1. Prognostic value of urokinase plasminogen activator in primary breast carcinoma: comparison of two immunoassay methods
- Author
-
Véronique Becette, Frédérique Spyratos, C Bouchet, K. Hacene, J. Oglobine, and L. Durcos
- Subjects
Adult ,Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pathology ,Mammary gland ,Breast Neoplasms ,Biology ,Disease-Free Survival ,Breast cancer ,Antigen ,Internal medicine ,Carcinoma ,medicine ,Humans ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,Immunoassay ,Univariate analysis ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Middle Aged ,Prognosis ,medicine.disease ,Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator ,Neoplasm Proteins ,Survival Rate ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Multivariate Analysis ,Female ,Breast carcinoma ,Plasminogen activator ,Research Article - Abstract
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is a potentially important prognostic factor in breast cancer for identifying patients at high risk of recurrence. This retrospective study assessed two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods measuring uPA antigen levels in 499 primary breast cancer cytosols. Both uPA methods were applied to cytosols used routinely for oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor assays. uPA was determined using a classical ELISA method (Imubind; American Diagnostica) and a novel automatic immunoluminometric assay (Lia; Sangtec Medical). The uPA Imubind method revealed about twice as much uPA antigen (median 0.75 ng mg(-1) protein) as the uPA Lia method (median 0.38 ng mg(-1) protein). The correlation coefficient between the two methods was acceptable (r = 0.81), but the two techniques are not interchangeable. Univariate analyses confirmed the poor outcome of patients whose tumours contained large amounts of uPA, regardless of the technique used. Multivariate analyses showed that uPA Imubind and uPA Lia values were both strong independent prognostic factors.
- Published
- 1998
- Full Text
- View/download PDF