Search

AbstractMyelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) treatment focuses on improving quality of life (QOL), affected by anemia and transfusion dependence (TD). Using the MDS-CAN registry, we studied how changes in transfusion status – TD to transfusion independence (TI) (group A), or vice versa (group B), and maintaining TD (group C) or TI (group D) – affected OS and QOL in 1120 MDS patients. Analysis showed superior OS for those remaining TI, poorer for those remaining TD, and intermediate for those with changes. Among 656 treated patients, group A (n = 54) showed improved QOL, with trends toward improved physical and social function scores. Group B (n = 151) experienced declines in global QOL measures after switching to TD, particularly in fatigue and physical, role, and social functioning. Group C had notable fatigue worsening, while group D showed milder declines across multiple QOL aspects. Achieving TI in MDS correlates with improved QOL, whereas reverting to TD more significantly worsens overall QOL and function scores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: First‐line treatment in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for intensive therapy is the combination of a hypomethylating agent (HMA) with venetoclax (VEN). However, retrospective data confirming the benefits of this regimen outside of clinical trials have shown conflicting results. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of outcomes with first‐line HMA–VEN versus HMA in AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Results: A total of 213 patients were included from three German hospitals (125 HMA–VEN, 88 HMA). Median overall survival in the HMA–VEN cohort was 7.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1–14.7) versus 4.9 months (3.1–7.1) with HMA. After 1 year, 42% (95% CI, 33–54) and 19% (12–30) of patients were alive, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46–0.88). After adjusting for clinical and molecular baseline characteristics, treatment with HMA–VEN remained significantly associated with both prolonged survival (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29–0.77) and time to next treatment (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.47–0.85). Patients who achieved recovery of peripheral blood counts had a favorable prognosis (HR for death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33–0.84). Discussion: These data align with findings from the pivotal VIALE‐A trial and support the use of HMA–VEN in patients unfit for intensive therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractHypomethylating agents (HMA) and venetoclax (VEN) are commonly used in patients with IDH-mutated (IDHm) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for induction chemotherapy. While prior studies demonstrated high response and survival rates with HMA/VEN in IDHm AML, the impact of treatment modifications in real-world settings is unclear. We retrospectively reviewed 89 IDHm AML patients treated with HMA/VEN from January 2018 to June 2023. CR/CRi rates were 76% in newly diagnosed (ND) and 55% in relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients, and median overall survival was 29.2 months (ND) and 17.1 months (R/R), respectively. Treatment modifications were common. Early VEN reductions were associated with lower response rates but not worse survival. Prolonged cycles were not associated with worse response rates or survival. Significant neutropenia and ED visits or unplanned hospitalizations were considerable before and after CR/CRi, though febrile neutropenia decreased afterward. HMA/VEN is efficacious, with treatment modifications not affecting survival, though long-term toxicities are notable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is an extremely rare hematological malignancy with a highly aggressive behavior and median survival of

Abstract Background Ferroptosis is a new form of nonapoptotic and iron-dependent type of cell death. Glutathione peroxidase-4 (GPX4) plays an essential role in anti-ferroptosis by reducing lipid peroxidation. Although acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells, especially relapsed and refractory (R/R)-AML, present high GPX4 levels and enzyme activities, pharmacological inhibition of GPX4 alone has limited application in AML. Thus, whether inhibition of GPX4 combined with other therapeutic reagents has effective application in AML is largely unknown. Methods Lipid reactive oxygen species (ROS), malondialdehyde (MDA), and glutathione (GSH) assays were used to assess ferroptosis in AML cells treated with the hypomethylating agent (HMA) decitabine (DAC), ferroptosis-inducer (FIN) RAS-selective lethal 3 (RSL3), or their combination. Combination index (CI) analysis was used to assess the synergistic activity of DAC + RSL3 against AML cells. Finally, we evaluated the synergistic activity of DAC + RSL3 in murine AML and a human R/R-AML-xenografted NSG model in vivo. Results We first assessed GPX4 expression and found that GPX4 levels were higher in AML cells, especially those with MLL rearrangements, than in NCs. Knockdown of GPX4 by shRNA and indirect inhibition of GPX4 enzyme activity by RSL3 robustly induced ferroptosis in AML cells. To reduce the dose of RSL3 and avoid side effects, low doses of DAC (0.5 µM) and RSL3 (0.05 µM) synergistically facilitate ferroptosis by inhibiting the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-SLC7A11-GPX4 axis. Knockdown of AMPK by shRNA enhanced ferroptosis, and overexpression of SLC7A11 and GPX4 rescued DAC + RSL3-induced anti-leukemogenesis. Mechanistically, DAC increased the expression of MAGEA6 by reducing MAGEA6 promoter hypermethylation. Overexpression of MAGEA6 induced the degradation of AMPK, suggesting that DAC inhibits the AMPK-SLC7A11-GPX4 axis by increasing MAGEA6 expression. In addition, DAC + RSL3 synergistically reduced leukemic burden and extended overall survival compared with either DAC or RSL3 treatment in the MLL-AF9-transformed murine model. Finally, DAC + RSL3 synergistically reduced viability in untreated and R/R-AML cells and extended overall survival in two R/R-AML-xenografted NSG mouse models. Conclusions Our study first identify vulnerability to ferroptosis by regulating MAGEA6-AMPK-SLC7A11-GPX4 signaling pathway. Combined treatment with HMAs and FINs provides a potential therapeutic choice for AML patients, especially for R/R-AML.

Background: Ferroptosis is a new form of nonapoptotic and iron-dependent type of cell death. Glutathione peroxidase-4 (GPX4) plays an essential role in anti-ferroptosis by reducing lipid peroxidation. Although acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells, especially relapsed and refractory (R/R)-AML, present high GPX4 levels and enzyme activities, pharmacological inhibition of GPX4 alone has limited application in AML. Thus, whether inhibition of GPX4 combined with other therapeutic reagents has effective application in AML is largely unknown. Methods: Lipid reactive oxygen species (ROS), malondialdehyde (MDA), and glutathione (GSH) assays were used to assess ferroptosis in AML cells treated with the hypomethylating agent (HMA) decitabine (DAC), ferroptosis-inducer (FIN) RAS-selective lethal 3 (RSL3), or their combination. Combination index (CI) analysis was used to assess the synergistic activity of DAC + RSL3 against AML cells. Finally, we evaluated the synergistic activity of DAC + RSL3 in murine AML and a human R/R-AML-xenografted NSG model in vivo. Results: We first assessed GPX4 expression and found that GPX4 levels were higher in AML cells, especially those with MLL rearrangements, than in NCs. Knockdown of GPX4 by shRNA and indirect inhibition of GPX4 enzyme activity by RSL3 robustly induced ferroptosis in AML cells. To reduce the dose of RSL3 and avoid side effects, low doses of DAC (0.5 µM) and RSL3 (0.05 µM) synergistically facilitate ferroptosis by inhibiting the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)-SLC7A11-GPX4 axis. Knockdown of AMPK by shRNA enhanced ferroptosis, and overexpression of SLC7A11 and GPX4 rescued DAC + RSL3-induced anti-leukemogenesis. Mechanistically, DAC increased the expression of MAGEA6 by reducing MAGEA6 promoter hypermethylation. Overexpression of MAGEA6 induced the degradation of AMPK, suggesting that DAC inhibits the AMPK-SLC7A11-GPX4 axis by increasing MAGEA6 expression. In addition, DAC + RSL3 synergistically reduced leukemic burden and extended overall survival compared with either DAC or RSL3 treatment in the MLL-AF9-transformed murine model. Finally, DAC + RSL3 synergistically reduced viability in untreated and R/R-AML cells and extended overall survival in two R/R-AML-xenografted NSG mouse models. Conclusions: Our study first identify vulnerability to ferroptosis by regulating MAGEA6-AMPK-SLC7A11-GPX4 signaling pathway. Combined treatment with HMAs and FINs provides a potential therapeutic choice for AML patients, especially for R/R-AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since HMAs were recommended for treatments in AML and MDS, we wondered whether HMAs could provide similar benefit to AML and intermediate/high-risk MDS under the direction of next-generation sequencing. Here we retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of 176 AML and 128 intermediate/high-risk MDS patients treated with HMAs or non-HMA regimens. For AML, HMAs regimen was related to better CR rate compared with non-HMA regimen in elder cohort, while the situation was the opposite in younger cohort. In consolidation phase, EMM (+) patients could benefit from HMAs regimen. Relapsed AML patients receiving HMAs regimen rather than non-HMA regimen had better post-relapse survival. Multivariate analysis identified HMA regimen as an independent prognostic factor for OS in EMM (+) cohort. For intermediate/high-risk MDS patients not undergoing HSCT, however, HMA regimen showed no survival advantage in EMM (+) cohort and was conversely associated with shorter survival in EMM (-) cohort compared with non-HMA regimen. And among those undergoing HSCT, HMA prior to HSCT predicted poor prognosis compared with upfront HSCT regardless of the existence of EMMs. Therefore, HMAs had better therapeutic value in AML rather than in intermediate/high-risk MDS based on EMMs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The hypomethylating agent decitabine is the standard therapy for intermediate or high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Methods In this trial, 191 adult patients with intermediate/high risk MDS (IPSS score ≥ 0.5) randomly received decitabine using a standard regimen (20 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days; n = 94) or an extended regimen with lower daily dose (12 mg/m2/day for 8 consecutive days; n = 97) every 4 weeks, for a total of 4 cycles. Results The median follow‐up was 14 months (range 2–36). The primary end point of overall response rate in the intent‐to‐treat analysis was 41.5% and 38.1% in the standard and extended dosing arms, respectively (p = 0.660). Complete remission and marrow complete remission also did not differ between the two arms. Cytopenia was the most frequent adverse event (76.4%). The median duration of neutropenia per cycle did not differ between the two arms during the first two cycles, but significantly shorter in the extended dosing arm in the third cycle (8.5 vs. 15.5 days, p = 0.049) and in the fourth cycle (8 vs. 14 days, p = 0.294). Conclusion The 5‐day 20‐mg/m2/day and 8‐day 12‐mg/m2/day decitabine regimens have similar efficacy and safety in patients with intermediate or high risk MDS.

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal hematologic disorders characterized by morphologic dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, and cytopenia. In the past year, the classification of MDS has been updated in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemia with incorporation of morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Furthermore, the more comprehensive International Prognostic Scoring System-Molecular (IPSS-M) allows for improved risk stratification and prognostication. These three developments allow for more tailored therapeutic decision-making in view of the expanding treatment options in MDS. For patients with lower risk MDS, treatment is aimed at improving cytopenias, usually anemia. The recent approval of luspatercept and decitabine/cedazuridine have added on to the current armamentarium of erythropoietic stimulating agents and lenalidomide (for MDS with isolated deletion 5q). Several newer agents are being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials for this group of patients, such as imetelstat and oral azacitidine. This review provides a summary of the classification systems, the prognostic scores and clinical management of patients with lower risk MDS.

Summary: Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) relapse after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo‐HCT) is often driven by immune‐related mechanisms and associated with poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with hypomethylating agents (HMA) may restore or enhance the graft‐versus‐leukaemia effect. Still, data about using this combination regimen after allo‐HCT are limited. We conducted a prospective, phase II, open‐label, single‐arm study in which we treated patients with haematological AML relapse after allo‐HCT with HMA plus the anti‐PD‐1 antibody nivolumab. The response was correlated with DNA‐, RNA‐ and protein‐based single‐cell technology assessments to identify biomarkers associated with therapeutic efficacy. Sixteen patients received a median number of 2 (range 1–7) nivolumab applications. The overall response rate (CR/PR) at day 42 was 25%, and another 25% of the patients achieved stable disease. The median overall survival was 15.6 months. High‐parametric cytometry documented a higher frequency of activated (ICOS+, HLA‐DR+), low senescence (KLRG1−, CD57−) CD8+ effector T cells in responders. We confirmed these findings in a preclinical model. Single‐cell transcriptomics revealed a pro‐inflammatory rewiring of the expression profile of T and myeloid cells in responders. In summary, the study indicates that the post‐allo‐HCT HMA/nivolumab combination induces anti‐AML immune responses in selected patients and could be considered as a bridging approach to a second allo‐HCT. Trial‐registration: EudraCT‐No. 2017‐002194‐18. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionOlder patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for conventional chemotherapy have historically received low-intensity treatments, if any, and have had dismal outcomes. Recent phase III data have demonstrated significant efficacy of venetoclax-based combinations and have begun to address the unmet need in this patient population. As venetoclax-based combinations become increasingly used in the clinical setting, it is important to understand their development, current use, and future directions.Areas coveredThis review covers the clinical development of venetoclax-based combinations for the management of AML, and their current and future use. A search of PubMed and ashpublications.org using the keywords 'venetoclax', 'AML', and 'hypomethylating agents' as the search terms was undertaken to identify the most pertinent publications.Expert opinionWhile venetoclax-based combinations have shown excellent responses and improved survival in patients with untreated AML, further studies are required to understand how to expand on their frontline use, manage patients who fail venetoclax-based combinations, and their true efficacy in the relapsed/refractory setting. Management of AML with venetoclax-based combinations is expected to evolve over the next few years.

Relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a devastating disease with a poor prognosis and represents a major unmet medical need. We report on a real-world academic center experience of treating 25 patients with relapsed/refractory AML using venetoclax in combination with decitabine or azacitidine, which is not otherwise widely evaluated in the current literature. Our patients come from a large, socioeconomically and geographically diverse area including the majority of Northern California. Most had ELN Adverse Risk (52%) or Intermediate Risk (44%) AML, and most had an ECOG Performance Status of 1 (64%). Over half (52%) had prior hypomethylating agent exposure, and 40% had Secondary AML. We observed an overall response rate of 52%, with eight patients (32%) achieving composite complete remission. Median overall survival was 5.5 months, and for patients achieving composite complete remission this was 21.6 months. One-year estimated overall survival was 38%. Three patients were able to proceed directly to stem cell transplant for consolidation, and all three were alive at last follow-up, ranging 13.8-24.0 months. We found venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents to be well tolerated and potentially efficacious in securing long-term remissions for patients with relapsed/refractory AML.

Simple Summary: Treatment of acute myeloid leukemia continues to progress. Although a number of therapies are efficacious in treating acute myeloid leukemia, some are intolerable to older patients or patients who have more advanced disease. In light of this, newer therapies that are both efficacious and tolerable are being studied as a monotherapy and in combination with other therapies. In this review article, we aim to summarize on going clinical trials of venetoclax in combination with other targeted therapies. When combined with other therapies, venetoclax demonstrates synergy in comparison to venetoclax monotherapy or alternate therapy alone. In addition, venetoclax combinations appear to overcome a number of known resistance mechanisms to venetoclax. Frontline acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treatment is determined by a combination of patient and genetic factors. This includes patient fitness (i.e., comorbidities that increase the risk of treatment-related mortality) and genetic characteristics, including cytogenetic events and gene mutations. In older unfit patients, the standard of care treatment is typically venetoclax (VEN) combined with hypomethylating agents (HMA). Recently, several drugs have been developed targeting specific genomic subgroups of AML patients, enabling individualized therapy. This has resulted in investigations of doublet and triplet combinations incorporating VEN aimed at overcoming known resistance mechanisms and improving outcomes in older patients with AML. These combinations include isocitrate dehydrogenase-1/2 (IDH1/2) inhibitors (i.e., ivosidenib and enasidenib), fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors (i.e., gilteritinib), anti-CD47 antibodies (i.e., magrolimab), mouse double minute-2 (MDM2) inhibitors, and p53 reactivators (i.e., eprenetapopt). This review summarizes ongoing trials aimed at overcoming known VEN resistance mechanisms and improving outcomes beyond that observed with HMA + VEN combinations in the treatment of AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are a heterogenous group of clonal hematologic disorders characterized by morphologic dysplasia, ineffective hematopoiesis, and cytopenia. In the past year, the classification of MDS has been updated in the 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemia with incorporation of morphologic, clinical, and genomic data. Furthermore, the more comprehensive International Prognostic Scoring System-Molecular (IPSS-M) allows for improved risk stratification and prognostication. These three developments allow for more tailored therapeutic decision-making in view of the expanding treatment options in MDS. For patients with lower risk MDS, treatment is aimed at improving cytopenias, usually anemia. The recent approval of luspatercept and decitabine/cedazuridine have added on to the current armamentarium of erythropoietic stimulating agents and lenalidomide (for MDS with isolated deletion 5q). Several newer agents are being evaluated in phase 3 clinical trials for this group of patients, such as imetelstat and oral azacitidine. This review provides a summary of the classification systems, the prognostic scores and clinical management of patients with lower risk MDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The hypomethylating agent decitabine is the standard therapy for intermediate or high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Methods: In this trial, 191 adult patients with intermediate/high risk MDS (IPSS score ≥ 0.5) randomly received decitabine using a standard regimen (20 mg/m2/day for 5 consecutive days; n = 94) or an extended regimen with lower daily dose (12 mg/m2/day for 8 consecutive days; n = 97) every 4 weeks, for a total of 4 cycles. Results: The median follow‐up was 14 months (range 2–36). The primary end point of overall response rate in the intent‐to‐treat analysis was 41.5% and 38.1% in the standard and extended dosing arms, respectively (p = 0.660). Complete remission and marrow complete remission also did not differ between the two arms. Cytopenia was the most frequent adverse event (76.4%). The median duration of neutropenia per cycle did not differ between the two arms during the first two cycles, but significantly shorter in the extended dosing arm in the third cycle (8.5 vs. 15.5 days, p = 0.049) and in the fourth cycle (8 vs. 14 days, p = 0.294). Conclusion: The 5‐day 20‐mg/m2/day and 8‐day 12‐mg/m2/day decitabine regimens have similar efficacy and safety in patients with intermediate or high risk MDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract To date, allogenic stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the only potential curative option for patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF). However, relapse rates and associated mortality remain a concern. A second ASCT may not be feasible due to advancing age, declined functional status, donor unavailability, toxicities associated with a second ASCT. Herein, we report the first case of utilizing initially azacitidine and subsequently oral decitabine + cedazuridine (decitabine), in the context of relapsed PMF post‐ASCT. Utilizing both hypomethylating agents provided disease control and improved donor/myeloid lineage chimerism levels, and the patient also remained transfusion independent, with preserved functional status and quality of life.

Yenny Moreno Vanegas, Talha Badar Division of Hematology-Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Program, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USACorrespondence: Talha Badar, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA, Email Badar.Talha@mayo.eduAbstract: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is predominantly a disease of the elderly, and a significant proportion of these patients are not candidates for intensive, curative-intent therapies. Epigenetic dysregulation resulting in abnormal DNA hypermethylation is one of the hallmarks of AML pathogenesis. For the past two decades, hypomethylating agents including azacitidine (AZA) have been the mainstay of treatment for AML patients who are ineligible to receive intensive chemotherapies. As our understanding of AML disease biology has improved, several novel treatment combinations have been developed to improve the outcome of AML patients, with remarkable success. A considerable proportion of these novel combinations have utilized AZA as the backbone of their treatment scheme. In this review, we have highlighted the evolution of AML treatment, focusing on novel AZA-based treatment combinations and their clinical efficacy.Keywords: azacitidine, elderly AML, hypomethylating agent, azacitidine plus venetoclax

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have failed hypomethylating agents (HMA) have a poor prognosis. We examined whether high intensity induction chemotherapy could abrogate negative outcomes in 270 patients with AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasms. Prior HMA therapy was significantly associated with a lower overall survival (OS) as compared to a reference group of patients with secondary disease without prior HMA therapy (median 7.2 vs 13.1 months). In patients with prior HMA therapy, high intensity induction was associated with a non-significant trend toward longer OS (median 8.2 vs 4.8 months) and decreased rates of treatment failure (39% vs 64%). These results redemonstrate poor outcomes in patients with prior HMA and suggest possible benefit of high intensity induction that should be evaluated in future studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opinion statement: Lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes are typically characterized by an indolent disease course with a relatively low risk of transformation into acute myeloid leukemia. These patients are classically identified using the revised International Prognostic Scoring System and most likely its molecular version in the near future which may change the paradigm of treatment. The overall goals of care are symptomatic control to reduce transfusion requirements and improve quality of life. Symptomatic anemia is the most common indication to initiate disease-specific therapies after the optimization of supportive measures. Currently, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents remain the standard upfront therapy for anemia, and patients with del(5q) cytogenetic changes can benefit from lenalidomide monotherapy. Other therapeutic options after failure of upfront treatment include luspatercept, hypomethylating agents, and immunosuppressive therapies after taking into account of individualized disease features. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative option and is usually reserved for medically fit patients with severe symptomatic cytopenias who failed all standard options and/or the disease is progressing toward higher risk categories. Fortunately, novel investigational therapies are rapidly emerging by targeting different biological processes contributing to MDS pathogenesis, and eligible patients should be managed in clinical trials if available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment process in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often results in prolonged neutropenia, especially in the early period, and this requires antifungal prophylaxis. In the era of venetoclax (VEN), concomitant antifungal prophylaxis has been abandoned because azole antifungals inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4, the primary enzyme responsible for VEN metabolism. If azole antifungal prophylaxis is used with VEN, the dose of VEN needs to be reduced, but the clinical consequences in this situation are unknown. Limited clinical data exist on outcomes for patients treated with VEN, a hypomethylating agent (HMA), and posaconazole. We retrospectively evaluated our single-center experience on 46 patients, 20 treatment-naive and 26 relapsed/refractory (RR) AML patients. VEN was used after dose adjustment due to concomitant posaconazole use for antifungal prophylaxis. The median age was 65.5 years (range, 18-78). The median follow-up was 5.5 months (range, 1-25). The overall response rate (ORR) was 60.8%. The incidence of invasive fungal infection was 15.2%. The median OS from venetoclax initiation of all the patients and those with CR/CRi was 6 and 10 months, respectively. After VEN dose reduction due to concomitant posaconazole use, the observed ORR was comparable to the ORR previously reported in the literature without VEN dose reduction and antifungal prophylaxis. However, the OS obtained in our patients was shorter than previously reported in the literature. In addition, the incidence of invasive fungal infections in our patients was not less than that reported in the VEN and HMA studies without antifungal prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are devastating diseases that frequently rely on the use of parenteral hypomethylating agents (HMAs), either as monotherapy or in combination, as first-line treatment for many patients. Two new oral HMAs, decitabine/cedazuridine (DC) for use in place of azacitidine or decitabine in MDS, and azacitidine (CC-486) for use as maintenance treatment in AML, were recently approved by the FDA. We will discuss the development of these oral HMAs, including the advantages/disadvantages in transitioning to oral HMAs and an in depth look at the pivotal phase III trials that led to their FDA approval – ASCERTAIN for DC and QUAZAR-AML-001 for CC-486. We also review how these agents have been and are being studied in other malignancies, and examine the future role that these exciting novel agents will play in both MDS and AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) results from clonal proliferation of neoplastic mast cells that infiltrate bone marrow and other organs. A major subset of patients with SM has a clonally related myeloid neoplasm and the SM itself (SM‐AMN). We evaluated the efficacy of hypomethylating agent and venetoclax (HMA‐VEN) to target both the myeloid neoplasm and mast cell infiltrate in a patient with SM associated with acute myeloid leukemia arising from myelodysplastic syndrome and illustrate complete elimination of bone marrow mast cells and complete remission of MDS/AML. This case illustrates the potent activity of HMA‐VEN both against the AMN as well as the associated SM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Failure of hypomethylation agent (HMA) treatments is an important issue in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Recent studies indicated that function of wildtype TP53 positively impacts outcome of HMA treatments. We investigated the combination of the HMA azacitidine (AZA) with DS-3032b and DS-5272, novel antagonists of the TP53 negative regulator MDM2, in cellular and animal models of MDS and CMML. In TP53 wildtype myeloid cell line, combinational effects of DS-3032b or DS-5272 with AZA were observed. In Tet2-knockout mouse model of MDS and CMML, DS-5272 and AZA combination ameliorated disease-like phenotype. RNA-Seq analysis in mouse bone marrow hematopoietic stem and progenitors indicated that DS-5272 and AZA combination caused down-regulation of leukemia stem cell marker genes and activation of pathways of TP53 function and stability. These findings demonstrate that combining an MDM2 antagonist with AZA has potential to improve AZA treatment in TP53 wildtype MDS and CMML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is predominantly a disease of the elderly, and a significant proportion of these patients are not candidates for intensive, curative-intent therapies. Epigenetic dysregulation resulting in abnormal DNA hypermethylation is one of the hallmarks of AML pathogenesis. For the past two decades, hypomethylating agents including azacitidine (AZA) have been the mainstay of treatment for AML patients who are ineligible to receive intensive chemotherapies. As our understanding of AML disease biology has improved, several novel treatment combinations have been developed to improve the outcome of AML patients, with remarkable success. A considerable proportion of these novel combinations have utilized AZA as the backbone of their treatment scheme. In this review, we have highlighted the evolution of AML treatment, focusing on novel AZA-based treatment combinations and their clinical efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell diseases arising from the bone marrow (BM), and approximately 30% of MDS eventually progress to AML, associated with increasingly aggressive neoplastic hematopoietic clones and poor survival. Dysregulated immune microenvironment has been recognized as a key pathogenic driver of MDS and AML, causing high rate of intramedullary apoptosis in lower-risk MDS to immunosuppression in higher-risk MDS and AML. Immune checkpoint molecules, including programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), play important roles in oncogenesis by maintaining an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Recently, both molecules have been examined in MDS and AML. Abnormal inflammatory signaling, genetic and/or epigenetic alterations, interactions between cells, and treatment of patients all have been involved in dysregulating PD-1/PD-L1 signaling in these two diseases. Furthermore, with the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway activated in immune microenvironment, the milieu of BM shift to immunosuppressive, contributing to a clonal evolution of blasts. Nevertheless, numerous preclinical studies have suggested a potential response of patients to PD-1/PD-L1 blocker. Current clinical trials employing these drugs in MDS and AML have reported mixed clinical responses. In this paper, we focus on the recent preclinical advances of the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling in MDS and AML, and available and ongoing outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in patients. We also discuss the novel PD-1/PD-L1 blocker-based immunotherapeutic strategies and challenges, including identifying reliable biomarkers, determining settings, and exploring optimal combination therapies.

DNA hypomethylating agents (HMAs) such as decitabine and 5-azacytidine have established roles in the treatment paradigms for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous leukemia, where they are considered to exert their anticancer effects by restoring the expression of tumor suppressor genes. Due to their relatively favorable adverse effect profile and known ability to pass through the blood-brain barrier, applications in the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) and other central nervous system malignancies are under active investigation. The present review examines the types of HMAs currently available, their known and less-understood antineoplastic mechanisms, and the evidence to date of their preclinical and clinical efficacy in glioblastoma and other solid malignancies. The present review discusses the potential synergies HMAs may have with established and emerging GBM treatments, including temozolomide, immune checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccines. Recent successes and setbacks in clinical trials for newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM are summarized in order to highlight opportunities for HMAs to improve therapeutic responses. Challenges for future clinical trials are also assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell diseases arising from the bone marrow (BM), and approximately 30% of MDS eventually progress to AML, associated with increasingly aggressive neoplastic hematopoietic clones and poor survival. Dysregulated immune microenvironment has been recognized as a key pathogenic driver of MDS and AML, causing high rate of intramedullary apoptosis in lower-risk MDS to immunosuppression in higher-risk MDS and AML. Immune checkpoint molecules, including programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), play important roles in oncogenesis by maintaining an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Recently, both molecules have been examined in MDS and AML. Abnormal inflammatory signaling, genetic and/or epigenetic alterations, interactions between cells, and treatment of patients all have been involved in dysregulating PD-1/PD-L1 signaling in these two diseases. Furthermore, with the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway activated in immune microenvironment, the milieu of BM shift to immunosuppressive, contributing to a clonal evolution of blasts. Nevertheless, numerous preclinical studies have suggested a potential response of patients to PD-1/PD-L1 blocker. Current clinical trials employing these drugs in MDS and AML have reported mixed clinical responses. In this paper, we focus on the recent preclinical advances of the PD-1/PD-L1 signaling in MDS and AML, and available and ongoing outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor in patients. We also discuss the novel PD-1/PD-L1 blocker-based immunotherapeutic strategies and challenges, including identifying reliable biomarkers, determining settings, and exploring optimal combination therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The combined use of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax with azacitidine now is the standard of care for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unfit for intensive chemotherapy with outcomes exceeding those achieved with hypomethylating agents alone. Venetoclax in combination with intensive chemotherapy is also increasingly used both as frontline as well as salvage therapy. However, resistance to and relapse after venetoclax-based therapies are of major concern and outcomes after treatment failure remain poor., Areas Covered: A comprehensive search was performed using PubMed database (up to April 2024). Studies evaluating venetoclax-based combination treatments in AML and studies assessing markers of response and resistance to venetoclax were investigated. We summarize the status of venetoclax-based therapies in the frontline and relapsed/refractory setting with focus on the main mechanisms of resistance to BCL-2 inhibition. Further, strategies to overcome resistance including combinatorial regimens of hypomethylating agent (HMA) + venetoclax + inhibitors targeting actionable mutations like IDH1/2 or FLT3-ITD and the introduction of novel agents like menin-inhibitors are addressed., Expert Opinion: Although venetoclax is reshaping the treatment of unfit and fit AML patients, prognosis of patients after HMA/VEN failure remains dismal, and strategies to abrogate primary and secondary resistance are an unmet clinical need.

Background: Outcomes are dismal for patients with myelofibrosis (MF) who are no longer responsive to JAK2 inhibitors (JAKi) and/or have increasing blast cell numbers. Although prior reports have suggested the benefits of intravenous decitabine (DAC) combined with ruxolitinib for patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) accelerated/blast phase (AP/BP), decitabine-cedazuridine (DEC-C), an oral fixed-dose combination providing equivalent pharmacokinetic exposure, has not been evaluated in MF., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 14 patients with high-risk MF refractory to ruxolitinib or MPN-AP (10-19% blasts) treated with DEC-C +/- JAKi at Mount Sinai Hospital from 2021 to 2024., Results: The cohort was elderly (median age,76 years) and almost uniformly possessed high risk mutations with 13 of the 14 patients progressing on JAKi therapy. With a median follow-up of 9.4 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 29 months for the entire cohort. Median OS was 10.8 months for MPN-AP and was not reached for ruxolitinib refractory MF patients. All patients (n = 9) receiving > 4 cycles of DEC-C had clinical benefit exemplified by a reduction in blast cell numbers, spleen size, and lack of progression to MPN-BP (78%). Furthermore, 3/14 patients proceeded to allogeneic stem cell transplant. Myelosuppression was a common adverse event which was managed by reducing the number of days of administration of DEC-C from 5 to 3 per cycle., Conclusions: This report demonstrates the feasibility, tolerability, and clinical benefit of an exclusively ambulatory regimen for high-risk, elderly patients with advanced MF which warrants further evaluation in a prospective clinical trial., Competing Interests: Disclosures D.T. receives contracted research funding paid to his institution from Sobi, Astellas Pharma, Gilead and Cogent Biosciences and consulting fees from Novartis, AbbVie, Sierra Oncology, GSK and Cogent Biosciences. J.M. receives research funding paid to his institution from Incyte, Novartis, BMS, CTI/Sobi, Abbvie, Geron, Kartos and PharmaEssentia. Consulting fees paid to me by Incyte, Novartis, CTI/Sobi, Abbvie, Karyopharm, Kartos, Geron, GSK, Sumitomo, BMS, MorphoSys, Galecto, Pfizer, Merck, Roche and PharmaEssentia. R.H. received research grant funding through his institution from the following sources: Citi BioPharma Corp, Curis, Inc., Dexcel Pharma Technologies Ltd. Genentech, Kartos Therapeutics, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Inc., Kymera Therapeutics, OncoMyx Therapeutics, Novartis, Protagonist Therapeutics, Repare Therapeutics, Translational Drug Development (TD2), Turning Point Therapeutics, and the NIH/NCI. Additionally, he has received funding as an advisor/consultant from the following sources: AbbVie, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Protagonist Therapeutics, Silence Therapeutics, GlycoMimetics, Dexcel Pharma Technologies LTD, Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, and Cellenkos, Inc. Finally, he holds a share of a patent filed by Dompé farmaceutici S.p.A. Y.Z.G. received research grant funding through her institution from the following sources: Protagonist Therapeutics, Repare Therapeutics, and the NIH/NIDDK. YZG has received funding as an advisor/consultant from the following sources: Bay Clinical, Takeda, Denali, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Protagonist Therapeutics. No other relevant financial disclosures for other authors., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), combined with hypomethylating agents, can be used to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but this strategy results in a high rate of pneumonitis. The authors sought to determine risk factors for pneumonitis development and whether pneumonitis increased mortality. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of 258 AML patients who received ICI‐containing regimens from 2016 to 2018. A multidisciplinary adjudication committee diagnosed pneumonia and pneumonitis by reviewing symptoms, imaging, microbiology, and response to therapies. To measure risk factors for pneumonitis and mortality, multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were constructed. Pneumonia, pneumonitis, and disease progression were modeled as a time‐dependent variable and incorporated a standard risk set modifying variables into the models. Results: Thirty patients developed pneumonitis (12%). Of these, 17 had partial or complete resolution, whereas 13 patients died from pneumonitis. Increasing age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04 per year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00‐1.08), and baseline shortness of breath increased pneumonitis risk (HR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.13‐5.55). Female sex (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15‐0.70) and increasing platelet count (HR, 0.52 per log‐unit increase; 95% CI, 0.30‐0.92) decreased pneumonitis risk. In adjusted models, ICI‐related pneumonitis significantly increased mortality (HR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.84‐4.37). Conclusions: ICI‐related pneumonitis occurs at a high rate in AML patients and increases mortality. Lay Summary: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remove inhibitory signals that reduce T‐cell function and allow T‐cells to better attack cancer cells.In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the effectiveness of ICIs is limited in part by inflammation of the lung, called pneumonitis.This study reviewed 258 patients with AML who received ICIs and identified 30 patients who developed pneumonitis, nearly half of whom died.Older age and baseline shortness of breath increased pneumonitis risk, whereas female sex and higher baseline platelet counts decreased pneumonitis risk.Pneumonitis increased mortality by nearly 3‐fold.This work highlights the significant harm imposed by pneumonitis after ICI therapies. Pneumonitis occurs in 12% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy and increases mortality by nearly 3‐fold. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Limited treatment options exist for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Venetoclax (VEN) in combination with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) has been recently approved for treatment-naïve patients unfit for intensive induction. Limited data are available to characterize the efficacy of VEN combinations in R/R AML. We retrospectively analyzed 77 patients with a median of 1 prior therapy (range 0–5) treated with VEN combinations for R/R AML or AML secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) progressing after HMA monotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 13.1 months (95% CI 9.2–15.1). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months (95% CI 8.2–15.4) with a median duration of response of 8.9 months (95% CI 5.7–13.9). Overall response rate (ORR) was 68% with a composite complete response (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rate of 53%. VEN combination therapy is efficacious in R/R AML and further prospective studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The natural course of untreated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is progression to an aggressive blast phase. Even in the current era of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the outcomes of blast phase CML remain poor with no consensus frontline treatment approach. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the response rates and survival outcomes of 104 consecutive patients with myeloid blast phase CML (CML-MBP) treated from 2000 to 2019 based on 4 different frontline treatment approaches: intensive chemotherapy (IC) + TKI (n = 20), hypomethylating agent (HMA) + TKI (n = 20), TKI alone (n = 56), or IC alone (n = 8). We also evaluated the impact of TKI selection and subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) on patient outcomes. Results Response rates were similar between patients treated with IC + TKI and HMA + TKI. Compared to treatment with TKI alone, treatment with IC/HMA + TKI resulted in a higher rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (57.5% vs 33.9%, p

Abstract Background Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a very rare condition, develops both in patients with other hematological neoplasms, and as isolated tumor. MS of the gynecologic tract is extremely rare. An available literature data about diagnosis and management of MS is summarized in the article. The role of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery and bone marrow transplantation in the treatment is discussed. Polychemotherapy and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation were suggested to be the optimal treatment strategy of MS of the gynecological tract. The use of new targeted agents results in promising clinical data. Case presentation We are presenting a rare clinical case of a MS of the uterine cervix with concomitant bone marrow involvement and describe all the peculiarities of the clinical course, diagnosis, and treatment. The patient received chemotherapy followed by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The pre-transplant therapy allowed us to perform allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with the deepest response possible: complete PET-negative and MRD-negative remission of the disease. Conclusions MS remains a subject of discussion regarding its diagnostic and therapeutic aspects. The use of novel targeting agents can be perspective option for patient with extramedullary disease.

Abstract Background The role of pre‐hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) cytoreduction with either induction chemotherapy (IC) or hypomethylating agents (HMAs) in treating advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) remains debatable. We aimed to evaluate pre‐HSCT strategies by comparing the endpoints related to disease control between advanced MDS patients with pre‐HSCT cytoreduction and those with best supportive care. Methods We described 228 consecutive advanced MDS patients who received HSCT from a haploidentical donor (HID, n = 162) or matched related donor (MSD, n = 66) with uniform myeloablative conditioning regimens between January 2015 and December 2018. Of these 228 patients, 131 (57.5%) were treated exclusively with pre‐HSCT best supportive care (BSC), 49 (22.5%) were given HMA, and 48 (21.1%) received both IC and HMA. Propensity score‐matching analysis, multivariate analyses, and subgroup analyses were performed to elucidate the impact of pre‐HSCT strategies on transplant outcomes. Results The 3‐year relapse‐free survival (RFS) rates were 78.2% and 70.0% for the BSC and cytoreduction cohorts (P = 0.189) and were 78.2%, 66.7%, and 73.2% for the BSC, HMA, and HMA+IC groups, respectively (P = 0.269). A propensity score‐matching analysis confirmed that the 3‐year RFS rates were 81.9%, 87.5%, and 66.9% for BSC, cytoreduction complete remission (CR), and cytoreduction non‐CR groups, respectively (P = 0.051). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that pre‐HSCT cytoreduction, older patient age, monosomal karyotype, and interval between diagnosis and HSCT were poor prognostic factors for RFS. In the subgroup analyses, BSC was associated with longer RFS compared to cytoreduction among the younger patients, those with international prognostic scoring system intermediate‐2/high risk at diagnosis, and those with intermediate/poor cytogenetics. Conclusions Different pre‐HSCT therapies did not yield discrepant post‐HSCT outcomes. No benefit in terms of post‐HSCT outcomes were correlated with pre‐HSCT cytoreduction in advanced MDS even for cytoreduction CR patients. Early referral to HSCT is essential for advanced MDS patients.

Summary: We investigated the incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) and other infectious complications in patients receiving venetoclax and hypomethylating agent therapy for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This retrospective, multicentre cohort study included adult patients with AML who received at least one cycle of venetoclax and either azacitidine or decitabine between January 2016 and August 2020. The primary outcome was the incidence of probable or confirmed IFI. Secondary outcomes included antifungal prophylaxis prescribing patterns, incidence of bacterial infections, and incidence of neutropenic fever hospital admissions. Among 235 patients, the incidence of probable or confirmed IFI was 5.1%. IFI incidence did not differ significantly according to age, antifungal prophylaxis use, or disease status. In the subgroup of patients with probable or confirmed IFIs, six (50%) were receiving antifungal prophylaxis at the time of infection. The overall incidence of developing at least one bacterial infection was 33.6% and 127 (54%) patients had at least one hospital admission for febrile neutropenia. This study demonstrated an overall low risk of developing probable or confirmed IFI as well as a notable percentage of documented bacterial infections and hospital admissions due to neutropenic fever. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Azacitidine (AZA) is important in the management of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Romidepsin (ROM) is a histone deacetylase inhibitor which synergises with AZA in vitro. The ROMAZA trial established the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of combined ROM/AZA therapy in patients with AML, as ROM 12 mg/m2 on Days 8 and 15, with AZA 75 mg/m2 administered for 7/28 day cycle. Nine of the 38 (23·7%) patients treated at the MTD were classified as responders by Cycle 6 (best response: complete remission [CR]/incomplete CR n = 7, partial response n = 2). Correlative next‐generation sequencing studies demonstrated important insights into therapy resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Review objective: There have been several advances in the field of myelodysplastic syndromes over the past year, yielding two new US Food and Drug Administration drug approvals. The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, therapeutic use, adverse effects, clinical use controversies, product description, and upcoming trials for myelodysplastic syndromes novel agents luspatercept-aamt and decitabine/cedazuridine are reviewed. Data sources: This review article utilized primary information obtained from both the published studies involved in the approval of luspatercept-aamt and decitabine/cedazuridine and package inserts for the respective medications. This review article utilized secondary information obtained from National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines using filters and keywords to sustain information relevancy as well as key studies using the keywords, "luspatercept-aamt, myelodysplastic syndromes, decitabine, cedazuridine, hypomethylating agent, ASTX727" from scholarly journal database PubMed. Data summary: Myelodysplastic syndromes consist of myeloid clonal hemopathies with a diverse range of presentation. Until recently, there have been relatively few new therapies in the myelodysplastic syndromes treatment landscape. On April 3, 2020 the US Food and Drug Administration approved Reblozyl®(luspatercept-aamt), then on July 7, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration approved INQOVI® (decitabine and cedazuridine). Luspatercept-aamt acts as a erythroid maturation agent through differentiation of late-stage erythroid precursors. The safety and efficacy of luspatercept-aamt was demonstrated in the MEDALIST trial, a phase III trial in patients with very low-intermediate risk refractory myelodysplastic syndromes and ring sideroblasts. Luspatercept-aamt met both primary and secondary endpoints of transfusion independence of 8 weeks or longer and transfusion independence of 12 weeks or longer, respectively. Decitabine/cedazuridine has a unique mechanism of action in which decitabine acts as a nucleoside metabolic inhibitor promoting DNA hypomethylation and cedazuridine then prevents degradation of decitabine. The safety and efficacy of decitabine/cedazuridine was shown in the ASCERTAIN study, a phase III trial in patients with intermediate or high risk myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. The primary outcome evaluated was 5-day cumulative area under the curve between decitabine/cedazuridine and IV decitabine as well as additional outcomes including safety. Decitabine/cedazuridine met primary outcome and had a similar safety profile to IV decitabine. Conclusion: The novel myelodysplastic syndromes agents luspatercept-aamt and decitabine/cedazuridine provide a clinical benefit in the studied populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

IntroductionHypomethylating agents (HMAs) seem to have a range of properties favorable to post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) maintenance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients.Materials and MethodsThe Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were independently searched by two investigators to identify relevant studies published inception to 18 November 2021. These trials compared HMA maintenance to observation following allo-SCT for AML or myelodysplastic syndrome.ResultsThe meta-analysis eligibility criteria were fulfilled by 14 studies. The overall survival and relapse-free survival of the HMA maintenance group were superior to the observation group, with a pooled risk ratio (RR) of 1.38 and 1.46, respectively. Moreover, the cumulative incidence of relapse was significantly lower in those who received HMAs. The HMA group also had lower non-relapse mortality compared with the observation group. Overall, the incidences of grades III–IV acute graft-vs.-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD did not differ in both groups. However, when looking specifically at those receiving decitabine maintenance, the rate of chronic GVHD seemed to be lower compared with observation alone.ConclusionsThe current systematic review and meta-analysis illustrated that AML and MDS patients receiving HMA maintenance after allo-SCT had better outcomes in regards to OS, RFS, NRM, CIR as well as a reduced incidence of chronic GVHD.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is an extremely rare hematological malignancy with a highly aggressive behavior and median survival of <2 years. Especially, most BPDCN patients present with extensive and non-specific skin lesions, usually leading to misdiagnosis as a skin disease and delay therapy. As for treatment, most patients with BPDCN experience relapse shortly after treatment with the traditional regimens. The alleviation of skin symptoms reflects the effects of clinical treatments. Herein, we report a case of a 71-year-old man with intermittent and gradually expanding skin lesions over his chest, abdomen, and back for 1 year. On admission, physical examination revealed extensive skin lesions and multiple enlarged lymph nodes. Laboratory examinations showed pancytopenia and numerous malignant cells in the peripheral blood smear (60%), bone marrow aspirate smear (73.5%). Immunophenotyping using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry presented large numbers of BPDCN cells in the bone marrow, cervical lymph nodes and dermal tissue. PET/CT revealed multiple enlarged lymph nodes and splenomegaly. Once the diagnosis was identified as BPDCN, the patient began treatment with the oral BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax and subcutaneously administered azacitidine. After the first course, skin lesions reduced markedly and complete remission was achieved in the bone marrow. Our study and current cumulative data according to reviewing systematically suggest that venetoclax combined with azacitidine is safe, effective, and applicable in the treatment of BPDCN, especially for elderly relapsed/refractory patients. This study, therefore, significantly contributes to the literature on the current and future treatment for BPDCN., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wang, Guo, Liu, Zheng, Xu, Wu, Yuan, Xue and Li.)

A retrospective study of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) found that a small subset of patients with mutations in the DDX41 gene achieved a negative measurable residual disease state after treatment with venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents. This study highlights the importance of identifying DDX41-mutated patients at diagnosis to improve cure rates with this treatment. The study also suggests that certain mutations in AML cells, such as splicing factor gene mutations, NPM1 mutations, and IDH1/2 mutations, may predict response to venetoclax. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms behind the therapeutic effect of venetoclax and hypomethylating agents in DDX41-mutated patients. Identifying genetic biomarkers for exceptional responders will help provide more precise therapy for AML patients. [Extracted from the article]

Introduction: This study aimed to identify genetic predictors of treatment response and survival in patients with myeloid neoplasms treated with hypomethylating agents (HMAs). Methods: We performed next-generation sequencing on bone marrow aspiration samples of 59 patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome with excess blasts-2, or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and treated with decitabine or azacitidine as a frontline therapy. Results: A single gene with the most common mutations was TP53 (14 of 59 patients), and mutations in RAS pathway-related genes including KRAS, NRAS, FLT3, PTPN11, CBL, and KIT were found in 28.8% of patients. The overall response rate to HMAs was 33.9%. Predictive factors for a poor response were an age >75 years (p = 0.007), 3 or more gene mutations (p = 0.004), mutations in RAS pathway-related genes (p = 0.033), and a mutated NRAS gene (p = 0.042). An age >75 years (hazard ratio 2.946), diagnosis of AML (hazard ratio 2.915), and mutations in NRAS (hazard ratio 4.440) were identified as poor prognostic factors for survival. Conclusion: In conclusion, mutations in RAS pathway-related genes were predictors of a poor response to HMAs. Particularly, mutated NRAS was associated with inferior survival rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Venetoclax (VEN) in combination with a hypomethylating agent (HMA) has become the standard of care for patients aged >75 years and for those not eligible for intensive chemotherapy who have newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The benefit of VEN‐based therapy in patients who have newly diagnosed AML with mutations in the TP53 gene (TP53mut) over standard therapy is undefined. Methods: In this single‐institutional, retrospective analysis, the authors assessed the clinical outcomes of 238 patients with newly diagnosed TP53mut AML and compared the clinical characteristics, response to different therapies, and outcomes of those who received VEN‐based (n = 58) and non–VEN‐based (n = 180) regimens. Results: Patients who received VEN‐based regimens were older (aged >65 years: 81% vs 65%; P =.02) and had higher response rates (complete remission, 43% vs 32%; P =.06) than those who received non–VEN‐based regimens. Compared with patients who received non–VEN‐based regimens, no difference in overall survival (median, 6.6 vs 5.7 months; P =.4) or relapse‐free survival (median, 4.7 vs 3.5 months; P =.43) was observed in those who received VEN‐based regimens, regardless of age or intensity of treatment. Conclusions: The addition of VEN to standard treatment regimens did not improve outcomes in younger or older patients who had TP53mut AML. These data highlight the need for novel therapies beyond VEN to improve the outcome of patients with TP53mut AML. The benefit of venetoclax‐based therapy over standard approaches in patients with newly diagnosed, TP53‐mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) needs to be better defined. Although the addition of venetoclax to standard therapy is associated with numerically higher response rates, there is no improvement in overall or relapse‐free survival compared with standard therapy in patients with newly diagnosed, TP53‐mutated AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Autoimmune disorders, including autoimmune cytopenias, are more common in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and may share with MDS the same steps of pathogenesis. Some patients with MDS have antibodies against red cells. Case report: We describe herein a 79-year-old patient who presented with fatigue, jaundice and pancytopenia. She was diagnosed with warm-antibody autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and synchronous MDS. Management and outcome: In our patient, AIHA responded to the hypomethylating agent 5-azacitidine used for the treatment of MDS. Six months later, the patient remains in clinico-laboratory remission for both MDS and AIHA. Discussion/conclusions: Our case indirectly suggests that 5-azacitidine led to a decrease in autoantibody production by the auto-reactive B-cell clone in MDS leading in turn to a diminished rate of autoimmune hemolysis. If our observation is accurate, we believe that similar reports will populate the scientific literature in the future years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Elderly and/or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia have historically been challenging to manage as they were ineligible for what was considered standard of care treatment with induction chemotherapy. The emergence of venetoclax with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine has substantially improved outcomes in the frontline setting with manageable toxicity. However, this regimen can be challenging to deliver given its differences from standard intensive chemotherapy. In this review, we summarize the landmark trials that established venetoclax-based combinations as a new standard of care for patients with acute myeloid leukemia not suitable for intense chemotherapy, provide practical clinical pearls for managing patients on these therapies, and offer a brief overview of modifications to these regimens under development to improve their efficacy and/or applicability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The natural course of untreated chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is progression to an aggressive blast phase. Even in the current era of BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the outcomes of blast phase CML remain poor with no consensus frontline treatment approach. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the response rates and survival outcomes of 104 consecutive patients with myeloid blast phase CML (CML-MBP) treated from 2000 to 2019 based on 4 different frontline treatment approaches: intensive chemotherapy (IC) + TKI (n = 20), hypomethylating agent (HMA) + TKI (n = 20), TKI alone (n = 56), or IC alone (n = 8). We also evaluated the impact of TKI selection and subsequent allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) on patient outcomes. Results: Response rates were similar between patients treated with IC + TKI and HMA + TKI. Compared to treatment with TKI alone, treatment with IC/HMA + TKI resulted in a higher rate of complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) (57.5% vs 33.9%, p < 0.05), a higher complete cytogenetic response rate (45% vs 10.7%, p < 0.001), and more patients proceeding to ASCT (32.5% vs 10.7%, p < 0.01). With a median follow-up of 6.7 years, long-term outcomes were similar between the IC + TKI and HMA + TKI groups. Combination therapy with IC/HMA + TKI was superior to therapy with TKI alone, including when analysis was limited to those treated with a 2nd/3rd-generation TKI. When using a 2nd/3rd-generation TKI, IC/HMA + TKI led to lower 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR; 44% vs 86%, p < 0.05) and superior 5-year event-free survival (EFS; 28% vs 0%, p < 0.05) and overall survival (OS; 34% vs 8%, p = 0.23) compared to TKI alone. Among patients who received IC/HMA + TKI, EFS and OS was superior for patients who received a 2nd/3rd generation TKI compared to those who received imatinib-based therapy. In a landmark analysis, 5-year OS was higher for patients who proceeded to ASCT (58% vs 22%, p = 0.12). Conclusions: Compared to patients treated with TKI alone for CML-MBP, treatment with IC + TKI or HMA + TKI led to improved response rates, CIR, EFS, and OS, particularly for patients who received a 2nd/3rd-generation TKI. Combination therapy with IC + TKI or HMA + TKI, rather than a TKI alone, should be considered the optimal treatment strategy for patients with CML-MBP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of review: For decades, the management of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) has been largely inextricable from myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasms, and acute myeloid leukemia. Hallmarks of these diseases have been the emergence of unique genomic signatures and discouraging responses to available therapies. Here, we will critically examine the current options for management and review the rapidly developing opportunities based on advances in CMML and JMML disease biology. Recent findings: Few clinical trials have exclusively been done in CMML, and in JMML, the rarity of the disease limits wide scale participation. Recent case series in JMML suggest that hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are a viable option for bridging to curative intent with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant or as posttransplant maintenance. Emerging evidence has demonstrated targeting the RAS-pathway via MEK inhibition may also be considered. In CMML, treatment with HMAs is largely derived from data inclusive of MDS patients, including a small number of patients with dysplastic CMML variants. Based on CMML disease biology, additional therapeutic targets being investigated include inhibitors of splicing, CD123/dendritic cell axis, inherent GM-CSF progenitor cell hypersensitivity, and targeting the JAK/STAT pathway. Current evidence is also expanding for oral HMAs. Summary: The management of CMML and JMML is rapidly evolving and clinicians must be aware of the genetic landscape and expanding treatment options to ensure these rare populations are afforded therapeutic interventions best suited to their needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Non-intensive therapies such as the hypomethylating agent (HMA) azacitidine (AZA) have been used in patients with AML ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy (IC) or stem cell transplant due to advanced age, comorbidities, and/or risk factors. However, response rates and survival remain dismal. Pre-clinical studies indicate the epigenetic combination of HMAs and HDAC inhibitors induce re-expression of silenced genes synergistically. The activity of pracinostat, an oral pan-HDAC inhibitor, has been shown in xenograft tumor models of AML and promising efficacy was seen in a Phase 2 study. This Phase 3 study (NCT03151408) evaluated the efficacy/safety of pracinostat administered with AZA in adult patients with newly diagnosed AML ineligible to receive IC. Patients were randomized to either pracinostat plus AZA or placebo/AZA and stratified by cytogenetic risk and ECOG status. As planned, an interim analysis was performed when 232/390 events (deaths) occurred. A total of 406 patients were randomized (203/group) at the time of the analysis. Median overall survival was 9.95 months for both treatment groups (p=0.8275). There was no significant difference between treatments in secondary efficacy endpoints, reflecting a lack of clinical response. This study did not show a benefit of adding pracinostat to AZA in elderly patients unfit for IC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]