acral, mucosal, and uveal melanoma, and in patients with active brain metastases. The percentage of patients with primary resistance was generally consistent across clinical trials, with variability in resistance noted for observational studies. Limitations include applying the SITC definitions to combination therapies, where consensus definitions are not yet available. Future studies should highly consider utilizing the SITC definitions to harmonize how resistance is classified and facilitate meaningful context for clinical activity.

Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.

Exciting advances in melanoma systemic therapies have presented the opportunity for surgical oncologists and their multidisciplinary colleagues to test the neoadjuvant systemic treatment approach in high-risk, resectable metastatic melanomas. Here we describe the state of the science of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) for melanoma, focusing on the surgical aspects and the key role of the surgical oncologist in this treatment paradigm. This paper summarizes the past decade of developments in melanoma treatment and the current evidence for NAST in stage III melanoma specifically. Issues of surgical relevance are discussed, including the risk of progression on NAST prior to surgery. Technical aspects, such as the definition of resectability for melanoma and the extent and scope of routine surgery are presented. Other important issues, such as the utility of radiographic response evaluation and method of pathologic response evaluation, are addressed. Surgical complications and perioperative management of NAST related adverse events are considered. The International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium has the goal of harmonizing NAST trials in melanoma to facilitate rapid advances with new approaches, and facilitating the comparison of results across trials evaluating different treatment regimens. Our ultimate goals are to provide definitive proof of the safety and efficacy of NAST in melanoma, sufficient for NAST to become an acceptable standard of care, and to leverage this platform to allow more personalized, biomarker-driven, tailored approaches to subsequent treatment and surveillance.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved cancer outcomes but can cause severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and flares of autoimmune conditions in cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease. The objective of this study was to identify the information physicians perceived as most useful for these patients when discussing treatment initiation with ICIs. Twenty physicians at a cancer institution with experience in the treatment of irAEs were interviewed. Qualitative thematic analysis was performed to organize and interpret data. The physicians were 11 medical oncologists and 9 non-oncology specialists. The following themes were identified: (1) current methods used by physicians to provide information to patients and delivery options; (2) factors to make decisions about whether or not to start ICIs in patients who have cancer and pre-existing autoimmune conditions; (3) learning points for patients to understand; (4) preferences for the delivery of ICI information; and (5) barriers to the implementation of ICI information in clinics. Regarding points to discuss with patients, physicians agreed that the benefits of ICIs, the probability of irAEs, and risks of underlying autoimmune condition flares with the use of ICIs were most important. Non-oncologists were additionally concerned about how ICIs affect the autoimmune disease (e.g., impact on disease activity, need for changes in medications for the autoimmune disease, and monitoring of autoimmune conditions).

Supplemental Figure 1. Characterization of the resistant cell lines. Supplemental Figure 2. Quantification of the cell invasion from figure 1D. Supplemental Figure 3. Model showing ligand dependent and independent ephrin signaling. Supplemental Figure 4. Acute drug treatment does not induce ligand independent ephrin signaling. Supplemental Figure 5. Quantification of matrigel invasion data from Figure 2E. Supplemental Figure 6. knockdown of EphA2 does not resensitize to BRAF inhibition. Supplemental Figure 7. PI3K and AKT inhibitors block AKT signaling. Supplemental Figure 8. Removal of drug increases cell doubling time. Supplemental Figure 9. Removal of drug reverses the resistance phenotype. Supplemental Figure 10. Removal of drug reverses EphA2 signaling and melanoma invasion. Supplemental Figure 11. Time course of EphA2 induction following chronic BRAF inhibition Supplemental Table 1. Levels of EphA2 staining in primary and metastatic melanoma lesions Supplemental Table 2. Increased EphA2 staining observed in melanoma patient specimens on BRAF inhibitor trial Supplemental Table 3. Incidence of new metastases in patients treated with either vemurafenib or dacarbazine.

Plasma sulforaphane concentrations by day, dose, and pre- or post-BSE-SFN administration

Supplementary Table S1. Representativeness of study participants Supplementary Table S2. Analysis of the intracranial response duration in the COMBI-MB trial. Supplementary Table S3. Analysis of overall survival in the COMBI-MB trial. Supplementary Table S4. Baseline clinical features of the COMBI-BRV trial. Supplementary Table S5. Gene expression score (SingScore) and multiplex immunohistochemical results. Supplementary Table S6. Summary statistics of the linear mixed models utilized to assess the association between protein/pathway expression/score and biopsy sites. Supplementary Table S7. Mutation annotated file of exome sequencing from melanoma biopsies.

Purpose:This study aimed to identify baseline clinical features associated with the outcomes of patients enrolled in the COMBI-MB phase II study of dabrafenib and trametinib treatment in patients with V600 BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma with melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Exploratory biomarker analysis was also conducted as part of the synergistic COMBI-BRV trial (BRV116521), to identify molecular and immunologic changes associated with dabrafenib in MBMs and extracranial metastases (ECM).Patients and Methods:Post hoc analysis was performed for baseline features of patients (n = 125) enrolled in COMBI-MB. Analyses were performed to identify baseline clinical features associated with intracranial response rate (ICRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).Exploratory biomarker analysis was performed on biospecimen collected in the COMBI-BRV trial in which patients with BRAF-mutant, resectable MBM were treated with dabrafenib for 10 to 14 days prior to craniotomy. Accessible ECM were resected or biopsied at the time of craniotomy. Biospecimens underwent molecular and immunologic profiling for comparative analyses.Results:In COMBI-MB baseline treatment with corticosteroids was independently associated with lower ICRR [39% vs. 63%; OR, 0.323; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.105–0.996; P = 0.049] and shorter PFS (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.06–3.51; P = 0.031). Additional significant associations identified in the multivariate analysis were improved PFS in patients with a BRAFV600E genotype (HR, 0.565; 95% CI, 0.321–0.996; P = 0.048) and improved OS in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25–0.78; P = 0.005).Conclusions:Corticosteroid treatment was associated with reduced ICRR and PFS in COMBI-MB, similar to results with immunotherapy for MBMs. Baseline corticosteroid treatment is a key factor to consider in MBM patient management and clinical trial design/interpretation.

Gene expression of major signalling pathways and multiplex immunohistochemical comparison of markers between timepoints and tumor sites. A) Gene expression of related oncogenic signalling pathways between treatment timepoints and site, B) Estimated mean difference of proteins and pathways between biopsy categories (95% confidence interval for the estimated mean difference is depicted as a segment), C) Multiplex immunohistochemical staining for key intracellular signalling proteins, D) Changes in immune intratumoral immune cell densities between treatment timepoints and site, E and F) Multiplex immunohistochemical staining depicted marked decrease in immune cell densities EDT in PT4 (steroid treated). PRE, collected prior to treatment; EDT, collected early during treatment (i.e., after 10-14 days of dabrafenib). MBM, melanoma brain metastasis; ECM, extracranial metastasis. PT, patient.

Supplementary Table S1. List of antibodies used in reverse phase protein array (RPPA). A table summarizing the antibodies used for RPPA in this study.

Purpose: Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has consistently demonstrated clinical efficacy in metastatic melanoma. Recent widespread use of checkpoint blockade has shifted the treatment landscape, raising questions regarding impact of these therapies on response to TIL and appropriate immunotherapy sequence.Patients and Methods: Seventy-four metastatic melanoma patients were treated with autologous TIL and evaluated for clinical response according to irRC, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Immunologic factors associated with response were also evaluated.Results: Best overall response for the entire cohort was 42%; 47% in 43 checkpoint-naïve patients, 38% when patients were exposed to anti-CTLA4 alone (21 patients) and 33% if also exposed to anti-PD1 (9 patients) prior to TIL ACT. Median overall survival was 17.3 months; 24.6 months in CTLA4-naïve patients and 8.6 months in patients with prior CTLA4 blockade. The latter patients were infused with fewer TIL and experienced a shorter duration of response. Infusion of higher numbers of TIL with CD8 predominance and expression of BTLA correlated with improved response in anti-CTLA4 naïve patients, but not in anti-CTLA4 refractory patients. Baseline serum levels of IL9 predicted response to TIL ACT, while TIL persistence, tumor recognition, and mutation burden did not correlate with outcome.Conclusions: This study demonstrates the deleterious effects of prior exposure to anti-CTLA4 on TIL ACT response and shows that baseline IL9 levels can potentially serve as a predictive tool to select the appropriate sequence of immunotherapies. Clin Cancer Res; 24(18); 4416–28. ©2018 AACR.

Supplementary figures and tables

Legends for Supplementary Tables S1-S6

Purpose: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the safety of daily oral PX-866 in combination with twice daily vemurafenib and to identify potential predictive biomarkers for this novel combination.Experimental Design: We conducted a phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study in patients with advanced BRAF V600–mutant solid tumors. PX-866 was administered on a continuous schedule in combination with vemurafenib. Patients underwent a baseline and on-treatment biopsy after 1-week of PX-866 monotherapy for biomarker assessment.Results: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. The most common treatment-related adverse events were gastrointestinal side effects. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 rash and one DLT of grade 3 pancreatitis were observed in cohort 2 (PX-866 6 mg daily; vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily) and cohort 3 (PX-866 8 mg daily; vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily), respectively. Of 23 response-evaluable patients, seven had confirmed partial responses (PR), 10 had stable disease, and six had disease progression. Decreases in intratumoral pAKT expression were observed following treatment with PX-866. Patients who achieved PRs had higher rates of PTEN loss by IHC (80% vs. 58%) and pathogenic PTEN mutations and/or deletions (57% vs. 25%). Two patients with durable PRs had an increase in intratumoral CD8+ T-cell infiltration following treatment with PX-866.Conclusions: PX-866 was well tolerated at its maximum tolerated single-agent dose when given in combination with a modified dose of vemurafenib (720 mg twice daily). Response to treatment appeared to be associated with PTEN loss and treatment with PX-866 seemed to increase CD8+ T-cell infiltration in some patients. Clin Cancer Res; 24(1); 22–32. ©2017 AACR.

Purpose:Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) historically yields a 40%–50% response rate in metastatic melanoma. However, the determinants of outcome are largely unknown.Experimental Design:We investigated tumor-based genomic correlates of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response to therapy by interrogating tumor samples initially collected to generate TIL infusion products.Results:Whole-exome sequencing (WES) data from 64 samples indicated a positive correlation between neoantigen load and OS, but not PFS or response to therapy. RNA sequencing analysis of 34 samples showed that expression of PDE1C, RTKN2, and NGFR was enriched in responders who had improved PFS and OS. In contrast, the expression of ELFN1 was enriched in patients with unfavorable response, poor PFS and OS, whereas enhanced methylation of ELFN1 was observed in patients with favorable outcomes. Expression of ELFN1, NGFR, and PDE1C was mainly found in cancer-associated fibroblasts and endothelial cells in tumor tissues across different cancer types in publicly available single-cell RNA sequencing datasets, suggesting a role for elements of the tumor microenvironment in defining the outcome of TIL therapy.Conclusions:Our findings suggest that transcriptional features of melanomas correlate with outcomes after TIL therapy and may provide candidates to guide patient selection.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify baseline clinical features associated with the outcomes of patients enrolled in the COMBI-MB phase II study of dabrafenib and trametinib treatment in patients with V600 BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma with melanoma brain metastases (MBM). Exploratory biomarker analysis was also conducted as part of the synergistic COMBI-BRV trial (BRV116521), to identify molecular and immunologic changes associated with dabrafenib in MBMs and extracranial metastases (ECM). Patients and Methods: Post hoc analysis was performed for baseline features of patients (n = 125) enrolled in COMBI-MB. Analyses were performed to identify baseline clinical features associated with intracranial response rate (ICRR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Exploratory biomarker analysis was performed on biospecimen collected in the COMBI-BRV trial in which patients with BRAF-mutant, resectable MBM were treated with dabrafenib for 10 to 14 days prior to craniotomy. Accessible ECM were resected or biopsied at the time of craniotomy. Biospecimens underwent molecular and immunologic profiling for comparative analyses. Results: In COMBI-MB baseline treatment with corticosteroids was independently associated with lower ICRR [39% vs. 63%; OR, 0.323; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.105–0.996; P = 0.049] and shorter PFS (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.06–3.51; P = 0.031). Additional significant associations identified in the multivariate analysis were improved PFS in patients with a BRAFV600E genotype (HR, 0.565; 95% CI, 0.321–0.996; P = 0.048) and improved OS in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0 (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25–0.78; P = 0.005). Conclusions: Corticosteroid treatment was associated with reduced ICRR and PFS in COMBI-MB, similar to results with immunotherapy for MBMs. Baseline corticosteroid treatment is a key factor to consider in MBM patient management and clinical trial design/interpretation.

Recurrence after resection of metastatic sarcoma is common. The gangliosides GM2, GD2 and GD3 are strongly expressed across sarcoma subtypes. We hypothesised that generation of anti-ganglioside antibodies would control micrometastases and improve outcomes in sarcoma patients who were disease-free after metastasectomy.We conducted a randomised phase II trial of the immunological adjuvant OPT-821 with a KLH-conjugated ganglioside vaccine targeting GM2, GD2 and GD3, versus OPT-821 alone in patients with metastatic sarcoma following complete metastasectomy. Patients received 10 subcutaneous injections at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 28, 40, 52, 68 and 84 and were followed for evidence of recurrent disease. The primary end-point was relapse-free survival. Secondary end-points included overall survival and serologic response.A total of 136 patients were randomised, 68 to each arm. The mean age was 51.2, 52.2% were male, 90.4% had relapsed disease, 86.8% had high-grade tumours and 14% had ≥4 metastases resected. Histologies included leiomyosarcoma (33%), spindle cell sarcoma (14%), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (13%), osteosarcoma (10%), synovial sarcoma (9%), liposarcoma (9%) and others (12%). Most adverse events were Grade ≤2 (83.8% and 70.6% in the vaccine and adjuvant arms, respectively). The most common (≥20% of patients) were injection site reaction (89.7%), fatigue (44.1%) and pyrexia (27.9%) on the vaccine arm, and injection site reaction (69.1%) on the adjuvant only arm. The 1-year relapse-free survival rate (34.5% and 34.8% in the vaccine and OPT-821 monotherapy arm, respectively) did not differ between arms (P = 0.725). One-year overall survival rates were 93.1% and 91.5% in the vaccine and OPT-821 monotherapy arm, respectively (P = 0.578). Serologic responses at week 9 were more frequent on the vaccine arm (96.5% of patients) than in the adjuvant arm (32.8%), and the difference between groups was durable.A sustained serologic response to vaccination was induced with the vaccine, but no difference in recurrence-free or overall survival was observed between treatment arms.gov identifier: NCT01141491.

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has improved long-term survival for patients with advanced melanoma. However, there is critical need to identify potential biomarkers of response and actionable strategies to improve response rates. Through generation and analysis of over 200 chromatin modification maps for ICB-treated melanoma patient samples, melanoma cells and T cells, we identified significant enrichment of active enhancer states in non-responders at baseline. Enhancer mapping by bulk ChIP-Seq or single cell ATAC-Seq methods in two independent cohorts of ICB-treated melanoma samples identified an enhancer signature that predicted response to anti-PD-1 therapy. The activated non-responder enhancers marked a group of key regulators of several pathways in melanoma cells (including c-MET, TGFβ, EMT and AKT) that are known to mediate resistance to ICB therapy. In addition, several checkpoint receptors were alternatively activated by aberrant enhancers in T cells. Unbiased CRISPRi screening in melanoma cells and T cells identified novel functional enhancers, such as one upstream of c-MET, that mediate ICB response or T cell mediated killing. Finally, inhibition of enhancers and repression of these pathways using bromodomain inhibitors along with anti-PD-1 therapy significantly decreased melanoma tumor burden and increased T-cell infiltration. Epigenomic experiments identified a signature of 107 genes that could be used as pharmacodynamic marker for BET inhibitor response. Together, these findings identify enhancer upregulation as a key mechanism of adaptive resistance to ICB response, a potential enhancer-based biomarker of resistance to anti-PD-1 and enhancer blockade in combination with ICB as a potential strategy to improve responses. Citation Format: Kunal Rai, Mayinuer Maitituoheti, Alvin Shi, Ming Tang, Li-Lun Ho, Firas Youssef Kreidieh, Christopher Terranova, Kyriakitsa Galani, Emily Z. Keung, Caitlin A. Creasy, Manrong Wu, Jiajia Chen, Nana Chen, Anand K. Singh, Apoorvi Chaudhri, Nazanin E. Anvar, Giuseppe Tarrantino, Jiekun Yang, Sharmistha Sarkar, Shan Jiang, Jared Malke, Lauren Haydu, Elizabeth Burton, Michael A. Davies, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Patrick Hwu, Alexander Lazar, Jaime H. Cheah, Christian K. Soule, Stuart S. Levine, Chantale Bernatchez, Srinivas V. Saladi, David Liu, Hussein Tawbi, Jennifer Wargo, Genevieve M. Boland, Manolis Kellis. Functional roles of enhancers in immune microenvironment & immunotherapy response. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6425.

Hyperactivation of the PI3K pathway has been reported to correlate with resistance to immune checkpoint blockade therapy (ICB) in melanoma, highlighting the therapeutic potential of combining PI3K inhibition (PI3Ki) with ICB. To maximize the clinical benefit of PI3Ki-based immune oncology (IO) combination, we characterized the role of PI3K isoforms in tumor and T cells and determined the immunological impacts of PI3Ki alone or in combination with ICB. Inhibitions of PI3K were achieved by either genetic knockdown (KD) or the bioactive compound in PTEN-present (B16/MC38), PTEN-absent (BP/D4M) tumor cell lines, and CD8+ T cells (Pmel-1). Following PI3Ki, we determined the activation status of the PI3K pathway (p-AKT level), transcriptional profile, and cellular function of these cells. We found both in vitro KD and pharmacological inhibition of either PI3Kα or PI3Kβ displayed a dramatic reduction of the PI3K pathway in tumor cells but moderate or no reduction in T cells, whereas the PI3K pathway significantly decreased in T cells with PI3Kγ or PI3Kδ inhibition. KD of PI3Kα or β isoforms drastically sensitized both D4M and MC38 tumors to αPD1 in vivo. We also observed that only PI3Kγ or PI3Kδ inhibition profoundly suppressed cytokine production and cytotoxicity of CD8+ T cell, suggesting that PI3Kα or PI3Kβ isoform inhibition can achieve tumor specific PI3Ki with limited impacts on T cell function. Furthermore, we used multiple syngeneic melanoma models to determine whether PI3K isoform inhibition can synergize the antitumor activity of ICB in vivo. In PTEN-present tumors, BYL719 (BYL, a PI3Kα inhibitor) synergized with αPD1 to delay tumor growth and extend survival (median survival of MC38-bearing mice in control (Ctrl), BYL, αPD1, and combination (Comb) groups: 30, 36, 33, and >45 respectively; p Citation Format: Ritu Bohat, Xiaofang Liang, Chunyu Xu, Yitao Tang, Jiakai Hou, Nicholas A. Egan, Leilei Shi, Ashley Guerrero, Roshni Jaffery, Elizabeth M. Burton, Han Liang, Hussein Tawbi, Michael A. Davies, Weiyi Peng. Targeting PI3K isoforms to improve the effectiveness of T cell mediated immunotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4444.

Although immunotherapy can offer profound clinical benefit for patients with a variety of difficult-to-treat cancers, many tumors either do not respond to upfront treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or progressive/recurrent disease occurs after an interval of initial control. Improved response rates have been demonstrated with the addition of ICIs to cytotoxic therapies, leading to approvals from the US Food and Drug Administration and regulatory agencies in other countries for ICI−chemotherapy combinations in a number of solid tumor indications, including breast, head and neck, gastric, and lung cancer. Designing trials for patients with tumors that do not respond or stop responding to treatment with immunotherapy combinations, however, is challenging without uniform definitions of resistance. Previously, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) published consensus definitions for resistance to single-agent anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). To provide guidance for clinical trial design and to support analyses of emerging molecular and cellular data surrounding mechanisms of resistance to ICI-based combinations, SITC convened a follow-up workshop in 2021 to develop consensus definitions for resistance to multiagent ICI combinations. This manuscript reports the consensus clinical definitions for combinations of ICIs and chemotherapies. Definitions for resistance to ICIs in combination with targeted therapies and with other ICIs will be published in companion volumes to this paper.

Immunotherapy offers deep and durable disease control to some patients, but many tumors do not respond to treatment with single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). One strategy to enhance responses to immunotherapy is via combinations with signal transduction inhibitors, such as antiangiogenic therapies, which not only directly target cancer cells but also could potentially favorably modulate the tumor immune microenvironment. Combination strategies with ICIs have demonstrated enhanced antitumor activity compared with tumor-targeted or antiangiogenic therapy alone in randomized trials in a variety of solid tumor settings, leading to regulatory approval from the US Food and Drug Administration and agencies in other countries for the treatment of endometrial cancer, kidney cancer, melanoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite improved survival and response rates for some patients when antiangiogenic or targeted therapies are administered with ICIs, many patients continue to progress after combination treatment and urgently need new strategies to address this manifestation of resistance to immunotherapy. Previously, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) published consensus definitions for resistance to single-agent anti-PD-(L)1. To provide guidance for clinical trial design and to support analyses of emerging molecular and immune profiling data surrounding mechanisms of resistance to ICI-based combinations, SITC convened a follow-up workshop in 2021 to develop consensus definitions for resistance to multiagent ICI combinations. This manuscript reports the consensus clinical definitions for combinations of anti-PD-(L)1 ICIs and targeted therapies. Definitions for resistance to ICIs in combination with chemotherapy and with other ICIs will be published in companion volumes to this paper.

There is a critical need for effective treatments for leptomeningeal disease (LMD). We conducted a single-arm, first-in-human phase I/Ib study of concurrent intrathecal (IT) and intravenous (IV) nivolumab in melanoma patients with LMD. The primary endpoints were determination of safety and the recommended IT nivolumab dose. The secondary objective was overall survival (OS). Patients were treated with IT nivolumab alone in cycle 1; IV nivolumab 240 mg was included in subsequent cycles, which were administered every two weeks. The dose escalation portion evaluated 5, 10, 20, and 50 mg of IT nivolumab. Twenty-five patients were enrolled and treated (twenty-one previously treated with anti-PD1): 2 with 5 mg, 3 with 10 mg, 14 with 20 mg, and 6 with 50 mg of IT nivolumab. There were no dose-limiting toxicities at any dose level; 10 patients experienced grade 1 or 2 toxicities, possibly related to IT nivolumab. The recommended IT dose of nivolumab was 50 mg (with IV nivolumab 240 mg) every 2 weeks. The median OS was 4.9 months, with 44% and 26% OS rates at 26 and 52 weeks, respectively. Concurrent IT and IV nivolumab is safe, feasible and appears to have a preliminary efficacy signal in patients with melanoma LMD, including in patients with previous anti-PD1 therapy.

The use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) has become an important modality in the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM). However, most patients (pts) do not experience durable responses and new treatment options are needed to improve clinical outcomes. Our pre-clinical studies have demonstrated that intratumoral CD40 activation synergizes with anti-PD-1 based therapy and induces systemic and distant anti-tumor effects. In this ongoing phase I/II study, we assessed intratumoral sotigalimab (APX005M), a CD40 agonist antibody, in combination with systemic pembrolizumab in CPI treatment naïve, unresectable stage III or IV MM. A total of 40 participants will be enrolled. As of December 15, 2021, 30 pts were enrolled. Pts received sotigalimab every 3 weeks for a total of 4 doses. The dose escalation portion of the trial has been completed, with 14 pts enrolled in 5 dosing cohorts of sotigalimab at 0.1, 0.5, 1, 3 and 10 mg. The primary objectives include safety and tolerability, determination of the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and assessment of the overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Biomarker analyses of blood and tumor samples were performed to measure immune activation using immunophenotyping including imaging mass cytometry, TCR sequencing, and a cross-cohort comparison of gene expression data (sotigalimab plus pembrolizumab versus anti-PD1 monotherapy). The combination therapy has been well-tolerated, and there were no study discontinuations or death due to treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Most common TRAEs were injection-site reactions; six pts experienced grade-3 immune-related adverse events. Efficacy analysis of 30 pts with post-baseline disease evaluations demonstrated an ORR of 50% (5 CR and 10 PR) in distant lesions and a disease control rate of 67%. The ORR at the RP2D of 10 mg is 55% (12/22). Responses were observed in PD-L1 negative pts and those with elevated LDH. Comprehensive transcriptome and immune cell profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor biopsies obtained from local lesions at baseline and 24 hours post sotigalimab injection demonstrate that sotigalimab effectively engaged CD40 pathway. In comparison to anti-PD1 monotherapy, the combination therapy significantly increased expression of genes associated with antigen presentation and effector T cells in local lesions accompanied by an increase in T cell activation genes at distant lesions. Additionally, T cell repertoire analysis demonstrated a significant increase in T cell clonality with expansion of new clones shared between local and distant tumors. Importantly, these immunologic changes were correlated with clinical response. Collectively, this combination therapy is well tolerated and has a notable clinical response rate, accompanied by broad innate and adaptive immune activation at both local and distant lesions. Citation Format: Salah-Eddine Bentebibel, Daniel Johnson, Rodabe Amariae, Daniel McGrail, Srisuda Lecagoonporn, Cara Haymaker, Dzifa Duose, Khalida Wani, Houssein Safa, Isabella Claudia Glitza, Sapna Pradyuman Patel, Michael K. Wong, Hussein Tawbi, Jared Burks, Xiaodong Yang, Patrick Hwu, Cassian Yee, Michael A. Davies, Ravi Murthy, Chantale Bernatchez, Suhendan Ekmekcioglu, Adi Diab, Gregory Lizée. Intratumoral CD40 agonist sotigalimab with pembrolizumab induces broad innate and adaptive immune activation in local and distant tumors in metastatic melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT039.