Search

Purpose of Review : Purposes were to identify evidence for post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) and post-intensive care syndrome-family (PICS-F), defined as the psychological impact on families from exposure to critical care, in the neurologically injured population and to characterize existing models for neurorecovery clinics and the evidence to support their use. Recent Findings: There has been an explosion of post-ICU clinics among the general critical care population, with their use largely justified based on the management of PICS and PICS-F, terminology which excludes brain injured patients. In contrast, neurocritical care recovery clinics are not common and not well-described. There is however evidence in the neuro-ICU population supporting the provision of "dyadic" care, whereby the patient and caregiver are treated as one unit. Summary: Brain injured populations likely experience many of the same PICS phenomena as medically ill patients but are not represented in this body of literature. These patients deserve the same level of follow-up as other patients who have experienced critical illness. We propose a neuro-ICU transitional care clinic that addresses PICS-like symptoms and is modeled after transitional care provided to other brain injured populations. Future investigations should be targeted toward understanding the sequalae of a neuro-ICU admission, mechanisms for providing dyadic care, and the impact of neurorecovery clinics on long-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As the recognition of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS_ grows, providers and health systems have sought ways to assess for treat PICS after hospitalization. Multidisciplinary ICU recovery clinics represent a centralized approach for care delivery after critical illness. These clinics provide care in a variety of models, depending on resources and the needs of a particular patient population., Competing Interests: Disclosure Dr V. Danesh has research funding from the NIH, United States (NIH/NIA R21AG080339). Dr C.M. Sevin has received funding related to post ICU care from the NIH, PCORI, United States, The Society of Critical Care Medicine, and the Department of Defense, United States. No specific funding for this project., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Complex medication regimen changes burden intensive care unit (ICU) survivors and their caregivers during the transition to home. Intensive care unit recovery clinics are a prime setting for pharmacists to address patients' and their caregivers' medication-related needs. The purpose of this study was to describe ICU recovery clinic pharmacists' activities, roles, and perceived barriers and facilitators to practicing in ICU recovery clinics across different institutions. Methods: An expert panel of ICU recovery clinic pharmacists completed a 15-item survey. Survey items addressed the pharmacists' years in practice, education and training, activities performed, their perceptions of facilitators and barriers to practicing in an ICU recovery clinic setting, and general ICU recovery clinic characteristics. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: Nine ICU recovery clinic pharmacists participated. The average number of years in practice was 16.5 years (SD = 13.5, range = 2-38). All pharmacists practiced in an interprofessional ICU recovery clinic affiliated with an academic medical center. Seven (78%) pharmacists always performed medication reconciliation and a comprehensive medication review in each patient visit. Need for medication education was the most prevalent item found in patient comprehensive medication reviews. The main facilitators for pharmacists' successful participation in an ICU recovery clinic were incorporation into clinic workflow, support from other health care providers, and adequate space to see patients. The ICU recovery clinic pharmacists perceived the top barriers to be lack of dedicated time and inadequate billing for services. Conclusions: The ICU recovery clinic pharmacists address ICU survivors' medication needs by providing direct patient care in the clinic. Strategies to mitigate pharmacists' barriers to practicing in ICU recovery clinics, such as lack of dedicated time and adequate billing for pharmacist services, warrant a multifaceted solution, potentially including advocacy and policy work by national pharmacy professional organizations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]