Search

Background: Evolocumab is the first monoclonal antibody against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 approved in Japan for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and hypercholesterolemia; however, data on its safety and effectiveness in the real-world setting in Japan are limited., Methods and Results: This real-world, postmarketing, single-arm study assessed the safety and effectiveness of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering with evolocumab in patients with homozygous/heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and hypercholesterolemia with high risk in Japan (668 sites). The primary safety end point was the incidence (percentage) and number of patients with adverse drug reactions and serious adverse events during the 104-week follow-up. Primary effectiveness end points included the percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from baseline to week 12, assessed using 2-sided paired t tests. The safety and effectiveness sets comprised 3724 (homozygous FH, n=108; heterozygous FH, n=2009; hypercholesterolemia with high risk, n=1607) and 2797 (homozygous FH, n=91; heterozygous FH, n=1615; hypercholesterolemia with high risk, n=1091) patients, respectively. Overall, mean age and disease duration were 63.2 and 12.3 years, respectively. Serious adverse drug reactions and serious adverse events were experienced by 0.5% and 10.3% of patients; the incidence rates of myocardial infarction and stroke were 0.7% and 0.3%, respectively. A significant mean±SD percentage change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels was observed at week 12 among patients with homozygous FH (-45.7%±28.2; P <0.001), heterozygous FH (-55.9%±28.8; P <0.001), and hypercholesterolemia with high risk (-63.3%±23.7; P <0.001)., Conclusions: Evolocumab was well tolerated, and real-world patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and hypercholesterolemia with high risk in Japan had sustained low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT02808403.

Background: Statins are the cornerstone treatment for patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia but research suggests it could increase the risk of type 2 diabetes in the general population. A low prevalence of type 2 diabetes was reported in some familial hypercholesterolaemia cohorts, raising the question of whether these patients are protected against type 2 diabetes. Obesity is a well known risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes. We aimed to investigate the associations of known key determinants of type 2 diabetes with its prevalence in people with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia., Methods: This worldwide cross-sectional study used individual-level data from the EAS FHSC registry and included adults older than 18 years with a clinical or genetic diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia who had data available on age, BMI, and diabetes status. Those with known or suspected homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and type 1 diabetes were excluded. The main outcome was prevalence of type 2 diabetes overall and by WHO region, and in relation to obesity (BMI ≥30·0 kg/m 2 ) and lipid-lowering medication as predictors. The study population was divided into 12 risk categories based on age (tertiles), obesity, and receiving statins, and the risk of type 2 diabetes was investigated using logistic regression., Findings: Among 46 683 adults with individual-level data in the FHSC registry, 24 784 with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia were included in the analysis from 44 countries. 19 818 (80%) had a genetically confirmed diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Type 2 diabetes prevalence in the total population was 5·7% (1415 of 24 784), with 4·1% (817 of 19 818) in the genetically diagnosed cohort. Higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes was observed in the Eastern Mediterranean (58 [29·9%] of 194), South-East Asia and Western Pacific (214 [12·0%] of 1785), and the Americas (166 [8·5%] of 1955) than in Europe (excluding the Netherlands; 527 [8·0%] of 6579). Advancing age, a higher BMI category (obesity and overweight), and use of lipid-lowering medication were associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes, independent of sex and LDL cholesterol. Among the 12 risk categories, the probability of developing type 2 diabetes was higher in people in the highest risk category (aged 55-98 years, with obesity, and receiving statins; OR 74·42 [95% CI 47·04-117·73]) than in those in the lowest risk category (aged 18-38 years, without obesity, and not receiving statins). Those who did not have obesity, even if they were in the upper age tertile and receiving statins, had lower risk of type 2 diabetes (OR 24·42 [15·57-38·31]). The corresponding results in the genetically diagnosed cohort were OR 65·04 (40·67-104·02) for those with obesity in the highest risk category and OR 20·07 (12·73-31·65) for those without obesity., Interpretation: Adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia in most WHO regions have a higher type 2 diabetes prevalence than in Europe. Obesity markedly increases the risk of diabetes associated with age and use of statins in these patients. Our results suggest that heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia does not protect against type 2 diabetes, hence managing obesity is essential to reduce type 2 diabetes in this patient population., Funding: Pfizer, Amgen, MSD, Sanofi-Aventis, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Regeneron., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests CAA-S reports support from Amgen to their institution. MAb reports support from Amryt for lectures and from Newbridge and Amryt to attend meetings. MAr reports grants to their institution from Novartis, Ionis, Lilly, and Amgen; and honoraria from Viatris, Alfasigma, Sanofi, Amgen, PIAM, Amaryn, Novartis, Ionis, and Ultragenyx. MAv reports consultancy fees from Akcea, Amgen, Amrith, Aurora Biofarma, Daiichi-Sankyo, Menarini, Novartis, Sanofi (Genzyme), and Sobi; and honoraria from Amgen, Amrith, Aurora Biofarma, Daiichi-Sankyo, Menarini, Novartis, Sanofi (Genzyme), and Sobi. FA reports support, consultancy fees, honoraria, and participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board from Amgen, Amryt, and Novartis. RA reports honoraria from Amgen, Novo Nordisk, Tecnofarma, Saval, Abbott, and PTC-Therapeutics; support to attend meetings from Amgen And PTC-Therapeutics; participation on a data safety monitoring or advisory board for PTC-Therapeutics; and leadership or fiduciary, society, committee or advocacy group for Chilean Atherosclerosis Working Group. MBa reports participation at speakers bureaus for Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Krka, Polpharma, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Teva, and Zentiva; being a consultant for Adamed, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esperion, New Amsterdam, Novartis, and Sanofi-Aventis; and grants from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, and Sanofi. CJB reports funding to the Austrian Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Registry from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Sanofi, and Novartis; consultancy fees from Novartis And Daiichi-Sankyo; and honoraria from Amgen and Novartis. MBo reports a grant to their institution from the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation and Portuguese Cardiology Society. JB reports grants from AstraZeneca and honoraria from Amgen. LRB reports consultancy fees from Ultragenyx and Amryt; and honoraria from Amgen, HLS Therapeutics, and Novartis. ALC reports grants from Amryt, Menarini, and Ultragenyx; and honoraria from Amarin, Amgen, Amryt, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esperion, Ionis Pharmaceutical, Medscape, Menarini, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PeerVoice, Pfizer, Recordati Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi, The Corpus, Ultragenyx, and Viatris. PC reports grants to FASTA University from Amgen; and consultancy fees and other honoraria from Amgen and Novartis. DC reports consultancy fees, including data safety monitoring, from Ultragenyx, Organon, and Novartis; honoraria from Bial, Alexion (Synageva), Daiichi-Sankyo, Amgen, Novartis, Organon, and Servier; support for attending meetings from Servier, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Medinfar; is the vice president of the Portuguese Atherosclerosis Society; and is a board member and ex-deputy director health of the Portuguese Society of Internal Medicine. OSD reports grants to their institution from Daiichi-Sankyo and Novartis; consultancy fees from Sanofi and Daiichi-Sankyo; and honoraria from Sanofi, Viatris, Organon, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, and Servier. KID reports grants to their institution from Pfizer, Amgen, MSD, Sanofi-Aventis, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Regeneron; and personal fees from Bayer and Regeneron. AE reports grants to their institution from Regeneron, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Amgen. TF reports grants to their institution from Ministry of Education, Youth, and Sports, National Institute for Research of Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases Programme (EXCELES; LX22NPO5104) funded by Next Generation EU; and consultancy fees and other honoraria from Novartis. DG reports honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi. UG reports grants from the Slovenian Research Agency and UMC Ljubljana Grant; honoraria from AstraZeneca and Novartis; and participation on a data safety monitoring board for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Europe Foundation. KBH reports consultancy fees and other honoraria from Sanofi and participation in a scientific advisory board for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Europe Foundation. GKH reports being a part-time employee of Novo Nordisk. MK reports honoraria for lectures and consultancy from Abbott, Abdi Ibrahim, Amryt, Novo Nordisk, and Tr-Pharma; funding from Amryt; participation in clinical trials with payments to their institution from Amgen, Ionis, Lib Therapeutics, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Medpace; and participation in an unpaid advocacy group for Familial Hypercholesterolaemia-Türkiye and Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Europe Foundation. WK reports grants to their institution from Health Systems Research Institute; payments from Medical Council of Thailand, Royal College of Physicians of Thailand, Chulalongkorn University, Endocrine Society of Thailand, and Amgen; other honoraria from Amgen, Novartis, Boehringer, AstraZeneca, Abbot, and Thai Meiji; support to attend meetings from Amgen; and participation on an advisory board for Daiichi-Sankyo, Amgen, Kowa (Biopharm), Thai Meiji, Novartis, and Abbott. KL reports honoraria from Novartis, Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, and Boehringer. GL reports grants to their institution from Latvian Science Council (lzp-2020/1–0151), Latvian National Research Program Biomedicine for Public Health 2014–2017, the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Latvia, and VPP-EM-BIOMEDICĪNA-2022/1–001 (State research project in the field of biomedicine, medical technologies and pharmacy); consultancy fees from Amgen, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer; other honoraria from Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Servier, Sanofi, Novartis, Swixx BioPharma, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Siemens Laboratories, Abbott Laboratories, and Roche Laboratories; support for attending meetings from Amgen, Bayer, Servier, and Sanofi; participation on data safety monitoring board for Amgen, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer; and is a member of the certification council at the Latvian Medical Association Board, Latvian Society of Cardiology Board, and the Baltic Atherosclerosis Society. EL reports personal fees and non-financial support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Bayer; and personal fees from Servier, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, and Chiesi. ARML reports grants to their institution from Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo, Regeneron, and Ultragenyx; and support for attending meetings from European Atherosclerosis Society. ADM reports grants from Medical Research Council Cape Heart Group; support to attend meetings from European Atherosclerosis Society; and is a board member and president of the Lipid and Atherosclerosis Society of Southern Africa. WM reports grants, consultancy fees, and other honoraria from Amgen, Sanofi, SYNLAB, Novartis, and Daiichi-Sankyo; and support to attend meetings from Daiichi-Sankyo. ARM reports grants from DiaGene Research Institute; grants and support to attend meetings from Sanofi and European Atherosclerosis Society; and is a president of Swiss Society for Familial Forms of Hypercholesterolemia. BGN reports consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Regeneron, Ionis, Amgen, Kowa, Denka, Amarin, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Esperion, Silence Therapeutics, and Ultragenyx; other honoraria from Sanofi, Kowa, Denka, Amarin, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Abbott, and Mankind; board participation for Ionis, Kowa, and Novartis; and research collaboration with AstraZeneca. AGP is a board member of the Cyprus Atherosclerosis Society. FJR reports grants and personal fees from Amgen, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Lib Therapeutics. KKR reports grants to their institution from Amgen, Sanofi, Regeneron, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Ultragenyx; consultancy fees for serving as a member of the steering committee or executive committee of clinical trials and roles as principal investigator and national lead investigator and for attending advisory boards, providing advice on data interpretation, and future lines of research from Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Kowa, Esperion, Novo Nordisk, MSD, Lilly, Silence Therapeutics, Az, New Amsterdam Pharma, Bayer, Beren Therapeutics, Cleerly, EmendoBio, Scribe, Crispr, Vaxxinity, Amarin, Regeneron, Ultragenyx, Cargene, and Resverlogix; lecture fees from Novartis, Bi, Az, Novo Nordisk, Viatris, Amarin, Biologix Pharma, Sanofi, Amgen, Esperion, Daiichi-Sankyo, Macleod Pharma for symposia at international meetings; holding stock options from New Amsterdam Pharma and Pemi31; and serving as a president for the European Atherosclerosis Society. ŽR reports grants from Sanofi Aventis and Novartis. RDS reports grants from Kowa, Amgen, Sanofi, Regeneron, Novartis, and Esperion; consultancy fees from Amgen, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Amryt, Pfizer, Hypera, and Sanofi; and support to attend meetings from Novo Nordisk and Daiichi-Sankyo. HSc reports grants from AstraZeneca and consultancy fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer Vital, Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Servier, Sanofi-Aventis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi-Sankyo, and SYNLAB. CATS reports grants to their institution from Pfizer, Amgen, MSD, Sanofi Aventis, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Regeneron. MT reports grants, consultancy fees, other honoraria, support to attend meetings, and participation on an advisory board for Novartis. AJV-V reports grants to their institution from Pfizer, Amgen, MSD, Sanofi-Aventis, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Regeneron; consultancy fees from Bayer and Regeneron; other honoraria from Ferrer, European Atherosclerosis Society, and USA National Lipid Association; and support for attending meetings from the European Atherosclerosis Society, USA National Lipid Association, and Spanish Atherosclerosis Society. BV reports consultancy fees from Novartis, Amgen, Sanofi, and Zentiva; support to attend meetings from Zentiva; participates on a board for Novartis and Zentiva; and is the president of the Slovak Association of Atherosclerosis. LW reports grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China and National Natural Science Foundation of China. GFW reports grants to their institution from Arrowhead Pharma, Amgen, Novartis, and Silence Therapeutics; consultancy fees from Amgen, Novartis, Sanofi, and Esperion; other honoraria from Amgen, Novartis, Sanofi, and Esperion; and support for attending meetings from Amgen, Novartis, Sanofi, and Esperion. ES reports consultancy fees to their institution from Amgen, Sanofi, Novo-Nordisk, Ionis, Merck, Novartis, and AstraZeneca. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Dyslipidemia is the most significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) Secondary dyslipidemia: its treatments and association with atherosclerosis. Glob Health Med, Efficacy and safety of saroglitazar for the management of dyslipidemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies. The current treatment strategies for managing dyslipidemia focus on reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) to minimize the risks of atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction (MI). Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is an inherited autosomal dominant disease caused by a mutation in the LDL receptor (LDLr), which can lead to extremely high levels of LDL-C The Beneficial Effect of Lomitapide on the Cardiovascular System in LDLr(-/-) Mice with Obesity, The microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor lomitapide improves vascular function in mice with obesity. Although statin therapy has been the primary treatment for dyslipidemia, HoFH patients do not respond well to statins, requiring alternative therapies. Microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) inhibition has emerged as a potential therapeutic target for treating HoFH. MTP is primarily responsible for transferring triglyceride and other lipids into apolipoprotein B (ApoB) during the assembly of very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles in the liver. Lomitapide, an inhibitor of MTP, has been approved for treatingof HoFH adults. Unlike statins, lomitapide does not act on the LDLr to reduce cholesterol. Instead, lomitapide lowers the levels of ApoB-containing proteins, primarily VLDL, eventually decreasing LDL-C levels. Studies have shown that lomitapide can reduce LDL-C levels by more than 50% in patients with HoFH who have failed to respond adequately to other treatments. Lowering LDL-C levels is important for preventing atherosclerosis, reducing cardiovascular risk, improving endothelial function, and promoting overall cardiovascular health, especially for patients with HoFH Efficacy and safety of a microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: a single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study. This review paper focuses on research findings regarding the therapeutic benefits of lomitapide, highlighting its effectiveness in lowering cholesterol levels and reducing the risk of CVDs The microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor lomitapide improves vascular function in mice with obesity., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Aims: Data describing the long-term efficacy and tolerability of inclisiran are limited. This was explored in ORION-8, an open-label extension of preceding Phase 2 and Phase 3 placebo-controlled and open-label extension trials., Methods and Results: Following completion of the parent trial, adult patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), ASCVD risk equivalent, or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia received open-label inclisiran twice yearly (after initial and 3-month doses) until Day 990, followed by an end-of-study visit at Day 1080 or ≥ 90 days after the last dose. The study endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving pre-specified low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals [ASCVD: < 1.8 mmol/L (< 70 mg/dL); ASCVD risk equivalent: < 2.6 mmol/L (< 100 mg/dL)], percentage and absolute changes in LDL-C at end-of-study, and safety of inclisiran. Of 3274 patients, 2446 (74.7%) were followed until end-of-study. Mean age was 64.9 ± 9.9 years, 82.7% (n = 2709) had ASCVD, and mean baseline LDL-C was 2.9 ± 1.2 mmol/L. Mean cumulative exposure to inclisiran (including parent trials) was 3.7 years; maximum exposure was 6.8 years. With inclisiran, 78.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 76.8, 80.0] of patients achieved pre-specified LDL-C goals and mean percentage change in LDL-C was -49.4% (95% CI: -50.4, -48.3). No attenuation of LDL-C lowering over time was observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events at injection site (all mild/moderate) occurred in 5.9% of the patients. Inclisiran-associated anti-drug antibodies were infrequent (5.5%) and had no impact on the efficacy or safety of inclisiran. No new safety signals were identified., Conclusion: In the largest and longest follow-up to date with >12 000 patient-years exposure, inclisiran demonstrated consistent and effective LDL-C lowering with a favourable long-term safety and tolerability profile., Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03814187., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: R.S.W. reports receiving advisory board fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and past fees for consulting on lipid issues with The Medicines Company; F.J.R. reports receiving advisory board fees and lecture fees from Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and LIB Therapeutics; W.K. reports receiving consulting fees and lecture fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Amgen; consulting fees from Pfizer, The Medicines Company, Novartis, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Corvidia Therapeutics, Esperion, Genentech, OMEICOS, Novo Nordisk, LIB Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, New Amsterdam Pharma, and TenSixteen Bio; lecture fees from Berlin-Chemie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Sanofi; and grant support and provision of reagents from Singulex, Abbott, Roche Diagnostics, and Dr Beckmann Pharma; U.L. reports receiving grant support from Amgen, Bayer, and Novartis and advisory board fee from Novartis; L.A.L. reports grant support paid to his institution and advisory board fees and fees for CME from Amgen and Novartis; grant support paid to his institution and fees for serving on a steering committee from Kowa, The Medicines Company and Novartis; and advisory board fees and fees for CME from Amarin, AstraZeneca, HLS, Merck, New Amsterdam, Pfizer, and Sanofi; G.G.S. reports receiving research support paid to his institution from AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Silence Therapeutics, and The Medicines Company and a patent (62/806313) on a method for reducing cardiovascular risk assigned in full to the University of Colorado; K.K.R. reports receiving support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Biomedical Research Centre; his institution (Imperial College London) receives support from the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Northwest London. K.K.R. also reports receiving lecture fees from Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Cipla, Algorithm, and Zuelling Pharma; grant support paid to his institution; lecture fees and advisory board fees from Amgen, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals/Sanofi, and Pfizer; lecture fees and fees for serving on steering committees for trials from AstraZeneca and Eli Lilly; fees for serving on steering committees for trials from Cerenis Therapeutics, The Medicines Company, and Esperion; advisory board fees from Akcea Therapeutics, Novartis, Silence Therapeutics, Bayer, and Daiichi Sankyo; lecture fees and advisory board fees from Takeda, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Dr Reddy’s Laboratories; grant support and advisory board fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme; fees for serving on a clinical events adjudication committee from AbbVie; and fees for serving as principal investigator for a trial from Resverlogix; Z.T., S.V., and X.Z. are all employees of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA and hold shares in Novartis; A.L. is employee of Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland; P.M. was an employee of Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, at the time of conducting this study., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background and Objectives : The proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors evolocumab and alirocumab are recently developed promising drugs used for treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to thoroughly evaluate the efficacy and safety of evolocumab and alirocumab among pediatric patients with FH. Materials and Methods : A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception through July 2024 to identify primary interventional studies among pediatric patients with FH. Meta-analyses were performed if appropriate. Statistics were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.4 and Stata version 16.0. Results : Fourteen articles reporting nine unique studies were included. There were three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing evolocumab or alirocumab involving a total of 320 pediatric patients, one cross-over trial and five single-arm or observational studies. Pooled results showed significant efficacy of evolocumab/alirocumab in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -37.92%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -43.06% to -32.78%; I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.60), apolipoprotein B (WMD: -33.67%, 95% CI: -38.12% to -29.22%; I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.71), and also lipoprotein(a) (WMD: -16.94%, 95% CI: -26.20% to -7.69%; I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.71) among pediatric patients with FH. The efficacies of evolocumab/alirocumab on LDL-C reduction within pediatric patients with heterozygous FH (HeFH) were consistent between studies, whereas in patients with homozygous FH (HoFH), it varied dramatically. Pediatric patients with the null/null variant may respond to the treatment. PCSK9 inhibitors were generally well tolerated within most pediatric patients, in line with previous studies among adult populations. Conclusions : The PCSK9 inhibitors evolocumab/alirocumab significantly reduced LDL-C and some other lipid parameters, such as apolipoprotein B, in pediatric patients with HeFH. These drugs may be appropriate as a potential therapy for pediatric patients with HoFH who cannot achieve LDL-C targets with other treatments. Evolocumab/alirocumab was generally well tolerated in the pediatric population.

Background: We assessed long-term real-world effectiveness and safety of lomitapide in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)., Methods: Retrospective case series of six patients with HoFH treated with lomitapide in an Italian clinic. Changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) during lomitapide treatment were assessed. The effect on LDL-C of PCSK9 inhibitors, apheresis and lomitapide was evaluated. Additionally, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), gastrointestinal tolerability, hepatic steatosis/elasticity, transaminases, and cardiovascular events and symptoms were assessed., Results: Median age at HoFH clinical and molecular diagnoses was 25 (range 2-49) and 40 (29-71) years, respectively. Five (83.3%) had prior cardiovascular events. One patient received apheresis, which was subsequently discontinued. All patients received PCSK9 inhibitors but discontinued due to minimal effectiveness. Median (range) age at lomitapide initiation was 44 (28-73) years, with a median 47 (18-85) months' treatment (mean dose 17.5 [5-40] mg/day). Mean (SD) baseline LDL-C was 263.2 (148.1) mg/dL, which decreased by 80% at nadir (52.8 [19.2] mg/dL) and 69% at last follow-up (81.3 [30.5] mg/dL). Four patients (66.7%) achieved LDL-C < 70 mg/dL sometime during follow-up, all of whom also achieved LDL-C < 55 mg/dL. Adverse events (AEs) were generally mild to moderate, hepatic steatosis was either absent or mild/moderate and hepatic elasticity remained normal in all but two patients (> 70 years old). All patients with reported cardiovascular symptoms had improvements in symptoms, and all patients reported stabilization or regression of intima-media thickness and atheromatous plaques., Conclusions: These long-term, real-world data demonstrate that lomitapide substantially reduced LDL-C for up to seven years. Most patients achieved LDL-C goal at some point, consistent with published Phase III trial and real-world evidence data. No patient discontinued lomitapide treatment. Further long-term follow-up in a larger patient population will be important to determine cardiovascular and other outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Aims: It is well known that elevated cholesterol is associated with enhanced platelet aggregation and patients suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have a high risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events. Although decreasing cholesterol level is associated with attenuation of platelet hyperactivity, there are currently no data on the effect of convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9ab) on platelet reactivity in FH. The aim of the study was to analyse the impact of different therapies including PCSK9ab on platelet aggregation in FH., Methods: This study enrolled all 15 patients treated in the University Hospital Hradec Králové for FH. PCSK9ab have been administered in 12 of 15 patients while 8 patients were also undergoing lipid apheresis. Blood samples from all patients including pre- and post-apheresis period were tested for platelet aggregation triggered by 7 inducers, and the effect of 3 clinically used drugs (acetylsalicylic acid, ticagrelor and vorapaxar) was compared as well., Results: Although apheresis decreased the reactivity of platelets in general, platelet responses were not different between non-apheresis patients treated with PCSK9ab and apheresis patients (post-apheresis values) with the exception of ristocetin. However, when compared to age-matched healthy population, FH patients had significantly lower platelet aggregation responses to 4 out of 7 used inducers and higher profit from 2 out of 3 used antiplatelet drugs even after exclusion of FH patients regularly receiving conventional antiplatelet treatment., Conclusion: This study showed for the first time the suitability of PCSK9ab treatment for reduction of platelet reactivity in FH patients., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Real-world utilization data for evolocumab, the first proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor to be introduced in Japan in 2016, to date are limited. This study aimed to clarify the current real-world patient user profiles of evolocumab based on large-scale health claims data., Methods and Results: This retrospective database study examined patients from a health administrative database (MDV database) who initiated evolocumab between April 2016 (baseline) and November 2021. Characteristics and clinical profiles of this patient population are described. In all, 4,022 patients were included in the final analysis. Most evolocumab prescriptions occurred in the outpatient setting (3,170; 78.82%), and 940 patients (23.37%) had a recent diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia. Common recent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events at baseline included myocardial infarction (1,633; 40.60%), unstable angina (561; 13.95%), and ischemic stroke (408; 10.14%). Comorbidity diseases included hypertension (2,504; 62.26%), heart failure (1,750; 43.51%), diabetes (1,199; 29.81%), and chronic kidney disease (297; 7.38%). Among the lipid-lowering regimens concomitant with evolocumab, ezetimibe+statin was used most frequently (1,281; 31.85%), followed by no concomitant lipid-lowering regimen (1,190; 29.59%), statin (950; 23.62%), and ezetimibe (601; 14.94%). The median evolocumab treatment duration for all patients was 260 days (interquartile range 57-575 days)., Conclusions: This study provides real-world insights into evolocumab utilization in Japan for optimizing patient care and adherence to guideline-based therapies to better address hypercholesterolemia in Japan.

Background and Aims: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a highly prevalent monogenic disorder characterized by elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Sex disparities in diagnosis, lipid-lowering therapy, and achieved lipid levels have emerged worldwide, resulting in barriers to care in FH. A systematic review was performed to investigate sex-related disparities in treatment, response, and lipid target achievement in FH (PROSPERO, CRD42022353297)., Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane library, PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and grey literature databases were searched from inception to 26 April 2023. Records were eligible if they described sex differences in the treatment of adults with FH., Results: Of 4432 publications reviewed, 133 met our eligibility criteria. In 16 interventional clinical trials (eight randomized and eight non-randomized; 1840 participants, 49.4% females), there were no differences between males and females in response to fixed doses of lipid-lowering therapy, suggesting that sex was not a determinant of response. Meta-analysis of 25 real-world observational studies (129 441 participants, 53.4% females) found that females were less likely to be on lipid-lowering therapy compared with males (odds ratio .74, 95% confidence interval .66-.85). Importantly, females were less likely to reach an LDL-C < 2.5 mmol/L (odds ratio .85, 95% confidence interval .74-.97). Similarly, treated LDL-C levels were higher in females. Despite this, male sex was associated with a two-fold greater relative risk of major adverse cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and cardiovascular mortality., Conclusions: Females with FH were less likely to be treated intensively and to reach guideline-recommended LDL-C targets. This sex bias represents a surmountable barrier to clinical care., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is a genetic condition that is associated with a high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) due to elevated lipid levels. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibody inhibitors have been shown to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) substantially. This study aimed to assess the real-world effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy among patients with HeFH., Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with probable or definite HeFH on a PCSK9 inhibitor at a specialized lipid clinic between 2015 and 2022. The primary objective was the proportion of patients who attained a ≥50% reduction in LDL-C after 12 months of treatment., Results: In total, 141 patients were screened and 95 were included. Mean age was 63 years, 51% were female, and mean baseline LDL-C level was 4.0 mmol/L (155 mg/dL). A majority of patients (60%) had statin intolerance, and 73% were on ezetimibe. The most common PCSK9 inhibitor was evolocumab (94%). Overall, 74% of patients achieved a ≥50% reduction in LDL-C after 12 months of therapy. Mean LDL-C concentration decreased to 1.7 mmol/L (66 mg/dL) (approximately 59% reduction from baseline) after 12 months of follow-up but increased to 1.9 mmol/L (73 mg/dL) after ≥24 months of follow-up. Similar trends were observed in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B. Lipoprotein(a) was significantly reduced by 45% over 12 months. Twelve percent of patients permanently discontinued therapy. Barriers to PCSK9i use were mostly related to cost., Conclusions: In a real-world cohort of HeFH patients, most of which were intolerant to statins, a high majority were able to achieve a ≥50% reduction in LDL-C after 12 months of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy (mean reduction of approximately 59%), which is similar to clinical trial data of patients with ASCVD. A significant reduction in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein(a) were also observed., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

Practicing endocrinologists are likely to confront 2 major issues that occur with dyslipidemias during pregnancy. The most dramatic is the development of severe hypertriglyceridemia leading to acute pancreatitis. The second is the approach to treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia, a common genetic disorder. This article reviews the normal physiology and the pathophysiology of lipoproteins that occurs with pregnancy and then discusses the approaches to prevention and/or treatment of dyslipidemia in pregnancy with a focus on lifestyle and acceptable drug therapies., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr I.J. Goldberg has received consulting fees from Arrowhead, Mammoth, and LG Pharmaceutical., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) leads to elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, which increases the risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Since the first functional and morphologic changes of the arterial wall occur in childhood, treatment should start early in childhood to mitigate the elevated risk of ASCVD. Pediatricians play an important role in the detection and care of children with FH. In this study, we aim to explore potential gaps in FH care amongst Dutch pediatricians, in order to enhance their knowledge and awareness of detecting and treating children with FH., Methods: An anonymous online survey, deployed using Google Forms, including 26 closed and semi-closed questions on FH care in children was distributed by the Dutch Association of Pediatrics via a newsletter to which the majority of the practicing Dutch pediatricians subscribe. In addition, we requested that the pediatric departments of all Dutch hospitals in the Netherlands distribute this survey personally among their employed pediatricians. Respondents were instructed to answer the questions without any help or use of online resources., Results: Between September 1st, 2023 and November 1st, 2023, 158 (an estimated 11% response rate) Dutch pediatricians completed the survey. They reported a median (IQR) of 15.0 (6.0-22.0) years of experience as a pediatrician, and 34 (21.5%) were working in academic hospitals. The majority (76.6%) of pediatricians correctly identified a typical FH lipid profile but 68 (43.0%) underestimated the true prevalence of FH (1:300). Underestimation and unawareness of the increased risk of FH patients for ASCVD were reported by 37.3% and 25.9% of pediatricians, respectively. Although 70.9% of the pediatricians correctly defined FH, only 67 (42.4%) selected statins and ezetimibe to treat severe hypercholesterolemia., Conclusions: The results of this study suggest significant gaps in knowledge and awareness of FH in children among Dutch pediatricians. FH care in children needs improvement through educational and training initiatives to mitigate the life-long risk of ASCVD from early life., What Is Known: • Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) leads to elevated LDL-cholesterol levels, which increases the risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). • The process of atherosclerosis starts in childhood • Pediatricians play an important role in the detection and treatment of children with FH., What Is New: • Our results highlight significant gaps in care for children with FH amongst pediatricians and this may lead to suboptimal detection and treatment. • FH care in children needs improvement by educational initiatives to ultimately prevent ASCVD in adulthood., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disease that leads to elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and risk of coronary heart disease. Current therapeutic options for FH remain relatively limited and only partially effective in both lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and modifying coronary heart disease risk. The unique characteristics of nucleic acid therapies to target the underlying cause of the disease can offer solutions unachievable with conventional medications. DNA- and RNA-based therapeutics have the potential to transform the care of patients with FH. Recent advances are overcoming obstacles to clinical translation of nucleic acid-based medications, including greater stability of the formulations as well as site-specific delivery, making gene-based therapy for FH an alternative approach for treatment of FH., Competing Interests: None.

Background: The atherogenic characteristics of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) increase the risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease including not only coronary artery disease but ischemic stroke. Asymptomatic intracranial artery stenosis/occlusion (IASO) is a major cause of ischemic stroke, but it has not yet been fully characterized in patients with HeFH., Methods and Results: This study analyzed 147 clinically diagnosed subjects with HeFH who underwent magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography imaging for evaluation of IASO (≥50% diameter stenosis). Major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events (cardiac death, ischemic stroke, and acute coronary syndrome) were compared in patients with HeFH with and without asymptomatic IASO. Asymptomatic IASO was observed in 13.6% of patients with HeFH. The untreated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (240±95 versus 244±75 mg/dL; P =0.67) did not differ between the 2 groups. Despite the use of lipid-lowering therapies (statin, P =0.71; high-intensity statin, P =0.81; ezetimibe, P =0.33; proprotein convertase subxilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, P =0.39; low-density lipoprotein apheresis, P =0.14), on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in patients with both HeFH and IASO was still suboptimally controlled (97±62 versus 105±50 mg/dL; P =0.17), accompanied by a higher triglyceride level (median, 109 versus 79 mg/dL; P =0.001). During the 12.4-year observational period (interquartile range, 6.2-24.6 years), asymptomatic IASO exhibited a 4.04-fold greater likelihood of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event (95% CI, 1.71-9.55; P =0.001) in patients with HeFH. This increased risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event was consistently observed in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model adjusting clinical characteristics (hazard ratio, 4.32 [95% CI, 1.71-10.9]; P =0.002)., Conclusions: A total of 13.6% of Japanese subjects with HeFH presented with asymptomatic IASO. Despite lipid-lowering therapies, patients with both HeFH and IASO more likely had elevated risk of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. Our findings highlight asymptomatic IASO as a phenotypic feature of HeFH-related atherosclerosis, which ultimately affects future outcomes.

Background: Long-term control of cardiovascular risk factors after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the cornerstone for preventing recurrence. We investigated the extent of cardiovascular risk factor management in males and females with and without familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) 5 years after ACS., Methods: We studied patients hospitalized for ACS between 2009 and 2017 in a Swiss multicenter prospective cohort study. FH was defined based on clinical criteria from the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network and Simon Broome definitions. Five years post-ACS, we assessed low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) levels, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and other cardiovascular risk factors, comparing males to females with and without FH using generalized estimating equations., Results: A total of 3139 patients were included; mean age was 61.4 years (SD, 12.1), 620 (19.8%) were female, and 747 (23.5%) had possible FH. Compared with males at 5-years post-ACS, females were more likely to not use statins (odds ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.28-2.03]) and less likely to have combination LLT (odds ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.55-0.93]), without difference between patients with FH and without FH. Females in both FH and non-FH groups less frequently reached LDL-c values ≤1.8 mmol/L (odds ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.78-0.93]). Overall, patients with FH were more frequently on high-dose statins compared with patients without FH (51.0% versus 42.9%; P =0.001) and presented more frequently with a combination of 2 or more LLT compared with patients without FH (33.8% versus 17.7%; P <0.001), but less frequently reached LDL-c targets of ≤1.8 mmol/L (33.5% versus 44.3%; P <0.001) or ≤2.6 mmol/L (70.2% versus 78.1%; P =0.001)., Conclusions: Five years after ACS, females had less intensive LLT and were less likely to reach target LDL-c levels than males, regardless of FH status. Males and females with FH had less optimal control of LDL-c despite more frequently taking high-dose statins or combination LLT compared with patients without FH. Long-term management of patients with ACS and FH, especially females, warrants optimization., Competing Interests: Dr Matter reports receiving grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Roche, Bayer, Novo Nordisk; expert testimony from Merck Sharp & Dohme; payment for lectures from Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca, and Roche. Dr Mach has received honoraria for advisory boards and conferences on dyslipidemia from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi, and Pfizer. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Obicetrapib, a novel, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL particles, apolipoprotein (Apo) B, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) when added to statins with or without ezetimibe. By substantially reducing LDL-C, obicetrapib has the potential to lower atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) whose LDL-C levels remain high despite treatment with available maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies, addressing an unmet medical need in a patient population at high risk for cardiovascular events., Methods and Results: BROADWAY (NCT05142722) and BROOKLYN (NCT05425745) are ongoing placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized Phase III trials designed to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of obicetrapib as an adjunct to dietary intervention and maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies in participants with a history of ASCVD and/or underlying HeFH whose LDL-C is not adequately controlled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percent change in LDL-C from baseline to day 84. Other endpoints included changes in Apo B, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, Apo A1, Lp(a), and triglycerides in addition to parameters evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. BROADWAY also included an adjudicated assessment of major adverse cardiovascular events, measurements of glucose homeostasis, and an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring substudy. A total of 2,532 participants were randomized in BROADWAY and 354 in BROOKLYN to receive obicetrapib 10 mg or placebo (2:1) for 365 days with follow-up through 35 days after the last dose. Results from both trials are anticipated in 2024., Conclusion: These trials will provide safety and efficacy data to support the potential use of obicetrapib among patients with ASCVD or HeFH with elevated LDL-C for whom existing therapies are not sufficiently effective or well-tolerated., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Stephen J. Nicholls received grant/research support from AstraZeneca, New Amsterdam Pharma, Amgen, Anthera, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Novartis, Cerenis, The Medicines Company, Resverlogix, InfraReDx, Roche, Sanofi-Regeneron, and LipoScience; and was a consultant for AstraZeneca, Amarin, Akcea, Eli Lilly, Anthera, Omthera, Merck, Takeda, Resverlogix, Sanofi-Regeneron, CSL Behring, Esperion, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Vaxxinity. Adam J. Nelson received personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Novartis, and Sanofi. Marc Ditmarsch is Chief Development Officer for NewAmsterdam Pharma. John J.P. Kastelein is Chief Scientific Officer for NewAmsterdam Pharma and Emeritus Professor of Medicine at the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Christie M. Ballantyne received grant/research support (all paid to the institution, not individual) from Abbott Diagnostic, Akcea, Amgen, Arrowhead, Esperion, Ionis, Merck, NewAmsterdam Pharma, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Regeneron, Roche Diagnostic, NIH, AHA, and ADA and was a consultant for 89Bio, Abbott Diagnostics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Althera, Amarin, Amgen, Arrowhead, AstraZeneca, Denka Seiken, Esperion, Genentech, Gilead, Illumina, Ionia, Lilly, Matinas BioPharma Inc., Merck, NewAmsterdam Pharma, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Roche Diagnostic. Kausik K. Ray reports his institution received unrestricted research grants from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Regeneron, and Sanofi; consulting or advisory board honoraria from Novartis, Esperion, Daiichi Sankyo, Abbott, Bayer, Eli Lilly, Silence Therapeutics, CSL Behring, NewAmsterdam Pharma, Sanofi, Amgen Novo Nordisk, BI, Scribe, Vaxxinity, CRISPR, AZ, Kowa, and Cargene; honoraria for CME and non-CME from Novartis, Novo Nordisk, BI, AZ, Viatris, Daiichi Sankyo, Amgen, and Sanofi; and he has stock options from PEMI-31. Ann Marie Navar reports honoraria and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Esperion, Janssen, Eli Lilly, Merck, NewAmsterdam Pharma, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Pfizer, and Silence Therapeutics; and funding for research to her institution from Esperion, Janssen, and Amgen. Steven E. Nissen reports that Cleveland Clinic Center for Clinical Research has received funding to perform clinical trials from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Arrowhead, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Medtronic, MyoKardia, NewAmsterdam Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, and Silence Therapeutics. Dr. Nissen is involved in these clinical trials but receives no personal renumeration for his participation and consults for these pharmaceutical companies but does not accept compensation. Anne C. Goldberg has received research grant(s)/support from Amarin, Amgen, Akcea/IONIS, Arrowhead, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc., Merck, NewAmsterdam Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi; has served as a consultant for 23andMe, Akcea, Esperion, IONIS, Merck, NewAmsterdam Pharma, Novartis, OptumRX, Regeneron, and Sanofi; and has provided editorial work for Merck. Liam R. Brunham is Reserch Chair, Associate Professor for The University of British Columbia. Danielle Curcio is Executive Director of Clinical Operations for NewAmsterdam Pharma. Erin Wuerdeman is Executive Director of Clinical Operations for NewAmsterdam Pharma. Annie Nield is Executive Vice President and Head of Global Regulatory Affairs for NewAmsterdam Pharma. Douglas Kling is Chief Operating Officer for NewAmsterdam Pharma. Andrew Hsieh is Vice President of Medical Affairs for NewAmsterdam Pharma. Mary R. Dicklin is an employee of Midwest Biomedical Research, which has received consulting fees and/or grant funding from NewAmsterdam Pharma, Acasti Pharma, Beren Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Company, Indiana University and Foundation, Matinas BioPharma, NorthSea Therapeutics, and 89Bio. Brain A. Ference reports research grants from Merck, Novartis, Amgen, and Esperion Therapeutics, and consulting fees, advisory boards, or lecture honoraria from Novartis, Merck, Amgen, Regeneron, Sanofi, Novartis, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Daiichi-Sankyo, Viatris, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, NewAmsterdam Pharma, dalCOR, The Medicines Co., Mylan, CiVi Pharma, KrKa Pharmaceuticals, American College of Cardiology, EAS, and European Society of Cardiology. Ulrich Laufs has received honoraria from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Novartis, and Sanofi. Maciej Banach has received renumeration for lectures from Adamed, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Exceed Orphan, KRKA Polypharma, Mylan/Viatris, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, Teva, and Zentiva; participated in advisory panels for Adamed, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Esperion, NewAmsterdam Pharma, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; and received grants from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Mylan/Viatris, and Sanofi. Roxana Mehran has institutional research grants from Abbott, Abiomed, Alleviant Medical, Amgen, AM-Pharma, Applied Therapeutics, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiawav, CeloNova, Chiesi, Concept Medical, CSL Behring, CytoSorbents, Daiichi Sankyo, Element Science, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Humacyte, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, I-Laser, Janssen, Magenta Medical, Mediasphere Medical, Medtelligence, Medtronic, Novartis, OrbusNeich, Penumbra, PhaseBio, Philips, Pi-Cardia, PLx Pharma, Protembis, RenalPro, RM Global, Shockwave, Transverse Medical, Vivasure, and ZOLL Medical; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Cine-Med Research, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Vectura Inc., and WebMD; honoraria from Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Philips Electronics, Biotronik Inc., and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals; advisory board participation for Humacyte Inc., PhaseBio, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Medtronic, Philips, and PLx Pharma; participation on a data safety monitoring board for Pi-Cardia; a leadership role with the American Medical Association (JAMA Cardiology, associate editor), American College of Cardiology (BOT Member, SC Member CTR Program), and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (Women in Innovations Committee Member); stock or stock options from Applied Therapeutics, Elixir Medical, Stel, and ControlRad; and faculty membership with the Cardiovascular Research Foundation. Alberico L. Catapano in the last three years has received honoraria, lecture fees, or research grants from Aegerion, Amarin, Amgen, Amryt Pharma, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Esperion, Ionis Pharmaceutical, Medscape Education, Menarini, MSD, NewAmsterdam Pharma, Novartis, NovoNordisk, PeerVoice, Pfizer, Recordati, Regeneron, Sanofi, The Corpus, Ultragenyx, and Viatris. Michael H. Davidson is Chief Executive Officer for NewAmsterdam Pharma., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by severely elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In the pivotal Phase 3 HoFH trial (NCT03399786), evinacumab significantly decreased LDL-C in patients with HoFH. This study assesses the long-term safety and efficacy of evinacumab in adult and adolescent patients with HoFH., Methods: In this open-label, single-arm, Phase 3 trial (NCT03409744), patients aged ≥12 years with HoFH who were evinacumab-naïve or had previously received evinacumab in other trials (evinacumab-continue) received intravenous evinacumab 15 mg/kg every 4 weeks with stable lipid-lowering therapy., Results: A total of 116 patients (adults: n = 102; adolescents: n = 14) were enrolled, of whom 57 (49.1%) were female. Patients were treated for a median (range) duration of 104.3 (28.3-196.3) weeks. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious TEAEs were reported in 93 (80.2%) and 27 (23.3%) patients, respectively. Two (1.7%) deaths were reported (neither was considered related to evinacumab). Three (2.6%) patients discontinued due to TEAEs (none were considered related to evinacumab). From baseline to Week 24, evinacumab decreased mean LDL-C by 43.6% [mean (standard deviation, SD), 3.4 (3.2) mmol/L] in the overall population; mean LDL-C reduction in adults and adolescents was 41.7% [mean (SD), 3.2 (3.3) mmol/L] and 55.4% [mean (SD), 4.7 (2.5) mmol/L], respectively., Conclusions: In this large cohort of patients with HoFH, evinacumab was generally well tolerated and markedly decreased LDL-C irrespective of age and sex. Moreover, the efficacy and safety of evinacumab was sustained over the long term., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Alirocumab (Praluent ® ), a proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor that has been co-developed by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Sanofi (formerly sanofi-aventis), is approved globally for use in adults with established cardiovascular disease, primary hyperlipidemia [including heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) or homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)]. In November 2023, based on clinical data in patients aged 8-17 years, alirocumab received its first pediatric approval in the EU as an adjunct to diet alone, or in combination with a statin and/or other low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapies, in pediatric patients aged ≥ 8 years with HeFH. Alirocumab was approved a few months later in the US for use as an adjunct to diet and other LDL-C-lowering therapies in pediatric patients aged ≥ 8 years with HeFH to reduce LDL-C. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of alirocumab leading to this first pediatric approval for HeFH., (© 2024. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

In this case report, a 31-year-old woman with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) underwent treatment with statins and PCSK9 inhibitor but had to discontinue due to elevated creatine kinase levels and neurological and muscular side effects. In 2021, the patient received inclisiran therapy, the first known instance of its application in Denmark. No side effects were reported, and LDL cholesterol levels were significantly reduced. This case report highlights the potential of inclisiran as an effective and well-tolerated treatment for individuals with heterozygous FH., (Published under Open Access CC-BY-NC-BD 4.0. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.)

Aims: The availability of novel lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) has remarkably changed the clinical management of homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH). The impact of these advances was evaluated in a cohort of 139 HoFH patients followed in a real-world clinical setting., Methods and Results: The clinical characteristics of 139 HoFH patients, along with information about LLTs and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at baseline and after a median follow-up of 5 years, were retrospectively retrieved from the records of patients enrolled in the LIPid transport disorders Italian GEnetic Network-Familial Hypercholesterolaemia (LIPIGEN-FH) Registry. The annual rates of major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events (MACE-plus) during follow-up were compared before and after baseline. Additionally, the lifelong survival free from MACE-plus was compared with that of the historical LIPIGEN HoFH cohort. At baseline, LDL-C level was 332 ± 138 mg/dL. During follow-up, the potency of LLTs was enhanced and, at the last visit, 15.8% of patients were taking quadruple therapy. Consistently, LDL-C decreased to an average value of 124 mg/dL corresponding to a 58.3% reduction (Pt < 0.001), with the lowest value (∼90 mg/dL) reached in patients receiving proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors and lomitapide and/or evinacumab as add-on therapies. The average annual MACE-plus rate in the 5-year follow-up was significantly lower than that observed during the 5 years before baseline visit (21.7 vs. 56.5 per 1000 patients/year; P = 0.0016)., Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the combination of novel and conventional LLTs significantly improved LDL-C control with a signal of better cardiovascular prognosis in HoFH patients. Overall, these results advocate the use of intensive, multidrug LLTs to effectively manage HoFH., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: Mar.A. received research grant support from Amryt Pharmaceutical, Amgen, IONIS, Akcea Therapeutics, Daiichi-Sankyo, Novartis, Pfizer, and Regeneron; served as a consultant for Amgen, Akcea Therapeutics, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Ultragenyx; and received fees for lecturing, congress participation, and advisory board participation from Amgen, Amryt Pharmaceutical, Daiichi-Sankyo, Regeneron, Sanofi, Amarin, and Ultragenyx. R.A. received consulting fees from GSK-Galaxosmithline. Si.B. received fees for lectures from SOBI; detains stock options of Eli Lilly, UnitedHealth, Novo Nordisk, Merck, and Thermo Fisher Scientific; and received grants for meeting participation from Novartis. M.B. received fees for lectures from Menarini, Servier, Alfasigma, Neopharmed, Aurora, Biopharma, Amryt, Novartis, Sanofi, and Viatris and received fees for participations in meeting from Ultragenyx, Daiichi-Sankyo, Lusofarmaco, and Sanofi. Carubbi F received grants for lectures and meeting participation from Amgen and Amryt, received funding for grants from Sanofi and Amgen, and received funding for data monitoring and lectures from Sanofi. A.L.C. received funding for consulting, lectures, and meeting attendance from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aegerion, Amryt, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esperion, Kowa, Ionis Pharma, Mylan, Merck, Menarini, Novartis, Recordati, Regeneron, Sandoz, Sanofi, and Viatris and also received research grants from Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Menarini, Sanofi-Regeneron, and Mylan. L.D. received personal fees for public speaking or consultancy or grant support from Amryt Pharmaceutical, Akcea Therapeutics, SOBI, AuroraBiopharma, Novartis, Amarin, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, and Sandoz. F.F. received consulting funds from Merck. G.I. received funds for research grants from Amryt and Ultragenix; lecture fees from Novartis, Sanofi, Lusofarmaco, and Agaton; funds for meeting attendance from Ultragenix; and funds for data monitoring from Novartis, Agaton, and Sanofi; G.M. received research grants from Daiichi-Sankyo and Novartis; lecture fees from Amgen, Eli Lilly, and Neopharmed; fund for meeting attendance from Amgen; and funds for data monitoring from Sanofi-Aventis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Amrin, and Novo Nordisk. F.N. received fees for consulting, lectures, and data monitoring from Sanofi. C.P. received fees for lectures from SOBI. L.P. received fees for lectures from Amgen, Sanofi, and Amryt and received funding for meeting attendance from Sanofi, Ultragenyx, and Daiichi-Sankyo; D.T. received fees for lectures from SOBI. J.P.W. received fees for lectures from Servier, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Sanofi, and Amgen and received funding for meeting attendance from Daiichi-Sankyo, Amgen, and MSD. A.Z. received fees for lectures from Amgen, Sanofi, Amarin, Amryt, Abbott, Viatris, Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Alfasigma, and Servier. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: Patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) remain at very high cardiovascular risk despite the best standard of care lipid-lowering treatment. The addition of evinacumab, an angiopoietin-like protein 3 monoclonal antibody, more than halves low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in short-term studies. This study evaluated whether the evinacumab response was durable in the long term and improved cardiovascular outcome., Methods: The OLE ELIPSE HoFH (Open-Label Extension to Evinacumab Lipid Studies in Patients With HoFH) study included newly diagnosed patients and those completing the ELIPSE HoFH trial, on stable lipid-lowering therapy including lipoprotein apheresis but not lomitapide. All patients received evinacumab (15 mg/kg intravenously) every 4 weeks, with no change in concomitant lipid-lowering treatment during the first 6 months. The primary efficacy end points were the mean absolute and percentage changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol from baseline to 6 months. A key secondary end point was cardiovascular event-free survival, which was compared with a control HoFH cohort not treated with evinacumab or lomitapide and matched for age, sex, and lipoprotein apheresis, derived from French Registry of Familial hypercholesterolemia., Results: Twelve patients, 5 women and 7 men (12-57 years), were enrolled in 3 centers in France. At 6 months, the mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction with evinacumab was 3.7 mmol/L or 56% (from 6.5 mmol/L at baseline to 2.8 mmol/L; P <0.0001) and was sustained over the median 3.5-year follow-up. No patients on evinacumab experienced cardiovascular events versus 13 events for 5/21 (24%) over 4 years in the control cohort (likelihood P =0.0267)., Conclusions: Real-life, long-term evinacumab adjunctive to lipid-lowering therapy including lipoprotein apheresis led to sustained low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering and improved cardiovascular event-free survival of patients with HoFH., Competing Interests: Disclosures S. Béliard reports grants/honoraria from Ultragenyx for clinical trials and consultancy and from Amarin, Amgen, Amryt Novartis, Sanofi for clinical trials, conferences and consultancy. R. Valero reports personal or institutional honoraria for speakers’ bureaux, consultancy, clinical trials and travel/accommodation for professional purposes from Adelia Médical, Akcea, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Dinno Santé, Ionis, Janssen, Lilly, Merck and Co., Nestlé, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orkyn, Pfizer, Sanofi-Regeneron, Servier. E. Bruckert reports grants/honoraria for clinical trials/consultancy from MSD, Astra Zeneca, Genfit, Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Aegerion/Amryt, Lilly, Mylan/Viatris, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, Organon, Akcea Therapeutics, and Ultragenyx. M. Farnier reports consultancy honoraria from Abbott, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Austell, Kowa, Merck and Co., Organon, Pfizer, Recordati, Sanofi/Regeneron, Servier, SMB, Ultragenyx, and Viatris. A. Gallo reports research grants and honoraria from Amgen, Sanofi and Regeneron, Mylan Viatris, Merck and Co., Akcea Therapeutics, Amryt, Novartis, Servier, Ultragenyx, Amarin, and Eli Lilly. The other authors report no conflicts.

Objectives: This study explored the association of deleterious variants in pharmacodynamics (PD) genes with statin response and adverse effects in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and analyzed their potential effects on protein structure and stability., Methods: Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from 144 adult FH patients treated with statins. A panel of 32 PD genes was analyzed by exon-targeted gene sequencing. Deleterious variants were identified using prediction algorithms and their structural effects were analyzed by molecular modeling studies., Results: A total of 102 variants were predicted as deleterious (83 missense, 8 stop-gain, 4 frameshift, 1 indel, 6 splicing). The variants ABCA1 rs769705621 (indel), LPA rs41267807 (p.Tyr2023Cys) and KIF6 rs20455 (p.Trp719Arg) were associated with reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) response to statins, and the LPL rs1801177 (p.Asp36Asn) with increased LDLc response (P < 0.05). LPA rs3124784 (p.Arg2016Cys) was predicted to increase statin response (P = 0.022), and ABCA1 rs769705621 to increase the risk of statin-related adverse events (SRAE) (P = 0.027). LPA p.Arg2016Cys and LPL p.Asn36Asp maintained interactions with solvent, LPA p.Tyr2023Cys reduced intramolecular interaction with Gln1987, and KIF6 p.Trp719Arg did not affect intramolecular interactions. DDMut analysis showed that LPA p.Arg2016Cys and p.Tyr2023Cys and LPL p.Asp36Asn caused energetically favorable changes, and KIF6 p.Trp719Arg resulted in unfavorable energetic changes, affecting protein stability., Conclusion: Deleterious variants in ABCA1, LPA, LPL and KIF6 are associated with variability in LDLc response to statins, and ABCA1 rs769705621 is associated with SRAE risk in FH patients. Molecular modeling studies suggest that LPA p.Tyr2023Cys and KIF6 p.Trp719Arg disturb protein conformational structure and stability., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare and serious genetic condition characterized by premature cardiovascular disease due to severely elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). HoFH primarily results from loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in the LDL receptor (LDLR), reducing LDL-C clearance such that patients experience severe hypercholesterolemia, exacerbating the risk of developing cardiovascular events. Treatment options such as statins, lomitapide, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, and apheresis help lower LDL-C; however, many patients with HoFH still fail to reach their target LDL-C levels and many of these lipid-lowering therapies are not indicated for pediatric use. Angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) has been identified as a target to treat elevated LDL-C by acting as a natural inhibitor of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and endothelial lipase (EL), enzymes involved in the hydrolysis of the triglyceride and phospholipid content of very low-density lipoproteins. Persons heterozygous for LOF mutations in ANGPTL3 were reported to have lower LDL-C than non-carriers and lower risk of coronary artery disease. Evinacumab is a first-in-class human monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to ANGPTL3 to prevent its inhibition of LPL and EL. In clinical trials, a 15 mg/kg intravenous dose every 4 weeks has shown a mean percent change from baseline in LDL-C of ~50% in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with HoFH. This mini review article describes the mechanism of action of evinacumab, evinacumab population PK and PD modeling, and clinical development history of evinacumab for the treatment of HoFH., (© 2024 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of inclisiran in Japanese patients with high cardiovascular risk and elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)., Methods: ORION-15 was a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial. Patients with hypercholesterolemia, including heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), were randomized to inclisiran sodium 100, 200, or 300 mg, or placebo and dosed subcutaneously on Days 1, 90, and 270. The primary endpoint was the percentage change from baseline to Day 180 to demonstrate the superiority of inclisiran vs. placebo. Patients who consented to the PK substudy had additional study procedures for blood collection and safety assessment., Results: Overall, 312 patients (mean age, 63.6 years; male, 74.4%; baseline LDL-C, 114.0 mg/dL) were randomized. Baseline characteristics were well balanced among the groups. At Day 180, inclisiran at all doses demonstrated significant LDL-C and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) reductions (p＜0.0001 for both), which showed a dose-response relationship. The greatest reductions (LDL-C, 65.3%; PCSK9, 79.2%) were with inclisiran sodium 300 mg. At Day 180, ＞86% of the patients receiving inclisiran achieved the Japan Atherosclerosis Society 2017 lipid management targets compared to 8.9% for placebo. The mean (SD) plasma half-life for inclisiran was 6.8 (2.0)-7.6 (0.8) h. The incidence of adverse events with inclisiran was similar to that with placebo., Conclusion: Inclisiran sodium 100, 200, and 300 mg demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant LDL-C and PCSK9 reductions at Day 180, which were consistent over 12 months. Inclisiran was effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia, including HeFH.

Aim: We aimed to describe clinical and genetic characteristics, lipid-lowering treatment and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes over a long-term follow-up in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)., Methods: SAFEHEART (Spanish Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Cohort Study) is a long-term study in molecularly diagnosed FH. Data analyzed in HoFH were prospectively obtained from 2004 until 2022. ASCVD events, lipid profile and lipid-lowering treatment were determined., Results: Thirty-nine HoFH patients were analyzed. The mean age was 42 ± 20 years and nineteen (49%) were women. Median follow-up was 11 years (IQR 6,18). Median age at genetic diagnosis was 24 years (IQR 8,42). At enrolment, 33% had ASCVD and 18% had aortic valve disease. Patients with new ASCVD events and aortic valve disease at follow-up were six (15%), and one (3%), respectively. Median untreated LDL-C levels were 555 mg/dL (IQ 413,800), and median LDL-C levels at last follow-up was 122 mg/dL (IQR 91,172). Most patients (92%) were on high intensity statins and ezetimibe, 28% with PCSK9i, 26% with lomitapide, and 23% with lipoprotein-apheresis. Fourteen patients (36%) attained an LDL-C level below 100 mg/dL, and 10% attained an LDL-C below 70 mg/dL in secondary prevention. Patients with null/null variants were youngers, had higher untreated LDL-C and had the first ASCVD event earlier. Free-event survival is longer in patients with defective variant compared with those patients with at least one null variant (p=0.02)., Conclusions: HoFH is a severe life threating disease with a high genetic and phenotypic variability. The improvement in lipid-lowering treatment and LDL-C levels have contributed to reduce ASCVD events., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest RA reports personal fees and non-financial support from Tecnofarma Chile, NovoNordisk Chile, and personal fees from Novartis Chile, Amgen Spain, and Teva Chile, outside the submitted work. JLDD received honoraria for research activities from Merck Sharp and Dhome Spain, Amgen Spain, and Sanofi Spain. PM, received research grants from Amgen USA and Sanofi Spain., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Familial hypercholesterolemia leads to elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from birth onwards due to a pathogenetic variation in genes in cholesterol metabolism. Early screening to identify and subsequently treat children with familial hypercholesterolemia is crucial to reduce the risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This review focuses on recent insights in the field of pediatric familial hypercholesterolemia., Recent Findings: Screening in childhood and early initiation of optimal lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) have shown promising outcomes in the prevention of ASCVD. In addition, cost-effectiveness research has demonstrated highly favorable results. With the availability of novel therapies, familial hypercholesterolemia has become a well treatable disease., Summary: Children with familial hypercholesterolemia benefit from early detection and optimal treatment of their elevated LDL-C levels., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) patients are subjected to a high lifetime exposure to low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), despite use of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). This study aimed to quantify the extent of subclinical atherosclerosis and to evaluate the association between lifetime cumulative LDL-C exposure and coronary atherosclerosis in young FH patients., Methods and Results: Familial hypercholesterolaemia patients, divided into a subgroup of early treated (LLT initiated <25 years) and late treated (LLT initiated ≥25 years) patients, and an age- and sex-matched unaffected control group, underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) with artificial intelligence-guided analysis. Ninety genetically diagnosed FH patients and 45 unaffected volunteers (mean age 41 ± 3 years, 51 (38%) female) were included. Familial hypercholesterolaemia patients had higher cumulative LDL-C exposure (181 ± 54 vs. 105 ± 33 mmol/L ∗ years) and higher prevalence of coronary plaque compared with controls (46 [51%] vs. 10 [22%], OR 3.66 [95%CI 1.62-8.27]). Every 75 mmol/L ∗ years cumulative exposure to LDL-C was associated with a doubling in per cent atheroma volume (total plaque volume divided by total vessel volume). Early treated patients had a modestly lower cumulative LDL-C exposure compared with late treated FH patients (167 ± 41 vs. 194 ± 61 mmol/L ∗ years; P = 0.045), without significant difference in coronary atherosclerosis. Familial hypercholesterolaemia patients with above-median cumulative LDL-C exposure had significantly higher plaque prevalence (OR 3.62 [95%CI 1.62-8.27]; P = 0.001), compared with patients with below-median exposure., Conclusion: Lifetime exposure to LDL-C determines coronary plaque burden in FH, underlining the need of early as well as potent treatment initiation. Periodic CCTA may offer a unique opportunity to monitor coronary atherosclerosis and personalize treatment in FH., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: L.F.R. is cofounder of Lipid Tools and reports speakers fee from Ultragenyx. G.K.H. reports research grants from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (vidi 016.156.445), CardioVascular Research Initiative, European Union, and the Klinkerpad fonds, institutional research support from Aegerion, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Ionis, Kowa, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, and The Medicines Company; speaker’s bureau and consulting fees from Amgen, Aegerion, Sanofi, and Regeneron until April 2019 (fees paid to the academic institution); and part-time employment and stock holder of at Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark since April 2019. W.A.B. reports lecturing fees and advisory board fees from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk. P.K. has received research grants from HeartFlow, Inc. A.W. reports payment or honoraria for participation in safety board for Amryt, in steering committee for Novartis, and research support from Amgen, Regeneron, Novartis, Silence Therapeutics, and Esperion. E.S.G.S. has received ad-board/lecturing fees, paid to the institution, from: Amgen, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, Esperion, Daiichi Sankyo, NovoNordisk, Ionis/Akcea, and Amarin. N.S.N. is cofounder of Lipid Tools. The other authors report no disclosures., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Background: In 2019, the European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) published updated guidelines, recommending even lower blood cholesterol targets than previously. In patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), who have very elevated blood cholesterol levels and are at ('Very') 'High risk' of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), this represents a real challenge. Anti-Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibody (anti-PCSK9 mAb) has been commercially available for FH in Belgium since 2015. Our study aims to investigate the real-life efficacy of anti-PCSK9 mAb in FH patients. Method: We sourced patients from the EAS FH Studies Collaboration database (an international database on FH in which Belgium participates). We only retained patients using anti-PCSK9 mAb and followed at our Lipid Clinic. Results: Of the 239 subjects included in this study (mean age: 56 years), 85% were considered at 'Very High Risk' (56% with a history of ASCVD), the remaining 15% were at 'High Risk'. The PCSK9 mAb treatment reduced LDL-C levels by 54% within the first year. This reduction was maintained over the follow-up (FU) period (3.0 ± 1.8 years). The EAS targets were reached in 50% of the subjects, 93% of whom were also treated with statins. The treatment was very well tolerated. At the end of the observation period, 96% patients continued receiving PCSK9 mAb. Conclusions: Anti-PCSK9 mAb are a safe and effective therapeutic option for lowering LDL-C levels in FH patients. It allowed a significant portion of our FH patients to reach their lipid targets, mainly in those with combined therapy with statin and/or ezetimibe.

Aims: Three physical signs, namely tendon xanthomas, corneal arcus and xanthelasma, have been associated with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH). The prevalence and clinical significance of these signs are not well established among contemporary heFH individuals. This study explored the frequency as well as the association of these physical signs with prevalent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in heFH individuals., Methods: Data from the Hellenic Familial Hypercholesterolemia Registry were applied for this analysis. The diagnosis of heFH was based on the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Score. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the association of heFH-related physical signs with prevalent ASCVD., Results: Adult patients ( n  = 2156, mean age 50 ± 15 years, 47.7% women) were included in this analysis. Among them, 14.5% had at least one heFH-related physical sign present. The prevalence of corneal arcus before the age of 45 years was 6.6%, tendon xanthomas 5.3%, and xanthelasmas 5.8%. Among physical signs, only the presence of corneal arcus before the age of 45 years was independently associated with the presence of premature coronary artery disease (CAD). No association of any physical sign with total CAD, stroke or peripheral artery disease was found. Patients with physical signs were more likely to receive higher intensity statin therapy and dual lipid-lowering therapy, but only a minority reached optimal lipid targets., Conclusion: The prevalence of physical signs is relatively low in contemporary heFH patients. The presence of corneal arcus before the age of 45 years is independently associated with premature CAD., (Copyright © 2024 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pediatric patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) have an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and difficulty meeting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. In this post hoc analysis, we evaluated pooled safety and efficacy data from 3 studies in pediatric patients with HoFH treated with the PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) monoclonal antibody inhibitor evolocumab., Methods: Patients with HoFH aged 10 to 17 years received treatment with open-label evolocumab 420 mg subcutaneously monthly or biweekly in the TAUSSIG, RAMAN, or HAUSER-OLE clinical studies. All patients received background statins with or without ezetimibe. Study duration ranged from 12 to 260 weeks. The primary end point was treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient-years. Efficacy end points were changes from baseline to week 12 in lipids and PCSK9., Results: Of the 39 patients in the pooled analysis, 69.2% were males, median age was 13.0 years, and 79.5% (31/39) had genotyped HoFH with LDLR pathogenic variants. Overall, median exposure to evolocumab was 18.2 (Q1, Q3: 3.0, 18.5) months. Treatment-emergent adverse events with an exposure-adjusted patient incidence rate of ≥5% were upper respiratory tract infection (6.6%), influenza (5.2%), and acne (5.0%) per 100 patient-years. Exposure-adjusted patient incidence of serious treatment-emergent adverse events was 13.3% per 100 patient-years. Excluding 4 patients receiving lipoprotein apheresis, week 12 median percentage change from baseline in LDL-C was -2.9% (Q1, Q3: -21.7, 1.5); however, 42.9% (15/35) of patients achieved ≥15% reduction in LDL-C from baseline. Residual LDLR (LDL receptor) activity was not associated with a reduction in LDL-C., Conclusions: In this pooled data analysis from 3 studies in pediatric patients with HoFH, evolocumab was well tolerated, with no new safety signals reported. These safety findings are consistent with findings from previous studies of evolocumab. Patients showed marked variability in LDL-C reduction. Results from this pooled analysis support guidelines suggesting a trial of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy regardless of estimated residual LDLR function., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01624142, NCT03403374, and NCT02624869., Competing Interests: Disclosures F.J. Raal has received research grants, honoraria, or consulting fees for professional input and lectures from Sanofi, Regeneron, Amgen, and Novartis; and travel support to attend the 2023 European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Congress from EAS. R.A. Hegele reports receiving consulting fees from Acasti, Aegerion, Akcea/Ionis, Amgen, Boston Heart, HLS Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Ultragenyx; and lecture fees from Amgen, HLS Therapeutics, and Novartis. A. Ruzza is a former employee and a stockholder of Amgen. He is a current employee and a stockholder of GlaxoSmithKline. He holds a pending patent application PCT/US2021/034489 on PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibitors and methods of use thereof to treat cholesterol-related disorders. J.A.G. López, A.K. Bhatia, H. Wang, and J. Wu are employees and stockholders of Amgen. D. Gaudet reports receiving research grants, honoraria, or consulting fees for professional input and lectures from Alnylam, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, Arrowhead, Boehringer Ingelhein, Chiesi (Amryt), CRISPR Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Esperion, Ionis, Kowa, New Amsterdam Pharma, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Ultragenyx, Uniqure, and Verve Therapeutics. A. Wiegman reports research support for pharmaceutical trials of lipid-lowering agents from Amgen, Sanofi-Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Silence Therapeutics, Esperion, and Ultragenyx; and is member of a safety board for Amryt. R.D. Santos reports receiving consulting fees and lecture fees from Abbott, Amgen, Amryt, AstraZeneca, Aché, Biolab, Getz Pharma, Eli Lilly, Libbs, Merck, PTC Therapeutics, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, and Sanofi-Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; and grant support from Amgen, Kowa, Esperion, Novartis, and Sanofi-Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. The other author reports no conflicts.

Refractory hypercholesterolemia (RH) is characterized by the failure of patients to achieve therapeutic targets for low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) despite receiving maximal tolerable doses of standard lipid-lowering treatments. It predominantly impacts individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), thereby elevating the risk of cardiovascular complications. The prevalence of RH is now recognized to be substantially greater than previously thought. This review provides a comprehensive insight into current and emerging therapies for RH patients, including groundbreaking genetic-based therapeutic approaches. The review places emphasis on the dependency of therapies on low-density lipoprotein receptors (LDLRs) and highlights the critical role of considering LDLR activity in RH patients for individualization of the treatment.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is an underdiagnosed and undertreated ultra-rare disease. We utilized claims data from the Komodo Healthcare Map database to develop a machine-learning model to identify potential HoFH patients. We tokenized patients enrolled in MyRARE (patient support program for those prescribed evinacumab-dgnb in the United States) and linked them with their Komodo claims. A true positive HoFH cohort (n = 331) was formed by including patients from MyRARE and patients with prescriptions for evinacumab-dgnb or lomitapide. The negative cohort (n = 1423) comprised patients with or at risk for cardiovascular disease. We divided the cohort into an 80% training and 20% testing set. Overall, 10,616 candidate features were investigated; 87 were selected due to clinical relevance and importance on prediction performance. Different machine-learning algorithms were explored, with fast interpretable greedy-tree sums selected as the final machine-learning tool. This selection was based on its satisfactory performance and its easily interpretable nature. The model identified four useful features and yielded precision (positive predicted value) of 0.98, recall (sensitivity) of 0.88, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.98, and accuracy of 0.97. The model performed well in identifying HoFH patients in the testing set, providing a useful tool to facilitate HoFH screening and diagnosis via healthcare claims data., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose of Review: Despite familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) being the most common genetic cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD), genetic testing is rarely utilized in the US. This review summarizes what is known about the clinical utility of genetic testing and its role in the diagnosis and screening of FH., Recent Findings: The presence of an FH-causative variant is associated with a substantially higher risk of CVD, even when low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are only modestly elevated. Genetic testing can facilitate the identification of FH cases who may be missed by clinical diagnostic criteria, improve risk stratification beyond LDL-C and family history, guide treatment decisions, and improve treatment initiation and adherence. Genetic testing can be incorporated into FH screening and diagnosis algorithms, including cascade, targeted, and universal screening. Integrating genetic testing into cascade screening can enhance the effectiveness of the process. Several models of universal FH screening with coordinated genetic and lipid testing are feasible and effective., Summary: More systematic integration of genetic testing into FH diagnosis and screening can significantly reduce the burden of this condition through early detection and treatment. Further pragmatic implementation studies are needed to determine how to more effectively and affordably integrate genetic testing into clinical lipid screening programs., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is a common genetic disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the LDL-C metabolism. Lifelong exposure to elevated LDL-C levels leads to a high risk of premature cardiovascular disease. To reduce that risk, children with HeFH should be identified and treated with lipid-lowering therapy. The cornerstone consists of statins and ezetimibe, but not in all patients this lowers the LDL-C levels to treatment targets. For these patients, more intensive lipid-lowering therapy is needed., Areas Covered: In this review, we provide an overview of the monoclonal antibodies which are currently available or being tested for treating HeFH in childhood., Expert Opinion: Monoclonal antibodies that inhibit PCSK9 are first in line lipid-lowering treatment options if oral statin and ezetimibe therapy are insufficient, due to intolerance or very high baseline LDL-C levels. Both evolocumab and alirocumab have been shown to be safe and effective in children with HeFH. For children, evolocumab has been registered from the age of 10 years old and alirocumab from the age of 8 years old. The costs of these new agents are much higher than oral therapy, which makes it important to only use them in a selected patient population.

Background: Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) predisposes to premature cardiovascular diseases. Since 2015, the European Atherosclerosis Society has advocated initiation of statins at 8-10 years of age and a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target of <135 mg/dL. Longitudinal data from large databases on pharmacological management of pediatric HeFH are lacking., Objective: Here, we describe treatment patterns and LDL-C goal attainment in pediatric HeFH using longitudinal real-world data., Methods: This was a retrospective and prospective multicenter cohort study (2015-2021) of children with HeFH, diagnosed genetically or clinically, aged <18 years, and followed up in the National French Registry of FH (REFERCHOL). Data on the study population as well as treatment patterns and outcomes are summarized as mean±SD., Results: We analyzed the data of 674 HeFH children (age at last visit: 13.1 ± 3.6 years; 82.0 % ≥10 years; 52.5 % females) who were followed up for a mean of 2.8 ± 3.5 years. Initiation of lipid-lowering therapy was on average at 11.8 ± 3.0 years of age for a duration of 2.5 ± 2.8 years. At the last visit, among patients eligible for treatment (573), 36 % were not treated, 57.1 % received statins alone, 6.4 % statins with ezetimibe, and 0.2 % ezetimibe alone. LDL-C was 266±51 mg/dL before treatment and 147±54 mg/dL at the last visit (-44.7 %) in treated patients. Regarding statins, 3.3 %, 65.1 %, and 31.6 % of patients received high-, moderate-, and low-intensity statins, respectively. Overall, 59 % of children on statin therapy alone and 35.1 % on bitherapy did not achieve the LDL-C goal; fewer patients in the older age group did not reach the treatment goal., Conclusion: Pediatric patients with FH followed up in specialist lipid clinics in France receive late treatment, undertreatment, or suboptimal treatment and half of them do not reach the therapeutic LDL-C goal. Finding a more efficient framework for linking scientific evidence to clinical practice is needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest • NP has received honoraria from ADEN-ALLP, Alexion AMGEN, Amryt, Biocodex, Elsevier, Kowa, Lactalis, Nestlé NHS, NHC, Nutricia-Danone, Orphan Europ, Sanofi, Shire, Ultragenyx • PT has participated in one scientific committee at Ultragenyx laboratories • YP has received honoraria from Servier, Viatris, AMGEN, Sanofi, Bouchara-Recordati • JPR has received remuneration from Sanofi, Ultragenyx • EB has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, AMGEN, MSD, Sanofi and Regeneron, Aegerion/Amryt, Lilly, Ionis-pharmaceuticals, Akcea, Alexion pharma, Servier, Novartis, Mylan/Viatris, Organon and Genfit • AG reports grants and personal fees from AMGEN, Sanofi, Regeneron, Mylan Viatris, MSD, Akcea Therapeutics, Amryt and Ultragenyx. • SB has received honoraria for board, conferences, clinical trial or congress from Aegerion, Akcea, Elivie, Novartis, Sanofi or AMGEN • PP, LR, AV, RR have no conflict of interest related to this article., (Copyright © 2024 French Society of Pediatrics. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is one of the most common monogenic disorders and is safely treatable with lipid-lowering medication. However, most individuals with HeFH remain untreated and undetected, especially in paediatric populations where the potential for long-term therapeutic benefit is higher. Here, we review the recent literature on health economic outcomes for the detection and management of FH in children., Recent Findings: A targeted literature review identified eight studies evaluating detection and management strategies for paediatric FH populations in the last 25 years. Most studies conducted modelled cost-effectiveness analyses to understand the long-term impact of these strategies on health outcomes and the financial impact on the healthcare system. All studies reported that detection and management of HeFH in paediatric populations was cost-effective, regardless of the age of the children. However, cost-effectiveness varied depending on the method of case ascertainment - targeted screening was generally cheaper overall, but less effective, than whole-of-population screening, although both methods were generally cost-effective., Summary: Detection and management of HeFH in paediatric populations is a cost-effective way to significantly lower the burden of disease later in life for these individuals. These strategies should be implemented across healthcare systems., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disease characterized by elevated LDL-C levels. In this study, two FH probands and 9 family members from two families from northeastern Thailand were tested for LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9 variants by whole-exome sequencing, PCR-HRM, and Sanger sequencing. In silico analysis of LDLR was performed to analyse its structure‒function relationship. A novel variant of LDLR (c.535&#95;536delinsAT, p.Glu179Met) was detected in proband 1 and proband 2 in homozygous and heterozygous forms, respectively. A total of 6 of 9 family members were heterozygous for LDLR p.Glu179Met variant. Compared with proband 2, proband 1 had higher baseline TC and LDL-C levels and a poorer response to lipid-lowering therapy combined with a PCSK9 inhibitor. Multiple sequence alignment showed that LDLR p.Glu179Met was located in a fully conserved region. Homology modelling demonstrated that LDLR p.Glu179Met variant lost one H-bond and a negative charge. In conclusion, a novel LDLR p.Glu179Met variant was identified for the first time in Thai FH patients. This was also the first report of homozygous FH patient in Thailand. Our findings may expand the knowledge of FH-causing variants in Thai population, which is beneficial for cascade screening, genetic counselling, and FH management to prevent coronary artery disease., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal semi-dominant disease, characterized by markedly elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) from conception and accelerated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, often resulting in early death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of clinically defined FH in Chinese Han patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and compare the long-term prognosis of ACS patients with and without FH receiving lipid-lowering therapy containing statins after a coronary event., Methods: All ACS patients were screened at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between Jan 2019 and Sep 2020, and 531 participants were enrolled. All were examined for FH under the Dutch Lipid Clinical Network (DLCN) criteria, and those patients were divided into definite/probable FH, possible FH and unlikely FH. The severity of coronary artery disease was evaluated by the Gensini scoring system. Plasma levels of total cholesterol (TC), triacylglycerol (TG), HDL-cholesterol (HDL-c), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c), very low-density lipoproteins-cholesterol (VLDL-c), apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1), apolipoprotein B (apoB) and lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) were determined centrally at baseline and the last follow-up visit in the fasting state. The non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-c) concentration, the TC/HDL-c and apoB/apoA1 ratios were calculated. After FH patients received lipid-lowering treatment containing statin, the target LDL-c levels recommended by the guidelines (LDL-c < 1.8 mmol/L or < 1.4 mmol/L and a reduction > 50% from baseline) were evaluated, and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) during the 12-month follow-up was recorded., Results: The prevalence of clinically definite or probable FH was 4.3%, and the prevalence of possible FH was 10.6%. Compared with the unlikely FH patients with ACS, the FH patients had higher levels of TC, LDL-c, apoB, Lp(a), non-HDL-c, TC/HDL-c and apoB/apoA1 ratio, more severe coronary artery diseases and greater prevalence of left main and triple or multiple vessel lesions. After lipid-lowering therapy containing statins, a minority of FH patients reached the target LDL-c levels defined by the guidelines (χ 2  = 33.527, P < 0.001). During the 12-month follow-up, a total of 72 patients experienced MACCE. The survival curve in patients in the FH group was significantly lower than that in the unlikely FH group (HR = 1.530, log-rank test: P < 0.05). Furthermore, the survival curve in patients with high LDL-c (≥ 1.8 mmol/L) was significantly lower than that in patients with low LDL-c (< 1.8 mmol/L) at the 12-month follow-up visit (HR = 1.394, log-rank test: P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between patients with LDL-c levels ≥ 1.4 mmol/L and with < 1.4 mmol/L at the 12-month follow-up visit by using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (HR = 1.282, log-rank test: P > 0.05)., Conclusions: FH was an independent risk factor for MACCE in adult patients after a coronary event during long-term follow-up. However, there was inadequate high-intensity statins prescriptions for high-risk patients in this current study. It is important for FH patients to optimize lipid-lowering treatment strategies to reach the target LDL-c level to improve the long-term prognosis of clinical outcomes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited condition that likely affects 1 in 300 people often requiring pharmacologic intervention in childhood., Objectives: We hypothesized that current strategies for pediatric lipid screening fail to detect and treat most FH, but data analysis may suggest specific methods to improve outcomes., Methods: We retrospectively searched 392,129 patient records of 11-17-year-olds in Kaiser Permanente Southern California for data related to recommended universal pediatric lipid screening. We categorized subjects as Probable or Possible FH and evaluated FH pharmacotherapy status., Results: 37% of the population received lipid screening with 0.13% (1 in 769) having Probable or Possible FH. Results at each step of the process showed progressive decreases in detection and treatment. We characterized 1 in 3448 subjects as Probable FH which is only 8.7% of cases expected from the prevalence of FH in the population. 45% of Probable FH cases received ongoing pharmacotherapy which is 1 in 7688 of the cohort (3.9% of expected cases). One major correctable reason for this drop-off was using obesity to target screening and treatment decisions rather than following the recommended universal screening. We found a strong association of obesity with screening (risk ratio (RR) 2.74 [confidence interval (CI) 2.71-2.76]), but not with FH (RR 0.72, CI 0.47-1.10)., Conclusion: This current universal lipid screening strategy, likely typical of US practice, fails to detect and treat the supermajority of FH cases, increasing risk for adult coronary artery disease. To address the specific deficiencies we observed, we suggest improvements to detect and treat FH., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare, autosomal semi-dominant lipid metabolism disorder characterized by extremely high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and premature cardiovascular disease. The objective of this study was to investigate sex-differences in the treatment and outcomes of patients with HoFH., Methods: We examined clinical characteristics, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and cardiovascular events using descriptive statistics of patients in the Canadian HoFH registry. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. Sex differences between continuous and categorical variables were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's Exact test, respectively., Results: This study included 48 patients (27 (56%) female). The median age at diagnosis in females was 14.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 9.0-30.0) and in males was 8.0 (IQR 2.0-23.0) (p = 0.07). Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between both sexes. The median baseline LDL-C was 12.7 mmol/L (10.0-18.3) in females and 15.3 (10.5-20.0) in males (p = 0.51). Follow up LDL-C levels were 7.6 mmol/L (IQR 4.8-11.0) in females and 6.3 (IQR 4.6-7.5) in males (p = 0.1). Most patients were taking 3 or more LLTs, with comparable proportions in both sexes (p = 0.26). Apheresis was similar in both sexes, 14 (51.8%) vs. 10 (47.6%) (p = 0.2). Over a mean of 10 years of follow-up, MACE occurred in 3 females (11.1%) and 4 males (19.1%) (p = 0.2)., Conclusion: Lipid levels and treatment were similar between sexes. MACE occurred in similar proportions between sexes, indicating that HoFH offsets the inherently lower cardiovascular risk in pre-menopausal females. Further investigation into sex-differences in HoFH in larger sample sizes is warranted., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Familial hypercholesterolemia is a common genetic condition that significantly increases an individual's risk of cardiovascular events such as heart attack, stroke, and cardiac death and is a candidate for population-wide screening programs. Economic analyses of strategies to identify and treat familial hypercholesterolemia are limited by a lack of real-world cost estimates for screening services and medications for reducing cardiovascular risk in this population., Methods: We estimated the cost of lipid panel testing in patients with hyperlipidemia and the cost of statins, ezetimibe, and PCKS9 inhibitors in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia from a commercial claims database and report costs and charges per panel and prescription by days' supply., Results: The mean cost for a 90-day supply for statins was $183.33, 2.3 times the mean cost for a 30-day supply at $79.35. PCSK9 inhibitors generated the highest mean costs among medications used by patients with familial hypercholesterolemia., Conclusions: Lipid testing and lipid-lowering medications for cardiovascular disease prevention generate substantial real-world costs which can be used to improve cost-effectiveness models of familial hypercholesterolemia screening and care management., (© 2024. Italian Society of Hypertension.)

Purpose: Inclisiran is the first small interfering RNA-based treatment approved for reducing pro-atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, who require additional lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We report the first evaluation of the effects of inclisiran in a Middle East population., Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients initiating inclisiran treatment at an outpatient diabetology, endocrinology, and cardiology center between May 2021 and December 2022. All patients followed up for 90 days or more, or with at least 1 lipid determination post initiation were included. Participants were categorized into primary prevention (n = 57) and secondary prevention (n = 89) groups according to previous atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease., Findings: Inclisiran was initiated in 146 patients; mean (SD) age was 54.8 (12.12) years, 82 patients (56.2%) were male, 28 patients (19.2%) had received a diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia, 89 patients (61%) had received a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, and 35 patients (23.9%) had a statin intolerance. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 137 (90 to 193) days. At 90 days, median (interquartile range) reductions in serum LDL-C and triglycerides were -37.9% (-9.5% to -51.2%) and -12.0% (-9.8% to -40.5%), respectively, in primary prevention and -54.1% (-17.1% to -71.4%) and -15.3% (-14% to -38.8%), respectively, in secondary prevention (all, P < 0.001). LDL-C goals were attained in 110 patients (75.3%). Nonattainment of LDL-C goal was attributed to system effect in 26 patients (72.2%), biological effect in 5 patients (13.9%), and discontinuation of treatment in 5 patients (13.9%). Therapy was well tolerated., Implications: This study is the first from the Middle East and North Africa region that reported the real-world efficacy and safety profile of inclisiran in a mixed-risk population of patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and other non-familial hypercholesterolemia indications. Clinically meaningful and sustained reductions in pro-atherogenic lipids with good tolerability were observed after inclisiran initiation. Fewer AEs were reported in this predominantly Arabic population, consistent with previous safety reports for inclisiran. It is important to note that no patient stopped inclisiran treatment due to AEs. Strengths of our study included an optimal cohort, patient heterogeneity, and high retention. In addition, we were able to report mean robust effects of inclisiran and good medication tolerability, quite like randomized studies and open-label extension periods. Despite this, our study had some limitations, including selection bias due to the retrospective design and the absence of a comparative group., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) often cannot reach guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals despite multidrug therapy., Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid as an add-on therapy for lowering LDL-C in patients with HeFH., Methods: Pooled data from two 52-week phase 3 clinical trials of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and/or HeFH receiving maximally tolerated statin therapy (randomized 2:1 to bempedoic acid or placebo) were analyzed by HeFH status. Endpoints included changes from baseline to week 12 (and up to week 52) in LDL-C and other lipid parameters, achievement of LDL-C goals, and safety., Results: A total of 217 (bempedoic acid, 146; placebo, 71) patients with HeFH and 2,792 (bempedoic acid, 1,864; placebo, 928) without HeFH were included (mean baseline LDL-C, 172.8 mg/dL and 102.6 mg/dL, respectively). Bempedoic acid significantly lowered LDL-C at week 12 vs. placebo regardless of HeFH status (with HeFH, -21.2%; without HeFH, -18.2% [both P<0.0001]). Bempedoic acid significantly reduced other lipid parameters and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein vs. placebo regardless of HeFH status (all P≤0.01). Among patients with HeFH treated with bempedoic acid, 32% and 27% achieved LDL-C <100 mg/dL at weeks 12 and 52, respectively. Overall treatment-emergent adverse event incidence was comparable across all four groups (74.7-77.5%)., Conclusion: Bempedoic acid significantly lowered LDL-C levels vs. placebo and was generally well tolerated in all patients, with no new safety findings in patients with HeFH, despite more intensive lipid-lowering therapy in patients with vs. without HeFH., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest PBD has received institutional research grant(s)/support from Regeneron, Regenxbio, and Retrophin/Travere Therapeutics, and has served as a consultant for Akcea/Ionis, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc., Kaneka, Novo Nordisk, and Regeneron. MB has received research grant(s)/support from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Mylan, and Valeant, and has served as a consultant for Abbott/Mylan, Abbott Vascular, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc., Freia Pharmaceuticals, KRKA, Lilly, MSD, NewAmsterdam Pharma, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Polfarmex, Polpharma, Regeneron, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier, Teva, and Zentiva. ALC has received research grant(s)/support from Amgen, Menarini, Mylan, Sanofi, and Sanofi Regeneron, and has served as a consultant for or received honoraria from Akcea, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc., Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Kowa, Medco, Menarini, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Recordati, Regeneron, Sanofi, The Corpus, and Viatris. UL has received research grants or funding from Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, and Sanofi. GBJM received research grant(s)/support from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, HLS Therapeutics, Merck, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi, and has served as a consultant for these companies as well as Esperion Therapeutics, Inc., Novartis, and Servier. KKR has received institutional research grant(s)/support from Amgen, MSD, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi, and served as a consultant for or received honoraria from AbbVie, Akcea, Algorithm, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cerenis, Cipla, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Lilly, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc., Kowa, Medco, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Regeneron, Resverlogix, Sanofi, Takeda, and Zuellig Pharma. CB is an employee of Esperion Therapeutics, Inc., and may own Esperion stock and/or stock options. YZ was an employee of Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. when the analysis was carried out and may hold stock and/or stock options. LL is a consultant contracted by Esperion Therapeutics, Inc. and may own Esperion stock or stock options. ACG has received research grant(s)/support from Amarin, Amgen, Akcea/IONIS, Arrowhead, Esperion Therapeutics, Inc., Merck, NewAmsterdam Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi; has served as a consultant for 23andMe, Akcea, Esperion, IONIS, Merck, NewAmsterdam Pharma, Novartis, OptumRX, Regeneron, and Sanofi; and has provided editorial work for Merck., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Importance: Many pediatric patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) cannot reach recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations on statins alone and require adjunct lipid-lowering therapy (LLT); the use of alirocumab in pediatric patients requires evaluation., Objective: To assess the efficacy of alirocumab in pediatric patients with inadequately controlled HeFH., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a phase 3, randomized clinical trial conducted between May 2018 and August 2022 at 43 centers in 24 countries. Pediatric patients aged 8 to 17 years with HeFH, LDL-C 130 mg/dL or greater, and receiving statins or other LLTs were included. Following consecutive enrollment into dosing cohorts, 25 of 99 patients screened for dosing every 2 weeks (Q2W) failed screening; 25 of 104 patients screened for dosing every 4 weeks (Q4W) failed screening. A total of 70 of 74 Q2W patients (95%) and 75 of 79 Q4W patients (95%) completed the double-blind period., Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to subcutaneous alirocumab or placebo and Q2W or Q4W. Dosage was based on weight (40 mg for Q2W or 150 mg for Q4W if <50 kg; 75 mg for Q2W or 300 mg for Q4W if ≥50 kg) and adjusted at week 12 if LDL-C was 110 mg/dL or greater at week 8. After the 24-week double-blind period, patients could receive alirocumab in an 80-week open-label period., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 in each cohort., Results: Among 153 patients randomized to receive alirocumab or placebo (mean [range] age, 12.9 [8-17] years; 87 [56.9%] female), alirocumab showed statistically significant reductions in LDL-C vs placebo in both cohorts at week 24. Least squares mean difference in percentage change from baseline was -43.3% (97.5% CI, -56.0 to -30.7; P < .001) Q2W and -33.8% (97.5% CI, -46.4 to -21.2; P < .001) Q4W. Hierarchical analysis of secondary efficacy end points demonstrated significant improvements in other lipid parameters at weeks 12 and 24 with alirocumab. Two patients receiving alirocumab Q4W experienced adverse events leading to discontinuation. No significant difference in adverse event incidence was observed between treatment groups. Open-label period findings were consistent with the double-blind period., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings in this study indicate that alirocumab Q2W or Q4W significantly may be useful for reducing LDL-C and other lipid parameters and be well tolerated in pediatric patients with HeFH inadequately controlled with statins., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03510884.