Search

Quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) has been proposed as a scientific domain that can enable efficient and informative drug development. During the past several years, there has been a notable increase in the number of regulatory submissions that contain QSP, including Investigational New Drug Applications (INDs), New Drug Applications (NDAs), and Biologics License Applications (BLAs) to the US Food and Drug Administration. However, there has been no comprehensive characterization of the nature of these regulatory submissions regarding model details and intended applications. To address this gap, a landscape analysis of all the QSP submissions as of December 2020 was conducted. This report summarizes the (1) yearly trend of submissions, (2) proportion of submissions between INDs and NDAs/BLAs, (3) percentage distribution along the stages of drug development, (4) percentage distribution across various therapeutic areas, and (5) nature of QSP applications. In brief, QSP is increasingly applied to model and simulate both drug effectiveness and safety throughout the drug development process across disease areas.

Since December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has exploded and led to a global crisis. Currently, the global case numbers topped 200 million, and toll of dead exceeded 4 million around the world. The pathogenesis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is driven by two processes. During the first stage of the infection that lasts around 5-7 days, replication of SARS-CoV-2 occurs. In the second stage, the disease may progress due to an exaggerated inflammatory response leading to tissue damage. Therefore, it is anticipated that antiviral agents would be effective during the early phase of the disease, while immunomodulator agents are likely to be more beneficial in the second stage of COVID-19. This basic concept of disease development led to explore several antiviral and immunomodulator agents for the treatment of COVID-19. Currently, remdesivir is the only available Food and Drug Administration-approved antiviral agent for the treatment of COVID-19. However, some other agents have been approved by various mechanisms, including Emergency Use Authorizations, Emergency Investigational New Drug applications, compassionate use or expanded access programs. In addition, a variety of repurposed agents that were approved for other indications are being investigated for the treatment of COVID- 19 in clinical trials. A myriad of publications including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are emerging continuously and are accessible as peer-reviewed, pre-print and press release formats. Considering the critical importance of RCTs in generating evidence and providing further guidance on COVID-19 treatment, we herein reviewed only RCTs and meta-analyses. The discussion includes antiviral agents (hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, remdesivir, favipiravir and ivermectin) and, various immunomodulatory drugs (corticosteroids, tocilizumab, baricitinib, and IL-1 inhibitors). Other investigational therapies including darunavir/cobicistat, umifenovir, sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, sofobuvir/ledipasvir, ribavirin, nitazoxanide and interferon-based regimens were not evaluated due to insufficient data on the efficacy and safety of these agents.

Convalescent plasma can be transfused to patients suffering from the same infection or for preparing immunoglobulin concentrates. Plasma obtained from recovered patients can be a valuable alternative during the COVID-19 pandemic for supporting its treatment within a randomized or case-control clinical trials or observational studies of plasma transfusion and for preparing plasma-derived biological products. WHO Blood Regulators Network highlighted that a systematic approach for collecting convalescent plasma from patients recovered from COVID-19 could provide a useful intervention. Structured clinical trials can be used to assess safety and effectiveness of convalescent plasma. The convalescent plasma therapy is still in the experimental stage and is currently not included in the interim clinical guidelines of WHO. However, an emergency investigational new drug application (eIND) process has been induced to ensure the availability of COVID-19 convalescent plasma to the patients with severe or life-threatening COVID-19 conditions. USFDA is regularly amending its guidance as new results, and best practices are emerging. The write-up provides an overview of convalescent plasma, from a regulatory considerations viewpoint, systematic workflow protocol, and a cross-section of clinical trials underway.

Secondary pharmacology studies are a time-efficient and cost-effective method for determining the safety profile of a potential new drug before it enters human trials. The results of these multi-target screens are commonly submitted with Investigational New Drug (IND) applications, but there currently is little guidance on how such information is presented and which targets are chosen for testing. In this study, we expand on our previous analysis of secondary pharmacology reports by manually curating and analyzing all secondary pharmacology results received by the FDA received as part of an IND submission. A total of 1120 INDs submitted by 480 sponsors between 1999 and October 2020 were included in this study. The overall results were largely consistent with previous internal and external studies, showing that the most tested target in our set was the histamine 1 receptor (tested 938 times), the most hit target was sodium channel site 2 (hit 141 times), and the target with the highest hit percentage was the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (hit 42.2% of the time). Additionally, this study demonstrated that improvements in the secondary pharmacology submission process, such as changes in formatting and nomenclature, could enhance the utility of these assays for regulatory review, including assisting with identifying the safety liabilities of a drug candidate early in development. This updated data set will allow FDA-industry collaborative working groups to continue developing the best methods for regulatory submission of secondary pharmacology data and evaluate the need for a standard target panel.

We present a longitudinal analysis of investigational new drug applications (INDs) for new, systemic antibacterial drugs under active development between 1980 and 2019, evaluating the characteristics of these investigational drugs and the outcomes of these drug development programs. The number of INDs in active development declined by two-thirds, from 39 active INDs at its peak in 1987 to a low 13 in 2001, with decreased development of new cephalosporin, quinolone, and macrolide drugs and reduced participation from large pharmaceutical firms. Antibacterial drug development activity rebounded substantially from 2002 to 2009, primarily led by involvement of small pharmaceutical companies. As of 31 December 2019, the number of active INDs has declined to an 11-year low, and the number of antibacterial INDs initiated with the US Food and Drug Administration during 2010–2019 was lower than any of the previous 3 decades. Antibacterial drug development programs initiated in the 1980s and 1990s had high success rates, with >40% of INDs obtaining marketing approval, in a median time of about 6 years from IND receipt to approval. For drug development programs initiated between 2000 and 2009, we found that IND-to-approval rates reduced to 23%, with median development times for approved antibacterial drugs increasing to 8.2 years. The majority of INDs in development as of 31 December 2019 come from already established drug classes, most in early stages of development, and few are sponsored by large pharmaceutical companies.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS–CoV-2), the cause of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has spurred a global health crisis. To date, there are no proven options for prophylaxis for those who have been exposed to SARS–CoV-2, nor therapy for those who develop COVID-19. Immune (i.e., “convalescent”) plasma refers to plasma that is collected from individuals following resolution of infection and development of antibodies. Passive antibody administration through transfusion of convalescent plasma may offer the only short-term strategy for conferring immediate immunity to susceptible individuals. There are numerous examples in which convalescent plasma has been used successfully as postexposure prophylaxis and/or treatment of infectious diseases, including other outbreaks of coronaviruses (e.g., SARS-1, Middle East respiratory syndrome [MERS]). Convalescent plasma has also been used in the COVID-19 pandemic; limited data from China suggest clinical benefit, including radiological resolution, reduction in viral loads, and improved survival. Globally, blood centers have robust infrastructure for undertaking collections and constructing inventories of convalescent plasma to meet the growing demand. Nonetheless, there are nuanced challenges, both regulatory and logistical, spanning donor eligibility, donor recruitment, collections, and transfusion itself. Data from rigorously controlled clinical trials of convalescent plasma are also few, underscoring the need to evaluate its use objectively for a range of indications (e.g., prevention vs. treatment) and patient populations (e.g., age, comorbid disease). We provide an overview of convalescent plasma, including evidence of benefit, regulatory considerations, logistical work flow, and proposed clinical trials, as scale-up is brought underway to mobilize this critical resource.

Background: Clinical trials are an integral part of translating new basic science research into therapeutics. It is crucial for those who run clinical trials to realize the gravity of their responsibilities as principal investigators. Methods: This review focuses on the relevant investigator responsibilities under the Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, the contents of Form 1572, FDA inspections, and methods to improve compliance. Results: While responsibility for day-to-day study activities can be delegated to outside entities and to study staff, a clinical principal investigator who has signed US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Form 1572 is held responsible for noncompliance and misconduct by anyone working on the study. Depending on the infraction, consequences can range from a publicly posted warning letter by the FDA to criminal prosecution and fines or imprisonment. Conclusion: Investigators are not only responsible for producing high-quality, meaningful, scientific research, but they are also responsible for maintaining public trust. If the principal investigator acts with integrity and provides training and oversight of employees, FDA inquiries should go smoothly. Following good clinical practice standards for clinical research will result in quality data collection and facilitate the analysis and publication process.

In the oncology field, understanding the relationship between the dose administered and the exerted effect is particularly important because of the narrow therapeutic index associated with anti-cancer drugs and the high interpatient variability. Therefore, in this review, we provide a critical perspective of the different methods of characterising treatment exposure in the oncology setting. The increasing number of modelling applications in oncology reflects the applicability and the impact of pharmacometrics on all phases of the drug development process and patient management as well. Pharmacometric modelling is a worthy component within the current paradigm of model-based drug development, but pharmacometric modelling techniques are also accessible for the clinician in the optimisation of current oncology therapies. Consequently, the application of population models in a hospital setting by generating close collaborations between physicians and pharmacometricians is highly recommended, providing a systematic means of developing and assessing model-based metrics as 'drivers' for various responses to treatments, which can then be evaluated as predictors for treatment success. Characterising the key determinants of variability in exposure is of particular importance for anticancer agents, as efficacy and toxicity are associated with exposure. We present the different strategies to describe and predict drug exposure that can be applied depending on the data available, with the objective of obtaining the most useful information in the patients' favour throughout the full drug cycle. Therefore, the objective of the present article is to review the different approaches used to characterise a patient's exposure to oncology drugs, which will result in a better understanding of the time course of the response and the magnitude of interpatient variability.

A vaccine is an immunogen, the administration of which is intended to stimulate the immune system to result in the prevention, amelioration, or therapy of any disease or infection (US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for Industry: content and format of chemistry, manufacturing, and controls information and establishment description information for a vaccine or related product). A vaccine may be a live attenuated preparation of microorganisms, inactivated (killed) whole organisms, living irradiated cells, crude fractions, or purified immunogens, including those derived from recombinant DNA in a host cell, conjugates formed by covalent linkage of components, synthetic antigens, polynucleotides (such as the plasmid DNA vaccines), living vectored cells expressing specific heterologous immunogens, or cells pulsed with immunogen. Vaccines are highly complex products that differ from small molecule drugs because of the biological nature of the source materials such as those derived from microorganisms as well as the various cell substrates from which some are derived. Regardless of the technology used, because of their complexities, vaccines must undergo extensive characterization and testing. Special expertise and procedures are needed for their manufacture, control, and regulation. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the National Regulatory Authority (NRA) in the United States responsible for assuring quality, safety, and effectiveness of all human medical products, including vaccines for human use.The Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) within the US FDA is responsible for overseeing the regulation of therapeutic and preventative vaccines against infectious diseases. Authority for the regulation of vaccines resides in Section 351 of the Public Health Service Act and specific sections of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C). Vaccines are regulated as biologics and licensed based on the demonstration of safety and effectiveness. The vaccine development process can be divided into two major categories: those events that are not under the regulatory authority of the FDA and are exploratory in nature and those events that are subject to regulatory authority by the FDA. Exploratory events or research and development cover basic research drug discovery processes that occur before the sponsor submits an investigational new drug application (IND) to the FDA. There are four main stages of vaccine development under the purview of regulatory authorities: preclinical, clinical (IND), licensing, and post-licensure. Throughout their life cycle from preclinical evaluation to post-licensure lot release testing, vaccines are subject to rigorous testing and oversight by manufacturers and NRAs. In this chapter an overview of the regulatory evaluation and testing requirements for vaccines is presented.

Regulatory agency interaction occurs from before a candidate drug enters clinical development and all the way to marketing approval and beyond. This paper presents ways to enable successful interaction by avoiding issues, with an emphasis on nonclinical testing aspects. Strategic thinking as to whether an early regulatory agency meeting should occur is discussed and if yes, how to make it a success by generating relevant questions with proper preparation including a robust Briefing Document. Examples of unfavourable regulatory agency feedback during meetings is given which may have been avoided. Similarly, ways for successful regulatory submission in the form of a Clinical Trials Application (CTA) in Europe or an Investigational New Drug (IND) application in the US are considered with examples of comments that can be received from regulatory agencies. At marketing application stage with submission of a Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA) in Europe and a New Drug Application (NDA) or a Biologic License Application (BLA) in the US, a key document is the Nonclinical Overview and suggested content and potential deficiencies are presented to allow avoidance of adverse regulatory agency responses and time delay. Successful regulatory agency interaction involves robust scientific thinking, proper planning and well-written documentation.

Introduction: OS2966 is a first-in-class, humanized and de-immunized monoclonal antibody which targets the adhesion receptor subunit, CD29/&beta, 1 integrin. CD29 expression is highly upregulated in glioblastoma and has been shown to drive tumor progression, invasion, and resistance to multiple modalities of therapy. Here, we present a novel Phase I clinical trial design addressing several factors plaguing effective treatment of high-grade gliomas (HGG). Study Design: This 2-part, ascending-dose, Phase I clinical trial will enroll patients with recurrent/progressive HGG requiring a clinically indicated resection. In Study Part 1, patients will undergo stereotactic tumor biopsy followed by placement of a purpose-built catheter which will be used for the intratumoral, convection-enhanced delivery (CED) of OS2966. Gadolinium contrast will be added to OS2966 before each infusion, enabling the real-time visualization of therapeutic distribution via MRI. Subsequently, patients will undergo their clinically indicated tumor resection followed by CED of OS2966 to the surrounding tumor-infiltrated brain. Matched pre- and post-infusion tumor specimens will be utilized for biomarker development and validation of target engagement by receptor occupancy. Dose escalation will be achieved using a unique concentration-based accelerated titration design. Discussion: The present study design leverages multiple innovations including: (1) the latest CED technology, (2) 2-part design including neoadjuvant intratumoral administration, (3) a first-in-class investigational therapeutic, and (4) concentration-based dosing. Trial registration: A U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational New Drug application (IND) for the above protocol is now active.

Clinical trials being conducted in the USA that utilize cellular therapy products require review from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and at least one Institutional Review Board (IRB). Additionally, if the cellular product includes a gene transfer component, the trial will also require review by at least one Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC). Each of these entities not only requires initial review but also has requirements for ongoing review of the clinical trial including amendments, adverse events, and an annual report. Failure to obtain proper regulatory review of clinical trials can have serious consequences including loss of funding, inability to publish, and restrictions in the ability to engage in further clinical research. It is important to note that these types of trials are regulated differently throughout the world and that if a study is to be conducted outside of the USA, a thorough review of regulations governing that country will be required. This chapter reviews the process for submitting an Investigational New Drug application to the FDA.

The objective of this manuscript is to provide the reader with a hypothetical case study to present an immunogenicity risk assessment for a multi-specific therapeutic as part of Investigational New Drug (IND) application. In order to provide context for the bioanalytical strategies used to support the multi-specific therapeutic presented herein, the introduction focuses on known immunogenicity risk factors. The subsequent hypothetical case study applies these principles to a specific example HC-12, based loosely on anti-TNFα and anti-IL-17A bispecific molecules previously in development, structured as an example immunogenicity risk assessment for submission to health authorities. The risk of higher incidence and safety impact of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) due to large protein complexes is explored in the context of multi-specificity and multi-valency of the therapeutic in combination with the oligomeric forms of the targets.

Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have broad application prospects for regenerative medicine due to their self-renewal, high plasticity, ability for differentiation, and immune response and modulation. Interest in turning MSCs into clinical applications has never been higher than at present. Many biotech companies have invested great effort from development of clinical grade MSC product to investigational new drug (IND) enabling studies. Therefore, the growing demand for publication of MSC regulation in China necessitates various discussions in accessible professional journals. The National Medical Products Administration has implemented regulations on the clinical application of MSCs therapy. The regulations for MSCs products as drug have been updated in recent years in China. This review will look over the whole procedure in allogeneic MSC development, including regulations, guidance, processes, quality management, pre-IND meeting, and IND application for obtaining an approval to start clinical trials in China. The review focused on process and regulatory challenges in the development of MSCs products, with the goal of providing strategies to meet regulatory demands. This article describes a path for scientists, biotech companies, and clinical trial investigators toward the successful development of MSC-based therapeutic product.

Seldom has a medical advance in cancer therapy been as pivotal as the advent of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell immunotherapy. While the first applications targeted the CD19 antigen on lymphoid malignancies, the incredible specificity of these 'living drugs', curative potential and generalisability to other targets have richly justified their declaration as 2019's breakthrough of the year by Science magazine. Two CAR-T products, Yescarta (axicabtagene ciloleucel) and Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) were Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved in the USA in late 2017, with the FDA commissioner Scott Gottlieb heralding 'a new frontier in medical innovation with the ability to reprogram a patient's own cells to attack a deadly cancer'. Building upon early enthusiasm, nearly 1000 cell- and gene-therapy investigational new drug applications are pending with the FDA, which expects to review and approve between 10 and 20 such treatments annually by 2025. Despite the enormous promise and urgent unmet need fulfilled by CAR-T cells, the real-world adoption of the two FDA-approved treatments has been slow.

We report our experience working with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to obtain access to an abandoned investigational new drug (IND) application and subsequent application documents submitted by Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. to the agency. Contrary to others’ experience and in response to our specific request, FDA provided the IND application number and 464 pages of relevant material, including the initial pharmacology review by the agency and an annual report consisting of an investigational drug brochure, clinical study protocol and amendments and detailing clinical experience with drug treatment. It may be possible to bring application files of additional drugs previously submitted to the agency into the public record to help bolster repurposing efforts and realize our shared public interest in benefiting from previous human clinical studies.

We aimed to investigate the regulatory approval of drugs for cancers by the US Food and Drug Administration based on the cancer type (major vs. minor), including the use of expedited development programs and duration from Investigational New Drug application (IND) to marketing approval. From publicly available records and through a Freedom of Information Act request, we gathered data to evaluate regulatory characteristics and pivotal study design for 115 anticancer drug approvals between 2012 and 2017 and the data were analyzed based on cancer incidence (major vs. minor cancers) and how expedited programs, orphan drug designation, and pivotal study design contribute to expedited approval was studied. Drugs targeting minor cancers more frequently (67%; P = 0.0155) utilized breakthrough therapy designation and/or accelerated approval, both of which significantly contributed to expedited drug approval (median time from IND to approval, 6.4 years; P = 0.0008, 6.2 years; P

Adoptive cell therapy using chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells, which is a promising cancer immunotherapy strategy, has been developing very rapidly in recent years. CAR-T cells are genetically modified T cells that can specifically recognize tumor specific antigens on the surface of tumor cells, and then effectively kill tumor cells. At present, exciting results are being achieved in clinical applications of CAR-T cells for patients with hematological malignancies. The research and development of CAR-T cells for various targets and for the treatment of solid tumors have become a hot topic worldwide, so an increasing number of investigational new drug applications (INDAs) and new drug applications (NDAs) of CAR-T cell products are expected to be submitted in future. The quality control and nonclinical research of these products are of great significance in ensuring the safety and effectiveness of these products; however, they also present great challenges and difficulties. This article discusses the general principles of and key issues regarding the quality control and nonclinical research of CAR-T cell products based on their product characteristics and on relevant guidelines for gene and cell therapy products. Keywords: Chimeric antigen receptor T cells, Quality control, Nonclinical research, Safety, Efficacy, Clinical trials, Cancer immunotherapy

Drug lag, which delays patients' access to medicinal products, is typically associated with pharmaceutical regulations. To shorten drug lag, health authorities may establish new policies to liberalize the regulations, a step that is important in countries, such as Taiwan, with consumer demand for imported novel therapeutic agents. Taiwan's government enacted Articles 38-1 and 38-2 of Regulations for Registration of Medicinal Products to relax the regulatory barriers for new drug submission, thus conditionally exempting the requirement for the Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product (CPP). This study examined whether the enacted regulations reduce submission lag by analyzing the time gap of submission between Taiwan and the United States during 2014-2017. The results indicated that the enacted regulations substantially affected submission lag. Submission lag was significantly shorter for applications not requiring a CPP than those requiring one CPP, which in turn was significantly shorter than those requiring two CPPs. This conclusion can be applied to biological, chemical, non-orphan, and oncology drugs and also applications filed by subsidiary companies, but not orphan drugs and applications filed by contract agents. Among applications requiring one CPP, oncology drugs showed the shortest submission lag. Certain factors, such as clinical studies recruiting over-threshold Taiwanese participants and those performed before the submission of new drug application in the United States, may shorten submission lag. In summary, this study justifies the policy of the exemption from CPP requirements, which supports the hypothesis that relaxing regulatory barriers can reduce submission lag in Taiwan.

Secondary pharmacology studies are utilized by the pharmaceutical industry as a cost-efficient tool to identify potential safety liabilities of drugs before entering Phase 1 clinical trials. These studies are recommended by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a part of the Investigational New Drug (IND) application. However, despite the utility of these assays, there is little guidance on which targets should be screened and which format should be used. Here, we evaluated 226 secondary pharmacology profiles obtained from close to 90 unique sponsors. The results indicated that the most tested target in our set was the GABA benzodiazepine receptor (tested 168 times), the most hit target was adenosine 3 (hit 24 times), and the target with the highest hit percentage was the quinone reductase 2 (NQO2) receptor (hit 29% of the time). The overall results were largely consistent with those observed in previous publications. However, this study also identified the need for improvement in the submission process of secondary pharmacology studies by industry, which could enhance their utility for regulatory purpose. FDA-industry collaborative working groups will utilize this data to determine the best methods for regulatory submission of these studies and evaluate the need for a standard target panel.

Background Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a target for cancer therapy as it is overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers. Therapeutic antibodies that bind EGFR are being evaluated in clinical trials as imaging agents for positron emission tomography and image-guided surgery. However, some of these antibodies have safety concerns such as infusion reactions, limiting their use in imaging applications. Nimotuzumab is a therapeutic monoclonal antibody that is specific for EGFR and has been used as a therapy in a number of countries. Methods Formulation of IRDye800CW-nimotuzumab for a clinical trial application was prepared. The physical, chemical, and pharmaceutical properties were tested to develop the specifications to determine stability of the product. The acute and delayed toxicities were tested and IRDye800CW-nimotuzumab was determined to be non-toxic. Non-compartmental pharmacokinetics analysis was used to determine the half-life of IRDye800CW-nimotuzumab. Results IRDye800CW-nimotuzumab was determined to be non-toxic from the acute and delayed toxicity study. The half-life of IRDye800CW-nimotuzumab was determined to be 38 ± 1.5 h. A bi-exponential analysis was also used which gave a t1/2 alpha of 1.5 h and t1/2 beta of 40.8 h. Conclusions Here, we show preclinical studies demonstrating that nimotuzumab conjugated to IRDye800CW is safe and does not exhibit toxicities commonly associated with EGFR targeting antibodies.

Gene and cell therapy products approved over the past decade in Europe and North America have provided new therapeutic options for single gene disorders and for hematologic malignancies. Lessons learned, and limitations identified, are reviewed.

Tremendous progress has been made in recent years to produce functional cells for cell therapy products. Hundreds of clinical trials of stem cell products (SCPs) have shown promising therapeutic potential worldwide, including the products derived from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), adult stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells (MSC). Before starting a clinical trial, comprehensive chemistry, manufacturing and control (CMC) study is required to assure the safety and quality consistency of SCPs. The heterogeneity of stem cell products arises from the variability in the donor tissues, isolation of cells and differentiation processes, and appropriate testing approaches are needed to characterize and release SCPs. Here we summarize the regulatory considerations of CMC study in Investigational New Drug (IND) application of SCPs in China based on the current knowledge, and they will be updated in the future with the advance of stem cell biology and regulatory science.

Background Herbal medicine has been used frequently in Korean medicine. We aimed to summarize the relevant regulations for herbal medicine clinical trials and to analyze their current status in the Republic of Korea. Methods We searched for legislation to find regulations on herbal medicine clinical trials. Additionally, the websites of the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (KMFDS) and Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS) were searched to investigate the current status of them. Results To conduct herbal medicine clinical trials for new drugs or previously approved drugs outside of indications, investigational new drug (IND) approval should be obtained from the KMFDS. For clinical trials of herbal medicines that have been used for more than 3 years with 200 cases at the clinical trial institution, nonclinical data can be exempted from IND approval. Total 95 and 108 herbal medicine clinical trials from the KMFDS and CRIS websites were analyzed. The number of clinical trials showed an increasing trend each year, as did KMFDS-regulated clinical trials. Recently, three clinical trials targeting new herbal formulations frequently used in Korean medicine institutions have been approved based on relevant regulations. Conclusion We confirmed that herbal medicine clinical trials are managed through strict regulations, which can ensure the safe and effective use of herbal medicine. Despite strict regulations, attempts to accumulate evidence through clinical trials for herbal medicine are increasing. High-quality clinical trials should be conducted to develop new drugs that reflect the clinical setting using relevant regulations, evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drugs, and strengthen insurance coverage.

BackgroundCOVID-19 disease, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has spread globally, and no proven treatments are available. Convalescent plasma therapy has been used with varying degrees of success to treat severe microbial infections for more than 100 years.MethodsPatients (n=25) with severe and/or life-threatening COVID-19 disease were enrolled at the Houston Methodist hospitals from March 28 – April 14, 2020. Patients were transfused with convalescent plasma obtained from donors with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and had been symptom free for 14 days. The primary study outcome was safety, and the secondary outcome was clinical status at day 14 post-transfusion. Clinical improvement was assessed based on a modified World Health Organization 6-point ordinal scale and laboratory parameters. Viral genome sequencing was performed on donor and recipient strains.ResultsAt baseline, all patients were receiving supportive care, including anti-inflammatory and anti-viral treatments, and all patients were on oxygen support. At day 7 post-transfusion with convalescent plasma, nine patients had at least a 1-point improvement in clinical scale, and seven of those were discharged. By day 14 post-transfusion, 19 (76%) patients had at least a 1-point improvement in clinical status and 11 were discharged. No adverse events as a result of plasma transfusion were observed. The whole genome sequencing data did not identify a strain genotype-disease severity correlation.ConclusionsThe data indicate that administration of convalescent plasma is a safe treatment option for those with severe COVID-19 disease. Randomized, controlled trials are needed to determine its efficacy.

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC)‐based therapies have been hailed as the future of regenerative medicine because of their potential to provide treatment options for most degenerative diseases. A key promise of iPSC‐based therapies is the possibility of an autologous transplant that may engraft better in the longer‐term due to its compatibility with the patient's immune system. Despite over a decade of research, clinical translation of autologous iPSC‐based therapies has been slow—partly due to a lacking pre‐defined regulatory path. Here, we outline regulatory considerations for developing an autologous iPSC‐based product and challenges associated with the clinical manufacturing of autologous iPSCs and their derivatives. These challenges include donor tissue source, reprogramming methods, heterogeneity of differentiated cells, controls for the manufacturing process, and preclinical considerations. A robust manufacturing process with appropriate quality controls and well‐informed, prospectively designed preclinical studies provide a path toward successful approval of autologous iPSC‐based therapies., Regulatory considerations for developing a phase I investigational new drug application for an autologous induced pluripotent stem cells‐based therapy.

Animal models of bacterial infection have been widely used to explore the in vivo activity of antibacterial drugs. These data are often submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to support human use in an investigational new drug application (IND). To better understand the range and scientific use of animal models in regulatory submissions, a database was created surveying recent pneumonia models submitted as part of IND application packages. The IND studies were compared to animal models of bacterial pneumonia published in the scientific literature over the same period of time. In this review, we analyze the key experimental design elements, such as animal species, immune status, pathogens selected, and route of administration, and study endpoints.

Objectives Iguratimod, a novel immunomodulatory agent for rheumatoid arthritis, has been shown to be effective against murine lupus. The aim of this study was to make a preliminary evaluation of the efficacy and safety of iguratimod as salvage therapy in patients with refractory lupus nephritis (LN). Methods We enrolled eligible patients with refractory LN, which we defined as having failed or relapsed on at least two immunosuppressant agents. After enrollment, we substituted iguratimod (25 mg twice daily) for their previous immunosuppressant agents without increasing the dose of steroids. The primary outcome was complete/partial remission (PR/CR) at week 24. Patients who achieved remission continued iguratimod as maintenance therapy over an extended follow-up. Results The study cohort comprised 14 patients with refractory LN, 10 of whom had recent treatment failure and 4 repeated relapses with inadequate initial responses. At enrollment, none of the patients had detectable evidence of extra-renal involvement. The median prednisone dosage was 10 mg/d (IQR 0–10 mg/day). Thirteen patients were eligible for response evaluation, with one patient missed. The renal response rate was 92.3% (12/13) at week 24, with 38.5% (5/13) achieving CR and 53.8% (7/13) achieving PR. We then continued to follow up the responding patients for up to 144 weeks. Twenty-five percent of the patients (3/12) had renal relapse after initial PR. The estimated glomerular filtration rate of all patients maintained stable during follow-up. One patient had a severe adverse reaction (anemia) but recovered fully after stopping iguratimod. Conclusions Our study supports the potential of iguratimod for treatment of refractory LN. Iguratimod could be a promising candidate drug for this condition.