Search

Liver transplant (LT) patients with significant coronary artery disease (CAD) have poorer outcomes. Pre-LT coronary angiography (CA) is associated with significant complications in cirrhotic patients.This study aimed to identify predictors of abnormal CA in pre-LT cardiac assessment and to develop a predictive model to reduce unnecessary CA. From January 2006 to June 2013, 122 patients underwent CA based on the current institutional protocol.Forty-one (33.6%) patients had abnormal CA. Univariate analysis showed age ≥65 years (P = .001), cryptogenic cirrhosis (P = .046), cardiac comorbidities (P = .027), ischemic heart disease (IHD; P = .002), left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH; P = .004), hypertension (P = .002), diabetes mellitus (P = .017), dyslipidemia (P .001), metabolic syndrome (P = .003), ≥2 CAD risk factors (P = .001), and high Framingham risk score (hard CAD risk, P = .018; cardiovascular disease: lipids, P = .002; body mass index, P .001) to be significant predictors of abnormal CA. A predictive model was developed with the use of multivariable logistic regression and included diabetes, dyslipidemia, IHD, age ≥65 years, and LVH, achieving a specificity of 55.1% and sensitivity of 90.0%. This would reduce unnecessary CA by up to one-half in our study population (from 81 to 35) while maintaining a false negative rate of only 8.5%.Diabetes, dyslipidemia, IHD, age ≥65 years, and LVH appear to be predictors of abnormal CA in pre-LT patients. Our predictive model may help to better select patients for CA, although further validation is required.

Background Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a feasible option for periampullary tumours. However, it remains a complex procedure with no proven advantages over open PD (OPD). The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes between laparoscopic-assisted PD (LAPD) and OPD using a propensity score-matched analysis. Methods Retrospective review of 40 patients who underwent PD for periampullary tumours between January 2014 and December 2016 was conducted. The patients were matched 1:1 for age, gender, body mass index, Charlson comorbidty index, tumour size and haematological indices. Peri-operative outcomes were evaluated. Results LAPD appeared to have a longer median operative time as compared to OPD (LAPD, 425 min (285-597) versus OPD, 369 min (260-500)) (P = 0.066). Intra-operative blood loss was comparable between both groups. Respiratory complications were five times higher in the OPD group (LAPD, 5% versus OPD, 25%) (P = 0.077), while LAPD patients required less time to start ambulating post-operatively (LAPD, 2 days versus OPD, 2 days) (P = 0.021). Pancreas-specific complications and morbidity/mortality rates were similar. Conclusion LAPD is a safe alternative to OPD in a select group of patients for an institution starting out with minimally invasive PD, and can be used to bridge the learning curve required for total laparoscopic PD.

Background In adult right lobe living donor liver transplantation, the decision to include the middle hepatic vein (MHV) remains controversial. Methods A retrospective analysis of 50 R-LDLTs between January 2008 and June 2016 was performed. Results Twenty-one procedures were performed using a MHV+ graft (42.0%) and 29 procedures using a MHV- graft (58%). MHV- donors were taller (173 vs 166 cm, p = 0.004) with a larger standard liver volume (1351 vs 1245 mls, p = 0.014) compared to MHV+ donors. The duration of operation for donors was significantly longer in the MHV+ group (530 (313–975) mins) compared to the MHV- group (489 (336–708) mins) (p = 0.029). Similarly, the operative time for recipients was longer in the MHV+ group (660 (428–831) mins) compared to MHV- (579 (359–1214) mins) (p = 0.023). MHV- grafts were heavier compared to MHV+ grafts (918 vs 711 g, p = 0.017). Recipient mortality rates and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis were comparable (p = 0.411). All donors were well at last review. Conclusion Both MHV+ and MHV- grafts are safe for the donor and recipient. The decision to take the MHV should be based on specific donor-recipient characteristics.

Introduction: The revised Human Organ Transplant Act (HOTA) was implemented in Singapore in July 2004. We aim to evaluate expanding the potential donor pool for liver transplant in Singapore with the inclusion of marginal donors. Materials and Methods: All donor referrals between July 2004 and June 2007 were studied. All potential deceased liver donors were heart-beating. After being reviewed by the transplant coordinator, potential donors were assessed by a transplant hepatologist and a transplant surgeon for suitability of organ donation strictly based on the programme’s donor assessment protocol. Reasons for rejection as potential donors were documented. The clinical characteristics of all donor referrals were retrospectively reviewed, and an independent decision was made as to whether liver retrieval in each rejected case might have been possible. Results: Among the 128 potential donor referrals, 20 donors (15.6%) underwent liver retrieval. Of the 20 livers retrieved, 16 were implanted and 4 were not implanted (3 unfit recipients, and 1 donor liver with 40% steatosis). Another 10 donor livers were assessed intraoperatively and were rejected because of varying levels of steatosis. Of these livers assessed, 5 donor livers had steatosis 40%. Of the remaining potential donors, 45 were deemed not possible because of prolonged hypotension (9), on-going or unresolved sepsis (13), high-risk behaviour (4), non-actualisation (8), or pre-existing medical conditions (11). Another 53 donors may potentially have been suitable donors but were rejected because of possible sepsis (13), no suitable recipients (12), transient hypotension (10), transient abnormal liver function test (6), history of alcohol ingestion (5), non-actualisation because of consent (4) and other reasons (3). Overall, it was deemed that 61 donors (47.7%) might potentially have been suitable liver donors. Conclusions: Despite new legislation (HOTA) in Singapore, the utilisation of cadaveric donor livers showed no increase in the last 3 years. By expanding our donor criteria to include marginal donors, we could potentially increase the availability of deceased donor livers to meet our waiting list demands. Key words: Liver transplant, Marginal livers, New legislation, Opt-out scheme

Background: Acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) is traditionally known to occur in critically ill patients, following cardiac surgery, abdominal vascular surgery, severe trauma, burns, prolonged fasting, total parenteral nutrition, or sepsis, and is believed to have a worse prognosis as compared with acute cholecystitis associated with stones. Our observation of de novo presentation of AAC in several outpatients in the absence of critical illness or predisposing factors prompted us to undertake this study. The aims of the present study were to examine the prevalence of AAC patients in the outpatient setting in our hospital, to identify associated risk factors and to assess the clinical course and outcome of these patients. Patients and methods: All patients who had a cholecystectomy (laparoscopic or open surgery) for acute cholecystitis at National University Hospital from January 2001 to May 2005 were reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. The demographic characteristics, clinicopathologic features, operative parameters, postoperative course, and histopathology of the patients were reviewed. Results: Eleven of 133 patients with acute cholecystitis fulfilled the criteria for the diagnosis of AAC. Patients’ ages ranged from 30 to 69 years (mean 52.39 years). All these patients presented as outpatients. None of the patients had any critical illness predisposing to AAC. The mean age was slightly less in the AAC group as compared with the remaining patients with acute cholecystitis (52.39 years vs 55.22 years, p=0.54). There was male predominance in the AAC group (male:female = 9:2). The time from admission to surgery, operative procedure, operative time, and postoperative stay were not statistically different from the remaining patients with acute cholecystitis. Discussion: AAC can occur in young and middle-aged healthy individuals, the presentation is no different from acute calculous cholecystitis, the prognosis is good if diagnosed and treated early.

AIM: To compare the surgical outcomes between laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) as a curative treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A PubMed database search was performed systematically to identify comparative studies of LLR vs OLR for HCC from 2000 to 2014. An extensive text word search was conducted, using combinations of search headings such as “laparoscopy”, “hepatectomy”, and “hepatocellular carcinoma”. A comparative study was also performed in our institution where we analysed surgical outcomes of 152 patients who underwent liver resection between January 2005 to December 2012, of which 42 underwent laparoscopic or hand-assisted laparoscopic resection and 110 underwent open resection. RESULTS: Analysis of our own series and a review of 17 high-quality studies showed that LLR was superior to OLR in terms of short-term outcomes, as patients in the laparoscopic arm were found to have less intraoperative blood loss, less blood transfusions, and a shorter length of hospital stay. In our own series, both LLR and OLR groups were found to have similar overall survival (OS) rates, but disease-free survival (DFS) rates were higher in the laparoscopic arm. CONCLUSION: LLR is associated with better short-term outcomes compared to OLR as a curative treatment for HCC. Long-term oncologic outcomes with regards to OS and DFS rates were found to be comparable in both groups. LLR is hence a safe and viable option for curative resection of HCC.

To retrospectively compare the outcomes of percutaneously drained and laparoscopically drained liver abscesses. Eight-five consecutive patients with radiological evidence of liver abscess were treated at National University Hospital of Singapore from 2005 to 2011. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify failures of intervention. This was defined as persistent objective signs of sepsis. Complications, length of antibiotic therapy, and hospital stay were recorded but not used as indicators for failure of intervention. A propensity score analysis was used to adjust for possible confounders. Twenty-seven (40.3 %) patients in the percutaneous group did not respond to primary intervention compared to 2 patients (11.1 %) in the laparoscopic group (p = 0.020). Two patients within the percutaneous group died from progression of sepsis despite intervention. In the multivariate model with propensity score, laparoscopic drainage had a protective effect against failure compared to percutaneous drainage of liver abscess (odds ratio [OR], 0.03; 95 % confidence interval [CI], [0–0.4]; p = 0.008). There were no differences in complications related to the intervention (p = 0.108). Mean duration of antibiotics (p = 0.437) and hospital stay (p = 0.175) between the groups was similar. Laparoscopic drainage of cryptogenic liver abscesses should be considered as an option for drainage of liver abscess.

Laparoscopic liver surgery is gaining increasing acceptance worldwide, but its frontiers are constantly challenged. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) has been performed for various organs, but the feasibility of LESS hepatectomies has yet to be explored fully. From May 2010 to March 2011, seven patients underwent LESS minor hepatectomies. Patient demographic, operative, and clinical data were reviewed. Five left lateral sectionectomies, one segment 3, and one segment 5 resection were performed. The median operative time was 142 min (range, 104–171 min), and the median blood loss was 200 ml (range, 100–450 ml). The median hospital stay was 3 days (range, 1–11 days). For all the patients, the indications for surgery were suspected malignant tumors, and the surgical resection margins were clear for every patient. Laparoendoscopic single-site minor hepatectomy is a novel modification to traditional laparoscopic surgery. The method is safe and feasible without any compromise to oncologic safety for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal liver metastases that are peripheral and smaller than 5 cm in size.

Single port laparoscopic surgery is an emerging technique, now commonly used in cholecystectomy. The experience of using this technique in liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is described in a series of 3 cases with single port laparoscopic liver resection performed during 2010. All patients were male aged 61 to 70 years, with several comorbidities. There were no complications in this early series. The length of hospital stay was 3–5 days. The blood loss was 200–450 mL, with operating time between 142 and 171 minutes. We conclude that this technique is feasible and safe to perform in experienced centers.