1. Isavuconazole Versus Voriconazole as the First-line Therapy for Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Invasive Aspergillosis: Comparative Analysis of 2 Multicenter Cohort Studies.
- Author
-
Fernández-Ruiz M, Gioia F, Bodro M, Gutiérrez Martín I, Sabé N, Rodriguez-Álvarez R, Corbella L, López-Viñau T, Valerio M, Illaro A, Salto-Alejandre S, Cordero E, Arnaiz de Las Revillas F, Fariñas MC, Muñoz P, Vidal E, Carratalà J, Goikoetxea J, Ramos-Martínez A, Moreno A, Martín-Dávila P, Fortún J, and Aguado JM
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Aged, Adult, Invasive Fungal Infections drug therapy, Invasive Fungal Infections mortality, Invasive Fungal Infections diagnosis, Transplant Recipients, Antifungal Agents therapeutic use, Antifungal Agents adverse effects, Voriconazole therapeutic use, Voriconazole adverse effects, Nitriles therapeutic use, Nitriles adverse effects, Pyridines therapeutic use, Pyridines adverse effects, Triazoles therapeutic use, Triazoles adverse effects, Organ Transplantation adverse effects, Aspergillosis drug therapy, Aspergillosis mortality, Aspergillosis diagnosis
- Abstract
Background: Isavuconazole (ISA) and voriconazole (VORI) are recommended as the first-line treatment for invasive aspergillosis (IA). Despite theoretical advantages of ISA, both triazole agents have not been compared in solid organ transplant recipients., Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis of 2 retrospective multicenter cohorts of solid organ transplant recipients with invasive fungal disease (the SOTIS [Solid Organ Transplantation and ISavuconazole] and DiasperSOT [DIagnosis of ASPERgillosis in Solid Organ Transplantation] studies). We selected adult patients with proven/probable IA that were treated for ≥48 h with ISA (n = 57) or VORI (n = 77) as first-line therapy, either in monotherapy or combination regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical response at 12 wk from the initiation of therapy. Secondary outcomes comprised 12-wk all-cause and IA-attributable mortality and the rates of treatment-emergent adverse events and premature treatment discontinuation., Results: Both groups were comparable in their demographics and major clinical and treatment-related variables. There were no differences in the rate of 12-wk clinical response between the ISA and VORI groups (59.6% versus 59.7%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-2.00). This result was confirmed after propensity score adjustment (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.32-2.05) and matching (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.31-2.04). All-cause and IA-attributable mortality were also similar. Patients in the ISA group were less likely to experience treatment-emergent adverse events (17.5% versus 37.7%; P = 0.011) and premature treatment discontinuation (8.8% versus 23.4%; P = 0.027)., Conclusions: Front-line treatment with ISA for posttransplant IA led to similar clinical outcomes than VORI, with better tolerability and higher treatment completion., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF