Search

Tubercular uveitis (TBU) is an inflammation/infection of the eye secondary to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. The difficulty in making the diagnosis has resulted in variable prevalence and clinical response rates. We aimed to determine the global prevalence of TBU in uveitis patients stratified by TB high-burden countries (HBCs) and non-HBCs and by geographic regions and the clinical response of TBU to antitubercular treatment We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of TBU studies published in PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE, up to June 30, 2020. A random effects model was used for all meta-analyses. Of 5,018 articles identified, 70 prevalence studies (65,607 uveitis and 3,166 TBU cases) and 18 clinical outcome studies (1,570 TBU cases; 1,304 responded to anti-tubercular therapy [ATT]) were analyzed. The overall weighted prevalence of TBU was 4.0% (95% CI, 3–5); in TB HBCs it was 7.0% (95% CI, 5–11), non-HBCs 3.0% (95% CI, 2–4), and sub-Saharan Africa 11.0% (95% CI, 8–15). The overall weighted clinical response was 82.0% (95% CI, 75–89). Despite the difficulty in diagnosing TBU, the prevalence is expectantly higher in HBCs, and sub-Saharan Africa and the clinical outcome is poor. Standardization of diagnostic criteria and ATT is warranted in future cohort studies.

PURPOSE: To compare botulinum neurotoxin (BNT) injections to surgery as first-line therapy in large-angle essential infantile esotropia (IE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children between the ages 6 months and 6 years with IE of ≥40 prism dioptres (PD) were randomised to either a maximum of three BNT injections or surgical intervention of bimedial rectus muscle recession for angles ≤60 PD and augmented with BNT injection in angles >60 PD. Time taken for each procedure was documented. Orthophoria or misalignment of ≤10 PD was regarded as a complete response (CR). Follow-up visits were done at 3, 6, 12 and 24 weeks. RESULTS: Mean (SD) age and baseline angle of esotropia were 26.9 (14.5) months and 61.9 PD (12.8), respectively, for the overall cohort. The proportion of children who achieved CR was significantly higher in the surgery arm compared to the BNT injection arm (OR = 4.01, 95% CI 1.74–9.22) but the time taken was six times longer (p 24 months achieved CR. In children with esotropia ≤60 PD, CR was achieved in 50% while those with esotropia >60 PD CR was achieved in 25%. CONCLUSION: Surgery remains the gold standard for treatment of esotropia but BNT injection is a safe and effective alternative in children ≤24 m and with smaller angles of esotropia ≤60 PD in resource-limited centres.

ObjectivesTo assess neurological sequelae and growth in the first 12 months of life in a cohort of congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) infected infants compared to cCMV uninfected infants.Study designThis was a prospective matched cohort study conducted in Soweto, South Africa where forty-six confirmed cCMV cases were matched on HIV-exposure, gender and gestational age (±two weeks) to 84 cCMV-uninfected controls in a 1:2 ratio. Cases and controls were followed up until 12 months of age to assess anthropometry, hearing and neurodevelopmental outcomes.ResultsThirty-four (73.9%) cCMV cases and 74 (88.1%) controls, completed all assessments at 12 months age. At 12 months, one cCMV case had died, none of the children in either group had SNHL and neurodevelopmental delay was present in a similar percentage of cCMV cases (n = 2; 6%) and controls (n = 1, 4%; OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.04-27.84, p = 0.958). Anthropometry did not differ between cases and controls overall throughout the follow up period. HIV-exposed cases had smaller head circumference for age at 6 and 12 months when compared with HIV-exposed controls.ConclusionBy 12 months of age, there was no evidence of a difference in neurological sequelae between cCMV infected South African children and cCMV uninfected children in this study. Further follow-up is warranted to detect late-onset hearing loss and neurodevelopmental delay beyond 12 months of age.

BackgroundThe travel distance from home to a treatment centre, which may impact the stage at diagnosis, has not been investigated for retinoblastoma, the most common childhood eye cancer. We aimed to investigate the travel burden and its impact on clinical presentation in a large sample of patients with retinoblastoma from Africa and Europe.MethodsA cross-sectional analysis including 518 treatment-naïve patients with retinoblastoma residing in 40 European countries and 1024 treatment-naïve patients with retinoblastoma residing in 43 African countries.ResultsCapture rate was 42.2% of expected patients from Africa and 108.8% from Europe. African patients were older (95% CI −12.4 to −5.4, pConclusionsFewer than half the expected number of patients with retinoblastoma presented to African referral centres in 2017, suggesting poor awareness or other barriers to access. Despite the relatively shorter distance travelled by African patients, they presented with later-stage disease. Health education about retinoblastoma is needed for carers and health workers in Africa in order to increase capture rate and promote early referral.

ObjectiveTo compare the cost implications of botulinum neurotoxin (BNT) injection to surgery in infantile esotropia (IE) in a public/government funded hospital.Methods and analysisA simple costing comparison was undertaken for a randomised clinical trial in IE. Patients were randomised to receive either BNT or standard surgery. The participants in the BNT arm were further subdivided into subgroups based on their age in months and degree of esotropia in prism dioptres (PD) at presentation: G1 ≤60 PD/24 months, G2 ≤24 months/>60 PD, G3 >24 months/≤60 PD, G4 >24 months/>60 PD. The costs were calculated for each arm from primary treatment to eventual satisfactory outcome defined as orthophoria or microtropia (≤10 PD). A bottom-up costing analysis was done for single and multiple procedures for each arm. Comprehensive variable costs as well as fixed costs were calculated at each point of intervention and expressed in local currency ZAR (US$1=ZAR15.00). Costing was analysed for surgery and BNT subgroups (based on clinical success)ResultsThere were 101 patients enrolled in the trial. 54 in the BNT arm and 47 in the surgery arm. Cost for single surgery and single BNT was ZAR 7743.04 and 1713.14, respectively. A favourable clinical outcome was achieved in 72% of surgery arm and 37% of BNT arm. The mean cost for eventual favourable outcome in BNT arm was ZAR9158.08 and in surgery arm ZAR9124.27 (p=0.26). Mean cost in G1 was ZAR6328.45, in G2 ZAR7197.45, in G3 ZAR11891.93 and G4 ZAR12882.44 (p=0.018).ConclusionBNT has a cost–benefit in IE and is a viable option in the primary treatment of IE in resource constrained regions. Clinical outcomes and economic benefit in smaller angle of esotropia and younger patients are comparable to surgery.

Aim: This paper presents a 20-year review of retinoblastoma in Johannesburg, South Africa, aiming to better characterize the disease in this sub-Saharan setting. Methods: The study represents a retrospective case series of retinoblastoma patients presenting to Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital and Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 2011. Results: The total number of cases identified was 282, with 245 meeting the study inclusion criteria. Retinoblastoma comprised 6.9% of the total pediatric oncology presentations; 65.3% were unilateral, 34.3% bilateral, and 0.4% trilateral. The overall male-to-female ratio was 1.08. The mean age at presentation overall was 32.6 months (median 28.0), in the unilateral group 39.4 months (median 33.0), and in the bilateral group 19.7 months (median 17.0). The mean delay to presentation overall was 7.0 months (median 4.0). The most frequent presenting symptoms were leukocoria (37.1%) and proptosis (34.7%). The distribution of disease stages at presentation (International Retinoblastoma Staging System) was 1.6% stage 0, 24.1% stage I, 27.8% stage II, 16.3% stage III, and 25.3% stage IV. 26.5% defaulted care. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival estimate was 57.7% overall. Conclusion: This study shows that delayed presentation and refusal of therapy remains a significant barrier to effective treatment in this African setting.

Background: Diabetic retinopathy is the most common cause of visual loss affecting the economically productive age group globally. Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) results from leakage of fluid into the retinal interstitial space. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs are the first line treatment for DMO. Since monthly injections are required, this treatment regimen can prove very costly. Of the anti-VEGF drugs, bevacizumab is the most cost-effective. The pro re nata (PRN) method is the current standard of care. However, the treat and extend (T and E) regimen can potentially decrease the patient burden on hospitals. Thus far, no randomised clinical trials have been performed using Bevacizumab in a treat and extend versus pro re nata regimen.Methods: A prospective randomised non-inferiority clinical trial testing bevacizumab (1.25 mg) in a treat and extend method versus the pro re nata method is being conducted. Patients will be randomised using a simple computer-based randomised algorithm. The primary outcome is non-inferiority within a five-letter margin for the T and E regimen versus the PRN regimen.Conclusions: This study aims to inform a key area in the literature on the treatment of DMO, i.e. whether a T and E regimen is non-inferior to a PRN regimen in the treatment of DMO with bevacizumab, which is the only anti VEGF available in resource poor settings. It is motivated by the cost involved in the treatment of DMO as well as the treatment burden on both the patient and the health institution at which the patient is receiving treatment.Trial registration: The trial has been registered on the Pan-African clinical trials registry (PACTR202001624880-753).

Background. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a vasoproliferative disease affecting premature babies and a major cause of blindness in childhood. Appropriate screening and treatment can prevent blindness. Objective. To report on the efficacy of using antivascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) as first-line therapy in ROP. Methods. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with ROP treated at St John Eye Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa, over a 3-year period. Outcome measures were the clinical response to intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) as well as the economic impact of IVB therapy. Results. Twenty-three patients were treated for active ROP or type 1 disease, in 44 eyes. Two patients required treatment in one eye only. The mean birth weight of these patients was 1 074 g (range 810 - 1 480). Response to treatment outcome was available for 22 patients (43 eyes). The mean follow-up period was 9 months (range 1 - 18). Forty-one eyes (95.3%) showed complete regression or non-progression of the disease. Two eyes (one eye each in two patients) progressed to advanced disease. There were no short-term adverse events. A cost-effective model showed that IVB treatment was much more economical than laser therapy. Conclusion. IVB is a safe and effective first-line treatment for ROP and should be considered in resource-limited centres.