Search

Background: The physicochemical changes of the surface aim to improve cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation, that is, better biological interaction with the cells and, consequently, with the peri-implant tissues. In the present study, implants with the same macrogeometry were compared in vitro and in vivo, but with two different surfaces: micro-rough and a new micro-nano-rough surface. Materials and Methods: A total of 90 implants were used, 10 of which were used for in vitro surface characterization (n = 5 per group) through scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and surface roughness measurements. For in vivo tests, 80 implants (n = 40 per group) were used in 20 rabbits (n = 2 implants per tibia). Two experimental groups were created: a control group, where the implants had a surface treated by sandblasting with titanium oxide microparticles, and a test group, where the implants were sandblasted using the same process as the previous group plus acid conditioned. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured by resonance frequency (initially and at both euthanasia times). Animals were euthanized 3 and 5 weeks after implantation (n = 10 animals per time). Ten samples from each group at each time point were evaluated by removal torque (RTv). Another ten samples from each group were evaluated histologically and histomorphometrically, measuring the percentage of bone-to-implant contact (%BIC) and the bone area fraction occupancy (%BAFO). Results: In vitro, it was possible to observe a more homogeneous surface for the test group compared to the control group. ISQ values showed statistical differences at both 3 and 5 weeks (test > control). For RTv, the values were: 44.5 ± 4.25 Ncm (control group) and 48.6 ± 3.17 Ncm (test group) for the time of 3 weeks; 64.3 ± 4.50 Ncm (control group) and 76.1 ± 4.18 Ncm (test group) at 5 weeks. The %BIC and %BAFO values measured in both groups and at both times did not show significant differences (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The higher removal torque and ISQ values presented in the samples from the test group compared to the control group indicate that there was an acceleration in the mineralization process of the newly formed bone matrix. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effect of photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy on implant stability and crestal bone loss placed in healed sites. The present systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA (The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Two investigators carried out the electronic search of Pubmed, Google Scholar, and Ebscohost for published literature from 2012 till March 2024. Handsearch for articles relevant to the topic was also carried out along with references. Only randomized controlled trials were included for systematic review. The assessment quality was done using the revised JBI checklist (Joanna Biggs Institute). After screening and eligibility assessment, Qualitative analysis was envisaged for 15 studies on implant stability and crestal bone loss, followed by quantitative analysis of 8 studies on implant stability and only 2 studies for crestal bone loss. Meta-analysis showed that overall implant stability was significantly higher in the control group (P < 0.00001). Crestal bone loss showed a significant difference after the therapy when observed after six months of implant placement (P = 0.03). Heterogeneity was high with the random effects model for implant stability, while it was acceptable for crestal bone loss. However, more studies with similar parameters concerning implant stability and PBM characteristics are required for further subgroup analysis and to reach conclusive results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Dental implants are a reliable solution for tooth loss; however, systemic conditions like osteoporosis and diabetes, which affect bone quality, healing, and stability, underline the importance of understanding their impact on enhanced outcomes. This study evaluated the comparative effects of osteoporosis and diabetes on dental implant stability over 12 months, utilizing objective implant mobility and stability measures. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study involved 50 patients, divided into 21 with type 2 diabetes and 29 with osteoporosis, with implant stability assessed at 6 and 12 months using Osstell ISQ and Periotest M devices and statistical analysis identifying differences between groups and time intervals at a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: At 6 months, the osteoporosis group showed higher initial stability (mean ISQ: 67.04 ± 5.42) compared to the diabetes group (mean ISQ: 62.10 ± 5.46; p = 0.0215)), and by 12 months, both groups showed significant improvements in ISQ scores (osteoporosis: 68.93 ± 4.83; diabetes: 65.79 ± 3.87), with Periotest values indicating more significant reductions in implant mobility, particularly in diabetic patients (osteoporosis: −3.34 ± 1.59; diabetes: −2.81 ± 1.44; p = 0.0001). Conclusions: Osteoporosis and diabetes significantly impact implant stability through distinct osseointegration pathways, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment plans to improve patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To determine the optimal implant diameter under limited bone width by comparing the effects of implants with different diameters on implant stability, peri-implant bone stability, and osseointegration. In addition, to evaluate the reliability of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) in detecting osseointegration and marginal bone level (MBL). Materials and Methods: Mandibular premolars and first molars of seven beagle dogs were extracted. After 8 weeks, their mandibular models and radiographic information were collected to fabricate implant templates. Implant sites were randomly divided into three groups according to diameter: Ø3.3, Ø4.1, and Ø4.8 mm. Implant stability quotient (ISQ) measurement and radiographic evaluation were performed after surgery (baseline) and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Three dogs were euthanized at 4 weeks to observe osteogenesis and implant-tissue interface biology. Four dogs were euthanized at 12 weeks to observe osseointegration. Hard tissue sections were prepared to analyze osteogenesis (fluorescence double labeling) and osseointegration (methylene blue-acid fuchsin staining). Results: At baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, the ISQ values of Ø4.1- and Ø4.8-mm implants did not differ (P > .05), but both had higher values than the Ø3.3-mm implants (P < .05). The mean marginal bone resorption (MBR) associated with Ø3.3-, Ø4.1-, and Ø4.8-mm implants was 0.65 ± 0.58 mm, 0.37 ± 0.28 mm, and 0.73 ± 0.37 mm, respectively. The buccal MBR of Ø4.8-mm implants was significantly higher than that of Ø4.1-mm implants (P < .05). The bone-to-implant contact (BIC) percentage at 12 weeks did not differ for any group (P > .05). The correlation coefficients between the ISQ and MBL of the Ø3.3-, Ø4.1-, and Ø4.8-mm implants were -0.84 (P < .01), -0.90 (P < .001), and -0.93 (P < .001), respectively, while that between the ISQ and BIC was 0.15 (P > .05). Conclusions: During the early healing stage, the performance of Ø4.1- and Ø4.8-mm implants in terms of implant stability was better than that of Ø3.3-mm implants. Implant diameter may not influence BIC percentage. RFA can be used to evaluate implant stability and MBL but is not suitable to assess the degree of osseointegration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the stability of short vs standard (ie, regular-length) implants in the edentulous mandible. Materials and Methods: In this prospective clinical study, 20 patients with edentulous mandibles received four implants each--two short implants (4 mm) in the region of the first molar and two standard implants (= 10 mm) in the interforaminal region. Implant stability was assessed using resonance frequency analysis immediately after implant placement and at the day of the abutment connection after 3 months of healing in order to provide an implant stability quotient (ISQ). Results: Implant stability in the two implant groups at placement (ISQ: short 66.2; standard 68.2) and at abutment connection (ISQ: short 74.9; standard 75.7) did not differ substantially or statistically significantly (both P > .05). Findings did not change after statistically controlling for potential confounders such as bone quality and bone crest width. At abutment connection, 95% of the short and 97.5% of the standard implants demonstrated sufficient stability for conventional loading (P > .05). Conclusions: Short dental implants demonstrate similar primary and secondary stability compared to standard implants and seem to be a promising treatment option for rehabilitation of patients with edentulous mandibles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Despite recent developments in THA, a more objective method is needed to assist orthopedic surgeons in identifying the insertion endpoint of the broaching procedure. Therefore, this systematic review evaluated the in-vivo efficacy of various acoustic and vibration analyses in detecting proper implant seating, identifying intraoperative complications, and quantifying the accuracy of predictive modeling using acoustics. Methods Four electronic databases were searched on July 23rd, 2023, to retrieve articles evaluating the use of acoustic analysis during THA. The search identified 835 unique articles, which were subsequently screened by two independent reviewers as per our inclusion and exclusion criteria. In total, 12 studies evaluating 580 THAs were found to satisfy our criteria and were included in this review. Results Methodologically, analyses have suggested stopping broaching when consecutive blows emit similar acoustic profiles (maximum peak frequency ± 0.5 kHz), which indicates proper implant seating in terms of stability and mitigates subsidence. Also, abrupt large deviations from the typical progression of acoustic signals while broaching are indicative of an intraoperative fracture. Since height, weight, femoral morphological parameters, and implant type have been shown to alter acoustic emissions while hammering, incorporating these factors into models to predict subsidence or intraoperative fracture yielded virtually 100% accuracy in identifying these adverse events. Conclusion These findings support that acoustic analyses during THA show promise as an accurate, objective, and non-invasive method to predict and detect proper implant fixation as well as to identify intraoperative fractures. Trial registration PROSPERO registration of the study protocol: CRD42023447889, 23 July 2023.

Background/purpose: Peri-implantitis is a representative etiology that affects the long-term survival of dental implants. It is known that decontamination of the implant surface is essential for the successful outcome of regenerative therapy for peri-implantitis. In the present study, the stability of a novel separable dental implant (SDI) was evaluated and compared with a conventional non-separable dental implant (NDI) using biomechanical and histomorphometric analyses. Materials and methods: In this animal study, 40 rabbits were implanted with two SDI fixtures in the left tibia and two NDI fixtures in the right tibia. The rabbits were sacrificed 3 and 6 weeks after implantation, and the implant samples were evaluated using resonance frequency analysis (RFA), micro-computed tomography (CT), removal torque testing, and histomorphometric analysis. Results: SDI exhibited comparable or better osseointegration and implant stability to NDI. In particular, SDI showed significantly higher implant stability quotient (ISQ) values immediately and 6 weeks after implantation, while removal torque values were significantly higher at both 3 and 6 weeks. In addition, microgaps on the histomorphometric images were not observed and abnormal signs or inflammation did not occur at the connection between the top and bottom parts of the SDI. Conclusion: The novel SDI fixture demonstrated sufficient osseointegration and biomechanical stability compared with NDI in this animal study. In addition, the changeable top part of SDI indicates that it may be effective in easily treating peri-implantitis in clinical practice. Additional future studies on the stability and clinical application after loading to the fixture are necessary.

Background and Objective: Dental implant therapy faces challenges in patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM and T2DM) due to adverse effects on bone metabolism and immune response. Despite advancements, diabetic patients face higher risks of peri-implantitis and compromised osseointegration. This review assesses the impact of anti-diabetic medications on implant outcomes, offering insights to bridge the gap between animal studies and clinical practice. By evaluating pharmacotherapeutic strategies in preclinical models, this review guides future research designs to improve implant success rates in diabetic individuals. Method: A comprehensive literature review identified 21 animal studies examining the impact of anti-diabetic medications on dental and bone implants. These studies explored diabetes models, medication regimens, and designs to assess outcomes related to bone metabolism, osseointegration, and peri-implant tissue responses. The findings are systematically summarized, highlighting the scope, design, and procedures of each study. An example includes placing a dental implant in the molar region of a mouse, providing insight into preclinical approaches. Results: Twenty-one animal studies, primarily using rodents, investigate various anti-diabetic medications on dental and bone implants. Interventions include insulin, aminoguanidine, voglibose, sitagliptin, exenatide, and metformin, analyzing outcomes like bone-implant contact (BIC), bone volume (BV), and counter-torque values in T1DM and T2DM models. The impacts of these medications on implant osseointegration under diabetic conditions are detailed, with their benefits and shortcomings assessed. Discussion: The findings and challenges of existing animal studies on diabetes mellitus (DM) and implant osseointegration are presented. Despite T2DM prevalence, research primarily focuses on T1DM models due to easier experimental practicalities, limiting applicability. Inconsistent protocols in studies compromise reliability regarding anti-diabetic treatments' effectiveness on osseointegration. Standardized methodologies and long-term assessments of local drug delivery alongside systemic anti-DM treatments are crucial to manage DM-related complications in implant dentistry. Conclusion: Insulin administration in short-term T1DM animal studies enhances implant osseointegration. However, the efficacy of non-insulin medications remains inconclusive. Rigorous experimental designs are needed to address inconsistencies and assess long-term impacts. Larger-sized (e.g., porcine) animal studies across various intraoral implant scenarios are required. Future research should focus on enhancing clinical applicability and improving implant stability in evolving conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Currently, maxillary sinus floor (SF) elevation is based on off-the-shelf allogeneic, xenogeneic or synthetic bone augmentation materials (BAM) that are implanted via an open lateral sinus wall approach (OSFE). However, this invasive method is associated with postoperative complications caused by an inadequate blood supply of the alveolar ridge. Balloon-assisted procedures are minimal invasive alternatives with lower complication rates. The aim was to evaluate local new bone (NB) formation in the SF following the application of a particulate BAM (Easy graft) via two different SF elevation techniques in a split mouth mini-pig sinus augmentation model. Material and methods: Seven adult Goettingen minipigs were used for evaluation of a biphasic ceramic (PLGA/ß-TCP) BAM in the elevated SF region. Treatments were randomized to the contralateral sinus sites and included two procedures: OSFE (control group) versus minimally invasive SF elevation by a balloon-lift-control system (BLC) (treatment group). The animals were euthanized after 28 and 56 days for analysis of new bone (NB) formation. Results: The biphasic synthetic BAM implanted via BLC increased more NB formation (5.2 ± 1.9 mm and 4.9 ± 1.6 mm vs. 2.6 ± 0.5 mm) and osseointegration of the particles (18.0 ± 6.0% and 25.1 ± 18.2% vs. 10.1 ± 8.0%, p < 0.05) compared to the control. Conclusions: Implantation of a biphasic synthetic BAM enhanced NB formation in the mini-pig maxillary sinus at both time points and in both groups, although BLC resulted in a slightly better total NB formation compared to the control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite recent developments in THA, a more objective method is needed to assist orthopedic surgeons in identifying the insertion endpoint of the broaching procedure. Therefore, this systematic review evaluated the in-vivo efficacy of various acoustic and vibration analyses in detecting proper implant seating, identifying intraoperative complications, and quantifying the accuracy of predictive modeling using acoustics. Methods: Four electronic databases were searched on July 23rd, 2023, to retrieve articles evaluating the use of acoustic analysis during THA. The search identified 835 unique articles, which were subsequently screened by two independent reviewers as per our inclusion and exclusion criteria. In total, 12 studies evaluating 580 THAs were found to satisfy our criteria and were included in this review. Results: Methodologically, analyses have suggested stopping broaching when consecutive blows emit similar acoustic profiles (maximum peak frequency ± 0.5 kHz), which indicates proper implant seating in terms of stability and mitigates subsidence. Also, abrupt large deviations from the typical progression of acoustic signals while broaching are indicative of an intraoperative fracture. Since height, weight, femoral morphological parameters, and implant type have been shown to alter acoustic emissions while hammering, incorporating these factors into models to predict subsidence or intraoperative fracture yielded virtually 100% accuracy in identifying these adverse events. Conclusion: These findings support that acoustic analyses during THA show promise as an accurate, objective, and non-invasive method to predict and detect proper implant fixation as well as to identify intraoperative fractures. Trial registration: PROSPERO registration of the study protocol: CRD42023447889, 23 July 2023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This preliminary in vitro study aims to evaluate the application of micro-CT in analyzing the microstructural coupling between dental implant fixtures and prosthetic abutments, with an emphasis on understanding the effectiveness and limitations of this technique in dental implantology. Materials and Methods: A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library up to May 2024 identified eight relevant studies that examined different facets of dental implantology, such as osseointegration, implant stability, and the comparative accuracy of micro-CT versus other imaging techniques. A comparative micro-CT radiographic analysis was performed on five different implant fixtures with respective prosthetic and healing abutments, by using SkyScan1174 micro-CT. Results: The reviewed studies demonstrated that micro-CT is reliable for assessing bone quality, implant stability, and the microstructural integrity of dental implants. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) studies reveal bone–implant contact (BIC) ratios of 40–80%, bone volume per total volume (BV/TV) values of 20–60%, and detect microgaps as small as 0.3 µm, highlighting its high-resolution capability (5–10 µm) for detailed implant analysis. The comparative analysis of the implant fixtures analyzed the implant–abutment connection, highlighting the relevance of implant design for ensuring stability. Conclusions: Micro-CT analysis has proven to be a valuable tool for evaluating the intricate microstructural properties of dental implants, offering insights into implant stability, bone quality, and osseointegration. The literature reviewed highlights consistent findings that underscore micro-CT's accuracy and reliability in capturing high-resolution data, suggesting its potential as a standard imaging modality in implant research and clinical assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the primary stability, according to the insertion torque value (ITV) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA), of dental implants placed in standardized blocks of bone quality equivalent to type II-A bone, using three surgical undersized protocols of 0.2 mm, 0.5 mm, and 0.8 mm, considering different dental implant diameters and lengths. Methods: One hundred and twenty dental implants (DIs) of different diameters (3.5, 3.8, 4.5, and 5.0 mm) and lengths (8.5, 10.0, 11.5, 13.0, and 15.0 mm) placed in polyurethane blocks equivalent to type II-A bone, according to the Lekholm and Zarb classification modified by Rosas et al., were examined with three surgical protocols of under-milling of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 mm. The ITV and the RFA were the determinants of primary stability, and their respective values were recorded as Ncm and the implant stability quotient (ISQ) immediately after the placement of the DIs. These were evaluated according to each surgical insertion protocol, length, and diameter of the DI under a multivariate analysis model (MANOVA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: It was observed that the average of the ITV was significantly higher when a 0.8 mm under-milling protocol was used (63.2 ± 14.9 Ncm) (p < 0.001). However, the ITV was significantly lower when a 0.2 mm under-milling protocol was used (25.1 ± 8.3 Ncm) (p < 0.001). On the other hand, the ISQ did not present significant differences (p = 0.166) when comparing the 0.2 (67.6 ISQ ± 5.4 ISQ), 0.5 (65.8 ISQ ± 3.4 ISQ), and 0.8 (65.7 ISQ ± 4.0 ISQ) under-milling protocols in the evaluation of the primary stability of the dental implant. The multivariate effect size (ηp2 = 0.639) indicated that the variability detected in the insertion torque and the ISQ, at the same time, was explained by 63.9% (p < 0.001) due only to the compression protocol, while the implant diameter explained this variability by 27.0% (ηp2 = 0.270) (p < 0.001) and the implant length only significantly explained this variability by 12.1% (ηp2 = 0.121) (p = 0.030). Finally, any interaction between the compression protocol, implant diameter, and length did not influence insertion torque variability or the ISQ (p > 0.05). Conclusions: It can be concluded that when the surgical protocol for subpreparation is optimal according to the prepared bone bed, regardless of the diameter or length of the dental implant used, primary stability was assured according to the ITV and the RFA in 63.9%. This finding allows us to recommend carrying out a correct analysis of bone quality in order to subsequently select the most appropriate surgical protocol for the subpreparation of the bone bed to achieve better primary stability of the dental implant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: In this preclinical study, we used an experimental rabbit model to investigate the effects of a new implant design that involves specific changes to the cervical portion, using a conventional implant design in the control group. Materials and Methods: We used 10 rabbits and 40 dental implants with two different macrogeometries. Two groups were formed (n = 20 per group): the Collo group, wherein implants with the new cervical design were used, which present a concavity (reduction in diameter) in the first 3.5 mm, the portion without surface treatment; the Control group, wherein conical implants with the conventional design were used, with surface treatment throughout the body. All implants were 4 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length. The initial implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured immediately after the implant insertion (T1) and sample removal (T2 and T3). The animals (n = five animals/time) were euthanized at 3 weeks (T1) and 4 weeks (T2). Histological sections were prepared and the bone–implant contact (BIC%) and tissue area fraction occupancy (TAFO%) percentages were analyzed in the predetermined cervical area; namely, the first 4 mm from the implant platform. Results: The ISQ values showed no statistical differences at T1 and T2 (p = 0.9458 and p = 0.1103, respectively) between the groups. However, at T3, higher values were found for the Collo group (p = 0.0475) than those found for the Control group. The Collo samples presented higher BIC% values than those of the Control group, with statistical differences of p = 0.0009 at 3 weeks and p = 0.0007 at 4 weeks. There were statistical differences in the TAFO% (new bone, medullary spaces, and the collagen matrix) between the groups at each evaluation time (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Considering the limitations of the present preclinical study, the results demonstrate that the new implant design (the Collo group) had higher implant stability (ISQ) values in the samples after 4 weeks of implantation. Furthermore, the histomorphometric BIC% and TAFO% analyses showed that the Collo group had higher values at both measurement times than the Control group did. These findings indicate that changes made to the cervical design of the Collo group implants may benefit the maintenance of peri-implant tissue health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To analyze the three‐dimensional stability and morphologic changes of tent space after the osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) procedures without bone grafts. Materials and Methods: Forty‐six implants placed using the OSFE technique with simultaneous implant placement without bone grafts were included in this retrospective study. Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of the augmented sinuses were obtained pre‐ and postoperatively up to 48 months of follow‐up. The maxillary sinus cavity profiles were outlined using three‐dimensional virtual reconstruction and superimposition of CBCT scans. The three‐dimensional changes in the tent space were measured. A generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to explore potential factors. Results: The implant survival rate was 97.8%. The mean volume of remaining tent space immediately after surgery was 96.8 ± 70.5 mm3, shrinking to 31.0 ± 24.9 mm3 after 48 months, while the mean percentage of remaining tent space volume decreased to 29.1 ± 20.7%. The tent space volume and the percentage of residual tent space volume only decreased significantly within 12 months after surgery (p =.008,.013). GEE results indicated positive correlations between the percentage of remaining tent space volume and implant protrusion length (p =.000) and apical height (p =.000), with a negative correlation between the sinus floor area immediately after surgery (p =.002) and the healing time (p =.022). Conclusions: The volume of the tent space rapidly shrank after OSFE without bone grafts. Several factors might influence the tent space stability. Long‐term clinical trials with larger sample sizes are necessary to further validate the results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the effect of two superstructure materials (all ceramic versus hybrid ceramics) on implant stability in implant-supported restorations. Twenty-two single implant-supported crowns with either IPS Emax (Group EM) or Vita Enamic crowns (Group VE) were placed in the maxillary premolar region. After an osseointegration period (4 months post-implantation), implants were exposed using a diode laser, cover screws were removed and replaced by a healing collar of proper size followed by temporization. Conventional implant closed tray impressions were executed, to determine the exact implant position for the fabrication of implant superstructures. The crown retention of the implant superstructures was combined screw and cement-retained restorations. This design of the crown was done virtually, using Exocad software, after extraoral scanning of the poured casts. The restorations were milled according to the manufacturer's instructions. Extra-oral cementation using self-cure resin cement of the milled crowns on the titanium abutments. Implant stability was measured using an OSSTELL implant stability device immediately, at 3, 6,9, and 12 months after placement of the crown. Data was collected, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. Implant stability values demonstrated an increase in values with function especially with Vita Enamic crowns, with statistically significant difference between both materials at a 12-month followup interval. Vita Enamic crowns presented no negative effect on implant stability when used to restore implants in the aesthetic zone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peri-implantitis is a representative etiology that affects the long-term survival of dental implants. It is known that decontamination of the implant surface is essential for the successful outcome of regenerative therapy for peri-implantitis. In the present study, the stability of a novel separable dental implant (SDI) was evaluated and compared with a conventional non-separable dental implant (NDI) using biomechanical and histomorphometric analyses. In this animal study, 40 rabbits were implanted with two SDI fixtures in the left tibia and two NDI fixtures in the right tibia. The rabbits were sacrificed 3 and 6 weeks after implantation, and the implant samples were evaluated using resonance frequency analysis (RFA), micro-computed tomography (CT), removal torque testing, and histomorphometric analysis. SDI exhibited comparable or better osseointegration and implant stability to NDI. In particular, SDI showed significantly higher implant stability quotient (ISQ) values immediately and 6 weeks after implantation, while removal torque values were significantly higher at both 3 and 6 weeks. In addition, microgaps on the histomorphometric images were not observed and abnormal signs or inflammation did not occur at the connection between the top and bottom parts of the SDI. The novel SDI fixture demonstrated sufficient osseointegration and biomechanical stability compared with NDI in this animal study. In addition, the changeable top part of SDI indicates that it may be effective in easily treating peri-implantitis in clinical practice. Additional future studies on the stability and clinical application after loading to the fixture are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Primary implant stability is important for successful outcomes after uncemented total ankle replacement (TAR). However, the influence of patient-specific bone density on TAR performance is poorly understood, especially for implants that rely on press-fit for stable primary fixation. Our goal was to evaluate how bone density influences implant-bone interfacial micromotions in 3 press-fit tibial component designs by sampling from a TAR preoperative planning database using finite element analysis (FEA). Methods: FEA was conducted in 4 TAR patients with relatively low-density (n = 2, lowest 10% of a sample including 58 patients) and average-density (n = 2, midrange of sample) bone as assessed from deidentified patient CT scans. Three tibial implant designs were evaluated: a bone-sparing resurfacing implant, a cortex-sparing anterior approach monoblock stemmed implant, and a distal-reaming modular stemmed implant. Implants were inserted into tibia geometries obtained from the CT scans. Press-fit implantation was modeled first, followed by loadings from the stance phase of gait, and the associated micromotions were computed from the FEA output. Results: In general, patients with average-density bone had FEA predicted lower micromotions than patients with low-density bone. FEA suggests that implant fixation features had less influence on micromotions in patients with average-density bone, with peak micromotions ranging from 2 to 23 µm (3.1 ± 1.3 µm average micromotion). For patients with low-density bone, interfacial regions are predicted to experience micromotions exceeding the bony ingrowth threshold of 50 µm only for the resurfacing implant. Conclusion: We investigated the influence of bone density on implant-bone micromotions with varying primary fixation features using FEA. The model predicts that micromotions are less in average-density bone, regardless of implant fixation features. However, both stemmed devices showed lower micromotions in less-dense bone, albeit with the corresponding clinical trade-off of requiring more tibial bone removal. Clinical Relevance: The results presented here implicate the complementary role that local bone density plays in the primary fixation stability of uncemented TAR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Atrophic posterior maxillary regions pose a significant challenge in dental medicine, where dental implant stability is hard to achieve. The innovative osseo-densification, a new biomechanical technique that aims to solve this problem without removing any bone tissue, is a topic of great interest and potential in our field. Case report: The patient, A.K., a 44-year-old smoking female, was presented to the clinic concerned with the lack of ability to eat from her left side as a result of the extraction of her upper molars. After a 3D radiographic scan was conducted, it was confirmed that there was considerable bone loss in the upper left posterior region and a proximity with the maxillary sinus. As part of the treatment plan, an Osseo-densification technique in crystal maxillary sinus elevation would be used for two implant placements in the first and second molar regions. Conclusions: The osseo-densification technique in crestal sinus lifting was shown to be a dependable and less invasive option for treating considerable posterior maxillary bone loss. However, conclusive findings are still needed for this technique, emphasizing the need for continuous research and learning in our field.

Abstract Background Long-term success of implant restoration depends on many factors one of them is the sufficient implant stability which is lowered in compromised bone density sites such as the maxilla as it is categorized as type III & IV bone, so searching for a new innovation and updates in implant material and features is very mandatory. So, the aim of this study was to compare between two implant materials (roxolid and traditional titanium) on the primary and secondary stability of implant retained maxillary overdenture. Methods Eighteen completely edentulous patients were selected. All patients received maxillary implant-retained overdentures and lower complete dentures; patients were divided equally into two groups according to the type of implant materials. Group A received a total number of 36 implants made of roxolid material and Group B received a total number of 36 implants made of traditional titanium alloys. Implant stability was assessed using ostell device, the primary implant stability was measured at the day of implant installation however, secondary implant stability was measured after six weeks of implant placement. Paired t-test was used to compare between primary and secondary stability in the same group and an independent t-test was used to compare between the two groups with a significant level

Aim: The present systematic review compares the stability, crestal bone levels and efficacy of osseodensification (OD) drilling techniques for dental implant placement to traditional drilling methods. Settings and Design: The Cochrane online library, PubMed, Scopus, and other well-known online resources are used in the research. Using a systematic review design, the current study examines published qualitative studies with an emphasis on analysis. Materials and Methods: Using precise keywords, a thorough search of pertinent databases was carried out in accordance with PRISMA standards. Studies testing dental implant stability, crestal bone levels and clinical results using both OD and traditional procedures were covered by the inclusion criteria. Statistical Analysis Used: The risk of bias and quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials. Results: A total of 170 patients and 334 implants from Egypt, India, and Brazil were included in eight papers that made up the systematic review. In several clinical situations, osseodensification outperformed standard drilling in terms of implant durability, bone development, and torque data. Statistical analysis presented the lowest risks, while blinded outcome assessment, allocation concealment, random sequence generation, incomplete outcome data and experimental technique revealed higher risks. Bias assessment found various risks across different components. Conclusion: The thorough examination of eight papers demonstrates that osseodensification is a technique with great promise in the field of dental implants. It exhibits superior torque values, bone development, and stability when compared to traditional drilling. The overall results highlight the potential of osseodensification to improve clinical outcomes and advance the science of dental implantology, even in the face of variances in bias concerns.

Purpose: To compare the effects of regular implant drills to osseodensifying drills used in clockwise and counterclockwise motions on bone dimension change and primary implant stability. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 bone models were made (20 × 15 × 4 mm) from porcine tibia to represent implants placed in soft bone. Implant osteotomies were prepared in the bone models using one of the following techniques: (1) regular implant drills in a clockwise direction (group A), (2) regular implant drills in a counterclockwise direction (group B), (3) osseodensifying drills in a clockwise direction (group C), and (4) osseodensifying drills in a counterclockwise direction (group D). Bone-level tapered titanium alloy implants (4.1 × 10 mm) were placed following osteotomy creation. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) was measured after implant placement. Each bone model was scanned with an optical scanner to convert to Standard Tessellation Language (STL) files before and after the osteotomy creation. Presurgical and postsurgical STL files were superimposed, and the dimensional changes were measured at 1, 3, and 7 mm from the crestal bone. Histomorphometric analysis was done, and bone-to-implant contact percentage (BIC%) was calculated. Results: There were no significant differences in ISQ values (P = .239) between any of the groups. Histomorphometric analysis showed implants in group D had significantly higher BIC% than groups A (P = .020) and B (P = .009). The amount of bone expansion decreased with distance from the crest (P < .001). Groups B (P = .039) and D (P = .001) showed significant expansions at all levels compared with group A. No other statistically significant differences in dimensional change were found between groups. Conclusion: Both regular and osseodensification burs used in a counterclockwise motion contribute to expansion of bone dimension compared to conventional drilling methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Implant stability is usually measured with resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and damping capacity assessment (DCA). This study aimed to measure primary and secondary stabilities using 3 devices that are based on these methods, namely; RFA (Osstell®) and DCA (Periotest® and AnyCheck®) to assess the correlations of the measurements obtained by these devices and the correlations between implant stability and insertion torque. Material and Methods: This observational prospective study included 35 dental implants. The implant stability was measured using the 3 devices. Mann–Whitney U test and unpaired t-test assessed the relationship between implant stability and insertion torque, while the Spearman and Pearson correlations measured the correlation between readings collected via the 3 devices for the primary and secondary stabilities. Results: For the primary stability, there was a strong positive correlation between Osstell® and AnyCheck® and moderate negative correlations between Periotest® and both Osstell® and AnyCheck®. While for the secondary stability, strong correlations with similar patterns were observed among the 3 devices. The stability measurements showed significant relationships with the insertion torque. Conclusions: The 3 devices are reliable in measuring implant stability; also, high insertion torque can lead to improved implant stabilities (primary and secondary). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to find in the literature data on the relationship between implant surface roughness and implant stability achieved, from the time of placement to three months afterward, to help us to know what type of surface roughness is more favorable to guarantee implant stability and osseointegration. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) statement, and the protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework. The specific inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected using the PICOS framework. The databases Medline (PubMed), Scopus, the Web of Science and The Cochrane Library were searched up to October 2023. The selection of studies and data extraction were conducted by two independent reviewers. The review included a total of 11 studies. A total of 1331 dental implant placements were identified. Two of the eleven selected studies were on humans in vivo, eight were on animals in vivo, and one was on animals in vitro. A statistically significant correlation between surface roughness and implant stability as measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was not identified in ten of the eleven selected studies. It appears that there is no correlation between primary stability and the degree of implant roughness. However, there appears to be a correlation between the roughness of the implant and the degree of osseointegration, as indicated by bone-implant contact values. This correlation is more closely related to secondary stability. The great methodological variability makes it difficult to compare data and draw conclusions, so it would be desirable to agree on a common methodology to help draw appropriate conclusions from published studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze and compare three-dimensional volumetric bone changes and stability of simultaneously placed dental implants following sinus augmentation using deproteinized human demineralized tooth matrix (dpDTM) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM). Methods: Twenty-four patients who required lateral maxillary sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous dental implant placement were randomly assigned to receive either dpDTM (n = 12) or DBBM (n = 12). Cone-beam computed tomography and resonance frequency analysis of implant stability were conducted immediately after surgery and 6 months postoperatively. Changes in the graft sinus floor and graft height volumes in the sagittal and coronal views, along with the implant stability quotient (ISQ), were analyzed and compared. Results: Volumetric graft alteration was comparable between dpDTM (120.33 ± 77.48 mm3) and DBBM (108.51 ± 65.15 mm3) (p = 0.690). Reduction in the average graft height was also comparable: dpDTM group ranged from − 0.59 to − 0.93 mm and the DBBM group ranged from − 0.55 to − 0.82 mm (p > 0.05) at most examined levels. However, greater reduction in the mesial-graft height occurred in the dpDTM group (− 1.08 ± 0.70 mm vs. −0.58 ± 0.39 mm, p = 0.04). The ISQ values increased similarly in both groups to reach 70 at 6 months. Conclusion: dpDTM demonstrated comparable stability in graft volume and height during the healing process compared to DBBM and could serve as a viable alternative to DBBM for sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Long-term success of implant restoration depends on many factors one of them is the sufficient implant stability which is lowered in compromised bone density sites such as the maxilla as it is categorized as type III & IV bone, so searching for a new innovation and updates in implant material and features is very mandatory. So, the aim of this study was to compare between two implant materials (roxolid and traditional titanium) on the primary and secondary stability of implant retained maxillary overdenture. Methods: Eighteen completely edentulous patients were selected. All patients received maxillary implant-retained overdentures and lower complete dentures; patients were divided equally into two groups according to the type of implant materials. Group A received a total number of 36 implants made of roxolid material and Group B received a total number of 36 implants made of traditional titanium alloys. Implant stability was assessed using ostell device, the primary implant stability was measured at the day of implant installation however, secondary implant stability was measured after six weeks of implant placement. Paired t-test was used to compare between primary and secondary stability in the same group and an independent t-test was used to compare between the two groups with a significant level < 0.05. Results: Independent t-test revealed a significant difference between the two groups with p -value = 0.0141 regarding primary stability and p-value < 0.001 regarding secondary stability, as roxolid implant group was statistically higher stability than titanium group in both. Paired t- test showed a statistically significant difference in roxolid implant group with p-value = 0.0122 however, there was non-statistically significant difference in titanium group with p-value = 0.636. Mann Whitney test showed a significant difference between the two groups regarding amount of change in stability with p value = 0.191. roxolid implant group showed a higher amount of change in stability than the titanium implant group. Conclusion: Within the limitation of this study, it could be concluded that: Roxolid implants showed promising results regarding primary and secondary stability compared to conventional Titanium implants and can be a better alternative in implant retained maxillary overdentures. Trial registration: Retrospectively NCT06334770 at 26–3-2024. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to compare implant stabilities between the immediate and early loaded, immediately placed bone‐level tapered dental implants in the maxilla and to evaluate marginal bone loss (MBL), oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL), and patient satisfaction at a 2‐year follow‐up. A pilot, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted on 24 maxillary failing dentition patients. The bone‐level tapered implants of 12 patients were immediately loaded with temporary restorations, while the other 12 patients did not receive any kind of temporization. Implant‐supported screw‐retained complete porcelain‐fused‐to‐metal prostheses were delivered to all patients in the seventh postoperative week. The insertion torque values of implants assigned to the immediate and early loading groups were 33.0 ± 4.87 and 29.26 ± 8.31 Ncm, respectively. The dynamics of implant stability changes from implant placement up to a 2‐year follow‐up were similar for both groups (Penguin®, p = 0.268; Ostell®, p = 0.552), while the MBL was at submillimeter level. The cumulative implant survival rate was 91.80% for immediately loaded implants and 97.22% for early loaded implants, without significant difference (p = 0.162). The total score on the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire significantly decreased over time in both groups, indicating improvement in OHRQoL (p < 0.001), and the high level of patient satisfaction remained after 2 years of function regardless of a loading protocol. Both loading protocols, immediate and early, of six immediately placed bone‐level tapered dental implants are an adequate treatment choice for fixed rehabilitation of the maxillary failing dentition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To determine the correlation between the primary implant stability quotient and the implant percussion sound frequency. Materials and Methods: A total of 14 pigs' ribs were scanned using a dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scanner to classify the bone specimens into three distinct bone density Hounsfield units (HU) value categories: D1 bone: >1250 HU; D2: 850–1250 HU; D3: <850 HU. Then, 96 implants were inserted: 32 implants in D1 bone, 32 implants in D2 bone, and 32 implants in D3 bone. The primary implant stability quotient (ISQ) was analyzed, and percussion sound was recorded using a wireless microphone connected and analyzed with frequency analysis software. Results: Statistically significant positive correlations were found between the primary ISQ and the bone density HU value (r = 0.719; p < 0.001), and statistically significant positive correlations between the primary ISQ and the percussion sound frequency (r = 0.606; p < 0.001). Furthermore, significant differences in primary ISQ values and percussion sound frequency were found between D1 and D2 bone, as well as between D1 and D3 bone. However, no significant differences were found in primary ISQ values and percussion sound frequency between D2 and D3 bone. Conclusion: The primary ISQ value and the percussion sound frequency are positively correlated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Flapless implant surgery is a minimally invasive technique aimed at reducing patient morbidity, promoting faster healing, and preserving peri-implant soft and hard tissues. The healing process of peri-implant tissue following flapless surgery is critical to long-term implant success. This study aims to evaluate the healing process and tissue response after flapless implant surgery. Materials and Methods A total of 60 patients requiring single dental implants were selected for this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (flapless implant surgery, 30 patients) and Group B (traditional flap surgery, 30 patients). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to assess bone density and tissue healing. Clinical parameters such as implant stability, peri-implant soft tissue healing, and probing depth were measured at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks post-surgery. Arbitrary values for tissue healing were assigned using a 0-5 scale, where 0 indicates no healing and 5 represents complete healing. Results At 2 weeks post-surgery, Group A showed an average healing score of 3.2, whereas Group B had a score of 2.5. By 6 weeks, Group A's healing improved to 4.0, compared to 3.5 in Group B. At 12 weeks, Group A reached a healing score of 4.8, while Group B achieved 4.2. Implant stability, measured via resonance frequency analysis (RFA), was significantly higher in Group A at all time intervals. Peri-implant probing depths were shallower in Group A compared to Group B, with a mean depth of 2.0 mm versus 2.6 mm at the 12-week follow-up. Conclusion Flapless implant surgery demonstrated superior peri-implant tissue healing and implant stability compared to traditional flap surgery. Patients undergoing flapless surgery experienced faster soft tissue healing and less postoperative discomfort. This technique can be considered a viable option for suitable candidates, contributing to improved clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Bioactive surfaces were designed to increase the interaction between the surface and the cells. This may speed up the biological stability and loading protocols. Materials and methods: 36 patients with D3-D4 bone density were recruited and allocated into two groups. 30 bioactive (test group) and 30 traditional (control group) surfaced implants were placed. Insertion torque value (Ncm), insertion torque curve integral (cumulative torque, Ncm), torque density (Ncm/sec), implant stability quotient (ISQ) measured at three timepoints (baseline (T0), 30 (T30) and 45 (T45) days after surgery), and marginal bone loss (MBL) at 6 months of loading were assessed. Results: The mean ISQ and standard deviation at T0, T30, T45 were respectively 74.57 ± 7.85, 74.78 ± 7.31, 74.97 ± 6.34 in test group, and 77.12 ± 5.83, 73.33 ± 6.13, 73.44 ± 7.89 in control group, respectively. Data analysis showed significant differences between groups in ΔISQ at T0-T30 (p = 0.005) and T30-T45 (p = 0.012). Control group showed a significant decrease in ISQ at T30 (p = 0.01) and T45 (p = 0.03) compared to baseline, while no significant change was observed in test group. Due to the stability of the ISQ value ≥ 70, 26 test group and 23 control group implants were functionally loaded after 45 days. Conversely, due to the ISQ < 70 at T45, four test group implants and one control group implant were loaded after 90 days, and 6 control group implants were loaded after 180 days. Neither insertion torque nor ISQ at baseline were correlated with bone density (in Hounsfield units). There was no significant correlation between cumulative torque and ISQ at baseline. There was a significant positive slope in the correlation between torque density and ISQ at baseline, more accentuated in D3 than D4. This correlation remained significant for the test group in D3 bone at day 30 and 45 (p < 0.01 in both time frames), but not in D4 bone, and it was not significant in CG. Conclusions: The bioactive surface showed better behavior in terms of implant stability in D3-D4 bone quality in the early stages of bone healing. Clinical relevance This study demonstrated that the transition from primary to secondary stability is improved using bioactive surface, especially in cases of poor bone environment (D3/D4 bone). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Recent years have seen a rise in the usage of dental implants to restore lost teeth. The stability of a dental implant is the main factor in determining its success. Implant stability is influenced by various factors. Several approaches have been employed clinically to evaluate stability at different time intervals. One non-invasive way to assess implant stability is by resonance frequency analysis. Utilizing the resonance frequency analysis method, this study seeks to understand how implant length and diameter affect primary and secondary stability. Methods: The current prospective study was conducted in the Prosthodontics Department of Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College. The duration of the study was six months. A total of 90 implants of sizes 4.5 x 8.5 mm and 4 x 10mm were placed. Resonance frequency measurements were recorded using OsstellTM AB device for primary stability at implant insertion and at 12 weeks for secondary stability. All the measurements were carried out by only one of the researchers to minimize inter-observer bias. Results: The average primary stability was 70.33±6.60, and the average secondary stability was 71.43±5.44. The data was stratified for age, gender, and implant site, and the mean primary and secondary stability of both sizes didn't show any statistically significant differences. Conclusion: Without forfeiting implant stability, both implant sizes (4 x 10mm and 4.5 x 8.5mm) can be used interchangeably, depending on available space and anatomical constraints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of China Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery is the property of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, College of Stomatology and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Aim: The present systematic review compares the stability, crestal bone levels and efficacy of osseodensification (OD) drilling techniques for dental implant placement to traditional drilling methods. Settings and Design: The Cochrane online library, PubMed, Scopus, and other well-known online resources are used in the research. Using a systematic review design, the current study examines published qualitative studies with an emphasis on analysis. Materials and Methods: Using precise keywords, a thorough search of pertinent databases was carried out in accordance with PRISMA standards. Studies testing dental implant stability, crestal bone levels and clinical results using both OD and traditional procedures were covered by the inclusion criteria. Statistical Analysis Used: The risk of bias and quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle- Ottawa Scale for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials. Results: A total of 170 patients and 334 implants from Egypt, India, and Brazil were included in eight papers that made up the systematic review. In several clinical situations, osseodensification outperformed standard drilling in terms of implant durability, bone development, and torque data. Statistical analysis presented the lowest risks, while blinded outcome assessment, allocation concealment, random sequence generation, incomplete outcome data and experimental technique revealed higher risks. Bias assessment found various risks across different components. Conclusion: The thorough examination of eight papers demonstrates that osseodensification is a technique with great promise in the field of dental implants. It exhibits superior torque values, bone development, and stability when compared to traditional drilling. The overall results highlight the potential of osseodensification to improve clinical outcomes and advance the science of dental implantology, even in the face of variances in bias concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Dental implants are a widely accepted method for replacing missing teeth, but the timing of implant placement--whether immediate (at the time of tooth extraction) or delayed (after a healing period)--remains a debated topic. Immediate implant placement is believed to preserve alveolar bone and soft tissue contours, potentially improving aesthetic outcomes. However, concerns persist about increased postoperative pain and complications. Delayed implants, on the other hand, are considered more predictable in terms of osseointegration, but they require longer treatment times and multiple surgical interventions. This study aimed to compare patient-centered outcomes, including pain, aesthetic satisfaction, quality of life, implant stability, and bone loss, between immediate and delayed implant placement. Objectives: This randomized controlled trial sought to evaluate and compare the patient-centered outcomes of immediate versus delayed implant placement in terms of pain, aesthetics, quality of life, implant stability, and peri-implant bone loss. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients requiring single-tooth implants in the anterior or premolar region were randomly allocated to either the immediate implant placement group (n=30) or the delayed implant placement group (n=30). Two patients were lost to follow-up, resulting in 58 participants. Pain levels were assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), aesthetic satisfaction using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES), and quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Implant stability was evaluated using resonance frequency analysis (RFA), and peri-implant bone loss was measured radiographically at six months. Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 version Results: Patients in the immediate implant group experienced significantly higher pain on the first postoperative day (VAS score = 5.8 ± 1.4) compared to the delayed group (VAS score = 4.1 ± 1.2, p = 0.002), but pain levels equalized by day seven. The immediate implant group had significantly higher aesthetic satisfaction at six months (PES = 10.6 ± 1.1) compared to the delayed group (PES = 9.3 ± 1.5, p = 0.01). Quality of life scores were also better in the immediate group (OHIP-14 score = 5.1 ± 2.8) compared to the delayed group (OHIP-14 score = 7.2 ± 3.0, p = 0.03). Both groups demonstrated comparable implant stability and minimal peri-implant bone loss at six months (p > 0.05), with no implant failures, resulting in a 100% survival rate. Conclusions: Immediate implant placement provided superior aesthetic outcomes and enhanced quality of life compared to delayed placement, although it was associated with higher early postoperative pain. Both approaches achieved high implant stability, minimal bone loss, and excellent implant survival. Immediate implant placement may be preferred when aesthetics and rapid restoration are priorities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The long-term success of implant-supported restorations is influenced by various implant placement techniques. Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial involved 120 patients requiring dental implants, divided into three equal groups based on the implant placement technique: Group A (conventional submerged), Group B (one-stage non-submerged), and Group C (guided surgery). All participants were followed for three years. The primary outcomes measured were implant stability (using implant stability quotient (ISQ) values) and marginal bone loss (using radiographic analysis). Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction and prosthetic complications. Results: The study results demonstrated significant differences among the implant placement techniques. Group C (guided surgery) exhibited the highest mean implant stability, with an ISQ value of 75.4, outperforming Group B (one-stage non-submerged) at 73.2 and Group A (conventional submerged) at 71.5. In terms of marginal bone loss, Group A demonstrated the greatest loss at 1.5 mm, whereas Group B and Group C experienced less bone loss, measuring 1.1 mm and 0.9 mm, respectively. Patient satisfaction scores were highest in Group C, with an average of 9.2 out of 10, followed by Group B at 8.7 and Group A at 8.3. Additionally, Group A recorded the highest incidence of prosthetic complications at 15%, compared to 10% in Group B and 5% in Group C, highlighting the superior performance of guided surgery in minimizing complications and enhancing overall outcomes. Conclusion: Guided implant surgery demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of implant stability, reduced marginal bone loss, and higher patient satisfaction compared to conventional submerged and one-stage techniques.

Background and ObjectiveDental implant therapy faces challenges in patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM and T2DM) due to adverse effects on bone metabolism and immune response. Despite advancements, diabetic patients face higher risks of peri-implantitis and compromised osseointegration. This review assesses the impact of anti-diabetic medications on implant outcomes, offering insights to bridge the gap between animal studies and clinical practice. By evaluating pharmacotherapeutic strategies in preclinical models, this review guides future research designs to improve implant success rates in diabetic individuals.MethodA comprehensive literature review identified 21 animal studies examining the impact of anti-diabetic medications on dental and bone implants. These studies explored diabetes models, medication regimens, and designs to assess outcomes related to bone metabolism, osseointegration, and peri-implant tissue responses. The findings are systematically summarized, highlighting the scope, design, and procedures of each study. An example includes placing a dental implant in the molar region of a mouse, providing insight into preclinical approaches.ResultsTwenty-one animal studies, primarily using rodents, investigate various anti-diabetic medications on dental and bone implants. Interventions include insulin, aminoguanidine, voglibose, sitagliptin, exenatide, and metformin, analyzing outcomes like bone-implant contact (BIC), bone volume (BV), and counter-torque values in T1DM and T2DM models. The impacts of these medications on implant osseointegration under diabetic conditions are detailed, with their benefits and shortcomings assessed.DiscussionThe findings and challenges of existing animal studies on diabetes mellitus (DM) and implant osseointegration are presented. Despite T2DM prevalence, research primarily focuses on T1DM models due to easier experimental practicalities, limiting applicability. Inconsistent protocols in studies compromise reliability regarding anti-diabetic treatments’ effectiveness on osseointegration. Standardized methodologies and long-term assessments of local drug delivery alongside systemic anti-DM treatments are crucial to manage DM-related complications in implant dentistry.ConclusionInsulin administration in short-term T1DM animal studies enhances implant osseointegration. However, the efficacy of non-insulin medications remains inconclusive. Rigorous experimental designs are needed to address inconsistencies and assess long-term impacts. Larger-sized (e.g., porcine) animal studies across various intraoral implant scenarios are required. Future research should focus on enhancing clinical applicability and improving implant stability in evolving conditions.

ABSTRACT: Background: The long-term success of implant-supported restorations is influenced by various implant placement techniques. Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial involved 120 patients requiring dental implants, divided into three equal groups based on the implant placement technique: Group A (conventional submerged), Group B (one-stage non-submerged), and Group C (guided surgery). All participants were followed for three years. The primary outcomes measured were implant stability (using implant stability quotient (ISQ) values) and marginal bone loss (using radiographic analysis). Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction and prosthetic complications. Results: The study results demonstrated significant differences among the implant placement techniques. Group C (guided surgery) exhibited the highest mean implant stability, with an ISQ value of 75.4, outperforming Group B (one-stage non-submerged) at 73.2 and Group A (conventional submerged) at 71.5. In terms of marginal bone loss, Group A demonstrated the greatest loss at 1.5 mm, whereas Group B and Group C experienced less bone loss, measuring 1.1 mm and 0.9 mm, respectively. Patient satisfaction scores were highest in Group C, with an average of 9.2 out of 10, followed by Group B at 8.7 and Group A at 8.3. Additionally, Group A recorded the highest incidence of prosthetic complications at 15%, compared to 10% in Group B and 5% in Group C, highlighting the superior performance of guided surgery in minimizing complications and enhancing overall outcomes. Conclusion: Guided implant surgery demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of implant stability, reduced marginal bone loss, and higher patient satisfaction compared to conventional submerged and one-stage techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Dental implants are a reliable solution for tooth loss; however, systemic conditions like osteoporosis and diabetes, which affect bone quality, healing, and stability, underline the importance of understanding their impact on enhanced outcomes. This study evaluated the comparative effects of osteoporosis and diabetes on dental implant stability over 12 months, utilizing objective implant mobility and stability measures. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study involved 50 patients, divided into 21 with type 2 diabetes and 29 with osteoporosis, with implant stability assessed at 6 and 12 months using Osstell ISQ and Periotest M devices and statistical analysis identifying differences between groups and time intervals at a significance level of p < 0.05. Results: At 6 months, the osteoporosis group showed higher initial stability (mean ISQ: 67.04 ± 5.42) compared to the diabetes group (mean ISQ: 62.10 ± 5.46; p = 0.0215)), and by 12 months, both groups showed significant improvements in ISQ scores (osteoporosis: 68.93 ± 4.83; diabetes: 65.79 ± 3.87), with Periotest values indicating more significant reductions in implant mobility, particularly in diabetic patients (osteoporosis: −3.34 ± 1.59; diabetes: −2.81 ± 1.44; p = 0.0001). Conclusions: Osteoporosis and diabetes significantly impact implant stability through distinct osseointegration pathways, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment plans to improve patient outcomes.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different drilling techniques on implant stability at different time intervals. Materials and Methods: Patients were randomly allotted into three groups based on drilling technique for osteotomy: conventional drilling technique; simplified drilling technique; or modified conventional drilling technique. In 30 patients (n = 10 each group), a total of 44 implants were placed. In the conventional drilling technique, drills with increasing diameters were used. In the simplified drilling technique, only pilot and final-diameter drills were used. In the modified conventional drilling technique, all the drills were used in sequential order in the clockwise direction except the last drill, which was used in the counterclockwise direction. Implant stability quotient was recorded immediately after placing implants and at 1 and 3 months. Statistical analysis was performed with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student t test. Results: Two-way ANOVA showed that drilling technique (P < .001) and time (P = .002) did have a statistically significant effect on implant stability quotient. The modified conventional drilling technique showed a drop in secondary implant stability at 1 month that was negligible compared to the other techniques. After 1 month, there was a significant increase in implant stability quotient with the modified conventional drilling technique compared to the conventional drilling technique (P = .001). The least crestal bone loss during 3 months of follow-up was with the modified conventional drilling technique (0.37 ± 0.06). Conclusion: Secondary stability increased with the modified conventional drilling technique in 3 months and showed a negligible drop at 1 month. This novel drilling technique had an early shift from a decrease to an increase in stability pattern, along with the least crestal bone loss at 3 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare implant stability and clinical outcome in implant placement between osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) with biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) which consisted of 30% of hydroxyapatite (HA) and 70% of beta-tricalcium phosphate (β -TCP) grafting material and OSFE without using bone grafting material. The research questions is whether the BCP provides any benefit in OSFE or not. Materials and methods: Thirty patients (30 implants) with a single edentulous area of upper premolar or molar were randomly separated into OSFE with BCP (n = 15) and OSFE without grafting (n = 15). The patients were reevaluated 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after implant loading. The clinical assessments (implant stability quotient (ISQ), implant survival-failure rate, and surgical complication) were analyzed. Together with radiographic assessments in 2D (endo-sinus bone gain (ESBG), mean marginal bone change (MMBC)) and 3D (endo-sinus bone gain in CBCT (ESBG-CT)) were evaluated, with a mean follow-up time of at least 12 months of functional loading and prosthetic complication. Results: 20 remaining implants (OSFE with BCP, n = 10; OSFE without grafting, n = 10) were analyzed. Mean ISQ was 79.18 ± 3.43 in 1-year follow-up (ISQ; OSFE with BCP = 78.72 ± 3.46, OSFE without grafting = 79.65 ± 3.52). ISQ in both groups increased steadily without significant differences in each follow-up. (p = 0.56). In radiographic evaluation, at 6-, 9-, and 12-month, OSFE without grafting group showed statistically significant lower MMBC (p < 0.05). The 1-year clinical results showed that 2 implants failed in OSFE with BCP, and 1 implant failed in OSFE without grafting. Conclusions: Graft material “BCP” (HA30:TCP70) coupled with OSFE presents no extraordinary benefit in implant stability, clinical and radiographic outcome in 1-year follow-up. Clinical relevance: Clinically, OSFE with grafting materials provides no additional benefit. Clinical trial registration number: TCTR20210517008 (date of registration: May 17, 2021) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Some evidence supports the influence of implant macro-design on primary stability. Additionally, tactile perception can be used to assess implant stability when placing the implant. This research aimed to quantify the primary and secondary stability of three implant systems with two different macro geometries (cylindrical and conical) determined based on the insertion torque and the implant stability quotient (ISQ) at the moment of implant placement as a function of implant-related factors (length, width, dental arch, and implant location in the arch), intraoperative factors (bone density determined subjectively by the clinician's tactile perception), and patient-related factors (age, gender, and bone density determined objectively based on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: 102 implants from three implant systems with two different macro geometries (conical and cylindrical) were placed in 53 patients. The insertion torque, the ISQ at the implant placement (ISQ0), and the bone quality according to the clinician's tactile sensation were recorded on the day of the surgery. After a three-month healing period, the ISQ was re-evaluated (ISQ3). Results: The cylindrical implants exhibited significantly higher insertion torque and ISQ values at the moment of the surgery and after three months compared to the conical implants. The cylindrical implants also showed significantly lower indices of tactile evaluation of bone quality during the implant placement surgery. However, no differences were demonstrated in the bone density measured objectively using CBCT. (4) Conclusions: The cylindrical implants achieved the highest values for primary stability (Newtons × centimeter (Ncm) and ISQ) and secondary stability (ISQ after three months). The insertion torque was the variable that most influenced the ISQ on the day of the surgery. The implant location (incisors–canines, bicuspids–molars) and the implant macro geometry were the variables that most influenced the secondary stability (ISQ at three months). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objective: To ensure that implants are able to support prosthetic rehabilitation, a stable and functional union between the bone and the implant surface is crucial to its stability and success. To increase bone volume and density and excel bone-implant contact, a novel drilling method, called osseodensification (OD), was performed. To assess the effectiveness of the osseodensification drilling protocol versus the conventional surgical technique on implant stability. Methods: Bone Level Tapered Straumann implants were placed side-by-side with both OD and subtractive conventional drilling (SD) in 90 patients from CESPU—Famalicão clinical unit. IT was measured using a manual torque wrench, and the Implant stability quotient (ISQ) value was registered using the Osstell® IDX. Results: According to the multifactorial ANOVA, there were statistically significant differences in the mean IT values due to the arch only (F(1.270) = 4.702, p-value = 0.031 < 0.05). Regarding the length of the implant, there were statistically significant differences in the mean IT in the OD group (p = 0.041), with significantly lower mean IT values for the Regular implants compared to the Long. With respect to the arch, the analyses of the overall ISQ values showed an upward trend in both groups in the maxilla and mandible. High levels of IT also showed high ISQ values, which represent good indicators of primary stability. Conclusions: OD does not have a negative influence on osseointegration compared to conventional subtractive osteotomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Española de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial is the property of Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Oral y Maxilofacial (SECOM) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Cones currently available in the market are rigid, and unless they are custom-specific designed, are unable to correctly adapt to the shape of the patient's bone. Therefore, flexible metaphyseal cones have been recently introduced to reduce potential bone trauma during implantation. Even if a preliminary clinical study on their use has shown promising results, no biomechanical study evaluates and quantifies their mechanical efficacy and safety. Two commercial versions of flexible cones were analyzed in this study using finite element analysis, based on a previously validated model. Each cone geometry was modeled both as flexible and as rigid, and implanted following surgical guidelines. Three activities were simulated in this study and compared among configurations: surgical impaction, walking, and chair rise. During impaction, results showed considerably reduced stress in the flexible cones in comparison with rigid ones; the stress resulted was also better distributed and more homogeneous all over the cortical bone, with lower bone peaks. Considering the 2 different activities, the analysis did not show any remarkable differences between flexible and rigid cones both in terms of bone stress and implant micromotion. The findings demonstrate that metaphyseal flexible cones allow macrodeformation during impaction due to their flexibility, and therefore, are safer in comparison with rigid cones. However, for the daily tasks investigated, results showed no major differences between rigid and flexible cones in terms of bone stress, implant stability, and micromotion. Therefore, their mechanical performances can be considered similar to the rigid cone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a flexible synthetic polymer bone graft to provide implant stability during implant placement in a dense cortical bone model. In the control group (Group 1), sockets were prepared on polyurethane blocks according to the standard implant socket drilling protocol; both oversizing and deepening were applied in Group 2; and only oversizing was applied in Group 3. In Groups 2 and 3, flexible synthetic polymer bone grafts were placed in the sockets prior to implant placement. The implants were placed at the bone level in all groups. The highest torque value obtained was recorded as the insertion torque. In this study, 75 implant sites were included across three groups. The torque values of the implants in the control group were significantly higher than those of the implants with the oversized and deepened sockets and the oversized-only sockets (p < 0.05; p < 0.01). The torque values of the implants with the oversized and deepened sockets were significantly higher than those of the implants with the oversized-only sockets (p < 0.01). In this study, a flexible synthetic polymer bone graft was shown to be effective in achieving implant stability in the management of implants where there has been a loss of primary stability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous osseointegrated implants for individuals with lower limb amputation can increase mobility, reduce socket related pain, and improve quality of life. It would be useful to have an evaluation method to assess the interface between bone and implant. We assessed outpatient radiographs from the Intraosseous Transcutaneous Amputation Prosthesis clinical trial using an interface scoring system which summed and weighted equally measures of implant collar cortical ongrowth and radiolucency along the implant stem/bone interface. Radiographs from 12 participants with unilateral transfemoral amputations (10 males, 2 females, mean age = 43.2, SD = 7.4 years) in the clinical trial from cohort I (implanted in 2008/09) or cohort II (implanted in 2013/14) were collated (mean image span = 7.2, SD = 2.4 years), scale normalised, zoned, and measured in a repeatable way. Interface scores were calculated and then compared to clinical outcomes. Explanted participants received the lowest interface scores. A higher ratio of stem to residuum and shorter residuum's produced better interface scores and there was an association (weak correlation) between participants with thin cortices and the lowest interface scores. A tapered, cemented, non curved stem may provide advantageous fixation while stem alignment did not appear critical. In summary, the interface score successfully demonstrated a non-invasive evaluation of percutaneous osseointegrated implants interfaces when applied to the Intraosseous Transcutaneous Amputation Prosthesis clinical trial. The clinical significance of this work is to identify events leading to aseptic or septic implant removal and contribute to clinical guidelines for monitoring rehabilitation, design and surgical fixation choices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The primary stability of the dental implant is a crucial factor determining the ability to initiate temporary implant-supported prosthesis and for subsequent successful osseointegration, especially in the maxillary non-molar sites. This study assessed the reliability of the insertion torque of dental implants by relating it to the implant stability quotient values measured by the Osstell device. Material and methods: This study included healthy, non-smoker patients with no history of diabetes or other metabolic, or debilitating diseases that may affect bone healing, having non-restorable fractured teeth and retained roots in the maxillary non-molar sites. Primary dental implant stability was evaluated using a torque ratchet from the dental implant kit and ISQ values generated from the Osstell device. Results: Twenty patients (13 female and 7 male) with an age range of 25-65 years received twenty immediate dental implants. The insertion torque value ranged from 15 to 50 N/cm with a mean of 28 N/cm. At the same time, the ISQ values ranged between 50 and 80 ISQ values, with a mean of 63 ISQ values. The results showed a statistically significant positive correlation between the insertion torque of the dental implant measured by torque rachet and ISQ values checked with Osstell. Conclusion: The insertion torque can be used as a reliable method to estimate the primary stability of the immediately inserted dental implants in the maxillary non-molar sites comparable to the Osstell device ISQ values. In addition, torque ratchet is readily available in the dental implant kit at no additional cost, making it a valuable choice over the Osstell device.