Search

Background: Despite the global use of trastuzumab biosimilars, concerns remain regarding their efficacy and safety. In particular, when used concurrently with pertuzumab, trastuzumab biosimilars lack extensive real-world data and safety information. Additionally, as cancer drug expenditures continue to rise worldwide, cost savings from biosimilars have become increasingly important., Objective: This study aims to assess the safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of trastuzumab originators and their biosimilars in real-world clinical settings, focusing on a large patient population., Methods: The analysis included 31,661 patients with HER2-positive breast cancer from the Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. database in Japan. Additionally, adverse event reports for the trastuzumab originator and its biosimilars were obtained for 58,799 patients from the World Health Organization's VigiBase, the global adverse event reporting database., Results: No significant differences were observed in heart failure hospitalizations, liver dysfunction, or infusion reaction rates in both the Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. database and the World Health Organization's VigiBase. In the Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. database, the addition of pertuzumab did not significantly influence the incidence of adverse events, and the use of biosimilars significantly reduced medical costs, with no significant difference in breast cancer recurrence rates., Conclusions: By analyzing two large and diverse datasets from multiple perspectives, we obtained reliable results that the trastuzumab originator and its biosimilars have similar safety profiles. The concurrent use of pertuzumab was also found to be safe. The use of biosimilars can lead to cost savings. These findings provide crucial insights for the evaluation and adoption of biosimilars in clinical practice., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The increasing incidence and prevalence of breast cancer alongside diagnostic and treatment technology advances have produced a debate about the financial burden cancer places on the healthcare system and concerns about access., Methods: This study was conducted at 51 hospitals belonging to the Breast Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group using a web-based survey. The survey period conducted from July 2021 to June 2022. The study population included patients with metastatic breast cancer who received the related treatment as their first-line therapy. The proportion of patients who selected that regimen as their first-line treatment was tabulated. The total cost increase for each current standard therapy in comparison to conventional treatments was calculated., Results: A total of 702 patients (pts) were surveyed. Of those enrolled, 342 (48.7%) received high-cost treatment [estimated monthly drug costs exceeding ~500 000 Japanese Yen (JPY)]. Of these, 16 pts (4.7%) were receiving very high-cost treatment, amounting to more than 1 000 000 JPY per month. Fifty three (15.5%) of the patients who received high-cost treatment were 75 years of age or older. Of these, 1 pt (0.3%) were receiving very high-cost treatment. Analyses of incremental costs by current drugs showed that abemaciclib was costly with total additional cost of 6 365 670 JPY per patient. The total additional cost of the regimen per patient that included palbociclib was the second highest at 4011248 JPY, followed by atezolizumab at 3209033 JPY., Conclusions: The findings indicate that evaluating the financial implications of high-cost treatments requires considering not only drug prices but also analysis of total cost increase., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Objective: Primary angiosarcoma of the breast (PBA) is an extremely rare and heterogeneous disease. PBA is difficult to diagnose and has a poor prognosis. In order to better understand the disease and provide evidence-based treatment for PBA patients, a review of the published literature in the English language was conducted., Methods: A literature review in agreement with the PRISMA protocol was conducted. Medline and Cochrane databases were searched for English articles on PBA patients in September 2023 with a predetermined strategy. The articles were categorized and assessed based on hierarchical levels of scientific evidence., Key Content and Findings: A total of 255 articles were identified, among these 137 publications which included 1,888 patients met the criteria for inclusion in the final analysis. No prospective, randomized trials exclusive to PBA have been recognized. This article provides an overview of the most current and comprehensive evidence concerning the epidemiology, etiology, genomic features, clinical presentations, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of PBA., Conclusions: Despite the fact that current evidence is largely derived from retrospective studies, database analyses, and case reports, we utilized this information to tackle important clinical questions concerning optimal patient management practices for PBA. Complete surgical excision continues to be the mainstay treatment for PBA. However, the effectiveness of adjuvant therapies is still unclear. This narrative review highlights the urgent need for more rigorously designed research to enhance the management and treatment strategies for PBA.

Abemaciclib (ABM) is recommended for adjuvant endocrine therapy in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative early breast cancer (EBC) patients at high risk of recurrence. Here, we present a case of radiation hepatitis challenging to differentiate from drug-induced liver injury during ABM treatment. The patient, a woman in her 40 s, underwent right mastectomy, axillary dissection, and postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for EBC. Subsequently, she received ABM as adjuvant endocrine therapy. Despite suspending ABM due to Grade 3 leukopenia, she developed Grade 3 hepatic dysfunction upon cessation. Based on the dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography, we diagnosed the cause of liver dysfunction as radiation hepatitis. Spontaneous improvement allowed us to resume ABM treatment. Clinicians may need to consider radiation hepatitis as a potential cause of hepatic dysfunction in patients who underwent PMRT, along with drug-induced liver injury., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japan Society of Clinical Oncology 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.)

Background: Eribulin prolongs overall survival (OS) of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), particularly in later chemotherapy (ChT) treatment. However, the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and efficacy of first or second-line therapy in eribulin-treated patients remain unknown. Using eribulin in the first- or second-line may demonstrate the non-inferiority of HRQoL compared to S-1, an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative, while maintaining OS., Methods: This randomised, controlled, open-label, phase III trial was conducted at 50 hospitals in Japan. Patients were enrolled from June 2016 and October 2019. Patients with HER2-negative MBC once under or no previous ChT were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive eribulin or S-1. HRQoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) every six weeks until week 24 and every nine weeks until week 42. The primary endpoint was the deterioration defined as more than 10 points worsening of the general health score of QLQ-C30 or death within one year after randomisation. The secondary endpoints included OS. (Trial ID: UMIN000021398)., Findings: Three hundred and two patients were enrolled, with 152 and 148 assigned to the eribulin and S-1 groups, respectively. The questionnaire compliance rate was 85.6%. Risk difference of global health status deterioration through one year was -0.66% (95% CI: -12.47-11.16; non-inferiority P = 0.077) for eribulin compared to S-1 groups. Median time to first deterioration for global health status score was 5.64 (95% CI: 3.51-8.00) and 5.28 months (95% CI: 3.28-7.80) in the eribulin and S-1 groups, respectively. The median OS was 34.7 and 27.8 months, (HR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.96; P = 0.026); the median progression-free survival was 7.57 and 6.75 months in the eribulin and S-1 groups, (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.67-1.16; P = 0.35), respectively. No new adverse events occurred., Interpretation: The time of the first clinical deterioration was similar between the two groups and OS significantly increased in eribulin-treated patients., Funding: This study was funded by CSPOR-BC and Eisai CO., Ltd., Competing Interests: KK, TI, KSh, SO, MKi, YT and TA report no coflicts of interest. MT reports honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, MSD and Pfizer. YK reports honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Pfizer and Taiho. NT reports grant and honoraria from Eisai. TY reports honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Chugai, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Kirin, MSD and Pfizer. JW reports grant from Eisai and honoraria from Eisai and Taiho. MKa reports honoraria from Eli Lilly and Pfizer. KW reports honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Kyowa Kirin, Novartis, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Shionogi and Taiho. KSa reports honoraria from Eisai and Taiho. HM reports honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho and Takeda., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Background: Mastectomy has been the standard surgical treatment for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Recently, there has been growing interest in repeat breast-conserving surgery (rBCS) for IBTR among breast surgeons; however, there is currently little information regarding patient preferences for surgical procedure for IBTR. The purpose of this study was to evaluate preference for surgical procedure (mastectomy vs. rBCS) among breast cancer patients who had undergone salvage surgery for IBTR., Methods: Overall, 100 breast cancer patients who had undergone salvage surgery for IBTR were asked about their preferred surgical methods for IBTR and the reason. The association of patient preference and the reasons related to various clinical and pathological factors were assessed., Results: Of the 100 respondents, only 11 patients (11%) preferred rBCS. Patients who had undergone rBCS and radiotherapy for IBTR were significantly more likely to prefer to undergo rBCS than other groups (p = 0.030). The most frequent reason for choosing rBCS was the patient's desire to minimize breast deformity and surgical wounds., Conclusions: Our study revealed that there is a low rate of patients who opt to undergo rBCS among patients who had undergone salvage surgery for IBTR. Discrepancies in perceptions regarding the surgical procedure for IBTR between patients and their surgeons may exist., (© 2024. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Aim: Patients with cancer experience various forms of psychological distress, including depressive symptoms, which can impact quality of life, elevate morbidity risk, and increase medical costs. Psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy are effective for reducing depressive symptoms among patients with cancer, but most patients prefer psychotherapy. This study aimed to develop an efficient and effective smartphone psychotherapy component to address depressive symptom., Methods: This was a decentralized, parallel-group, multicenter, open, individually randomized, fully factorial trial. Patients aged ≥20 years with cancer were randomized by the presence/absence of three cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) skills (behavioral activation [BA], assertiveness training [AT], and problem-solving [PS]) on a smartphone app. All participants received psychoeducation (PE). The primary outcome was change in the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) total score between baseline and week 8. Secondary outcomes included anxiety., Results: In total, 359 participants were randomized. Primary outcome data at week 8 were obtained for 355 participants (99%). The week 8 PHQ-9 total score was significantly reduced from baseline for all participants by -1.41 points (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.89, -0.92), but between-group differences in change scores were not significant (BA: -0.04, 95% CI -0.75, 0.67; AT: -0.16, 95% CI -0.87, 0.55; PS: -0.19, 95% CI -0.90, 0.52)., Conclusion: As the presence of any of the three intervention components did not contribute to a significant additive reduction of depressive symptoms, we cannot make evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of specific smartphone psychotherapy., (© 2024 The Authors. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology.)

Purpose: This study addresses the critical issue of fertility preservation among young patients with cancer in Japan, recognizing the brief decision-making window and the need for comprehensive support. Pharmacists, well-versed in the side effects of anticancer drugs, can play a vital role in this support process. However, the extent of pharmacists' involvement in fertility preservation remains unclear. We aimed to investigate pharmacists' roles in addressing cancer treatment-induced fertility concerns and their collaboration with physicians, offering insights into enhancing pharmacist participation in fertility preservation. Methods: A survey conducted between April and July 2022 targeted doctors and pharmacists at cancer treatment hospitals, along with pharmacists affiliated with the Japanese Society of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences. Results: Our findings indicated that although pharmacists had limited knowledge about gonadotoxicity and fertility, they expressed readiness to conduct research and provide information when consulted. Approximately 10%-20% of the pharmacists participated in explaining the primary disease at diagnosis. Pharmacists played a more prominent role after establishing chemotherapy regimens, with less involvement in its formulation. Notably, treatment decision case conferences emerged as crucial forums for gathering patient data, confirming treatment plans, and identifying those in need for fertility preservation information. Roughly half of the pharmacists attended these conferences, suggesting a need for increased participation. Conclusion: Enhancing physician-pharmacist collaboration could be pivotal for effective fertility preservation. This requires augmenting the knowledge and awareness of both professions and encouraging greater participation in case conferences to create a conducive environment for addressing this critical aspect of cancer care.

Objective: Gynecologic cancer chemotherapy impacts the quality of life (QOL) of patients, with lasting adverse events that may require treatment adjustments or discontinuation. Consequently, real-time symptom monitoring before outpatient visits has resulted in improved QOL for patients and extended survival times. This study investigated whether there are differences between electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PRO-CTCAE) and physician-assessed outcomes (NCI-CTCAE) evaluated in an outpatient setting in gynecologic cancer chemotherapy., Methods: The study was conducted on 50 patients who received their first chemotherapy treatment at St. Marianna University Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022. PRO-CTCAE and NCI-CTCAE were evaluated at each instance of chemotherapy and 2 weeks after. The PRO-CTCAE was additionally collected weekly using e-PRO., Results: The values for "Joint Pain," "Nausea," "Taste Disturbance," "Constipation," "Insomnia," "Fatigue," "Limb Edema," and "Concentration Impairment" were consistently higher in PRO-CTCAE than in NCI-CTCAE, indicating that physicians underestimated the severity of adverse events. In contrast, there was no significant difference in "Peripheral Neuropathy," demonstrating that physicians had a good understanding of this condition in patients. The weekly responses obtained from e-PRO revealed that symptom exacerbations peaked outside of clinic visits., Conclusions: This study demonstrated physicians tend to underestimate most adverse events. Moreover, the responses using e-PRO revealed peak symptom deterioration occurred outside of outpatient visits. This suggested that e-PRO and actions taken in response to them can improve patients' QOL., (© 2023 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.)