1. Sonication in the diagnosis of fracture-related infections (FRI)-a retrospective study on 230 retrieved implants.
- Author
-
Bellova P, Knop-Hammad V, Königshausen M, Schildhauer TA, Gessmann J, and Baecker H
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Bacteriological Techniques methods, Child, Device Removal, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Sonication methods, Young Adult, Bacteriological Techniques standards, Equipment Contamination, Fractures, Bone surgery, Internal Fixators microbiology, Prosthesis-Related Infections diagnosis, Prosthesis-Related Infections microbiology, Sonication standards
- Abstract
Background: In fracture-related infections (FRI), both the diagnosis of the infection and the identification of the causative pathogen are crucial to optimize treatment outcomes. Sonication has been successfully used for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI); however, its role in FRI remains unknown. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity) of sonicate fluid culture (SFC). The primary objective was to compare SFC with peri-implant tissue culture (PTC) overall and among subgroups using the consensus definition by Metsemakers et al. The secondary objective was to determine the yield of SFC in possible fracture-related infections (PFRI)., Methods: From March 2017 to May 2019, 230 cases of retrieved implants were retrospectively reviewed. To perform sonication, explants were placed in sterile polypropylene jars intraoperatively. After treatment in an ultrasonic bath (Bandelin, Berlin, Germany), sonicate fluid was incubated into blood culture bottles, and conventional culturing was eventually performed. Sensitivity and specificity were determined using two-by-two contingency tables. McNemar's test was used to compare proportions among paired samples while Fisher's exact test was used for comparison between categorical variables., Results: Of the 230 cases, 107 were identified as FRI, whereas 123 were aseptic revision cases (ARC). Of the latter, 105 were labeled as PFRI. Sensitivity of SFC was higher in comparison with PTC, although this did not reach statistical significance (90.7% vs. 84.1%; p = .065). The specificity of SFC was significantly lower than that of PTC (73.2% vs. 88.6%; p = .003). In PFRI, SFC yielded significantly more positive results than PTC (33/105 vs. 14/105; p = .003). Overall, 142 pathogens were identified by SFC, whereas 131 pathogens were found by PTC., Conclusions: We found that sonication of fracture fixation devices may be a useful adjunct in FRI, especially in "low-grade" infections lacking confirmatory clinical criteria. Standardized diagnostic protocols are warranted in order to further optimize the diagnostic accuracy.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF