Search

Survival in patients who have Ewing sarcoma is correlated with postchemotherapy response (tumor necrosis). This treatment response has been categorized as the response rate, similar to what has been used in osteosarcoma. There is controversy regarding whether this is appropriate or whether it should be a dichotomy of complete versus incomplete response, given how important a complete response is for in overall survival of patients with Ewing sarcoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact that the amount of chemotherapy-induced necrosis has on (1) overall survival, (2) local recurrence-free survival, (3) metastasis-free survival, and (4) event-free survival in patients with Ewing sarcoma.In total, 427 patients who had Ewing sarcoma or tumors in the Ewing sarcoma family and received treatment with preoperative chemotherapy and surgery at 10 international institutions were included. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analyses were used to assess the associations between tumor necrosis and all four outcomes while controlling for clinical factors identified in bivariate analysis, including age, tumor volume, location, surgical margins, metastatic disease at presentation, and preoperative radiotherapy.Patients who had a complete (100%) tumor response to chemotherapy had increased overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% CI, 0.14-0.48; p .01), recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.82; p = .01), metastasis-free survival (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.15-0.46; p ≤ .01), and event-free survival (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.16-0.41; p ≤ .01) compared with patients who had a partial (0%-99%) response.Complete tumor necrosis should be the index parameter to grade response to treatment as satisfactory in patients with Ewing sarcoma. Any viable tumor in these patients after neoadjuvant treatment should be of oncologic concern. These findings can affect the design of new clinical trials and the risk-stratified application of conventional or novel treatments.

We reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients treated for alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) and analyzed the effect of surgery for patients presenting with and without metastatic disease (DM).The SEER Registry was queried for patients with ASPS from 1973-2012. The Kaplan-Meier estimate and Cox proportional hazards were used to analyze survival outcomes and risk variables.Among 251 patients, 43% had DM and 67% locoregional disease (LR) on presentation. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for all patients was 56% (82% and 27% for LR and DM, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03 per year, P 0.001), tumor size10 cm (HR = 2.76, P = 0.013), DM at diagnosis (HR = 3.79, P 0.001), and truncal primary site (HR = 1.63, P = 0.035) as independent factors predicting worse OS. For LR patients, surgery plus radiotherapy (RT) resulted in better OS compared to surgery alone P = 0.014. For DM patients, primary site surgery significantly improved survival (P 0.001).ASPS presents with high metastasis rate but has a relatively indolent clinical course and a favorable prognosis with prolonged survival. Aggressive treatment using adjuvant RT with surgery is indicated in patients with LR disease and surgery is indicated in patients presenting with DM. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:581-586. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.