Search

Abstract Aim The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding a fourth osteotomy at the lower border of the mandible on the lingual cortical fracture pattern in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies. Patients and methods The sample of the study consisted of 20 patients (12 male and 8 female, with a mean age of 26.79 ± 7.12 years) with mandibular deformities who needed bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. One side underwent a traditional sagittal split ramus osteotomy, and the procedure was modified on the other side by adding a 1 cm horizontal osteotomy at the lower border of the mandible, just distal to the caudal end of the vertical buccal osteotomy cut. A 3D CBCT was used to identify the split pattern. Results In the total sample, 40% of the lingual splits ran vertically toward the lower border of the mandible (LSS1), 20% of the splits passed horizontally to the posterior border of the mandible (LSS2), 32.5% of the splits took place along the inferior alveolar canal (LSS3), and 7.5% of the splits were unfavourable fractures (LSS4). On the inferior border osteotomy sides, the distribution of LSS1, LSS2, LSS3, and LSS4 was 10 (25%), 6 (15%), 4 (10%), and 0 (00), respectively. Their distribution on the sides without inferior border osteotomy was 6 (15%), 8 (20%), 13 (32.5%), and 3 (7.5%), respectively. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the two groups (p

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding a fourth osteotomy at the lower border of the mandible on the lingual cortical fracture pattern in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies. Patients and methods: The sample of the study consisted of 20 patients (12 male and 8 female, with a mean age of 26.79 ± 7.12 years) with mandibular deformities who needed bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. One side underwent a traditional sagittal split ramus osteotomy, and the procedure was modified on the other side by adding a 1 cm horizontal osteotomy at the lower border of the mandible, just distal to the caudal end of the vertical buccal osteotomy cut. A 3D CBCT was used to identify the split pattern. Results: In the total sample, 40% of the lingual splits ran vertically toward the lower border of the mandible (LSS1), 20% of the splits passed horizontally to the posterior border of the mandible (LSS2), 32.5% of the splits took place along the inferior alveolar canal (LSS3), and 7.5% of the splits were unfavourable fractures (LSS4). On the inferior border osteotomy sides, the distribution of LSS1, LSS2, LSS3, and LSS4 was 10 (25%), 6 (15%), 4 (10%), and 0 (00), respectively. Their distribution on the sides without inferior border osteotomy was 6 (15%), 8 (20%), 13 (32.5%), and 3 (7.5%), respectively. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Inferior border osteotomy tends to direct the lingual split fracture line toward the lower and posterior borders of the mandible and minimizes bad splits; however, further studies are needed to confirm our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is a widely used orthognathic surgery technique. This prospective observational study investigated the correspondence between the planned inferior border cut and the actually executed inferior border cut during BSSO. The influence of the inferior border cut on lingual fracture patterns was also analyzed. Postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 41 patients, representing 82 sagittal split osteotomies, were investigated. The inferior border cut was intended to penetrate completely through the caudal cortex. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the executed inferior border cuts. Mixed models were used to investigate the influence of independent variables such as the surgeon's experience on the inferior border cut. Secondarily the influence of the inferior border cut on lingual fracture patterns and the incidence of bad splits was assessed. The inferior border cut reached the caudal cortex in all cases, but reached the lingual cortex in only 38% of the splits. There was no significant relationship between the inferior border cut and a specific lingual fracture line. In this study, postoperative CBCT analysis revealed that the bone cuts during BSSO were often not placed exactly as planned. No significant relationship between the inferior border cut and lingual fracture patterns or bad splits was, however, detected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]