1. Very Long-term Outcome after Linear vs. Electrogram-guided Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis
- Author
-
Yamashita S, Sato H, Ikewaki H, Tanigawa S, Yokoyama K, Narui R, Kato M, Mahida S, Tokuda M, Isogai R, Yokoyama M, Sugimoto K, Oseto H, Yamane T, Yoshimura M, and Tokutake K
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Text mining ,business.industry ,Internal medicine ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Propensity score matching ,Persistent atrial fibrillation ,Cardiology ,Medicine ,business ,Ablation ,Outcome (game theory) ,Term (time) - Abstract
The optimal ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) remains to be defined. We sought to compare very long-term outcomes between linear ablation and electrogram (EGM)-guided ablation for PsAF. In a retrospective analysis, long-term arrhythmia-free survival compared between two propensity-score matched cohorts, one with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and linear ablation including roof/mitral isthmus line (LINE-group, n = 52) and one with PVI and EGM-guided ablation (EGM-group; n = 52). Overall, 99% of patients underwent successful PVI. Complete block following linear ablation was achieved for 94% of roof lines and 81% of mitral lines (both lines blocked in 75%). AF termination by EGM-guided ablation was accomplished in 40% of patients. Non-PV foci were targeted in 7 (13%) in the LINE-group and 5 (10%) patients in the EGM-group (p = 0.76). During 100 ± 28 months of follow-up, linear ablation was associated with superior arrhythmia-free survival after the initial and last procedure (1.8 ± 0.9 procedures) compared with EGM-group (Logrank test: P = 0.0001 and P = 0.045, respectively). In multivariable analysis, longer AF duration and EGM-guided ablation remained as independent predictors of AAs recurrence. Linear ablation might be a more effective complementary technique to PVI than EGM-guided ablation for PsAF ablation.
- Published
- 2021