Search

Background: Benin, a country eligible for Gavi support, changed the presentation of the 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine (PCV13) from the single-dose vial (SDV) to the multi-dose vial (MDV). The present work aims to evaluate the process of making this decision as well as programmatic and logistic impacts., Methods: WHO protocol for post-introduction evaluation (PIE) was used. Programmatic impact was evaluated by comparing PCV13 coverage and dropout rates with a comparator vaccine administered simultaneously over similar 6-month periods prior to and after the transition. This impact was also appreciated from observation of multi-dose vial management practices during immunization sessions. Logistic impact was measured from the analysis of storage capacities, waste management and vaccine losses., Results: Decision to move to PCV13 MDV was taken at EPI level. Activities planned to support this switch were partially implemented. Impact on vaccination coverage and PCV13 dropout rates in relation with the transition to PCV13 MDV was not detected. The study found that 63% of the health staff surveyed knew and applied WHO's multidose vial policy (MDVP). Vaccines opened vials were found in 83% of health facilities visited. PCV13 MDV (37%) was one of the 3 main vaccines found with open vials in health facility refrigerators. Vaccination risky practices were observed during immunization sessions in 83% of health facilities. The main risky practice was the lack of indication of the date and hour of opening vials (56%). There was a reduction of the volume occupied by vaccines at central store by 47%. Net storage volume per fully immunized child (FIC) decreased from 69.5 to 41 m 3 . PCV13 MDV allows for 40% reduction in the amount of waste produced by vaccination. PCV13 open vial loss rate has increased from 3 to 7%., Conclusion: Benin's experience in transition to an MDV presentation of PCV13 reveals the need for better preparation and planning., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: In 2011, Benin introduced the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugated vaccine (PCV13), in a single-dose vial, into its Expanded Programme for Immunisation (EPI) with support from Gavi. In April 2018, with the support of the Agence de Médecine Préventive Afrique (AMP) and other technical and financial partners, the single-dose vial was transitioned to a four-dose vial. Here we describe the decision-making process and the experience of the vaccinators during the change., Methods: We carried out semi-structured, individual interviews with 61 participants individuals involved in the EPI: 7 from central level, 5 from regional level, 7 from township level and 42 from district level. The interviews were recorded and transcribed, and the information categorised, using Nvivo software, and then analysed., Results: The Inter-agency Coordination Committee (ICC), the Benin National Advisory Committee for Vaccines and Vaccination, (BNACVV) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) (i.e., the traditional governance structures involved in vaccination decisions) were not involved in the decision to change to the four-dose vial for PCV13. The decision was taken by the EPI, supported by Gavi. The vaccination errors observed in the first months following the change in presentation were due to the absence of guidelines for changes in vaccine presentation and the central-level actors' perception that it was 'only a change in the vial', and therefore that the communication and training for a new vaccine were not required since the vaccine itself and its administration mode were unchanged., Conclusions: It is important that the other countries eligible for Gavi support that are about to change to the multi-dose vial PCV13 presentation learn from Benin's experience. The main lessons learned are that changes in the presentation of an established vaccine should follow the same process as the introduction of a new vaccine, and that all stakeholders involved in vaccines and vaccination should participate in the decision-making process and implementation.