Search

PURPOSE: Seizure-related homolog protein 6 (SEZ6) is a novel target expressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). ABBV-011, a SEZ6-targeted antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, was evaluated in a phase I study (NCT03639194) in patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. We report initial outcomes of ABBV-011 monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ABBV-011 was administered intravenously once every 3 weeks (Q3W) during dose escalation (0.3-2 mg/kg) and expansion. Patients with SEZ6-positive tumors (≥25% of tumor cells with ≥1+ staining intensity by immunohistochemistry) were preselected for expansion. Safety, tolerability, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated. RESULTS: As of August 2022, 99 patients received ABBV-011 monotherapy (dose escalation, n=36; Japanese dose evaluation, n=3; dose expansion, n=60 [1 mg/kg, n=40]); median age was 63 years (range, 41-79). Thirty-two percent, 41%, and 26% of patients received 1, 2, and ≥3 prior therapies, respectively. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached through 2.0 mg/kg. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were fatigue (50%), nausea (42%), and thrombocytopenia (41%). Most common hepatic TEAEs were increased aspartate aminotransferase (22%), increased g-glutamyltransferase (21%), and hyperbilirubinemia (17%); 2 patients experienced veno-occlusive liver disease. Objective response rate (ORR) was 19% (19/98). In the 1-mg/kg dose-expansion cohort (n=40), ORR was 25%; median response duration was 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.6-6.7) and median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.5-4.2). CONCLUSIONS: ABBV-011 1.0 mg/kg Q3W monotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. SEZ6 is a promising novel SCLC target and warrants further investigation.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) provide recommended management for patients with SCLC, including diagnosis, primary treatment, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. This selection for the journal focuses on metastatic (known as extensive-stage) SCLC, which is more common than limited-stage SCLC. Systemic therapy alone can palliate symptoms and prolong survival in most patients with extensive-stage disease. Smoking cessation counseling and intervention should be strongly promoted in patients with SCLC and other high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas. The "Summary of the Guidelines Updates" section in the SCLC algorithm outlines the most recent revisions for the 2022 update, which are described in greater detail in this revised Discussion text.

Treatment response assessment for patients with advanced solid tumors is complex and existing methods require greater precision. Current guidelines rely on imaging, which has known limitations, including the time required to show a deterministic change in target lesions. Serial changes in whole-genome (WG) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were used to assess response or resistance to treatment early in the treatment course. Ninety-six patients with advanced cancer were prospectively enrolled (91 analyzed and 5 excluded), and blood was collected before and after initiation of a new, systemic treatment. Plasma cell-free DNA libraries were prepared for either WG or WG bisulfite sequencing. Longitudinal changes in the fraction of ctDNA were quantified to retrospectively identify molecular progression (MP) or major molecular response (MMR). Study endpoints were concordance with first follow-up imaging (FFUI) and stratification of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patients with MP (n = 13) had significantly shorter PFS (median 62 days vs. 310 days) and OS (255 days vs. not reached). Sensitivity for MP to identify clinical progression was 54% and specificity was 100%. MP calls were from samples taken a median of 28 days into treatment and 39 days before FFUI. Patients with MMR (n = 27) had significantly longer PFS and OS compared with those with neither call (n = 51). These results demonstrated that ctDNA changes early after treatment initiation inform response to treatment and correlate with long-term clinical outcomes. Once validated, molecular response assessment can enable early treatment change minimizing side effects and costs associated with additional cycles of ineffective treatment.

Introduction: Determining lines of therapy (LOT) using real‐world data is crucial to inform clinical decisions and support clinical research. Existing rules for determining LOT in patients with metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) do not incorporate the growing number of targeted therapies used in treatment today. Therefore, we propose rules for determining LOT from real‐world data of patients with mNSCLC treated with targeted therapies. Methods: LOT rules were developed through expert consensus using a real‐world cohort of 550 patients with ALK+ or ROS1+ mNSCLC in the multi‐institutional, electronic medical record‐based Academic Thoracic Oncology Medical Investigators Consortium's (ATOMIC) Driver Mutation Registry. Rules were subsequently modified based on a review of appropriate LOT determination. These resulting rules were then applied to an independent cohort of patients with EGFR+ mNSCLC to illustrate their use. Results: Six rules for determining LOTs were developed. Among 1133 patients with EGFR mutations and mNSCLC, a total of 3168 regimens were recorded with a median of 2 regimens per patient (IQR, 1–4; range, 1–13). After applying our rules, there were 2834 total LOTs with a median of 2 LOTs per patient (IQR, 1–3; range, 1–11). Rules 1–3 kept 11% of regimen changes from advancing the LOT. When compared to previously published rules, LOT assignments differed 5.7% of the time, mostly in LOTs with targeted therapy. Conclusion: These rules provide an updated framework to evaluate current treatment patterns, accounting for the increased use of targeted therapies in patients with mNSCLC, and promote standardization of methods for determining LOT from real‐world data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundUnsuccessful KRAS-specific treatment approaches in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might reflect underlying disease heterogeneity. We sought to define clinical "syndromes" within advanced KRAS mutant NSCLC to improve future clinical trials and create a clinical framework for future molecular development.Patients and methodsTo test a series of a priori hypotheses regarding KRAS-mutant NSCLC clinical syndromes, we conducted a multi-institutional retrospective medical record review. Survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier model. Between-group differences were assessed using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analyses and Wilcoxon rank sum testing were used to assess progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) differences.ResultsAmong 218 patients with advanced KRAS-mutant NSCLC, OS and progression-free survival with first-line chemotherapy did not differ by intrathoracic versus extrathoracic spread, smoking intensity, or the specific KRAS mutation. Metastatic disease at diagnosis resulted in significantly worse OS than recurrent, unresectable disease (median OS, 14.6 vs. 40.9 months; P = .001). Among the patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis, nonscalp, soft tissue metastases (syndrome X; 6% of cases; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5%-10.1%) signified a poor prognosis (median OS, 7.5 vs. 15.9 months for the controls; P = .021). The response to first-line chemotherapy (syndrome Y; 41% of cases; 95% CI, 32.3%-50.6%) signified a good prognosis (median OS, 26.7 vs. 11.9 months; P = .002). The overlap between these 2 syndromes was minimal (2 of 111). Multivariate analysis confirmed these observations. The hazard ratio for death for syndromes X and Y was 2.64 (95% CI, 1.13-6.14) and 0.45 (95% CI, 0.28-0.76), respectively.ConclusionChemotherapy-responsive disease and nonscalp, soft tissue spread might represent distinct clinical syndromes within KRAS-mutant NSCLC. The molecular biology underlying this heterogeneity warrants future studies.