Search

Background: Long-term outcome of contemporary stress echocardiography has not been systematically assessed., Objective: To evaluate the association between results of stress echocardiography and patients' outcomes with suspected coronary artery disease using randomised controlled trials., Methods: Multiple electronic databases were searched for studies evaluating long-term outcome (>12 months) of stress echocardiography in patients suspected of coronary artery disease since year 2000. A common-effect model was used to derive pooled estimates. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction, depending on the definition applied in individual trials, termed as major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. Positive stress echocardiography result was defined as inducible ischaemia in at least one of the 17 left ventricular segments and negative stress echocardiography with no inducible ischaemia., Results: Among a total of six trials, 16 581 subjects underwent either pharmacological or treadmill stress echocardiography, a median follow-up of 31 months (range 21-101). The annual event rate was 1.76% for the composite MACE and 1.35% for all-cause mortality. Compared with negative stress echocardiography, positive stress echocardiography was associated with an increased risk of the MACE and all-cause mortality with an annual event rate of 1.99% vs 1.54% (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.79 to 2.33) and 1.68% vs 1.02% (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.80 to 2.35), respectively., Conclusion: Positive stress echocardiography results were associated with poorer long-term MACE and all-cause mortality. Stress echocardiography results may provide a useful long-term guidance in intensifying preventative treatment in patients with suspected coronary artery disease., Prospero Registration Number: CRD42023416766., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Myocardial perforation is a rare yet serious complication following cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator device procedures. In this article, the authors describe a case of right ventricular pacemaker lead perforation presenting to our hospital's medical assessment unit with a clinical presentation suggestive of an acute pulmonary embolism. Treatment dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was commenced while awaiting CT scan. CT images were negative for PE however demonstrated RV lead perforation. Echocardiogram demonstrated pericardial effusion with the tip of RV lead in the pericardial free space. A rapid deterioration in the patient's haemodynamics prompted an emergency pericardial drain insertion and successful RV lead re-position in the cardiac catheter lab. The patient recovered well and was discharged with routine pacemaker clinic follow-up.