Search

Context: While in-person workshops on serious illness communication skills using VitalTalk pedagogy have been shown to have a long-lasting impact, whether changing the format into virtual would maintain its enduring impact is unknown. Objectives. To examine long-term impacts of a virtual VitalTalk communication workshop. Methods: Physicians in Japan who participated in our virtual VitalTalk workshop were asked to complete a self-assessment survey at 3 time points: before, immediately after, and 2 months after the workshop. We examined self-reported preparedness in 11 communication skills on a 5-point Likert scale at 3 time points, as well as self-reported frequency of practice on 5 communication skills at the pre- and 2-month time points. Results: Between January 2021 and June 2022, 117 physicians from 73 institutions across Japan completed our workshop. Seventy-four participants returned the survey at all the 3 time points. Their skill preparedness significantly improved upon the completion of the workshop in all 11 skills (P <.001 for all items). The improvement remained at the same level at 2 months in 7 skills. In 4 of the 11 skills, there was further improvement at the 2-month point. The frequency of self-directed skill practice also increased significantly in the 2-month survey for all 5 skills. Conclusion: A virtual workshop of VitalTalk pedagogy improved self-reported preparedness of communication skills, and the impact was long-lasting in a non-U.S. setting as it likely induced self-practice of skills. Our findings encourage the use of a virtual format in any geographical location considering its enduring impact and easy accessibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Responding to emotions is a key feature of U.S.-based serious illness communication skills training, VitalTalk®, of which trained actors portraying seriously ill patients is a component. The cultural appropriateness and perceived utility of the actors' emotional expressions remain to be empirically evaluated outside of the U.S. Objectives: To determine the cultural appropriateness and educational utility of VitalTalk® actors' emotional expressions, as perceived by clinicians. Methods: From January 2021-April 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional study of physicians in Japan attending virtual VitalTalk® training in Japanese, each session focusing on: responding to emotions (#1) and discussing goals of care (#2), respectively. We examined their perceived authenticity and utility of the actively and passively intense emotional expressions portrayed by actors in VitalTalk® role-plays. Results: Physicians (N = 100, 94% response rate) from across Japan voluntarily attended two-session workshops and completed post-session surveys. Eighty-eight participants (88%) responded that both actively and passively intense emotions portrayed by the actors provided useful learning experiences. For session #1, the participants found actively intense emotional expressions to be more clinically authentic, compared to passively intense ones (4.21 vs 4.06 out of a 5-point Likert scale, P P =.02). For session #2, no such difference was observed (4.16 vs 4.08 of a 5-point Likert scale, P =.24). Conclusions: Even in a culture where patients may express emotions passively, any intense and authentic emotional expressions by actors can be perceived as facilitating learning. Most participants perceived both the Name, Understand, Respect, Support, and Explore '(NURSE)' statements and Reframe, Expect emotion, Map out patient goals Align with goals and Propose a plan '(REMAP)' frameworks as useful in routine clinical practice in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]