Search

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of domestic and sexual violence and to characterize the association between exposure to domestic and sexual violence and low uptake of gynecological care, in the context of induced abortion., Study Design: We conducted a case-control study among women seeking abortion care, in mother and child centers and sexual health centers in the Paris, France area (April 2022-March 2023)., Results: A total of 103 women were included in the study during induced abortion care. Physical, psychological or sexual domestic violence was reported by 48.5 % and sexual violence, whoever the perpetrator, was reported by 23.3 %. In the bivariate analysis, a history of physical, psychological or sexual domestic violence was not associated with the absence of a gynecological consultation in the past two years, compared with no history of intimate partner violence (p = 0.09). After adjustment for regular pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, vulvodynia and dyspareunia, there was no association between a history of sexual violence and the absence of a gynecological consultation in the past two years (OR 1.05; CI95% 0.27-4.13, p = 0.93)., Conclusion: Violence was a common finding among women seeking abortion care. We did not find any association between a history of sexual violence and the absence of a gynecological consultation in the past two years. We suggest investigating multiple or frequent use of gynecological care following violence. The combination of ethical, moral, and psychological constraints associated with violence screening and abortion care is a challenge to patient recruitment in future studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Pelvic examination, a routine practice for gynecological care, can cause anxiety and be considered traumatic. This study aimed to define the association between domestic or sexual violence and the experience of pelvic examination, as well as the uptake of gynecological care following domestic or sexual violence. Pubmed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar were searched, up to April 30, 2023. Cohort, cross-sectional, case-control studies and controlled trials assessing perception of pelvic examination or the use of gynecological care for women with a history of violence were selected and analyzed. Each study underwent a descriptive analysis and was assessed for bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the RoB2 tool. Twenty-three articles met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies, including 7,329 women, investigated the experience of pelvic examination following lifetime or childhood sexual violence. Most reported an association between violence and adverse experiences of pelvic examination, such as discomfort, anxiety, distress, and pain perceptions. Ten studies, including 9,248 women, investigated the uptake of gynecological care following domestic or sexual violence and reported mixed results, such as a decreased or an increased uptake, particularly for acute symptoms. Two studies, including 1,304 women, examined both outcomes. The present study highlights the association between violence and adverse experiences of pelvic examination, as well as mixed results on the uptake of gynecological care. It argues for the necessity to screen for violence in consultations, particularly when considering a pelvic examination, to guarantee the utility of pelvic examinations, and to consider the traumatic impact of sexual violence in care., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the association between exposure to domestic and sexual violence and low uptake of gynecological consultation., Study Design: Between October 2021 and October 2022, a case-control studywas conducted in mother andchild centers and sexual health centers in the Paris, France area. The case group included pregnant women who did not have a scheduled gynecological consultation in the past two years. The control group included pregnant women who had a scheduled gynecological consultation in the past two years. Pregnant women were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire about a history of domestic and sexual violence, the date of their last gynecological consultation and the gynecological health., Results: A total of 405 pregnant women were included in the case group (n = 129) or in the control group (n = 276). After adjustment for age, couple, social security, supplementary health insurance, dyspareunia, abnormal vaginal discharge, dysmenorrhea, regular pelvic pain, mastodynia, vulvodynia and history of difficult delivery, a history of intimate partner violence was associated with the absence of a gynecological consultation in the past two years (OR 2.13; CI95% 1.21-3.73, p = 0.008). A history of sexual violence, regardless of age, was associated with the absence a gynecological consultation in the past two years (OR 1.92; CI95% 1.05-3.49, p = 0.03). The absence of a gynecological consultation was associated with dyspareunia and domestic or sexual violence (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively)., Conclusions: This study highlighted the association between domestic and sexual violence and the absence of gynecological consultations in the past two years. It underlines the importance of screening for domestic and sexual violence during gynecological consultations and its impacts on mental health, in particular psychotraumatic symptoms, and on gynecological health, in particular dyspareunia., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Domestic and sexual violence have been linked to adverse gynecological and obstetric outcomes. Survivors often find it difficult to verbalize such violence due to feelings of shame and guilt. Vulnerable or socially excluded women are frequently excluded from research, particularly qualitative studies on violence. This study aimed to characterize the perceived impact of domestic or sexual violence on the gynecological health and follow-up among women with complex social situations., Methods: We analyzed the data following inductive thematic analysis methods., Results: Between April 2022 and January 2023, we conducted 25 semi-structured interviews, lasting on average 90 min (range: 45-180), with women aged between 19 and 52, recruited in an emergency shelter in the Paris area. The women described physical and psychological violence mainly in the domestic sphere, their altered gynecological and mental health and their perception of gynecological care. The levels of uptake of gynecological care were related to the characteristics of the violence and their consequences. The description of gynecological examination was close to the description of coerced marital sexuality which was not considered to be sexual violence. Gynecological examination, likely to trigger embarrassment and discomfort, was always perceived to be necessary and justified, and consent was implied., Conclusion: This study can help question the appropriateness of professional practices related to the prevention of violence against women and gynecological examination practices. Any gynecological examination should be carried out within the framework of an equal relationship between caregiver and patient, for the general population and for women with a history of violence. It participates in preventing violence in the context of care, and more widely, in preventing violence against women., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

The loss of organizational knowledge has emerged as a prevalent issue for 21st-century organizations. This systematic review aims to scrutinize knowledge transfer procedures applied to individuals in managerial and intermediate positions during generational change or knowledge management initiatives. Following the PRISMA statement [1], this review progressed through four stages, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, and ultimately identifying 28 articles for the final analysis. Descriptive indicators and content-related metrics were employed in the study. Key findings include: (1) predominant investment in knowledge retention studies and procedure design is observed among large companies, primarily in the secondary sector; (2) digitalization emerges as a critical aspect of effective organizational knowledge transfer procedures and protocols; (3) intra-organizational communication styles are predominantly employed for knowledge transfer; (4) organizations prefer a collective approach to transferring both tacit and explicit knowledge. In summary, this research offers fresh insights into a pivotal area of business management, showcasing originality in its exploration of knowledge transfer within the realms of generational change and knowledge management., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: AF: SELAS Pointgyn, Laboratoire Innotech International, Respiratory and Women’s Health Products, Center for observational and real-world evidence (CORE);CLR: Ferring;CRJ:Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono Healthcare, Mylan, Roche, Theramex;ES: Evalformsanté;HB: Organon, Bayer, Gédéon Richter, MSD vaccins, Exeltix, Besins;LMM: Ferring, Vichy, Ipsen, Evalformsanté, Besins, Gédéon Richter, Effik, Theramex;MB: Gédéon Richter;ML: Theramex, Gédéon Richter, Ferring, IBSA Pharma, Merck, Serono, Organon and Exeltis;SM: HAS;TB:Nordic Pharma;VB: Merck, IBSA Pharma and Besins-HealthCare, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, Ferring, IBSA Pharma, Merck Serono, Organon and Exeltis;VG: PFIZER and HAC pharma;XD: Sanofi, Astellas, Coloplast, Hologic, IBSA Pharma, Laborie, Mylan, Pierre-Fabre, Elsevier-Masson, Regimedia and HealthEvents;YA: Conférences Hermes;YC: HAS. Other authors declared no C.O.I.

Objective: To provide guidelines for the pelvic clinical exam in gynecology and obstetrics., Material and Methods: A multidisciplinary experts consensus committee of 45 experts was formed, including representatives of patients' associations and users of the health system. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any funding. The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized., Methods: The committee studied 40 questions within 4 fields for symptomatic or asymptomatic women (emergency conditions, gynecological consultation, gynecological diseases, obstetrics, and pregnancy). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology., Results: The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 27 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 17 present a strong agreement, 7 a weak agreement and 3 an expert consensus agreement. Thirteen questions resulted in an absence of recommendation due to lack of evidence in the literature., Conclusions: The need to perform clinical examination in gynecological and obstetrics patients was specified in 27 pre-defined situations based on scientific evidence. More research is required to investigate the benefit in other cases., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Sexual violence can be followed by different levels of gynecological care. Our objective was to characterise gynecological care and to identify the related factors among women who had reported sexual violence., Methods: Twenty-five semi-structured interviews were conducted among adult women who reported sexual violence during childhood or as adults. Topics addressed included gynecological health, gynecological care and experienced violence, RESULTS: Interviewed women, aged 20-60, had a good professional integration and a high level of education. The violence had often been committed by a relative or acquaintance. For the women interviewed, the least use of gynecological care was motivated by a desire to avoid the gynecological examination. Among women who had regular check-ups, the desire to conform to the norm explained their need for gynecological check-ups, which was similar to that of women who had never been subjected to violence. Lastly, some care pathways were characterised by multiple recourse of gynecological care for complaints with identical motives. The women interviewed expected professionals to spontaneously identify the violence they had suffered and the gynecological consequences attributed to such violence., Conclusion: Individual and interpersonal differences in levels of gynecological care use were related to the characteristics of the violence and its perceived effects on gynecological health. It would be interesting to extend this research by examining the care pathways of women with other socioeconomic characteristics. A quantitative study would measure the association between violence and the use of gynecological care., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: While a number of glossaries have been produced by various authorities in different countries, at present there is no internationally accepted common set of definitions for many terms used to describe pregnancy losses. The objective of the current study was to provide a standardized French/English terminology/glossary relating to pregnancy losses., Methods: Literature review, construction of a glossary and rating of proposals using a formal consensus method. The glossary was subject of a critical comprehensive review by a meeting of professionals (multidisciplinary panel)., Results: A miscarriage is a spontaneous evacuation of an intra-uterine pregnancy<22WG. A missed early miscarriage is when ultrasound (<14WG) shows no growth of intra-uterine sac/embryo and/or loss of fetal heart activity. An early miscarriage is when spontaneous evacuation of intra-uterine pregnancy occurs <14WG. A complete early miscarriage is when there is no retained products of conception (empty uterus on ultrasound) and no bleeding nor pain. Incomplete early miscarriage is when ultrasonography shows retained products of conception in the uterine cavity (including cervical canal). Repeat miscarriage or recurrent pregnancy loss is when the woman experiences 3 or more consecutive miscarriages <14WG. A late miscarriage is when there is spontaneous evacuation of pregnancy ≥14WG and <22WG. A threatened late miscarriage is when shortening/opening of the cervix±uterine contraction occur ≥14WG and <22WG. An intra-uterine fetal demise is when there is a spontaneous loss of fetal heart activity ≥14 WG., Conclusion: The final current terminology should be used by all healthcare professionals., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between psychology and pregnancy loss., Methods: A literature review was conducted by consulting Medline until April 2014., Results: Psychological factors appear to be significantly associated with the risk of recurrent miscarriage. Depression and anxiety are common symptoms after miscarriage. A return to normal scores of depression and anxiety is frequently found in one year. A systematic psychological treatment after an episode of miscarriage seems to not bring obvious benefits, one year after a miscarriage, in terms of anxiety and depression. After a stillbirth, psychological impacts on the couple, such as anxiety and depressive symptoms, are common. An empathetic and respectful attitude of all medical and paramedical team at the support is associated with better psychological experience., Conclusion: After a pregnancy loss, psychological consequences are common and usually reversible. An attitude of empathy is desirable in order to accompany patients and to consider a future pregnancy., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)