1. Association of SLC6A3 variants with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a genetic association study of dopamine-related genes in schizophrenia.
- Author
-
Kogure M, Kanahara N, Miyazawa A, Shiko Y, Otsuka I, Matsuyama K, Takase M, Kimura M, Kimura H, Ota K, Idemoto K, Tamura M, Oda Y, Yoshida T, Okazaki S, Yamasaki F, Nakata Y, Watanabe Y, Niitsu T, Hishimoto A, and Iyo M
- Abstract
Background: Most genetic analyses that have attempted to identify a locus or loci that can distinguish patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) from those who respond to treatment (non-TRS) have failed. However, evidence from multiple studies suggests that patients with schizophrenia who respond well to antipsychotic medication have a higher dopamine (DA) state in brain synaptic clefts whereas patients with TRS do not show enhanced DA synthesis/release pathways., Patients and Methods: To examine the contribution (if any) of genetics to TRS, we conducted a genetic association analysis of DA-related genes in schizophrenia patients (TRS, n = 435; non-TRS, n = 539) and healthy controls (HC: n = 489)., Results: The distributions of the genotypes of rs3756450 and the 40-bp variable number tandem repeat on SLC6A3 differed between the TRS and non-TRS groups. Regarding rs3756450, the TRS group showed a significantly higher ratio of the A allele, whereas the non-TRS group predominantly had the G allele. The analysis of the combination of COMT and SLC6A3 yielded a significantly higher ratio of the putative low-DA type (i.e., high COMT activity + high SLC6A3 activity) in the TRS group compared to the two other groups. Patients with the low-DA type accounted for the minority of the non-TRS group and exhibited milder psychopathology., Conclusion: The overall results suggest that ( i ) SLC6A3 could be involved in responsiveness to antipsychotic medication and ( ii ) genetic variants modulating brain DA levels may be related to the classification of TRS and non-TRS., Competing Interests: NK reports honoraria from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Ltd., Yoshitomi Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., and Eisai Co. Ltd. HK reports honoraria from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., and Teijin Ltd. YN reports honoraria from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. MI received consultant fees from Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., and Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., and reports honoraria from Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., GlaxoSmithKline K.K., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., Eisai Co. Ltd., Daiichi-Sankyo Co. Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., Teijin Ltd., Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co., Inc., and Asahi Kasei Corporation. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Kogure, Kanahara, Miyazawa, Shiko, Otsuka, Matsuyama, Takase, Kimura, Kimura, Ota, Idemoto, Tamura, Oda, Yoshida, Okazaki, Yamasaki, Nakata, Watanabe, Niitsu, Hishimoto and Iyo.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF