Search

Context: Glycemic variability and hypoglycemia during diabetes treatment may impact therapeutic effectiveness and safety, even when glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction is comparable between therapies., Objective: We employed masked continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) during a randomized trial of dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin (DAPA + SAXA) vs insulin glargine (INS) to compare glucose variability and patient-reported outcomes (PROs)., Design: 24-week substudy of a randomized, open-label, 2-arm, parallel-group, phase 3b study., Setting: Multicenter study (112 centers in 11 countries)., Patients: 283 adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with metformin ± sulfonylurea., Interventions: DAPA + SAXA vs INS., Main Outcome Measures: Changes in CGM profiles, HbA1c, and PROs., Results: Changes from baseline in HbA1c with DAPA + SAXA were similar to those observed with INS, with mean difference [95% confidence interval] between decreases of -0.12% [-0.37 to 0.12%], P = .33. CGM analytics were more favorable for DAPA + SAXA, including greater percent time in range (> 3.9 and ≤ 10 mmol/L; 34.3 ± 1.9 vs 28.5 ± 1.9%, P = .033), lower percent time with nocturnal hypoglycemia (area under the curve ≤ 3.9 mmol/L; 0.6 ± 0.5 vs 2.7 ± 0.5%, P = .007), and smaller mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (-0.7 ± 0.1 vs -0.3 ± 0.1 mmol/L, P = .017). Improvements in CGM were associated with greater satisfaction, better body weight image, less weight interference, and improved mental and emotional well-being., Conclusion: DAPA + SAXA and INS were equally effective in reducing HbA1c at 24 weeks, but people with T2D treated with DAPA + SAXA achieved greater time in range, greater reductions in glycemic excursions and variability, less time with hypoglycemia, and improved patient-reported health outcomes., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Hypoglycemia may be related to malnutrition or treatment of diabetes. An association between treatment with medical food and lower incidence of hypoglycemia among patients with diabetes and hypoalbuminemia has recently been shown., Aims: To study the association between hypoglycemia incidence and medical and nutrition treatment for diabetes., Methods: In this observational study, data was collected from electronic medical records. Included were patients with type 2 diabetes, admitted to internal medicine "E" at the Edith Wolfson Medical Center between 1.6.2016-31.5.2017. Logistic regression was implemented to assess the association between treatment for diabetes and hypoglycemia. Linear regression models were built to examine the association between treatment for diabetes and the number of hypoglycemic events., Results: Included were 221 patients (62.4% females, mean age 77.4 ± 12.0 years), 52 of them (23.5%) had hypoglycemia. The proportion of patients on medical food was 69.5±37.1%. According to logistic regression model, age (OR 1.034, CI 1.002-1.068, p=0.038), male sex (OR 2.941, CI 1.454-5.945, p=0.003) and treatment with insulin (OR 3.778, CI 1.831-7.794, p<0.001) were associated with hypoglycemia, while treatment with medical food was associated with less hypoglycemia (OR 0.352, CI 0.145-0.857, p=0.022). The linear regression model showed that metformin was associated with fewer hypoglycemic events (beta=-0.352 CI -1.391- -0.704, p<0.001). Nutrition was not found to be associated with the number of hypoglycaemic events., Conclusions: Treatment with oral nutrition supplements and metformin is associated with reduced incidence of hypoglycemia., Discussion: Oral nutrition is crucial for preventing hypoglycaemia during hospitalizations, regardless of the treatment for glucose control. Metformin is also beneficial.

Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can provide a comprehensive assessment of glycaemic control. This exploratory analysis of the ONWARDS 1 trial assessed CGM-based metrics and CGM-derived hypoglycaemia duration in insulin-naive individuals with type 2 diabetes treated with subcutaneous once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 (glargine U100)., Methods: ONWARDS 1 was a 78-week (52-week main treatment phase and a 26-week treatment extension phase plus a 5-week follow-up), randomised, open-label, treat-to-target, phase 3a trial done at 143 sites (outpatient clinics and hospital departments) across 12 countries. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes (HbA 1c : 7·0-11·0%) who had not previously received insulin were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web-response system to once-weekly icodec or once-daily glargine U100. Double-masked CGM data were collected during treatment initiation (weeks 0-4), midtrial (weeks 22-26), end of main phase (weeks 48-52), end of extension phase (weeks 74-78), and follow-up (weeks 78-83). Secondary and exploratory outcomes were CGM-based metrics, including the mean percentages of time in glycaemic range (TIR; sensor glucose 3·9-10·0 mmol/L [70-180 mg/dL]), time in tight range (TITR; 3·9-7·8 mmol/L [70-140 mg/dL]), time above range (TAR; >10·0 mmol/L [>180 mg/dL]), and time below range (TBR; <3·9 mmol/L [<70 mg/dL] and <3·0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]), and CGM-derived hypoglycaemic episode durations (episodes defined by sensor glucose <3·9 mmol/L [<70 mg/dL for ≥15 consecutive minutes]). Analyses were done in the full analysis set (all randomly assigned participants). The ONWARDS 1 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04460885, and is complete., Findings: Participants were enrolled and randomly assigned in ONWARDS 1 between Nov 25, 2020, and Dec 1, 2022 (n=492 in each treatment group). During treatment initiation, we observed no statistically significant differences in the mean percentages of TIR, TITR, TAR, and TBR with icodec versus glargine U100. During the midtrial, end of main phase, and end of extension phase periods, the mean percentages of TIR and TITR were statistically significantly greater and the mean percentages of TAR statistically significantly lower with icodec versus glargine U100. The mean percentages of TIR met the internationally recommended CGM target (>70%) with icodec but not with glargine U100 during the three periods. TBR (<3·9 mmol/L [<70 mg/dL] and <3·0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]) was low and below recommended targets (<4% and <1%, respectively) across all study periods in both treatment groups, with no statistically significant differences between treatment groups for the lower threshold (<3·0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]). During the follow-up period, mean percentages of TIR, TITR, TAR, and TBR did not statistically significantly differ with icodec versus glargine U100. The duration of overall hypoglycaemic episodes was similar between treatment groups throughout the trial (median duration ≤35 min)., Interpretation: These CGM data support the long-term efficacy and safety of icodec versus glargine U100 during treatment and indicated no increase in the duration of individual hypoglycaemic episodes with icodec versus glargine U100 in insulin-naive individuals with type 2 diabetes., Funding: Novo Nordisk., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests RMB has received research support, consultant fees, or has served on advisory panels for Abbott Diabetes Care, Ascensia Diabetes Care, Bigfoot Biomedical, CeQur, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Embecta, Hygieia, Insulet, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Onduo, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi, Tandem Diabetes Care, United Healthcare, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and Zealand Pharma. RMB's employer, the nonprofit organisation HealthPartners Institute, contracts for his services and he receives no personal income from these activities. BÁ and SKW are employees of Novo Nordisk; TN is both an employee and shareholder of Novo Nordisk. IL has received research funding (paid to their institution) from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Mylan, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, and Sanofi; and has received advisory or consulting fees, travel support, or manuscript editorial support from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Carmot Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, Shionogi, Structure Therapeutics, Target Pharma, Translational Medical Academy, Valeritas, WebMD, and Zealand Pharma. JKM has received speaker fees from Abbott Diabetes Care, A Menarini Diagnostics, BD and Embecta, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Medtrust, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi, Servier, Viatris, and Ypsomed; is a member of advisory boards for Abbott Diabetes Care, BD and Embecta, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Prediktor, Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi, and Viatris; is a board member of the Austrian Diabetes Society and of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes; is a chair for the Postgraduate Education Committee of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes; has received materials provided by Menarini Diagnostics and Dexcom; is a shareholder of Decide Clinical Software and Elyte Diagnostics; and serves as the Chief Medical Officer at Elyte Diagnostics. JR reports clinical research grants from Applied Therapeutics, Biomea Fusion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Carmot, Corcept, Eli Lilly, Hanmi, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Oramed, Regeneron, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has served on scientific advisory boards and received honorarium or consulting fees from Applied Therapeutics, Biomea Fusion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Hanmi, Novo Nordisk, Oramed, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Structure Therapeutics, and Zealand Pharma; and has received honoraria for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Aims: Lifestyle interventions are widely used among women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study aimed to assess the ethnic disparities in the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions on reducing adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly macrosomia and neonatal hypoglycemia among women with GDM., Methods: We systematically searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1, 2000, up to March 31, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of lifestyle interventions in GDM patients. Subgroup analysis was performed to investigate heterogeneity across different ethnic groups (including Asians, Whites/Caucasians, Hispanics/ Latinos, and Unknown ethnicity). The random effects model was used to calculate the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI)., Results: After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, twenty-one studies comprising 4567 participants were included. Lifestyle interventions significantly reduced the incidence of macrosomia ((RR = 0.54; 95 % CI: 0.42-0.70, P < 0.001), with consistent effects observed across racial groups. Conversely, lifestyle interventions were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia only among Asians (RR = 0.56; 95 % CI: 0.38-0.84, P = 0.004), while no significant effects were observed in Whites/Caucasians or Hispanics/Latinos (all P > 0.05). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings., Conclusions: Regardless of ethnic background, this study emphasizes the significant benefits of lifestyle interventions in reducing the risk of macrosomia among women with GDM. However, lifestyle interventions seem to reduce the risk of neonatal hypoglycemia only among Asians, which warrants further studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To evaluate treatment advancement with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300), with or without prior glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2D)., Methods: Efficacy and safety outcomes of insulin-naïve patients intensifying with Gla-300, with/without prior GLP-1 RA therapy, were evaluated in three analyses (N = 3562): a pooled analysis of seven interventional studies, a subanalysis comparing participants who stopped GLP-1 RA therapy and initiated Gla-300 with those who received add-on Gla-300, and an expanded analysis including two observational studies., Results: Glycaemic outcomes, including HbA1c improvement and fasting plasma glucose, were similar between groups with/without prior GLP-1 RA use. HbA1c least squares mean change from baseline was - 1.7 % and - 1.6 % with and without prior GLP-1 RA, respectively. Glycaemic outcomes were similar between participants who stopped GLP-1 RA therapy when initiating Gla-300 and those who received add-on Gla-300, although more participants receiving add-on Gla-300 achieved HbA1c targets. The expanded analysis yielded similar results. Incidence of hypoglycaemia was low with no clinically relevant weight changes in all analyses., Conclusions: Treatment advancement with Gla-300 in patients with T2D, with/without prior GLP-1 RA therapy, improved glycaemic outcomes with no relevant impact on weight, while maintaining a low hypoglycaemia risk., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, had full access to all the data in this study and take complete responsibility for the integrity of the data and accuracy of the data analysis. All authors participated in the interpretation of the data, the writing, reviewing, and editing of the manuscript, and had final responsibility for approving the published version. A. Cheng: Advisory board member for Abbott, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dexcom, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Insulet, HLS Therapeutics, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and Takeda. Speaking honoraria for Abbott Diabetes Care, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bausch, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, GSK, Insulet, HLS Therapeutics, Janssen, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer and Sanofi. Consulting fees from Abbott Diabetes Care, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Insulet, HLS Therapeutics, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and Takeda. D. Mauricio: Advisory and/or speaking fees from AB-Biotics, Almirall, Esteve, Ferrer, Janssen, Lilly, Menarini, MSD, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. Research grants to the institution from MSD, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. R. Ritzel: Consultant for Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Merck (MSD) and Eli Lilly, and has served on Speaker’s bureau for Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Merck (MSD), Bristol-Myers Squibb and AstraZeneca. M. E. Al-Sofiani: Has served on an advisory panel for Abbott, Medtronic, Insulet, VitalAire, and Sanofi. Honoraria for speaking/consultancy from Abbott, Eli Lilly, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and VitalAire. T. Bailey: Research support from Abbott Diabetes, Abbott Rapid Diagnostics, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Kowa, Livongo, Mannkind, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, REMD, Sanofi, Sanvita, Senseonics, Viacyte, vTv Therapeutics and Zealand Pharma. Consulting honoraria from Abbott, CeQur, Lifescan, Mannkind, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Abbott Rapid Diagnostics, HagarTech, Intuity Medical, Perspirion, SequelMedTech and Ypsomed. Speaking honoraria from BD, Medtronic and Sanofi. Expert testimony consulting fees from Medtronic Diabetes. Travel/meeting support from Sanofi. M. A.Mabunay & M. Bonnemaire: Employees of Sanofi, may hold stocks/shares in Sanofi. L. Melas-Melt: Employee of Ividata Life Sciences, contracted to provide services to Sanofi. S.Mimouni: Advisory board member and speaker for Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi. M. Davies: Has acted as a consultant, advisory board member and speaker for Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi; an advisory board member for Lexicon, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Zealand Pharma and Medtronic; and as a speaker for AstraZeneca. Grants received from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis, Eli Lilly and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre (which is a partnership between University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Loughborough University and the University of Leicester)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of cofrogliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor taken once every 2 weeks (Q2W), compared with linagliptin (taken daily) in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin in China., Materials and Methods: In this phase 3 randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multicentre study, patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive cofrogliptin 10 mg Q2W, cofrogliptin 25 mg Q2W, or linagliptin 5 mg daily, all as an add-on treatment to metformin, for 24 weeks. Eligible patients could enter an open-label extension period and receive cofrogliptin 25 mg Q2W for an additional 28 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to 24 weeks, with a non-inferiority margin of 0.4% for cofrogliptin versus linagliptin treatment., Results: Overall, 465 patients entered the 24-week treatment period (median age: 57.0 years). The least-squares mean (standard error) change in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to week 24 was -0.96 (0.063), -0.99 (0.064) and -1.07 (0.065) for the cofrogliptin 10 mg, cofrogliptin 25 mg and linagliptin 5 mg groups, respectively. The between-group difference met the predefined margin for non-inferiority of cofrogliptin (10 and 25 mg) versus linagliptin treatment. The incidence of common adverse events (≥5% patients) during the 24-week treatment period was similar between treatment groups. There were no serious hypoglycaemic events., Conclusion: In Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin, the glucose-lowering effect of cofrogliptin (Q2W) was non-inferior to linagliptin (daily), with a similar safety profile maintained over 52 weeks of treatment., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To analyze the degree of control based on classical glucometric parameters and Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) in real-life conditions in a cohort of patients with type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and Latent Autoimmune Diabetes in Adults (LADA) and to assess the factors that are associated with GRI., Patients and Methods: Cross-sectional study. 447 adult patients with type 1 DM and LADA users of Intermittent Continuous Glucose Monitoring (iCGM) with an adherence ≥ 70% were included. GRI was calculated with its Hypoglycemia (CHypo) and Hyperglycemia (CHyper) Components. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the factors associated with GRI., Results: Mean age 44.6 years (SD 13.7); 57.7% men; 83.9% type 1 DM; 16.1% LADA; time of evolution 20.6 years (SD 12.3). In patients with type 1 DM vs. LADA, differences were observed in relation to age [-11.1 years (SD 1.7)], age of onset [-21.9 years (DE 1.5)], time of evolution [11.7 years (DE 1.5)], treatment modality (p < 0.001), Time in Range (TIR) [-6.3% (SD 2.2)], Time Below Range (TBR) [1.9% (SD 0.6)], TBR level 1 (TBR1) [1.4% (SD 0.5)], Time Above Range (TAR) level 2 (TAR2) [4.7% (SD 1.3)], Coefficient of Variation (CV) [4.6% (SD 0.9)], GRI [11.3% (SD 2.8)], CHypo [1.3% (SD 0.5)] and CHyper [4.8% (SD 1.7)]. The variables that were independently associated with GRI were TIR (β = -1.34; CI 95% -1.43 to -1.25; p < 0.001), Glucose Management Indicator (GMI) (β = -5.82; CI 95% -7.59 to -4.05; p < 0.001), CV (β = 0.67; CI 95% 0.57 to 0.77; p < 0.001) and adherence to sensor usage (β = -0.16; CI 95% -1.27 to -0.06; p < 0.002)., Conclusions: LADA present better control according to some glucometric parameters and a low GRI. However, the type of DM is not a factor that is independently associated with GRI., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: Evaluate the impact of 40% oral dextrose gel (DG) for management of neonatal hypoglycemia (NH) on the incidence of multiple hypoglycemic events in the well-baby nursery., Study Design: A retrospective chart review of 738 at-risk infants in 2 cohorts before (Cohort 1) and after (Cohort 2) DG implementation. Primary outcome was the incidence of ≥2 hypoglycemic episodes. Secondary outcomes were number of lowest median glucose level, and incidence of NICU admission., Results: There were 384 and 354 at-risk newborns in Cohorts 1 & 2. The incidence of developing ≥2 hypoglycemia episodes significantly decreased following DG implementation [62(42.5%) vs 29(25.9%), p = 0.0058]. There were no differences in lowest glucose level [37 (14-45) vs 37 (10-45), p = 0.31], and NICU admission rate [31 (21.2%) vs 21 (18.8%), p = 0.62]., Conclusions: Implementation of DG lowers the incidence of subsequent hypoglycemia episodes., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Background: Gestational diabetes is associated with increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, but there are limited data on fetal growth and neonatal outcomes when both conditions are present., Objective: We evaluated the risk of abnormal fetal growth and neonatal morbidity in pregnancies with co-occurrence of gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy., Study Design: In a retrospective study of 47,093 singleton pregnancies, we compared the incidence of appropriate for gestational age birthweight in pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes alone, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy alone, or both gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy with that in pregnancies affected by neither disorder using generalized estimating equations (covariates: maternal age, nulliparity, body mass index, insurance type, race, marital status, and prenatal care site). Secondary outcomes were large for gestational age birthweight, small for gestational age birthweight, and a neonatal morbidity composite outcome (stillbirth, hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, respiratory distress, encephalopathy, preterm delivery, neonatal death, and neonatal intensive care unit admission)., Results: The median (interquartile range) birthweight percentile in pregnancies with both gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (50 [24.0-78.0]; N=179) was similar to that of unaffected pregnancies (50 [27.0-73.0]; N=35,833). However, the absolute rate of appropriate for gestational age birthweight was lower for gestational diabetes/hypertensive disorders of pregnancy co-occurrence (78.2% vs 84.9% for unaffected pregnancies). Adjusted analyses showed decreased odds of appropriate for gestational age birthweight in pregnancies with both gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy compared with unaffected pregnancies (adjusted odds ratio, 0.72 [95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.00]; P=.049), and in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes alone (adjusted odds ratio, 0.78 [0.68-0.89]; P<.001) or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy alone (adjusted odds ratio, 0.73 [0.66-0.81]; P<.001). The absolute risk of large for gestational age birthweight was greater in pregnancies with both gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (14.5%) than in unaffected pregnancies (8.2%), without apparent difference in the risk of small for gestational age birthweight (7.3% vs 6.9%). However, in adjusted models comparing pregnancies with gestational diabetes/hypertensive disorders of pregnancy co-occurrence with unaffected pregnancies, neither an association with large for gestational age birthweight (adjusted odds ratio, 1.33 [0.88-2.00]; P=.171) nor small for gestational age birthweight (adjusted odds ratio, 1.32 [0.80-2.19]; P=.293) reached statistical significance. Gestational diabetes/hypertensive disorders of pregnancy co-occurrence carried an increased risk of neonatal morbidity that was greater than that observed with either condition alone (gestational diabetes/hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: adjusted odds ratio, 3.13 [2.35-4.17]; P<.001; gestational diabetes alone: adjusted odds ratio, 2.01 [1.78-2.27]; P<.001; hypertensive disorders of pregnancy alone: adjusted odds ratio, 1.38 [1.26-1.50]; P<.001)., Conclusion: Although pregnancies with both gestational diabetes and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy have a similar median birthweight percentile to those affected by neither condition, pregnancies concurrently affected by both conditions have a higher risk of abnormal fetal growth and neonatal morbidity., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the association between continuous glucose monitoring in pregnant people with type 2 diabetes and perinatal outcomes., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant people with type 2 diabetes who received prenatal care and delivered singleton, nonanomalous neonates at a single academic tertiary care center from November 1, 2019, to February 28, 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal morbidity, including hypoglycemia, hyperbilirubinemia, shoulder dystocia, large for gestational age at birth, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, or perinatal death. Demographics and outcomes were compared by type of monitoring (continuous glucose monitoring vs intermittent self-monitoring of blood glucose), and multivariable logistic regression estimated the association between continuous glucose monitoring use and perinatal outcomes., Results: Of 360 pregnant people who met the inclusion criteria, 82 (22.7%) used continuous glucose monitoring. The mean gestational age at continuous glucose monitoring initiation was 21.3±6.4 weeks. The use of continuous glucose monitoring was associated with lower odds of the primary composite neonatal morbidity (65.9% continuous glucose monitoring vs 77.0% self-monitoring of blood glucose, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.48, 95% CI, 0.24-0.94). Continuous glucose monitoring use was also associated with lower odds of preterm birth (13.4% vs 25.2%, aOR 0.48, 95% CI, 0.25-0.93) and NICU admission (33.8% vs 47.6%, aOR 0.36, 95% CI, 0.16-0.81)., Conclusion: In pregnant people with type 2 diabetes, continuous glucose monitoring use was associated with less neonatal morbidity, fewer preterm births, and fewer NICU admissions., Competing Interests: Financial Disclosure: The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Control-IQ technology version 1.5 allows for a wider range of weight and total daily insulin (TDI) entry, in addition to other changes to enhance performance for users with high basal rates. This study evaluated the safety and performance of the updated Control-IQ system for users with basal rates >3 units/h and high TDI in a multicenter, single arm, prospective study., Methods: Adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and at least one basal rate over 3 units/h (N = 34, mean age = 39.9 years, 41.2% female, diabetes duration = 21.8 years) used the t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ technology version 1.5 for 13 weeks. Primary outcome was safety events (severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)). Central laboratory hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ) was measured at system initiation and 13 weeks. Participants continued using glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, or other medications for glycemic control and/or weight loss if on a stable dose., Results: All 34 participants completed the study. Fifteen participants used a basal rate >3 units/h for all 24 hours of the day. Nine participants used >300 units TDI on at least one day during the study. There were no severe hypoglycemia or DKA events. Time in range 70-180 mg/dL was 64.8% over the 13 weeks, with 1.0% time <70 mg/dL. Hemoglobin A 1c decreased from 7.69% at baseline to 6.87% at 13 weeks (-0.82%, P < .001)., Conclusions: Control-IQ technology version 1.5, with wider range of weight and TDI input and enhancements for users with high insulin requirements, was safe in individuals with T1D in this study., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: A.L.C.’s employer, International Diabetes Center, has received research support and/or consulting fees from Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Medtronic, Tandem, Insulet, Dexcom, Abbott Diabetes, and MannKind. T.E.G.’s employer, Diabetes & Endocrine Treatment Specialists, has received research support/and or consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Provention Bio, Novartis, Tandem, Insulet, Ascendis Pharma, and Progenitor Life Sciences. H.K.A. has received research grants through University of Colorado from Tandem Diabetes Care, Medtronic, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, and MannKind and has received consulting fees through University of Colorado from Tandem Diabetes Care, Medtronic, and Dexcom. D.R.L. has received funding for clinical research from Abbott Diabetes Care, Biolinq, Senseonics, Dexcom, Diasome, Sanvita, Medtronic, Tandem, Provention, Eyenuk, TrialNet, and JAEB Center for Clinical Research. R.M.B. has received research support, has acted as a consultant, or has been on the scientific advisory board for Abbott Diabetes Care, Ascensia, Bigfoot Biomedical, Inc, CeQur, Dexcom, Eli Lilly, Embecta, Hygieia, Insulet, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Onduo, Roche Diabetes Care, Tandem Diabetes Care, Sanofi, United Healthcare, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, and Zealand Pharma. R.M.B.’s employer, non-profit HealthPartners Institute, contracts for his services, and he receives no personal income from these activities. B.S. has received payments from Medtronic, Insulet, and Tandem as a certified pump trainer, consulting fees from Eli Lilly, honorariums from Medtronic, the Academy of Nutrition & Dietetics, the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists, and the American Diabetes Association. V.N.S. has received research grants through University of Colorado from Tandem Diabetes Care, Insulet, Novo Nordisk, Alexion, JDRF, and NIH and consulting fees through University of Colorado from Dexcom, Insulet, Tandem Diabetes Care, Embecta, Novo Nordisk, and Medscape. M.S. has received consulting fees from Sanvita. P.Z., P.B., R.S.-K., and J.E.P. are employees of Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist consult service on rates of hypoglycemia in adult inpatients with renal dysfunction receiving antidiabetic medications., Methods: This was a single-center, institutional review board-approved, quasi-experimental, 2-phase prospective study. Adult inpatients admitted within 48 to 96 hours of hospitalization with a creatine clearance of less than 30 mL/min or estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and an active antidiabetic medication order were included. Patients located in a critical care unit or with a previous or planned transplantation were excluded. Each phase was conducted over 4 months. The primary endpoint was the change in the incidence of hypoglycemic episodes (blood glucose [BG] of <70 mg/dL) per 100 patient days when comparing the cohorts. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of recurrent and severe (BG of <40 mg/dL) episodes of hypoglycemia per 100 patient days, occurrence of a BG concentration of higher than 300 mg/dL, and length of stay., Results: Overall, 150 patients were included in the retrospective preimplementation phase and 172 were included in the prospective postimplementation phase. In the postimplementation group, there was a significant decrease in the rate of hypoglycemia per 100 patient days when compared to the retrospective group (5.8 vs 9.0; incidence rate ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.0; P < 0.05). There was no difference in secondary endpoints between the groups., Conclusion: The implementation of a pharmacy consult service resulted in lower rates of hypoglycemic events, which supports pharmacist involvement to prevent hypoglycemia in this at-risk population. Additional studies involving pharmacists working under collaborative practice agreements may reinforce the results., (© American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 2024. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: Prior studies demonstrate that some untoward clinical outcomes vary by outdoor temperature. This is true of some endpoints common among persons with diabetes, a population vulnerable to climate change-associated health risks. Yet, prior work has been agnostic to the antidiabetes drugs taken by such persons. We examined whether relationships between ambient temperature and adverse health outcomes among persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D) varied by exposure to different antidiabetes drugs., Design: Retrospective cohort., Setting: Healthcare and meteorological data from five US states, 1999-2010., Participants: US Medicaid beneficiaries with T2D categorised by use of antidiabetes drugs., Exposure: Maximum daily ambient temperature (t-max)., Outcomes: Hospital presentation for serious hypoglycaemia, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or sudden cardiac arrest (examined separately)., Methods: We linked US Medicaid to US Department of Commerce data that permitted us to follow individuals longitudinally and examine health plan enrolment, healthcare claims, and meteorological exposures-all at the person-day level. We mapped daily temperature from weather stations to Zone Improvement Plan (ZIP) codes, then assigned a t-max to each person-day based on the residential ZIP code. Among prespecified subcohorts of users of different pharmacologic classes of antidiabetes drugs, we calculated age and sex-adjusted occurrence rates for each outcome by t-max stratum. We used modified Poisson regression to assess relationships between linear and quadratic t-max terms and each outcome. We examined effect modification between t-max and a covariable for current exposure to a specific antidiabetes drug and assessed significance via Wald tests., Results: We identified ∼3 million persons with T2D among whom 713 464 used sulfonylureas (SUs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), meglitinides, or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs). We identified a positive linear association between t-max and serious hypoglycaemia among non-insulin users of glimepiride and of glyburide but not glipizide (Wald p value for interaction among SUs=0.048). We identified an inverse linear association between t-max and DKA among users of the DPP-4i sitagliptin (p=0.016) but not the GLP1RA exenatide (p=0.080). We did not identify associations between t-max and sudden cardiac arrest among users of SUs, meglitinides, exenatide, or DPP-4is., Conclusions: We identified some antidiabetes drug class-specific and agent-specific differences in the relationship between ambient temperature and untoward glycaemic but not arrhythmogenic, safety outcomes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CEL is a Special Government Employee of the US Food and Drug Administration. CEL consults for Novo Nordisk and TriNetX. CEL recently received an honorarium from the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Foundation, University of Florida and Ancora Education. CEL’s spouse is employed by Merck; neither CEL nor his spouse own Merck stock. WB serves on multiple independent data monitoring committees for Genentech. MB has consulted for Clinique and ToxiMap. MB has received honoraria from the US Environmental Protection Agency, National Institutes of Health, Health Canada, Colorado School of Public Health, Duke University, University of Texas, Data4Justice, Korea University, Organization of Teratology Information Specialists, University of Pennsylvania, Boston University, IOP Publishing, Pacific-10 Conference, UK Research and Innovation, AXA Research Fund, Harvard University, SciQuest and University of Montana. MB has received travel support from the Colorado School of Public Health, University of Texas, Duke University, Boston University, University of Pennsylvania, Harvard University, American Journal of Public Health, Columbia University, CMAS conference and Nature conference. SH has consulted for the Medullary Thyroid Cancer Consortium (Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Eli Lilly and Company), Urovant Sciences, Bluebird Bio, Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen Bioscience, Covis Pharma GmbH, i2o Therapeutics, Basilea, Balance Ophthalmics, Lykos Therapeutics and Applied Therapeutics. Other authors report no conflicts., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To assess neonatal and maternal characteristics, glycaemic status and comorbidities in the neonates of diabetic mothers., Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2021 to May 2022 at the Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, University of Mustansiriyah, Baghdad, Iraq, and comprised healthy women. Samples were raised by simple random technique. Digital pulse waves were captured using a fingertip pulse wave transducer. Lab Chart Pro version 7.2 was used to automatically detect and quantify the amplitude of A, B, C, D and E waves expressed by the second derivative. QT interval of each beat was recorded by electrocardiogram, and was calculated automatically via Lab chart Pro version 7.2 without averaging. Data was spread out on Microsoft Office Excel 2013 and analysed using SPSS version 26., Results: Among the 70 mothers, aged between 18 to 44 years, gestational diabetes was the commonest type 52(74.3%), and, among the 70 neonates, 52(74.3%) developed mild hypoglycaemia, 12(17.1%) hypocalcaemia, 26(37.1%) congenital heart disease, 50(71.4%) respiratory distress syndrome, 24(34.3%) hyperbilirubinaemia, 2(2.9%) congenital anomalies, 6(8.6%) prematurity, and 4(5.7%) developed birth asphyxia. Prematurity, female gender and low birthweight were significantly associated with hypoglycaemia (p<0.05). No significant differences were detected in terms of neonatal complications between pregestational and gestational diabetic mothers (p>0.05)., Conclusions: Diabetic pregnancies were linked to a higher risk of neonatal complications.

Purpose: The optimal design for pharmacoepidemiologic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) studies is unclear. Using the association between concomitant use of sulfonylureas and warfarin and the risk of severe hypoglycemia as a case study, a DDI with little or no clinical impact, we tested whether the prevalent new-user design can be applied in the area., Methods: Among all patients initiating sulfonylureas in the UK's Clinical Practice Research Datalink (1998-2020), we identified those adding-on warfarin while on a sulfonylurea. For each co-exposed patient, we defined a prescription-based exposure set including other sulfonylurea users not adding-on warfarin (comparators). Within each exposure set, we matched each co-exposed patient to five comparators on time-conditional propensity scores (TCPS) and followed them using an as-treated approach. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of severe hypoglycemia associated with concomitant use of sulfonylureas and warfarin compared to use of sulfonylureas alone. Sensitivity analyses addressed the impact of different potential sources of bias., Results: The study cohort included 17 890 patients co-exposed to sulfonylureas and warfarin and 88 749 matched comparators. After TCPS matching, patient characteristics were well-balanced between groups. Compared to use of sulfonylureas alone, concomitant use of sulfonylureas and warfarin was not associated with the risk of severe hypoglycemia (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.92-1.17). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis (HRs ranging from 1.01 to 1.15, all not statistically significant)., Conclusions: Our study suggests that the prevalent new-user design could be used for the assessment of clinical effects of DDIs., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim: To develop and test different machine learning algorithms for predicting nocturnal hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus., Design: A retrospective study., Methods: We collected data from dynamic blood glucose monitoring of patients with T2DM admitted to the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism at a hospital in Shanghai, China, from November 2020 to January 2022. Patients undergone the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for ≥ 24 h were included in this study. Logistic regression, random forest and light gradient boosting machine algorithms were employed, and the models were validated and compared using AUC, accuracy, specificity, recall rate, precision, F1 score and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test., Results: A total of 4015 continuous glucose-monitoring data points from 440 patients were included, and 28 variables were selected to build the risk prediction model. The 440 patients had an average age of 62.7 years. Approximately 48.2% of the patients were female and 51.8% were male. Nocturnal hypoglycaemia appeared in 573 (14.30%) of 4015 continuous glucose monitoring data. The light gradient boosting machine model demonstrated the highest predictive performances: AUC (0.869), specificity (0.802), accuracy (0.801), precision (0.409), recall rate (0.797), F1 score (0.255) and Kolmogorov (0.603). The selected predictive factors included time below the target glucose range, duration of diabetes, insulin use before bed and dynamic blood glucose monitoring parameters from the previous day., Patient or Public Contribution: No Patient or Public Contribution., (© 2024 The Author(s). Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: The safety and efficacy of insulin analogue insulin aspart (IAsp) have been demonstrated in a randomised clinical trial in pregnant women with Type 1 diabetes (T1D), and IAsp is widely used during pregnancy. The aim of this study was to assess glycaemic control and safety of IAsp versus other bolus insulins in Type 1 diabetic pregnancy in a real-world setting., Methods: This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study of 1840 pregnant women with T1D, treated with IAsp (n = 1434) or other bolus insulins (n = 406) in the Diabetes Pregnancy Registry. The primary (composite) outcome was the proportion of pregnancies resulting in major congenital malformations or perinatal or neonatal death. Secondary outcomes included all HbA 1c values measured immediately before and during pregnancy and major hypoglycaemia, as well as abortion, pre-eclampsia, pre-term delivery, large for gestational age at birth, stillbirth and fetal malformations., Results: There were no significant differences found in any of the pregnancy outcomes between treatment with IAsp and other bolus insulins in either the crude or propensity score-adjusted analyses. However, maternal HbA 1c was lower in the IAsp group at the end of the third trimester (adjusted difference, -0.16% point [95% CI -0.28;-0.05]; -1.8 mmol/mol [95% CI -3.1;-0.6]; p = 0.0046)., Conclusions: No significant differences in safety or pregnancy outcomes were demonstrated when comparing treatment with IAsp versus other bolus insulins in women with T1D during pregnancy. The observed improvement in HbA 1c with IAsp in late pregnancy should be confirmed in other studies., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.)

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) in people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) in China., Methods: INITIATION (NCT05002933) was a prospective, interventional, multicentre, single-arm, phase IV study conducted in China. Individuals with suboptimally controlled T2D who were insulin naïve or switching from another basal insulin (insulin experienced) were included. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. Safety assessments included hypoglycaemia and adverse events (AEs)., Results: In total, 568 participants were enrolled and 562 initiated Gla-300 treatment (189 in the insulin-naïve subgroup; 373 in the insulin-experienced subgroup). At week 24, the mean ± standard error (SE) change in HbA1c from baseline was -0.91% ± 0.05% (-9.9 ± 0.5 mmol/mol; P < .0001). Significant HbA1c reductions were also observed in the insulin-naïve (mean ± SE change: -1.38% ± 0.09% [-15.1 ± 1.0 mmol/mol]) and insulin-experienced (-0.68% ± 0.05% [-7.4 ± 0.5 mmol/mol]) subgroups (both P < .0001). During the 24-week treatment period, the incidence of confirmed hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose ≤ 3.9 mmol/L) was 39.7% for all hypoglycaemia and 13.3% for nocturnal hypoglycaemia; the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia was low (0.5%). Overall, treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were reported in 126 participants (22.4%), with no serious treatment-related TEAEs., Conclusions: Gla-300 was effective in improving glycaemic control and had a relatively low risk of hypoglycaemia in people with suboptimally controlled T2D who were insulin naïve or switching from another basal insulin in China., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of enavogliflozin monotherapy (0.3 mg/day) in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)., Materials and Methods: Following a 24-week randomized, double-blind treatment period with enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day (n = 77) or placebo (n = 69), consenting participants received enavogliflozin 0.3 mg/day for an additional 28 weeks during an open-label extension (OLE) period. The safety and efficacy of enavogliflozin were assessed at Week 52., Results: A total of 37 participants continued enavogliflozin (maintenance group), and 26 participants switched from placebo to enavogliflozin (switch group). No additional adverse drug reactions related to enavogliflozin were observed during the OLE period. At Week 52, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose were significantly lower than at the baseline, by 0.9% and 24.9 mg/dL, respectively, in the maintenance group (p < 0.0001 for both), and by 0.7% and 18.0 mg/dL, respectively, in the switch group (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.002). The proportions of participants reaching HbA1c 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at Week 52 were 69.4% in the maintenance group and 65.4% in the switch group. A significant increase in urine glucose-to-creatinine ratio was observed at Week 52, by 84.9 g/g and 67.1 g/g in the maintenance and switch groups, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both). Body weight in both groups decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) from baseline to Week 52, by 3.5 kg and 3.8 kg in the maintenance and switch groups, respectively., Conclusions: Enavogliflozin 0.3 mg monotherapy provides long-term glycaemic control in T2DM and is safe and well tolerated during a 52-week treatment period., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim: To investigate, through post hoc analysis of nine studies from the SemaglUtide Real-world Evidence (SURE) programme, the safety of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and in subpopulations in routine clinical practice, complementing findings from the phase 3 randomized clinical trial (RCT) SUSTAIN programme., Methods: The SURE studies had a duration of ~30 weeks and included adults with diagnosed T2D treated with OW semaglutide. Safety information, including hypoglycaemic events, were collected and analysed for the total study population and for patient subgroups based on baseline patient characteristics, baseline co-medication and prescriber specialty., Results: Of the total 3505 patients, 24.3% reported adverse events (AEs), with most patients reporting non-serious (22.3%) and mild (17.1%) AEs. AEs mainly belonged to the gastrointestinal disorders system organ class (16.3% of patients). In total, 5.1% of patients reported AEs that led to treatment discontinuation, 0.5% reported serious adverse drug reactions and 0.2% had an AE with a fatal outcome, reported as unrelated to treatment. Overall, 1.1% and 0.1% of patients reported level 2 and 3 hypoglycaemic events, respectively. A higher rate of level 2 hypoglycaemia was observed in patients with baseline microvascular complications treated with insulin versus those on insulin without these complications., Conclusions: Safety data reported in the real-world SURE studies were generally consistent with observations in phase 3 OW semaglutide RCTs. No new safety concerns were identified, highlighting that OW semaglutide is well tolerated by adults with T2D and in subpopulations in routine clinical practice., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Gliptins are a relatively recent class of oral antidiabetic agents used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study is to identify the adverse effects of gliptins in patients with type 2 diabetes, compare the tolerability of these drugs with data from the literature, and determine patients' behavior in the face of these adverse effects with a view to optimizing their management., Methods: Our study is cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical, involving 100 patients aged over 20 years, followed at the Endocrinology Department of the Military Hospital Mohammed V., Results: The average age of the patients was 63 years, with a sex ratio F/H of 1.13. The median age of diabetes in the patients was 13 years, with an average blood glucose level of 1.64 and an average hemoglobin A1c of 8.26. The comorbidities were 30% cardiovascular disease, 25% hypertension, and 14% dyslipidemia, and 30% of patients had no comorbidities. Forth-six percent of patients reported adverse events and 54% did not report any adverse event. Twenty-eight percent of the adverse events were gastrointestinal, 18% skin disorders, 14% urinary tract infections, 12% hypoglycemia, 12% nervous system disorders, 8% airway infections, and 8% general disorders., Conclusion: This study shows that gliptins remain a safe option as the side effects seem fairly well tolerated by patients. Adverse events may impact patient compliance and pose a problem of adherence to treatment. Thus, it would be advantageous to develop therapeutic education for diabetic patients to detect and manage adverse effects., (Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Annals of African Medicine.)

Background: Severe hypoglycemia is a serious adverse drug event associated with hypoglycemia-prone medications; older patients with diabetes are particularly at high risk. Economic food insecurity (food insecurity due to financial limitations) is a known risk factor for hypoglycemia; however, less is known about physical food insecurity (due to difficulty cooking or shopping for food), which may increase with age, and its association with hypoglycemia., Objective: Study associations between food insecurity and severe hypoglycemia., Design: Survey based cross-sectional study., Participants: Survey responses were collected in 2019 from 1,164 older (≥ 65 years) patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin or sulfonylureas., Main Measures: Risk ratios (RR) for economic and physical food insecurity associated with self-reported severe hypoglycemia (low blood glucose requiring assistance) adjusted for age, financial strain, HbA1c, Charlson comorbidity score and frailty. Self-reported reasons for hypoglycemia endorsed by respondents., Key Results: Food insecurity was reported by 12.3% of the respondents; of whom 38.4% reported economic food insecurity only, 21.1% physical food insecurity only and 40.5% both. Economic food insecurity and physical food insecurity were strongly associated with severe hypoglycemia (RR = 4.3; p = 0.02 and RR = 4.4; p = 0.002, respectively). Missed meals ("skipped meals, not eating enough or waiting too long to eat") was the dominant reason (77.5%) given for hypoglycemia., Conclusions: Hypoglycemia prevention efforts among older patients with diabetes using hypoglycemia-prone medications should address food insecurity. Standard food insecurity questions, which are used to identify economic food insecurity, will fail to identify patients who have physical food insecurity only., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.)

Background: Prolonged preoperative fasting can cause hypoglycemia, dehydration, hypotension, and irritability, especially in children. Multimodal protocols such as the Enhanced Recovery After Operation (ERAS) and the Accelerated Full Postoperative Recovery (ACERTO, Aceleração da Recuperação Total Pós-Operatória) recommend a shortened fasting period. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between shortened preoperative fasting and perioperative outcomes in pediatric patients., Methods: This study is a systematic review of the literature. The inclusion criteria were original studies published between January 2017-November 2022 that used shortened preoperative fasting protocols validated in patients aged 0-17 years and that evaluated the association of this practice with perioperative outcomes. The studies were obtained from the Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS), National Library of Medicine and National Institutes of Health (PubMed) and Science Direct databases., Results: A total of 6064 articles were obtained, of which eight were considered eligible. The results showed that shortened preoperative fast is safe in children and adolescents. The main benefits of this practice were higher preoperative blood glucose, no episodes of preoperative hypoglycemia, lower incidence of nausea, and minor complaints of crying., Conclusions: Shortening the fasting time with high-carbohydrate drinks between one and 2 h before operation is safe in children and adolescents, being associated with better metabolic and emotional responses in the perioperative period., Levels of Evidence: Level II., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims/hypothesis: To study the progression of HbA1c after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents during 2010-2019 with emphasis on HbA1c nadir 3-6 months after onset., Methods: Partial funding was secured for this study. The Swedish paediatric diabetes quality register SWEDIABKIDS has >95 % coverage of type 1 diabetes up to 18 years. A mixed model for repeated measurements was used to estimate differences in HbA1c between onset year periods., Results: We followed 6,891 patients over two years from onset (48,292 HbA1c values). We found a gradual decrease in mean HbA1c 24 months after onset from 56.0 mmol/mol (7.28 %) in 2010/11 to 50.5 mmol/mol (6.77 %) in 2018/19, which is at the level of several recent intervention studies. The initial drop in HbA1c from onset until 3 and 6 months has become more pronounced in recent years. There was a significant positive correlation between HbA1c at 3 and 6 months with 12, 18 and 24 months. Percentage of severe hypoglycaemic coma was higher (5.1 % vs 3.4 %; p = 0.023) in 2010/2011 than 2018/2019, but the absolute risk of ketoacidosis was essentially unchanged, (1.5 % to 0.8 %, p = 0.110) CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: There was a continuous decrease in HbA1c over the study period 2010-2019, which coincides in time with an increased use of diabetes technology and lowering the HbA1c target to 48 mmol/mol (6.5 %). The decrease in 2-year HbA1c was preceded by a lower HbA1c nadir, which may set the trajectories for coming HbA1c and be a modifiable factor for a long-term improvement in metabolic control., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [None of the investigators have personal or financial interests in the conduct or the outcomes of the project. I.S has received lecture honoraria from Roche Diabetes Care and Rubin Medical. RH has received lecture honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, and Medtronic, and has participated in advisory board for Novo Nordisk and Abbott and data monitoring committee for Astra Zeneca. KEO has received honoraria for consulting and/or lecture fees from Abbott Diabetes Care, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk and Sanofi, SS has received lecture honoraria from Novo Nordisk and has participated in advisory board for Novo Nordisk]., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the stratification of people with diabetes mellitus (DM) based on the International Diabetes Federation-Diabetes and Ramadan 2021 risk calculator into different risk categories and assess their intentions to fast and outcomes of fasting during the holy month of Ramadan., Methods: This was a 3-month prospective study that was performed from February 9, 2023, to May 6, 2023 (6 weeks before Ramadan until 6 weeks after Ramadan), at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Data regarding glycemic control, characteristics and complications of diabetes, comorbidities, and the various factors that influence fasting were gathered from patients of either sex aged 18 to 80 years with any type of diabetes. The International Diabetes Federation-Diabetes and Ramadan 2021 risk calculation and recommendation were made accordingly for each patient., Results: This study comprised of 460 participants with DM, with 174 males (37.8%) and 286 females (62.2%). The risk categorization showed that 209 (45.4%), 107 (23.3%), and 144 (31.3%) of the participants were in the low-, moderate-, and high-risk categories, respectively. Of the 144 high-risk patients who fasted, 57.9% experienced hypoglycemia (P <.0001). The recommendation of fasting showed statistically significant differences with risk categories, intention to fast, hypoglycemia, type of DM, duration of DM, level of glycemic control, and days of fasting (P <.001)., Conclusion: A statistically significant number of participants in the high-risk group who fasted experienced complications. This reiterates the importance of rigorous adherence to the medical recommendations., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 AACE. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims/hypothesis: Whether hypoglycaemia increases the risk of other adverse outcomes in diabetes remains controversial, especially for hypoglycaemia episodes not requiring assistance from another person. An objective of the Hypoglycaemia REdefining SOLutions for better liVEs (Hypo-RESOLVE) project was to create and use a dataset of pooled clinical trials in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes to examine the association of exposure to all hypoglycaemia episodes across the range of severity with incident event outcomes: death, CVD, neuropathy, kidney disease, retinal disorders and depression. We also examined the change in continuous outcomes that occurred following a hypoglycaemia episode: change in eGFR, HbA 1c , blood glucose, blood glucose variability and weight., Methods: Data from 84 trials with 39,373 participants were pooled. For event outcomes, time-updated Cox regression models adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration and HbA 1c were fitted to assess association between: (1) outcome and cumulative exposure to hypoglycaemia episodes; and (2) outcomes where an acute effect might be expected (i.e. death, acute CVD, retinal disorders) and any hypoglycaemia exposure within the last 10 days. Exposures to any hypoglycaemia episode and to episodes of given severity (levels 1, 2 and 3) were examined. Further adjustment was then made for a wider set of potential confounders. The within-person change in continuous outcomes was also summarised (median of 40.4 weeks for type 1 diabetes and 26 weeks for type 2 diabetes). Analyses were conducted separately by type of diabetes., Results: The maximally adjusted association analysis for type 1 diabetes found that cumulative exposure to hypoglycaemia episodes of any level was associated with higher risks of neuropathy, kidney disease, retinal disorders and depression, with risk ratios ranging from 1.55 (p=0.002) to 2.81 (p=0.002). Associations of a similar direction were found when level 1 episodes were examined separately but were significant for depression only. For type 2 diabetes cumulative exposure to hypoglycaemia episodes of any level was associated with higher risks of death, acute CVD, kidney disease, retinal disorders and depression, with risk ratios ranging from 2.35 (p<0.0001) to 3.00 (p<0.0001). These associations remained significant when level 1 episodes were examined separately. There was evidence of an association between hypoglycaemia episodes of any kind in the previous 10 days and death, acute CVD and retinal disorders in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, with rate ratios ranging from 1.32 (p=0.017) to 2.68 (p<0.0001). These associations varied in magnitude and significance when examined separately by hypoglycaemia level. Within the range of hypoglycaemia defined by levels 1, 2 and 3, we could not find any evidence of a threshold at which risk of these consequences suddenly became pronounced., Conclusions/interpretation: These data are consistent with hypoglycaemia being associated with an increased risk of adverse events across several body systems in diabetes. These associations are not confined to severe hypoglycaemia requiring assistance., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: This study evaluated glycemic outcomes for hospitalized patients after reduction in bedtime correctional insulin dosing. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center analysis of a protocol change that reduced bedtime correctional insulin scale. Comparable cohorts pre- and post-protocol change were created which included patients who were ordered correctional insulin with at least 1 blood glucose (BG) reading. The primary outcome was number of nocturnal hypoglycemia readings. Secondary outcomes included, but were not limited to, mean fasting BG, BG within various ranges, and length of stay. Results: 3 percent of patients in the post-protocol change group (N = 100) experienced nocturnal hypoglycemia compared to 6% of patients in the pre-change group (N = 100) ( P = .507). There were no significant differences in BG ranges <110 mg/dL, <140 mg/dL, 140 to 180 mg/dL, and >180 mg/dL. However, 19% of patients in the post-protocol change group had BG of >250 mg/dL as compared to 9% in the pre-change group ( P = .033). Mean fasting BG was higher in the post-protocol change group compared to the pre-change group (156.5 mg/dL vs 139.3 mg/dL [ P = .002]), as was hospital length of stay (5.17 vs 4.6 days, [ P = .024]). Conclusions: A decreased bedtime correctional insulin scale had mixed results with more patients achieving goal fasting BG but also more patients experiencing BG > 250 mg/dL and longer length of stay. Larger prospective studies are required to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this type of intervention and its long-term impact., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems are a rapidly growing component in the area of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy. As more patients use these systems in the outpatient setting, it is important to assess safety if their use is allowed to continue in the inpatient setting., Methods: Analysis was conducted of the records of patients using AID technology upon admission to our hospital between June 2020 and December 2022. Adverse events and glycemic control of AID users were compared with patients using non-AID systems and with patients who had CSII discontinued., Results: There were 185 patients analyzed: 64 on AID, 86 on non-AID, and 35 who had CSII discontinued. The number of patients on AID increased over the course of the observation period, whereas non-AID users decreased. Pairwise comparisons indicated that patient-stay mean glucose levels and percentage of hypoglycemic events were similar between all groups, but the percentage of patient hyperglycemic measurements was significantly lower in the AID cohort. No adverse events (diabetic ketoacidosis, pump site complications, equipment malfunction) were reported in any either CSII cohort., Conclusion: The type of CSII technology encountered in the hospital is shifting from non-AID toward AID technologies. This analysis supports earlier findings that outpatient AID systems can be successfully transitioned into the inpatient setting. Further study is needed to define if AID systems offer any advantage in glycemic control., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 AACE. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives. The incidence of occupational traumatic injuries caused by human error has been reported to occur at 11:00 and 8-9 h after commencing work. Impaired attention is closely related to the incidence of these accidents. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the changes in blood glucose, fatigue and stress response hormone levels over time among workers in a secondary industry. Methods. The blood glucose and subjective fatigue levels of 26 male secondary-industry workers were measured on workdays. In addition, the cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone levels in saliva were measured on one workday and one holiday. Results. Blood glucose levels at 11:00 and 17:30 on the workday were significantly lower than those at 09:30. Moreover, hypoglycemia was observed in some participants. A significant increase in subjective fatigue levels was observed during the workday. However, no significant differences in salivary cortisol levels were observed between the workday and the holiday at any time point. Conclusions. Blood glucose levels decreased and subjective fatigue levels increased at the time points that occupational accidents were reported to occur most frequently during work. These factors may contribute to human errors due to impaired attentional function.

Background: Nocturnal hypoglycaemia is a burden for people with diabetes, particularly when treated with multiple daily injections (MDI) therapy. However, the characteristics of nocturnal hypoglycaemic events in this patient group are only poorly described in the literature., Method: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data from 185 study participants with type 1 diabetes using MDI therapy were collected under everyday conditions for up to 13 weeks. Hypoglycaemic events were identified as episodes of consecutive CGM readings <70 mg/dl or <54 mg/dl for at least 15 minutes. Subsequently, the time <54 mg/dl (TB54), time below range (TBR), time in range (TIR), time above range (TAR), glucose coefficient of variation (CV), and incidence of hypoglycaemic events were calculated for diurnal and nocturnal periods. Furthermore, the effect of nocturnal hypoglycaemic events on glucose levels the following day was assessed., Results: The incidence of hypoglycaemic events <70 mg/dl was significantly lower during the night compared to the day, with 0.8 and 3.8 events per week, respectively, while the TBR, TB54, and incidence of events with CGM readings <54 mg/dl was not significantly different. Nocturnal hypoglycaemic events <70 mg/dl were significantly longer (60 vs 35 minutes) and enveloped by less rapidly changing glucose levels. On days following nights containing hypoglycaemic events, there was a decrease in TAR, mean CGM glucose level and morning glucose levels and an increase in TB54, TBR, and CV., Conclusions: The results showed that nocturnal hypoglycaemic events are a common occurrence in persons with type 1 diabetes using MDI with significant differences between the characteristics of nocturnal and diurnal events., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: GF is the general manager and medical director of the Institute for Diabetes Technology (Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany), which carries out clinical studies, for example, with medical devices for diabetes therapy on its own initiative and on behalf of various companies. GF/IfDT have received research support, speakers’ honoraria or consulting fees in the last 3 years from Abbott, Ascensia, Berlin Chemie, Boydsense, Dexcom, Lilly Deutschland, Novo Nordisk, Perfood, Pharmasens, Roche, Sinocare, Terumo, and Ypsomed. ME, DW, and SÖ are employees of IfDT. LH is a shareholder of the Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung GmbH, Neuss, Germany. LH is a consultant for several companies that are developing novel diagnostic and therapeutic options for diabetes treatment. RZ has received speakers’ honoraria or consulting fees in the last 3 years from Abbott, Dexcom, Lilly, Medtronic, mySugr, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diabetes Care, VitalAire, and Ypsomed. BK has received speakers’ honoraria or consulting fees from Abbott, Bayer, Berlin Chemie, Dexcom, Embecta, Emperra, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sanofi, Ypsomed. OS is the founder and general manager of Sciarc GmbH, Baierbrunn, Germany. OS is a consultant for several companies that are developing diagnostic and therapeutic options for the management of cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney diseases, obesity, and metabolic diseases. TG is an employee and stockholder of Roche Diabetes Care GmbH, Mannheim, Germany.

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemigliptin and dapagliflozin dual add-on therapy (GEMI + DAPA) to metformin in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients who had inadequate glycaemic control on metformin alone, compared with a single add-on of either gemigliptin (GEMI) or dapagliflozin (DAPA) to metformin., Materials and Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study, 469 T2D patients treated with a stable dose of metformin for 8 weeks or longer were randomized to receive GEMI + DAPA (n = 157) and either GEMI (n = 156) or DAPA (n = 156). The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c levels from baseline at week 24., Results: Baseline characteristics including body mass index and T2D duration were similar among groups. At week 24, the least square mean changes in HbA1c from baseline were -1.34% with GEMI + DAPA, -0.90% with GEMI (difference between GEMI + DAPA vs. GEMI -0.44% [95% confidence interval {CI}: -0.58% to -0.31%], P < .01) and -0.78% with DAPA (difference between GEMI + DAPA vs. DAPA -0.56% [95% CI: -0.69% to -0.42%], P < .01). Both upper CIs were less than 0, demonstrating the superiority of GEMI + DAPA for lowering HbA1c. The rates of responders achieving HbA1c less than 7% and less than 6.5% were greater with GEMI + DAPA (84.9%, 56.6%) than with GEMI (55.3%, 32.2%) and DAPA (49.3%, 15.3%). The incidence rate of adverse events was similar across groups, with low incidence rates of hypoglycaemia, urinary tract infection and genital infection., Conclusions: These results suggest that the addition of GEMI + DAPA to metformin as triple combination therapy was effective, safe and well-tolerated, especially for T2D patients who experienced poor glycaemic control on metformin alone., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Previous studies have shown that increasing body mass index (BMI) was associated with decreased hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes, but it remains uncertain whether this finding could be applied to patients with and without cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN)., Methods: The study included 7789 participants with type 2 diabetes from action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes (ACCORD) trail. CAN was defined as SDNN < 8.2 ms and RMSSD < 8.0 ms. Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m 2 . Outcomes were identified as severe hypoglycemia requiring any assistance (HAA) or requiring medical assistance (HMA). We assessed the association between obesity and severe hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes with or without CAN using COX regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics., Results: Over a median follow-up of 4.7 years, a total of 893 participants developed HAA and 584 participants developed HMA. Compared with non-obesity, obesity was associated with lower risk of severe hypoglycemia (HAA: hazard ratio [HR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.68, P < 0.001; HMA: HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40-0.82, P = 0.002) in CAN present group, but not in CAN absent group (HAA: HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83-1.16, P = 0.830; HMA: HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.79-1.19, P = 0.754). Similarly, increasing BMI was associated with reduced severe hypoglycemic events in participants with CAN, but not in participants without CAN., Conclusions: CAN modifies the association between obesity and hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetic individuals with CAN who are under weight control should pay attention to hypoglycemic events., Trial Registry: http://www., Clinicaltrials: gov . Unique identifier: NCT00000620., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of recent innovations in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which include once-weekly formulations such as tirzepatide, a dual glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist, and once-weekly insulin options such as icodec and basal insulin Fc., Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted. The network meta-analysis protocol was registered at OSF registries (https://osf.io/gd67x). The primary outcome of interest was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), with change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, incidence of hypoglycaemia, and treatment discontinuation as secondary outcomes., Results: Tirzepatide exhibited superior efficacy in reducing HbA1c levels compared with insulin therapies, with the 15-mg dose showing the most significant reduction (mean difference [MD] -1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.49; -1.0). In terms of FPG reduction, tirzepatide 15 mg ranked highest (MD -0.70, 95% CI -1.05; -0.34), followed by tirzepatide 10 mg and 5 mg. Additionally, tirzepatide led to substantial weight loss, with the 15-mg dose exhibiting the most pronounced effect (MD -12.13, 95% CI -13.98; -10.27). However, a higher incidence of adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuation were associated with tirzepatide, particularly at higher doses., Conclusion: Tirzepatide, particularly at higher doses, demonstrates superior efficacy in lowering HbA1c and reducing hypoglycaemia risk compared with weekly insulin. However, its use is also associated with a higher incidence of AEs and treatment discontinuation., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.)

Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL plus lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) with premixed insulin, insulin degludec plus insulin aspart (IDegAsp), in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) suboptimally controlled with oral antidiabetic drug(s) (OADs)., Methods: In Soli-D, a 24-week, multicentre, open-label, study, insulin-naïve adults were randomized 1:1 to once-daily injections of iGlarLixi (n = 291) or IDegAsp (n = 291), with continued metformin ± sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority in HbA1c change from baseline to week 24. Key secondary endpoints included superiority in HbA1c change and body weight (BW) change at week 24. Hypoglycaemia rates were also assessed., Results: At week 24, iGlarLixi showed non-inferiority and superiority over IDegAsp in HbA1c reduction (least squares [LS] mean difference: -0.20 [95% confidence interval {CI}: -0.33, -0.07]; P < .001 for non-inferiority; [97.5% CI: -0.35, -0.05]; P = .003 for superiority). iGlarLixi decreased BW and IDegAsp increased BW from baseline to week 24, with a statistically significant LS mean difference of -1.49 kg in favour of iGlarLixi (97.5% CI: -2.32, -0.66; P < .001). Event rates (per person-year) for American Diabetes Association (ADA) Level 1, 2 or 3 hypoglycaemia were lower for iGlarLixi (1.90) versus IDegAsp (2.72) (relative risk: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.52, 0.98). No ADA Level 3 hypoglycaemia or unexpected safety findings were reported., Conclusions: In Chinese people with T2D suboptimally controlled with OADs, once-daily iGlarLixi provided better glycaemic control with BW benefit and lower hypoglycaemia event rates versus IDegAsp., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: Impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IAH) increases the risk of severe hypoglycaemia in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). IAH can be reversed through meticulous avoidance of hypoglycaemia. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) has been proposed as an underlying mechanism contributing to IAH; however, data are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) on IAH reversibility inT1DM., Methods: Participants with T1DM and IAH (Gold score ≥4) recruited to the HypoCOMPaSS (24-week 2 × 2 factorial randomised controlled) trial were included. All underwent screening for cardiac autonomic function testing at baseline and received comparable education and support aimed at avoiding hypoglycaemia and improving hypoglycaemia awareness. Definite CAN was defined as the presence of ≥2 abnormal cardiac reflex tests. Participants were grouped according to their CAN status, and changes in Gold score were compared., Results: Eighty-three participants (52 women [62.7%]) were included with mean age (SD) of 48 (12) years and mean HbA1c of 66 (13) mmol/mol (8.2 [3.3] %). The mean duration of T1DM was 29 (13) years. The prevalence of CAN was low with 5/83 (6%) participants having definite autonomic neuropathy with 11 (13%) classified with possible/early neuropathy. All participants, regardless of the autonomic function status, showed a mean improvement in Gold score of ≥1 (mean improvement -1.2 [95% CI -0.8, -1.6]; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: IAH can be improved in people with T1DM, and a long duration of disease, with and without cardiac autonomic dysfunction. These data suggest that CAN is not a prime driver for modulating IAH reversibility., (© 2024 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.)

Backgruound: This study investigated the real-world efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) in Korean adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), whose insulin treatment was switched to IDegAsp., Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study comprising two 26-week treatment periods, before and after switching to IDegAsp, respectively. Korean adults with uncontrolled T2DM treated with basal or premix insulin (±oral antidiabetic drugs) were enrolled. The primary objective was to compare the degree of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change in each 26-week observation period. The analyses included changes in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight, proportion of participants achieving HbA1c <7.0%, hypoglycemic events, and total daily insulin dose (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04656106)., Results: In total, 196 adults (mean age, 65.95 years; mean T2DM duration, 18.99 years) were analyzed. The change in both HbA1c and FPG were significantly different between the pre-switching and the post-switching period (0.28% vs. -0.51%, P<0.001; 5.21 mg/dL vs. -23.10 mg/dL, P=0.005), respectively. After switching, the rate of achieving HbA1c <7.0% was significantly improved (5.10% at baseline vs. 11.22% with IDegAsp, P=0.012). No significant differences (before vs. after switching) were observed in body weight change, and total daily insulin dose. The rates of overall and severe hypoglycemia were similar in the two periods., Conclusion: In real-world clinical practice in Korea, the change of insulin regimen to IDegAsp was associated with an improvement in glycemic control without increase of hypoglycemia, supporting the use of IDegAsp for patients with T2DM uncontrolled with basal or premix insulin.

Aims: In tackling rising diabetes-related emergencies, the need to understand and address emergency service usage by people with type 1 diabetes is vital. This review aimed to quantify current trends in presentations for type 1 diabetes-related emergencies and identify public health strategies that reduce the frequency of diabetes-related emergencies and improve glycaemic management., Methods: Medline (OVID), Cochrane and CINAHL were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2023, focusing on people with type 1 diabetes, severe hypoglycaemia and/or diabetic ketoacidosis, and ambulance and/or emergency department usage. There were 1313 papers identified, with 37 publications meeting review criteria., Results: The incidence of type 1 diabetes-related emergencies varied from 2.4 to 14.6% over one year for hypoglycaemic episodes, and between 0.07 and 11.8 events per 100 person-years for hyperglycaemic episodes. Notably, our findings revealed that ongoing diabetes education and the integration of diabetes technology, such as continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pump therapy, significantly reduced the incidence of these emergencies. However, socio-economic disparities posed barriers to accessing these technologies, subsequently shifting the cost to emergency healthcare and highlighting the need for governments to consider subsidising these technologies as part of preventative measures., Conclusions: Improving access to continuous glucose monitoring and insulin pump therapy, in combination with ongoing diabetes education focusing on symptom recognition and early management, will reduce the incidence of diabetes-related emergencies. Concurrent research assessing emergency healthcare usage patterns during the implementation of such measures is essential to ensure these are cost-effective., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.)

Background: Managing diabetes during Ramadan fasting is a challenge due lifestyle changes. We described the characteristics and patterns of care for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) during Ramadan 2020 and 2022., Methods: Our study included multinational Muslims with T2DM who were during routine consultation. We collected data on demographics, fasting characteristics, and complications. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, and multiple testing were performed., Results: 12,529 patients participated. Mean age was 55.2 ± 11.8 years; 52.4% were females. Mean diabetes duration was 9.9 ± 7.4 years; 27.7% were with HbA1c >9% (75 mmol/mol) and 70% had complications. Metformin was the most used medication followed by insulin. 85.1% fasted ≥1 day; fasting mean duration was 27.6 ± 5.6 days. Hypoglycemia occurred in 15.5% of whom 11.7% attended emergency department or were hospitalized; this was significantly associated with age and/or duration of diabetes. Hyperglycemia occurred in 14.9% of whom 6.1% attended emergency department or were hospitalized and was also associated with age or duration of diabetes. 74.2% performed SMBG during fasting. 59.2% were educated on Ramadan fasting, with 89.7% receiving it during routine consultation., Conclusions: Ramadan fasting in T2DM is high. Multidisciplinary approach is required to mitigate complications. Our findings support current recommendations for safe fasting.

Background: The Glycemia Risk Index (GRI) was introduced as a single value derived from the ambulatory glucose profile that identifies patients who need attention. This study describes participants in each of the five GRI zones and examines the percentage of variation in GRI scores that is explained by sociodemographic and clinical variables among diverse adults with type 1 diabetes., Methods: A total of 159 participants provided blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data over 14 days (mean age [SD] = 41.4 [14.5] years; female = 54.1%, Hispanic = 41.5%). Glycemia Risk Index zones were compared on CGM, sociodemographic, and clinical variables. Shapley value analysis examined the percentage of variation in GRI scores explained by different variables. Receiver operating characteristic curves examined GRI cutoffs for those more likely to have experienced ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia., Results: Mean glucose and variability, time in range, and percentage of time in high, and very high, glucose ranges differed across the five GRI zones ( P values < .001). Multiple sociodemographic indices also differed across zones, including education level, race/ethnicity, age, and insurance status. Sociodemographic and clinical variables collectively explained 62.2% of variance in GRI scores. A GRI score ≥84.5 reflected greater likelihood of ketoacidosis (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.848), and scores ≥58.2 reflected greater likelihood of severe hypoglycemia (AUC = 0.729) over the previous six months., Conclusions: Results support the use of the GRI, with GRI zones identifying those in need of clinical attention. Findings highlight the need to address health inequities. Treatment differences associated with the GRI also suggest behavioral and clinical interventions including starting individuals on CGM or automated insulin delivery systems., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: The standard of care for burned patients experiencing hyperglycemia associated with the hypermetabolic response is insulin therapy. Insulin treatment predisposes burn patients to hypoglycemia, which increases morbidity and mortality. Metformin has been suggested as an alternative to insulin therapy for glycemic control in burn patients given its safety profile, but further research is warranted. This study investigated whether metformin use in burn patients is associated with improved glycemic control and morbidity/mortality outcomes compared to insulin use alone., Materials and Methods: Using the TriNetX database, we conducted a retrospective study of burned patients who were administered insulin, metformin, or both within one week of injury. Demographic, comorbidity, and burn severity information were collected. Patients were categorized by treatment type, propensity score-matched, and compared for the following outcomes within 3 months: hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, sepsis, lactic acidosis, and death. Statistical significance was set a priori at p ≤ 0.05., Results: The insulin cohort was at increased risk for all outcomes (all p < 0.0001) compared to the metformin cohort, and an increased risk for sepsis, lactic acidosis, and death (all p ≤ 0.0002) compared to the insulin/metformin combination cohort. When compared to the metformin cohort, the combination cohort was at increased risk for all outcomes (all p ≤ 0.0107) except death., Conclusions: Treatment with metformin after burn is associated with a reduced risk of morbidity and mortality compared to insulin. The combination of insulin and metformin is no more effective in reducing the risk of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia than insulin alone but is less effective than metformin alone., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors do not have any financial disclosures or other conflicts of interest to report other than that SEW is the editor of this journal., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd and International Society of Burns Injuries. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To perform a participant-level post hoc meta-analysis of Phase 3a trials in type 2 diabetes (T2D) to characterize the hypoglycaemia safety and glycaemic efficacy of once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec)., Materials and Methods: All ONWARDS 1-5 randomized participants were pooled as overall T2D, insulin-naive, an insulin-experienced subgroups, and by once-daily trial comparator (degludec or glargine U100). The main outcomes included incidence and rates of clinically significant and severe hypoglycaemia. Additional endpoints included change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline and HbA1c target achievement without clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia., Results: The meta-analysis comprised 3765 participants (1882 icodec vs. 1883 comparators). In the overall T2D pool, clinically significant hypoglycaemia incidence was similar in the icodec group versus the comparator group (17.9% vs. 16.2%, odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94, 1.38); however, rates were low but significantly higher in the icodec group (1.15 vs. 1.00 episodes/participant-year of exposure, estimated rate ratio 1.51 [95% CI 1.24, 1.85]). Fewer severe hypoglycaemic episodes occurred with icodec than with comparators (8 vs. 18). A greater reduction in HbA1c occurred with icodec versus comparators, irrespective of subgroup (estimated treatment difference range [-0.10 to -0.29%]; all p < 0.05). Across subgroups, except for the insulin-experienced subgroup, the odds of achieving HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (7.0%) without clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia were greater with icodec than with comparators (OR range 1.30-1.55; all p < 0.05)., Conclusions: Icodec was associated with a similar incidence but higher rates of clinically significant hypoglycaemia (equating to one additional hypoglycaemic episode every 6 years) and fewer severe hypoglycaemic episodes versus comparators. Our findings also confirmed the greater efficacy of icodec that was demonstrated in the ONWARDS trial programme., (© 2024 Novo Nordisk A/S and The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Gestational diabetes (GD) is a risk factor for neonatal hypoglycaemia (NH), but other factors can increase this risk., Objectives: To create a score to predict NH in women with GD., Methods: Retrospective study of women with GD with a live singleton birth between 2012 and 2017 from the Portuguese GD registry. Pregnancies with and without NH were compared. A logistic regression was used to study NH predictors. Variables independently associated with NH were used to score derivation. The model's internal validation was performed by a bootstrapping. The association between the score and NH was assessed by logistic regression., Results: We studied 10216 pregnancies, 410 (4.0%) with NH. The model's AUC was 0.628 (95%CI: 0.599-0.657). Optimism-corrected c-index: 0.626. Points were assigned to variables associated with NH in proportion to the model's lowest regression coefficient: insulin-treatment 1, preeclampsia 3, preterm delivery 2, male sex 1, and small-for-gestational-age 2, or large-for-gestational-age 3. NH prevalence by score category 0-1, 2, 3, 4, and ≥5 was 2.3%, 3.0%, 4.5%, 6.0%, 7.4%, and 11.5%, respectively. Per point, the OR for NH was 1.35 (95% CI: 1.27-1.42). A score of 2, 3, 4, 5 or ≥6 (versus ≤1) had a OR for NH of 1.67 (1.29-2.15), 2.24 (1.65-3.04), 2.83 (2.02-3.98), 3.08 (1.83-5.16), and 6.84 (4.34-10.77), respectively., Conclusion: Per each score point, women with GD had 35% higher risk of NH. Those with ≥6 points had 6.8-fold higher risk of NH compared to a score ≤1. Our score may be useful for identifying women at a higher risk of NH., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

To investigate the combined effect of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia on intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and mortality recognizing that previous research has predominantly focused on examining these conditions independently. This study included very preterm infants who were born at King Saud Medical City, a tertiary referral center, and admitted to a level 3 neonatal intensive care unit between January 2020 and January 2024. Modified log-Poisson regression with generalized linear models and a robust variance estimator (Huber-White) were used to adjust for potential confounding factors. A total of 554 infants met the inclusion criteria. Hyperglycemia and/or hypoglycemia developed in 75.5% (418) patients within the first postnatal week. During the study period, IVH occurred in 28.5% (N = 158), and severe IVH occurred in 13% (72) infants. In addition, 13.7% (76) of infants died during the study period. The multivariate regression revealed an association between the isolated hyperglycemia, combined exposure of hypo- and hyperglycemia, and development of IVH (relative risk [RR], 2.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36, 3.25; RR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.34, 4.06, respectively). Severe IVH was significantly associated with isolated hyperglycemia (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 2.46; 95% CI, 1.16, 5.23). Death was associated with combined hypo- and hyperglycemia (adjusted hazardous ratio [aHR], 3.19; 95% CI, 1.23, 8.26).Conclusion: Combined hyper- and hypoglycemia in the first week of life of premature babies increases the risk and severity of IVH and neonatal mortality., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Aim: To compare the effects of iGlarLixi versus insulin glargine 100 U/mL (iGlar) on residual hyperglycaemia in Chinese people with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on prior basal insulin (BI) therapy ± oral antidiabetic drugs in the LixiLan-L-CN study (NCT03798080)., Materials and Methods: In this post hoc analysis, residual hyperglycaemia (i.e. HbA1c ≥ 7.0% [≥ 53 mmol/mol] and fasting plasma glucose [FPG] < 7.0 mmol/L) were assessed over 30 weeks. Outcomes were assessed at week 30 in participants with baseline residual hyperglycaemia, including changes from baseline in HbA1c, FPG, 2-hour postprandial glucose (PPG) and daily BI dose, the proportion of participants with HbA1c less than 7.0% (< 53 mmol/mol) and FPG less than 7.0 mmol/L and the incidence of hypoglycaemia., Results: Of 421 participants, 124 (29.5%) had baseline residual hyperglycaemia (iGlarLixi, n = 64 [31.7%]; iGlar, n = 60 [29.1%]). At week 30, the residual hyperglycaemia rate decreased to 7.0% with iGlarLixi and increased to 43.3% with iGlar. Among participants with baseline residual hyperglycaemia, a greater proportion achieved both HbA1c and FPG targets at week 30 with iGlarLixi versus iGlar (43.8% vs. 16.7%), and iGlarLixi provided greater reductions in HbA1c (least squares mean [LSM] difference, -0.9% [-9.4 mmol/mol]) and 2-hour PPG (LSM difference, -4.7 mmol/L; both P < .001). Daily BI dose and incidence of hypoglycaemia were similar in the two groups., Conclusions: The findings of this post hoc analysis suggest that iGlarLixi had greater benefits than iGlar in reducing the rate of residual hyperglycaemia over 30 weeks in Chinese people with suboptimally controlled T2D on prior BI-based therapy., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim: To explore the efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) in Japanese adults (≥20 years old) with type 2 diabetes from the global ONWARDS 1, 2 and 4 trials., Materials and Methods: Insulin-naive (ONWARDS 1) and insulin-experienced (ONWARDS 2 and 4) individuals were randomized to icodec or a once-daily insulin comparator: insulin glargine U100 [ONWARDS 1 (basal insulin only) and 4 (basal-bolus regimen)] or insulin degludec [ONWARDS 2 (basal insulin only)]. The primary outcome was change in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to end of treatment (EOT) (ONWARDS 1: Week 52; ONWARDS 2 and 4: Week 26). Here, we present the Japanese subgroup results., Results: Similar reductions in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to EOT were observed in each trial for icodec and comparators. The proportion of time in range (blood glucose 3.9-10.0 mmol/L) at EOT was also comparable across treatment groups (time in range: 58%-68%), as was time spent with blood glucose below 3.0 mmol/L (<1.0%). Combined clinically significant (blood glucose <3.0 mmol/L) or severe (requiring external assistance for recovery) hypoglycaemia rates were low, with no severe events (ONWARDS 1 and 2) or a single severe event (ONWARDS 4; icodec group) reported. These results generally aligned with findings from the respective global populations. No new safety issues were identified., Conclusions: Icodec improved glycaemic control to a similar degree as once-daily basal insulin comparators while maintaining low levels of clinically significant or severe hypoglycaemia. The findings support icodec use in Japanese individuals with different levels of type 2 diabetes progression., (© 2024 Novo Nordisk and The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: To conduct a systematic review in order to better understand the association of glycaemic risk factors and diabetes duration with risk of heart failure (HF) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D)., Methods: We identified longitudinal studies investigating the association of glycaemic factors (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c], HbA1c variability, and hypoglycaemia) and diabetes duration with HF in individuals with T2D. Hazard ratios and odds ratios were extracted and meta-analysed using a random-effects model where appropriate. Risk of bias assessment was carried out using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Egger's test along with the trim-and-fill method were used to assess and account for publication bias., Results: Forty studies representing 4 102 589 people met the inclusion criteria. The risk of developing HF significantly increased by 15% for each percentage point increase in HbA1c, by 2% for each additional year of diabetes duration, and by 43% for having a history of severe hypoglycaemia. Additionally, variability in HbA1c levels was associated with a 20%-26% increased risk of HF for each unit increase in the metrics of variability (HbA1c standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and average successive variability). All included studies scored high in the risk of bias assessment. Egger's test suggested publication bias, with trim-and-fill analyses revealing a significant 14% increased risk of HF per percentage point increase in HbA1c., Conclusions: Glycaemic risk factors and diabetes duration significantly contribute to the heightened risk of HF among individuals with T2D. A reduction in risk of HF is anticipated with better management of glycaemic risk factors., (© 2024 The Author(s). Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) often experience dysglycaemia. However, studies investigating the link between acute kidney injury (AKI) and dysglycaemia, especially in those with and without diabetes mellitus (DM), are limited., Methods: We used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database to investigate the association between AKI within 7 days of admission and subsequent dysglycaemia. The primary outcome was the occurrence of dysglycaemia (both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia) after 7 days of ICU admission. Logistic regression analyzed the relationship between AKI and dysglycaemia, while a Cox proportional hazards model estimated the long-term mortality risk linked to the AKI combined with dysglycaemia., Results: A cohort of 20,008 critically ill patients were included. The AKI group demonstrated a higher prevalence of dysglycaemia, compared to the non-AKI group. AKI patients had an increased risk of dysglycaemia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41-1.65), hypoglycemia (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.41-1.73), and hyperglycemia (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.41-1.66). In subgroup analysis, compared to DM patients, AKI showed higher risk of dysglycaemia in non-DM patients (aOR: 1.93 vs. 1.33, P int <0.01). Additionally, the AKI with dysglycaemia group exhibited a higher risk of long-term mortality compared to the non-AKI without dysglycaemia group. Dysglycaemia also mediated the relationship between AKI and long-term mortality., Conclusion: AKI was associated with a higher risk of dysglycaemia, especially in non-DM patients, and the combination of AKI and dysglycaemia was linked to higher long-term mortality. Further research is needed to develop optimal glycemic control strategies for AKI patients.

Aim: To describe glucose homeostasis disturbances (dysglycaemia) in very low-birthweight infants (<1500 g) during the admission period and explore associated risk factors., Methods: The LIGHT (very low-birthweight infants - glucose and hormonal profile over time) study was a prospective observational cohort study that included 49 very low-birthweight infants admitted to the tertiary neonatal intensive care unit in Umeå, Sweden, during 2016-2019. All glucose concentrations (n = 3515) sampled during the admission period were registered., Results: Hyperglycaemia >10 mmol/L and hypoglycaemia <2.6 mmol/L were registered in 63% and 55% of the infants, respectively. Onset of dysglycaemia occurred almost exclusively in the first postnatal week. Hyperglycaemia followed 15% of corticosteroid doses given; all were preceded by pre-existing hyperglycaemia. Pre-existing hyperglycaemia was found in 66.7% of hyperglycaemic infants who received inotrope treatment. Upon commencement, 72.5% of antimicrobial treatments given were neither preceded nor followed by hyperglycaemia., Conclusion: Dysglycaemia was common in very low-birthweight infants. Daily means of glucose concentrations seemed to follow a postmenstrual age-dependent pattern, decreasing towards term age suggesting a postmenstrual age-dependent developmental mechanism. The primary mechanism causing hyperglycaemia was independent of sepsis, and corticosteroid and inotrope treatments. No hypoglycaemia was registered during ongoing insulin treatment., (© 2024 The Author(s). Acta Paediatrica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Foundation Acta Paediatrica.)

Objective: This Study aims to investigate the risk factors of hypoglycemia in neonates through meta-analysis., Method: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of science databases were searched for case-control studies on risk factors for neonatal hypoglycemia. The search was done up to 1st October 2023 and Stata 15.0 was used for data analysis., Results: A total of 12 published studies were included, including 991 neonates in the hypoglycemic group and 4388 neonates in the non-hypoglycemic group. Meta-analysis results suggested caesarean section [OR = 1.90 95%CI (1.23, 2.92)], small gestational age[OR = 2.88, 95%CI (1.59, 5.20)], gestational diabetes [OR = 1.65, 95%CI (1.11, 2.46)], gestational hypertension[OR = 2,79, 95%CI (1.78, 4.35)] and respiratory distress syndrome[OR = 5.33, 95%CI (2.22, 12.84)] were risk factors for neonatal hypoglycemia., Conclusion: Based on the current study, we found that caesarean section, small gestational age, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, respiratory distress syndrome are risk factors for neonatal hypoglycemia., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42023472974., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The prevalence of type 2 diabetes (DM) has been increasing globally, particularly among older adults who are more susceptible to DM-related complications. Elderly individuals with diabetes are at higher risk of developing hypoglycemia compared with younger diabetes patients. Hypoglycemia in elderly patients can result in serious consequences such as cognitive changes, increased risk of falls, heart and other vascular problems, and even high mortality rate., Objective: To assess prevalence, and factors associated with hypoglycemia events among geriatric outpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus., Methods: The study was conducted at King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) at the outpatient diabetes clinic from October 1st, 2022 to August 1st, 2023. Variables such as socio-demographics, medication history, and comorbidities were obtained using electronic medical records. The prevalence of hypoglycemia was determined through patient interviews during their clinic visit. Patients were prospectively monitored for hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and mortality using electronic medical records over a three-month follow-up period. Logistic regression models were conducted to identify factors associated with hypoglycemia and hospital admissions/ emergency visits. Ethical Approval (Reference # 53/151/2022) was obtained on 19/9/2022., Results: Electronic medical charts of 640 patients who have type 2 diabetes mellitus and age ≥ 60 years were evaluated. The mean age ± SD was 67.19 (± 5.69) years. Hypoglycemia incidents with different severity levels were prevalent in 21.7% (n = 139) of the patients. Insulin administration was significantly associated with more hypoglycemic events compared to other antidiabetic medication. Patients with liver diseases had a significantly higher risk of hypoglycemia, with odds 7.43 times higher than patients without liver diseases. Patients with dyslipidemia also had a higher risk of hypoglycemia (odd ratio = 1.87). Regression analysis revealed that hypoglycemia and educational level were significant predictors for hospital admission and emergency department (ER) visits. Hypoglycemia was a positive predictor, meaning it increased the odds of these outcomes, while having a college degree or higher was associated with reduced odds of hospital admission and ER visits., Conclusion: Current study identified a considerable prevalence of hypoglycemia among older patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly, among those with concurrent liver diseases and dyslipidemia. Furthermore, hypoglycemia was associated with an increased rate of emergency department visits and hospital admissions by 2 folds in this population., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Al-Azayzih et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)