Search

Objectives: To guide Therapeutic Patient Education (TPE) programs to improve patients' and spouses' perceived health, we aimed to analyze the effect of the spouse health state and patient-spouse relationship on functional impairment, mental health and self-efficacy of patients with RA or SpA., Methods: In this observational cross-sectional study, inclusion criteria were age≥18years and diagnosis of RA or SpA. The outcome criteria were functional impairment and mental health measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12-item version (SF-12-MCS); mental health measured by the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12); and self-efficacy by the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE Scale). Caregiver-patient relationship was assessed by the Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships (PAIR) questionnaire and the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS); social support by the Social Support Questionnaire-6 and spousal burden by the Zarit questionnaire., Results: A total of 88 patient-spouse couples were included. Patients were mostly female (n=68, 77%), with mean age 59 (SD 12.6) years; 69% had RA. On bivariate analyses, only spousal burden was associated with patients' functional impairment. Patients' mental health was associated with satisfaction with social support and the dyad relationship. Self-efficacy of patients was associated with spousal burden, satisfaction with social support, spousal anxiety/depression and the dyad relationship. On multivariate analysis, improved mental health and perceived self-efficacy of patients were associated with spousal satisfaction with social support (Beta=0.8, P=0.1 with GHQ-12) good communication in the couple (Beta=0.5, P=0.04 with SF-12-MCS and Beta=0.4, P=0.04 with GSE Scale) and low spousal-assessed burden (Beta=-0.2, P=0.003 with GSE Scale)., Conclusion: This study has identified potential focus for intervention. It has highlighted the importance of recognizing the role of couple communication (experiencing an open and fluent exchange of ideas) in the patient's mental health and self-efficacy but also perceived satisfaction with social support of both members of the couple on the patient's mental health., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aims of this study in SLE population were (1) to describe ultrasonography (US) joint abnormalities, (2) to estimate the reliability of clinical swollen joint count (C-SJC) and SLEDAI (C-SLEDAI) versus US-SJC and US-SLEDAI scores, (3) to highlight specific patterns of lupus patients with Power Doppler (PD) abnormalities., Method: For this cross-sectional multicenter study, 151 consecutive adult SLE patients were recruited. Evaluation included a clinical standardized joint assessment, B-mode and PD US of 40 joints and 26 tendons blinded for clinical examination. Reliability and agreement between clinical and B-mode US were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [95% Confidence Interval])., Results: We found a very high frequency of subclinical US abnormalities in asymptomatic patients: 85% of patients without joint symptoms had at least 1 US abnormality. Among them 46 patients (87%) had a history of joint involvement. The most frequent abnormalities were joint effusmaions (108 patients), synovial hypertrophy (SH, 109 patients) and synovitis (61 patients). Joint or tendon PD signal (grade>1) was found in 44% of patients (67/151). Synovitis were mainly located especially on MCPs and wrists. Even if reliability between clinical and grey-scale US SJC assessments was poor, reliability between clinical and US SLEDAI was good. Comparison between SLE patients with and without PD signal did not show any specific SLE pattern., Conclusion: US may be useful to assess joint involvement in SLE patients but did not significantly change SLEDAI score., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Objective: To assess the implementation of European recommendations for use of TNF inhibitors for spondyloarthritis (SpA), rheumatologists' level of knowledge of and adherence to the recommendations, and potential barriers to the application of recommendations., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study among 42 rheumatologists who initiated a first subcutaneous TNF inhibitor for SpA in 2013 or 2014. Thirty items from national and international recommendations were separated into 3 domains: indication, pretherapeutic monitoring, and management under TNF inhibitors. A standardized data collection procedure was used to gather data from medical files to assess the application of each recommendation. Questionnaires assessing the knowledge, level of adherence to each recommendation, and potential barriers to their implementation were sent to rheumatologists., Results: Rheumatologists applied a mean of 60% of items from domains A and B, but less than 50% from domain C items. Recommendations regarding the search for previous infection and the prevention of future infections were the ones most often applied. However, < 60% of rheumatologists assessed cancer and other diseases before TNF inhibitor initiation. More than 95% of rheumatologists knew of the recommendations and had a high level of adherence. Lack of time, difficulties accessing specialized consultations, and lack of flexibility in the recommendations explained rheumatologists' difficulties in applying the recommendations., Conclusion: Despite high levels of knowledge of, and adherence to, recommendations for using TNF inhibitors for SpA, rheumatologists' application was limited because of a lack of human and material resources.