Search

This abstract was not presented at the conference. Citation Format: Rapiti E, Schaffar R, Bouchardy C, Neyroud-Caspar I, Benhamou S. Not presented [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-08.

Background & Aims There are conflicting data regarding the epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) arising in the context of non-alcoholic and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (NAFLD and MAFLD). We aimed to examine the changing contribution of NAFLD and MAFLD, stratified by sex, in a well-defined geographical area and highly characterised HCC population between 1990 and 2014. Methods We identified all patients with HCC resident in the canton of Geneva, Switzerland, diagnosed between 1990 and 2014 from the prospective Geneva Cancer Registry and assessed aetiology-specific age-standardised incidence. NAFLD-HCC was diagnosed when other causes of liver disease were excluded in cases with type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, or obesity. Criteria for MAFLD included one or more of the following criteria: overweight/obesity, presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, or evidence of metabolic dysregulation. Results A total of 76/920 (8.3%) of patients were diagnosed with NAFLD-HCC in the canton of Geneva between 1990 and 2014. Between the time periods 1990–1994 and 2010–2014, there was a significant increase in HCC incidence in women (standardised incidence ratio [SIR] 1.83, 95% CI 1.08–3.13, p = 0.026) but not in men (SIR 1.10, 95% CI 0.85–1.43, p = 0.468). In the same timeframe, the proportion of NAFLD-HCC increased more in women (0–29%, p = 0.037) than in men (2–12%, p = 0.010) while the proportion of MAFLD increased from 21% to 68% in both sexes and from 7% to 67% in women (p, Graphical abstract, Highlights • The burden of HCC arising in the context of non-alcoholic and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (NAFLD and MAFLD) remains unclear. • We assessed all HCC cases between 1990 and 2014 in an area of western Switzerland. • We found a significant increase in overall HCC incidence in women but not in men. • The proportion of NAFLD- and MAFLD-HCC increased in both sexes, particularly in women. • Liver function of MAFLD patients was intermediate between ‘pure’ NAFLD and non-MAFLD individuals.

A recent study reported an increased risk of contralateral estrogen-negative breast cancer after a first primary estrogen-negative breast cancer. Our study aims to confirm this result and to evaluate how the risk of second breast cancer occurrence is affected by family history of breast cancer and anti-estrogen treatment. We included all 4,152 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1995 and 2007, using data from the population-based Geneva Cancer Registry. We compared the incidence of second breast cancer among patients according to estrogen receptor (ER) status with that expected in the general population by age-period Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIRs). Among the cohort, 63 women developed second breast cancer. Patients with ER-positive first tumors had a decreased risk of second breast cancer occurrence (SIR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.48-0.90), whereas patients with ER-negative primary tumors had an increased risk (SIR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.19-3.09) limited to ER-negative second tumors (SIR: 7.94, 95% CI: 3.81-14.60). Patients with positive family history had a tenfold (SIR: 9.74, 95% CI: 3.57-21.12) higher risk of ER-negative second tumor which increased to nearly 50-fold (SIR: 46.18, 95% CI: 12.58-118.22) when the first tumor was ER-negative. Treatment with anti-estrogen decreased the risk of second ER-positive tumors but not ER-negative tumors. The risk of second ER-negative breast cancer is very high after a first ER-negative tumor, in particular among women with strong family history. Surveillance and prevention of second cancer occurrence should consider both ER status of the first tumor and family history.

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) use declined sharply after mid-2002, when the Women's Health Initiative trial reported an association between breast cancer occurrence and HRT. Hypothesized mechanism behind this association is that HRT promotes growth of pre-existing small tumors, leading to earlier tumor detection. We evaluated the impact of the sudden decline in HRT use on age distribution of breast cancer in Geneva. We included all incident breast cancer cases recorded from 1975 to 2006 at the Geneva cancer registry. We calculated mean annual incidence rates per 100,000 for 2 year periods for three age groups and assessed temporal changes by joinpoint regression. We compared age-specific incidence curves for different periods, reflecting different prevalence rates of HRT use. After increasing constantly between 1986 and 2002 among women aged 50-69 years [annual percent change (APC): +4.4, P < 0.0001], rates declined sharply after 2003 (APC: -6.0; P = 0.0264). Age-specific breast cancer rates changed dramatically with changes in prevalence of HRT use. During low HRT prevalence, breast cancer incidence increased progressively with age, when HRT prevalence was reaching its maximum (1995-2002), higher rates were seen in 60- to 64-year-old women, with a concomitant decrease in risk among elderly. After the sudden decline in HRT use, the incidence peak diminished significantly and incidence increased again with age. Following the abrupt decline in HRT use in Geneva, breast cancer incidence rates among post-menopausal women decreased considerably with striking changes in age-specific incidence rates before, during and after the peak in HRT prevalence.

Triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with a poor prognosis. Surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and referral for genetic counseling are the standard of care. We assessed TNBC prevalence, management, and outcome using data from the population‐based Geneva cancer registry. 2591 women had a first invasive stage I‐III breast cancer diagnosed between 2003 and 2011. We compared TNBC to other breast cancers (OBC) by χ 2‐test and logistic regression. Kaplan–Meier survival curves, up to 31‐12‐2014, were compared using log‐rank test. TNBC risk of mortality overall (OS) and for breast cancer (BCSS) was evaluated through Cox models. Linkage with the Oncogenetics and Cancer Prevention Unit (OCPU) database of the Geneva University Hospitals provided genetic counseling information. TNBC patients (n = 192, 7.4%) were younger, more often born in Africa or Central‐South America than OBC, had larger and more advanced tumors. 18% of TNBC patients did not receive chemotherapy. Thirty‐one (17%) TNBC women consulted the OCPU, 39% among those aged

Background Using data from the population-based Geneva Cancer Registry we evaluated the risk of invasive cervical cancer following carcinoma in situ (CIS) or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III according to type of treatment. Methods Included in the study were all women diagnosed with CIS/CIN III in Geneva (Switzerland) between 1970 to 2002 (n = 2658) and followed for invasive cervical cancer occurrence until 31st December 2008. We calculated age and period standardised incidence ratios (SIR) and multiadjusted hazard ratios (HR) of invasive cervical cancer by treatment groups. Results During follow-up, 17 women developed invasive cervical cancer, conferring a SIR of 5.1 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 3.0–8.1). The risk of cervical cancer was significantly increased until 10 years after diagnosis. The risk was highest for women ⩾50 years (SIR = 7.3, 95% CI: 2.7–15.8) and for women who did not undergo excisional treatment (SIR = 25, 95% CI: 12.0–46.0). The multiadjusted HR of invasive cervical cancer for women who did not undergo surgical excisional treatment was 9.4 (95% CI: 2.8–32.2) compared with women who did. Conclusion Women diagnosed with CIS/CIN III are at increased risk of developing invasive cervical cancer. This risk is particularly high for women who did not have excision of cervical lesions.

Population-based studies have shown a concordance of breast cancer survival among first-degree relatives (FDRs), suggesting a heritable component. Reasons for such heritability remain to be elucidated. We aimed to determine whether association of breast cancer survival among FDRs is linked to shared patient and tumor characteristics or type of treatment. At the population-based Geneva Breast Cancer Registry, we identified 162 FDR pairs diagnosed with breast cancer. We categorized FDRs into poor, medium and good familial survival risk groups according to breast cancer-specific survival of their proband (mother or sister). We compared patient, tumor and treatment characteristics between categories and calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and adjusted disease-specific mortality for each group. Breast cancer patients in the poor familial survival risk group were more likely to be diagnosed at later stages than those in the good familial survival risk group. Similarly, they had higher SMRs than those in the medium and good survival risk groups (18.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.4-33.5 vs. 16.5, 95% CI: 7.5-31.3 and 9.4, 95% CI: 3.4-20.4, respectively). After adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics and type of treatment, women in the poor familial survival risk group were almost five times more likely to die of breast cancer than those in the good familial survival risk group (adjusted hazard ratio 4.8, 95% CI: 1.4-16.4). Our study shows that breast cancer prognosis clusters within families and suggests that the hereditary component is independent of patient and tumor characteristics and type of treatment.

Fondation Jean Dausset, Paris, France; Karolinska Institute, Stockolm, Sweden; Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland Introduction: Several studies have suggested that survival of breast cancer is inherited, but none has assessed if this observation is linked to shared tumor characteristics or type of treatment. We studied the association of survival among first-degree relatives (FDRs) with breast cancer, taking into account characteristics of patients, tumors and treatments. Methods: In the population-based Geneva Breast Cancer Registry, we identified 162 pairs of FDRs diagnosed with breast cancer. Based on the breast cancer specific survival status of their proband (i.e. the mother or older sister), we categorized FDRs into poor, medium and good familial survival risk groups. We compared patient, tumor and treatment characteristics between categories and calculated standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and adjusted disease specific mortality for each group. Results: Breast cancer patients in the poor familial survival risk group were more likely to be diagnosed at later stages than those in the good familial survival risk group. Similarly, they had higher SMRs than those in the medium and good survival risk groups (18.7, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 9.4-33.5 versus 16.5 95% CI: 7.6-31.4 and 9.4, 95% CI: 3.4-20.3, respectively). After adjustment for prognostic factors, women in the poor familial survival risk group were almost five times more likely to die of breast cancer than those in the good survival risk group (adjusted Hazard Ratio 4.8, 95% CI: 1.4-16.4). Conclusion: This study shows that breast cancer prognosis clusters within families, and suggests that the hereditary component is independent of patient, tumor characteristics and type of treatment. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-09-06.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the characteristics of young women with endometrial carcinoma, and evaluate those potentially eligible for conservative therapy. METHODS: We identified women diagnosed with endometrial cancer between 1970 and 2005 at the population-based Geneva Cancer Registry (n=1365). We classified patients into two age groups (< or =45 and >45 years old). Differences in demographic, tumor, diagnostic and treatment characteristics were tested with chi square. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate survival from endometrial cancer and the log-rank test to analyze differences in survival between the two groups. RESULTS: The young group comprised 44 (3.2%) women and the old group 1321 (96.8%) women. Synchronous ovarian malignancies were found in six patients (14%) in the young group, compared with 23 (2%) in the old group (P

In this population-based study, we evaluated the impact of obesity on presentation, diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer. Among all women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer in the canton Geneva (Switzerland) between 2003 and 2005, we identified those with information on body mass index (BMI) and categorized them into normal/underweight (BMI or =- or =30 kg/m(2)) women. Using multivariate logistic regression, we compared tumour, diagnosis and treatment characteristics between groups. Obese women presented significantly more often with stage III-IV disease (adjusted odds ratio [OR(adj)]: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.0-3.3). Tumours > or =1 cm and pN2-N3 lymph nodes were significantly more often impalpable in obese than in normal/underweight patients (OR(adj) 2.4, [1.1-5.3] and OR(adj) 5.1, [1.0-25.4], respectively). Obese women were less likely to have undergone ultrasound (OR(adj) 0.5, [0.3-0.9]) and MRI (OR(adj) 0.3, [0.1-0.6]) and were at increased risk of prolonged hospital stay (OR(adj) 4.7, [2.0-10.9]). This study finds important diagnostic and therapeutic differences between obese and lean women, which may impair survival of obese women with breast cancer. Specific strategies are needed to optimize the care of obese women with or at risk of breast cancer.

Purpose In the current pTNM classification system, nodal status of breast cancer is based on the number of involved lymph nodes and does not account for the total number of lymph nodes removed. In this study, we assessed the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR; ie, ratio of positive over excised lymph nodes) as compared with pN staging and determined its optimal cutoff points. Patients and Methods From the Geneva Cancer Registry, we identified all women diagnosed with node-positive breast cancer between 1980 and 2004 (n = 1,829). The prognostic value of LNRs was calculated for values ranging from 0.05 to 0.95 by Cox regression analysis and validated by bootstrapping. Based on maximum likelihood, we identified cutoff points classifying women into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk LNR groups. Results Optimal cutoff points classified patients into low- (≤ 0.20), intermediate- (> 0.20 and ≤ 0.65), and high-risk (> 0.65) LNR groups, corresponding to 10-year disease-specific survival rates of 75%, 63%, and 40%, and adjusted mortality risks of 1 (reference), 1.78 (95% CI, 1.46 to 2.18), and 3.21 (95% CI, 2.54 to 4.06), respectively. In contrast to LNR risk categories, survival curves of pN2 and pN3 crossed after 15 years, and their adjusted mortality risks showed overlapping CIs: 2.07 (95% CI, 1.69 to 2.53) and 2.84 (95% CI, 2.23 to 3.61), respectively. Conclusion LNR predicts survival after breast cancer more accurately than pN classification and should be considered as an alternative to pN staging.

The effect of age on breast cancer survival is still a matter of controversy. Breast cancer in young women is thought to be more aggressive and to have worse prognosis but results from clinical research have been neither consistent nor definitive. In this study, we have assessed the impact of young age at diagnosis on tumor characteristics, treatment and survival of breast cancer. The study included 82 very young (or = 35 years), 790 young (36-49), and 2125 older (50-69) women recorded between 1990 and 2001 at the Geneva Cancer Registry. Very young and young patients had more often stage II cancers (P = 0.009), poorly differentiated (P0.001) and estrogen receptor negative (P0.001) tumors. They were also more likely to receive chemotherapy (P0.001) and less likely to receive hormonal therapy (P0.001). Specific five-year survival was not different in the three groups (91%, 90%, and 89% for very young, young and older, respectively). When adjusting for all prognostic variables, age was not significantly related to mortality from breast cancer with a hazard ratio of 0.8 (95% CI: 0.3-2.0) for very young and 1.1 (95% CI: 0.8-1.4) for young patients compared to older women. Tumor stage, differentiation, estrogen receptor status, surgery, and radiotherapy were all independent determinants of breast cancer prognosis. We conclude that age is not an independent prognostic factor when accounting for breast tumor characteristics and treatment.

This study was undertaken to assess the incidence of 1) metachronous colorectal cancer and 2) subsequent extracolonic cancers, in relation to the location (proximal or distal to the splenic flexure) of the first primary colorectal tumor. In this population-based study, a cancer registry database was used to identify patients diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma between 1970 and 1999. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and those with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome were excluded from the study, as were patients with nonepithelial tumors. Location of the first tumor was established according to International Classification of Diseases-Oncology-02 classification. The registry covers a population of 500,000 residents. A total of 5,006 patients had sporadic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum during this period of time, with 1,703 first primary tumors (34 percent) being located proximal to the splenic flexure. One hundred twenty occurrences of second primary colorectal cancer were observed in this population (2.39 percent). The risk for developing a second incidence of primary colorectal cancer was higher in patients whose initial tumor was located in the proximal colon (3.4 percent vs. 1.8 percent; odds ratio, 1.92; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.33–2.77; P < 0.001). The risk for each segment of the large bowel was as follows: cecum, 3.4 percent; right colon, 3 percent; transverse colon, 3.8 percent; left colon, 2.8 percent; sigmoid colon, 1.7 percent; and rectum, 1.8 percent. By contrast, the risk for developing a second, extracolonic tumor did not differ between patients with proximal and distal tumors (13.7 percent vs. 13.4 percent, P = 0.73). Patients with a first tumor located within the proximal colon are at twice the risk for developing metachronous colorectal cancer. From an epidemiologic standpoint, these data are in accordance with 1) the increasing incidence and 2) the better prognosis of proximal colon cancer in various populations. Our results confirm that proximal colon cancer is a distinct entity, which justifies the reporting of cases of colon cancer according to their location proximal or distal to the splenic flexure.

Background: The objective of this population-based study was to assess patient, physician and tumour determinants associated with positive surgical margins after prostatectomy, and to assess the effects of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer-specific survival. Methods: We included 1’254 prostate cancer patients recorded at the Geneva Cancer Registry who had radical prostatectomy during 1990–2008. To assess factors associated with positive margins, we used logistic regression. We assessed the effects of positive margins on prostate cancer-specific survival by Cox proportional hazard models accounting for numerous other prognostics factors including prostate and tumour volume, the total percentage of tumour, radiotherapy, surgical approach and surgeon’s caseload. Results: Among men undergoing prostatectomy, 479 (38%) had positive margins. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, period, clinical- and pathological T stage, Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score and percentage of tumour in the prostate were significantly associated to positive margins. Ten-year prostate cancer-specific survival was 96.6% for the negative margins group and 92.0% for the positive margins group (log rank p = 0.008). In the Cox survival analysis adjusted for tumour characteristics, surgical margin status per se was not an independent prognostic factor while age, pathological T, PSA level and Gleason score remained associated with prostate cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: More aggressive tumour characteristics were strong determinants for positive margins. Furthermore, surgical margin status per se was not an independent prognostic factor for prostate cancer-specific survival after adjusting by the gravity of the disease in the multivariate analysis.

Background In this population-based study, we investigated the degree of concordance between Gleason scores obtained from prostate biopsies and those obtained from prostatectomy specimens, as well as the determinants of biopsy understaging. Methods We considered for this study all 371 prostate cancer patients recorded at the Geneva Cancer Registry diagnosed from 2004 to 2006 who underwent a radical prostatectomy. We used the kappa statistic to evaluate the Gleason score concordance from biopsy and prostatectomy specimens. Logistic regression was used to determine the parameters that predict the undergrading of the Gleason score in prostate biopsies. Results The kappa statistic between biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason score was 0.42 (p

Increased risk of secondary melanoma after breast cancer has been reported. Several lines of evidence suggest that elevated estrogen levels may be implicated in melanoma etiology. Accordingly, use of antiestrogens should be associated with decreased risk of melanoma. We compared melanoma incidence among a cohort of breast cancer patients with and without antiestrogen therapy, with data from the Geneva Cancer Registry. The cohort consisted of 7,360 women diagnosed with breast cancer between 1980 and 2005. About 54% of these patients received antiestrogens. All women were followed until December 2008. We compared cutaneous melanoma incidence rates among patients with and without antiestrogens with those expected in the general population by age and period standardized incidence ratios (SIR). A total of 34 women developed a melanoma during the follow-up period. Compared with the general population, the risk of melanoma was higher for patients who did not receive antiestrogens (SIR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.08–2.12, P = 0.02). On the contrary, the risk was close to 1 (SIR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.40–1.56, P = 0.57) for patients who received antiestrogen therapy. This study suggests that antiestrogen therapy modifies the risk of melanoma after breast cancer. Although our results are in agreement with the hypothesis that estrogens could play a role in melanoma occurrence, they need to be replicated in a larger study with data on potential confounders. Cancer Prev Res; 5(1); 82–88. ©2011 AACR.

Background The prognostic value of lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is not straightforward. We evaluated whether lymph node involvement is associated with overall survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and whether Lymph Node Ratio (LNR – ratio of the positive to excised axillary lymph nodes) is a superior prognosticator when compared to ypN status (according to the pTNM classification). Methods Three hundred and fourteen patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy in Geneva, Singapore or Kuala Lumpur were pooled for analysis. We evaluate the prognostic value of the LNR [zero, low (>0 and 0.65)] and ypN staging [ypN0, ypN1, ypN2 and ypN3] with multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results When using the LNR classification, 88 patients were categorised as zero, 91 as low, 82 as intermediate and 53 as high risk. For classic ypN staging, 88 were ypN0, 126 ypN1, 58 ypN2 and 42 ypN3. Compared to the low risk category, LNR zero corresponded to an adjusted hazard ratio [HRadj] of 0.4 (95%CI, 0.2–0.9), intermediate risk LNR to a HRadj of 1.2 (0.7–2.2) and high risk LNR to a HRadj of 2.7 (1.5–5.0). Similarly, the ypN0 category corresponded to a HRadj of 0.3 (0.2–0.7), ypN2 to a HRadj 1.1 (0.6–2.0) and ypN3 to a HRadj 2.2 (1.3–3.8) compared to ypN1 patients. Conclusion Lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts overall survival. In patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, LNR does not seem to be superior to classic ypN staging.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy of the left breast is associated with higher cardiovascular mortality linked to cardiotoxic effect of irradiation. Radiotherapy of inner quadrants can be associated with greater heart irradiation, but no study has evaluated the effect of inner-quadrant irradiation on cardiovascular mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 1245 women, the majority with breast-conserving surgery, irradiated for primary node-negative breast cancer from 1980 to 2004 registered at the Geneva Cancer Registry. We compared breast cancer-specific and cardiovascular mortality between inner-quadrant (n = 393) versus outer-quadrant tumors (n = 852) by multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 7.7 years, 28 women died of cardiovascular disease and 91 of breast cancer. Patients with inner-quadrant tumors had a more than doubled risk of cardiovascular mortality compared with patients with outer-quadrant tumors (adjusted hazard ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval 1.1-5.4). Risk was particularly increased in the period with higher boost irradiation. Patients with left-sided breast cancer had no excess of cardiovascular mortality compared with patients with right-sided tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy of inner-quadrant breast cancer is associated with an important increase of cardiovascular mortality, a possible result of higher irradiation of the heart. For patients with inner-quadrant tumors, the heart should be radioprotected.

BACKGROUND: Tamoxifen has a remarkable impact on the outcome of oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Without proven benefits, tamoxifen is occasionally prescribed for women with ER-negative disease. This population-based study aims to estimate the impact of tamoxifen on the outcome of ER-negative disease. METHODS: We identified all women (n = 528) diagnosed with ER-negative invasive breast cancer between 1995 and 2005. With Cox regression analysis, we calculated breast cancer mortality risks of patients treated with tamoxifen compared with those treated without tamoxifen. We adjusted these risks for the individual probabilities (propensity scores) of having received tamoxifen. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (13%) with ER-negative disease were treated with tamoxifen. Five-year disease-specific survival for women treated with versus without tamoxifen were 62% [95% confidence interval (CI) 48% to 76%] and 79% (95% CI 75% to 83%), respectively (P(Log-rank) < 0.001). For ER-negative patients, risk of death from breast cancer was significantly increased in those treated with tamoxifen compared with patients treated without tamoxifen (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.9, P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Our results show that patients with ER-negative breast cancer treated with tamoxifen have an increased risk of death from their disease. Tamoxifen use should be avoided for these patients.

Introduction: This population-based study aims to assess prognosis of prostate cancer diagnosed with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels

We evaluated the impact of a family history of breast/ovarian cancer on the risk of secondary leukemia following breast cancer. At the Geneva cancer registry, we identified 4,397 patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1990 and 2004. Patients were followed up for leukemia until the end of 2005. Family history was categorized as positive in patients with >or=1 first- or second-degree relative with breast/ovarian cancer. We compared leukemia rates in patients with positive and negative family histories with those expected in the general population, generating standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). With Cox regression analysis, we calculated adjusted risks of secondary leukemia in patients with familial risks compared to those without it. Breast cancer patients had a significantly increased risk of secondary acute leukemia (SIR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.2-6.9) but not of chronic leukemia (SIR 1.6, 95% CI: 0.6-3.5). Among patients with a positive family history (n = 1.125, 25.6%), the SIRs were 5.7 (95% CI: 1.2-16.6) for acute and 5.2 (95% CI: 1.4-13.3) for chronic leukemia. Among breast cancer patients, family history was independently associated with leukemia [adjusted hazard ratio (HR(adj)) of 3.2, 95% CI: 1.1-9.2, among patient with vs. without family history]. The effect of family history was stronger for chronic leukemia (HR(adj): 11.6, 95% CI 1.3-104.7) than for acute leukemia (HR(adj) 1.6, 95% CI: 0.4-6.6). Breast cancer patients with a family history of breast/ovarian have an increased risk of secondary leukemia, both compared to the general population as well as to breast cancer patients without family histories. This excess risk is largely due to the increased risk of secondary chronic leukemia.

Using data from the Geneva Cancer Registry, we found that in 2002–2004, breast cancer incidence in women aged 25–39 years increased by 46.7% per year (95% CI: 7.1–74.0, P=0.015), which surveillance or detection bias may not fully explain.

Purpose Surgery of the primary tumor usually is not advised for patients with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis because the disease is considered incurable. In this population-based study, we evaluate the impact of local surgery on survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis. Methods We included all 300 metastatic breast cancer patients recorded at the Geneva Cancer Registry between 1977 and 1996. We compared mortality risks from breast cancer between patients who had surgery of the primary breast tumor to those who had not and adjusted these risks for other prognostic factors. Results Women who had complete excision of the primary breast tumor with negative surgical margins had a 40% reduced risk of death as a result of breast cancer (multiadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4 to 1.0) compared with women who did not have surgery (P = .049). This mortality reduction was not significantly different among patients with different sites of metastasis, but in the stratified analysis the effect was particularly evident for women with bone metastasis only (HR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.4; P = .001). Survival of women who had surgery with positive surgical margins was not different from that of women who did not have surgery. Conclusion Complete surgical excision of the primary tumor improves survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer at diagnosis, particularly among women with only bone metastases.

Objective : To evaluate treatment patterns of vulvar cancer in patients over 80 years. Material and Methods : Between 1979 and 1999, the Geneva Tumor Registry identified 230 women with vulvar cancer. Treatment of patients over 80 years and younger were compared. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to determine disease specific cumulative survival. Results : Young women are more likely to present in situ lesions compared to their older counterparts. Majority of vulvar cancers were observed in women ⩾80 ( p 0.001 ) at more advanced stages. Elderly women have either no treatment, either unconventional or inadequate treatments. The Mantel-Haentzel analysis shows a 23.4 OR (IC (95%) 2.9–186.6) of not being treated if the patient is over 80. Specific 5-years survival was 93% in stage I, compared to 21% in stage IV. Conclusion : Patients over 80 years are diagnosed at more advanced stages. Less aggressive treatments decrease outcome.

Purpose: No consensus exists on therapy of elderly cancer patients. Treatments are influenced by unclear standards and are usually less aggressive. This study aims to evaluate determinants and effect of treatment choice on breast cancer prognosis among elderly patients. Patients and Methods: We reviewed clinical files of 407 breast cancer patients aged ≥ 80 years recorded at the Geneva Cancer Registry between 1989 and 1999. Patient and tumor characteristics, general health status, comorbidity, treatment, and cause of death were considered. We evaluated determinants of treatment by logistic regression and effect of treatment on mortality by Cox model, accounting for prognostic factors. Results: Age was independently linked to the type of treatment. Overall, 12% of women (n = 48) had no treatment, 32% (n = 132) received tamoxifen only, 7% (n = 28) had breast-conserving surgery only, 33% (n = 133) had mastectomy, 14% (n = 57) had breast-conserving surgery plus adjuvant therapy, and 2% (n = 9) received miscellaneous treatments. Five-year specific breast cancer survival was 46%, 51%, 82%, and 90% for women with no treatment, tamoxifen alone, mastectomy, and breast-conserving surgery plus adjuvant treatment, respectively. Compared with the nontreated group, the adjusted hazard ratio of breast cancer mortality was 0.4 (95% CI, 0.2 to 0.7) for tamoxifen alone, 0.4 (95% CI, 0.1 to 1.4) for breast-conserving surgery alone, 0.2 (95% CI, 0.1 to 0.7) for mastectomy, and 0.1 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.4) for breast-conserving surgery plus adjuvant treatment. Conclusion: Half of elderly patients with breast cancer are undertreated, with strongly decreased specific survival as a consequence. Treatments need to be adapted to the patient’s health status, but also should offer the best chance of cure.

Background: Increasing incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) confronts patients and clinicians with optimal treatment decisions. This multidisciplinary study investigates therapeutic modalities of DCIS in daily practice and provides recommendations on how to increase quality of care. Patients and methods: All women (n = 116) with unilateral DCIS recorded in the Geneva Cancer Registry from 1995 to 1999 were considered. Information concerned patient and tumor characteristics, treatment and outcome. Factors linked to therapy were determined using a case-control approach. Cases were women with treatment of interest and controls other women on the study. Results: Most DCIS cases (62%) were discovered by mammography screening. Ninety (78%) women had breast-conserving surgery (BCS), 18 (16%) mastectomy and seven (6%) bilateral mastectomy. Eight (7%) patients had tumor-positive margins, 18 (16%) lymph node dissection and two (1.7%) chemotherapy. Twenty-five per cent of women with BCS had no radiotherapy, three had radiotherapy after mastectomy. Less than 50% underwent breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Method of discovery, multifocality, tumor localization, size and differentiation were linked to the use of BCS or lymph node dissection. Conclusions: Because of important disparities in DCIS management, recommendations are made to increase quality of care, in particular to prevent axillary dissection or bilateral mastectomy and to increase the use of radiotherapy after BCS

Background: Radiation therapy of left breast has been associated with higher cardiovascular (CV) mortality due to higher cardiotoxicity. Because tumor location can also influence heart exposure, it could influence CV mortality linked to radiotherapy. This study aims to assess CV mortality in irradiated patients according to breast cancer laterality and location. Methods: From a population-based cancer registry, we identified all women who had been irradiated for a first primary node-negative breast cancer between 1980 and 2004. We compared CV mortality between patients with cancer in the inner quadrants (n=393) versus outer quadrant (n=852) by log-rank test and by Cox regression accounting for the main prognostic factors. For all patients who die from CV, we collected and compared data on radiotherapy type and dose according to quadrant and laterality by chi-square of heterogeneity. Results: The mean follow-up was 7.7 years. Out of 1,245 patients, 28 died because of CV disease. Patients with inner tumor had amore than doubled risk for CV mortality compared with patients with outer tumor (multi-adjusted Hazard Ratio: 2.3, 95%CI: 1.1–5.1, p=0.034). Patients with breast-conserving therapy for inner cancer who die from CV received higher dose to the breast (p=0.032) but similar internal mammary chain irradiation than those with outer quadrant. Breast laterality had no effect on CV mortality. Conclusions: This study reports a strong excess of CV mortality among patients irradiated for inner breast cancer probably linked to site of the boost and higher radiation exposure of the heart.