Search

The article discusses a study on granulomatous skin reactions in tattoos associated with BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy for metastatic melanoma. The study identified three cases of granulomatous reactions in tattoos among patients receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitors for melanoma treatment. The reactions occurred months after starting therapy, mainly in black tattoos, and were managed with topical corticosteroids or oral antibiotics. The study emphasizes the importance of counseling patients with tattoos about the potential risk of such reactions during targeted therapy for melanoma. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Neutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis (NEH) is a benign neutrophilic dermatosis not well recognized beyond an association with malignancy. Although the disease is commonly reported in adults with malignancy, this association is uncommon in children. The diagnosis of NEH is predominantly based on histologic findings to exclude alternative diagnoses for adults, but biopsy is not usually required for children. Methods: A retrospective study was performed of adult and pediatric patients diagnosed with NEH at three Mayo Clinic sites from January 1, 1992, to January 1, 2022. The aim of this study was to elucidate risk factors for NEH and its clinical characteristics, treatment options, and natural course. Clinical information and pathologic results were collected from health records. Available pathologic slides were reviewed with a dermatopathologist. Results: Of 47 patients identified, 33 had either histologic or clinical confirmation of the diagnosis; 21 were adults (64%), and 12 were children (36%). Most adults (16/21; 76%) had underlying malignancy and received chemotherapy. Five adults (24%) were classified as having idiopathic NEH, and they were younger and had higher NEH recurrence rates than the other adults. Only one pediatric patient (8%) had underlying malignancy. For 10 children (83%), NEH was preceded by strenuous activity. Initial findings of idiopathic NEH were palmoplantar eruptions for both adult and pediatric patients, whereas malignancy‐associated NEH commonly involved the face and axillae. Conclusions: Among adults, NEH is commonly associated with malignancy and chemotherapy. Among children, idiopathic NEH occurs primarily after overexertion, and malignancy is highly unlikely to be the cause of NEH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Infantile perianal pyramidal protrusion (IPPP) is a rare benign skin condition that is typically seen in infant girls. This condition is often mistaken for other skin lesions such as acrochordons, condyloma acuminatum, and sequelae of sexual abuse. Many clinicians are unfamiliar with IPPP which can lead to aggressive workup and treatment. The purpose of this study was to elucidate demographic data, clinical features, diagnostic workup, and management of IPPP in a large cohort of patients seen at an academic medical center. Methods: A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with IPPP at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN was conducted. Demographic data, examination findings, diagnostic workup, and treatments were noted. Results: Twenty-seven patients with IPPP, 24 of which were girls and 3 were boys from the ages of 1 day to 4 years (mean 10.8 months, median 8.6 months) were identified. Symptoms were reported in 63% (17/27) of patients. Four patients received treatment with topical corticosteroid or local anesthetic. No patient underwent skin biopsy. Conclusion: IPPP is commonly observed in healthy prepubertal girls. Constipation is a common symptom. Awareness of this entity may prevent overtreatment and unnecessary evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Methods Results Conclusions Perianal draining tunnels in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) and perianal fistulizing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) present diagnostic and management dilemmas.We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with perianal disease evaluated at Mayo Clinic from January 1, 1998, through July 31, 2021. Patients' demographic and clinical data were extracted, and 28 clinical features were collected. After experimenting with several machine learning techniques, random forests were used to select the 15 most important clinical features to construct the diagnostic prediction model to distinguish perianal HS from fistulizing perianal IBD.A total of 263 patients were included (98 with HS, 100 with IBD, and 65 with both IBD and HS). Patients with HS had a higher mean body mass index, a higher smoking rate, and more commonly showed cutaneous manifestations of tunnels and comedones, while fistulas, abscesses, induration, anal tags, ulcers, and anal fissures were more common in patients with IBD. In addition to having lesions in the perianal area, patients with IBD often had lesions in the buttocks and perineum, while those with HS had additional lesions in the axillae and groin. Among the statistically significant features, the 15 most important were identified by random forest: fistula, tunnel, digestive symptom, knife‐cut ulcer, perineum, body mass index, age, axilla, abscess, tags, smoking, groin, genital cutaneous edema, erythema, and bilateral/unilateral.The results of this study may help differentiate perianal lesions, especially perineal HS and fistulizing perineal IBD, and provide promise for a better therapeutic outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]