Search

Introduction: Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is characterized by a poor prognosis and is generally treated with platinum and etoposide combination therapy as first-line chemotherapy. However, it remains uncertain whether carboplatin and etoposide combination therapy (CE) and cisplatin and etoposide combination therapy (PE) have comparable treatment efficacy. In this retrospective analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of CE and PE in patients with NEC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the patient's clinical record from 2005 to 2022 at the Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital. Patients who received either CE or PE were included in the study. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro 16.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Results: A total of 104 patients were enrolled, with 73 patients assigned to the CE group and 31 patients assigned to the PE group. Statistically, the response rate, progression-free survival time and overall survival time were 42.6%, 5.1 months (95% CI: 3.5–6.3) and 13.6 months (95% CI: 8.9–17.4), respectively, in the CE groups and 44.4%, 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.1–7.0) and 12.5 months (95% CI: 11.2–14.6), respectively, in the PE groups. There was no significant difference in treatment efficacy between the CE and the PE groups. However, the number of patients with elevated creatinine (3.35 mg/dL and 3.88 mg/dL in 2 patients, respectively) was significantly higher in the PE group than in the CE group. Conclusion: The efficacy of CE and PE in patients with NEC is comparable. However, the incidence of renal dysfunction was found to be significantly higher in the PE group than in the CE group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Driver mutations at BRAF V600 are frequently identified in papillary thyroid cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), in which BRAF inhibitors have shown clinical effectiveness. This Japanese phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a BRAF inhibitor, encorafenib, combined with an MEK inhibitor, binimetinib, in patients with BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, uncontrolled study was conducted at 10 institutions targeted patients with BRAF V600-mutated locally advanced or distant metastatic thyroid cancer not amenable to curative treatment who became refractory/intolerant to ≥1 previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted regimen(s) or were considered ineligible for those. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We enrolled 22 patients with BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer: 17 had differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and 5 had ATC. At data cutoff (October 26, 2022), the median follow-up was 11.5 (range = 3.4–19.0) months. The primary endpoint of centrally assessed ORR was 54.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.2–75.6; partial response in 12 patients and stable disease in 10). The ORRs in patients with DTC and ATC were 47.1% (8 of 17) and 80.0% (4 of 5), respectively. The medians for DOR and PFS by central assessment and for OS were not reached in the overall population, the DTC subgroup, or the ATC subgroup. At 12 months, the rate of ongoing response was 90.9%, and the PFS and OS rates were 78.8% and 81.8%, respectively. All patients developed ≥1 adverse events (AEs): grade 3 AEs in 6 patients (27.3%). No patients developed grade 4–5 AEs. The most common grade 3 AE was lipase increased (4 patients [18.2%]). Those toxicities were mostly manageable with appropriate monitoring and dose adjustment. Conclusions: Treatment with encorafenib plus binimetinib met the primary endpoint criteria and demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer regardless of its histological type, such as DTC or ATC, with no new safety concerns identified. Encorafenib plus binimetinib could thus be a new treatment option for BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer. Clinical Trial Registration number: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCT2011200018 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Patients with the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are often treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Recently, antibiotic intake was reported to lower the efficacy of ICIs in patients with several types of cancers. However, it is unclear if antibiotics affect the efficacy of ICIs in patients with head and neck SCC. We retrospectively assessed the influence of antibiotics on the treatment efficacy of nivolumab, an ICI, in patients with head and neck SCC. Methods: We reviewed the medical records of patients with head and neck SCC treated with nivolumab at the Department of Medical Oncology, Tohoku University Hospital, between 2017 and 2021. Patients who received oral or intravenous antibiotics from a month before the day of nivolumab initiation to the day of the first imaging evaluation of ICI efficacy were assigned to the antibiotic-treated group. The remaining patients were assigned to the antibiotic-untreated group. The response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival time (OS) of both groups were compared. Results: Forty-five patients were assigned to the antibiotic-treated group and 19 to the antibiotic-untreated group. The RR, median PFS, and median OS of the antibiotic-treated group were 23.7%, 3.2 months (95% confidential interval [CI]: 2.0–4.1), and 8.4 months (95% CI: 5.3–15.1) and those of the antibiotic-untreated group were 42.1%, 5.8 months (95% CI: 2.3–16.7), and 18.4 months (95% CI: 6.2–23.1), respectively. The PFS of the antibiotic-untreated group was significantly longer than that of the antibiotic-treated group. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that antibiotic treatment significantly shortens the PFS with nivolumab therapy in patients with head and neck SCC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]