1. Safety of systemic anti-cancer treatment in oncology patients with non-severe COVID-19: a cohort study
- Author
-
C. van Marcke, N. Honoré, A. van der Elst, S. Beyaert, F. Derouane, C. Dumont, F. Aboubakar Nana, J. F. Baurain, I. Borbath, P. Collard, F. Cornélis, A. De Cuyper, F. P. Duhoux, B. Filleul, R. Galot, M. Gizzi, F. Mazzeo, T. Pieters, E. Seront, I. Sinapi, M. Van den Eynde, N. Whenham, J. C. Yombi, A. Scohy, A. van Maanen, and J. P. Machiels
- Subjects
Systemic anti-cancer treatment ,Non-severe COVID-19 ,Ambulatory ,Safety ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,RC254-282 - Abstract
Abstract Background The viral pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disrupted cancer patient management around the world. Most reported data relate to incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe COVID-19. The safety of systemic anti-cancer therapy in oncology patients with non-severe COVID-19 is an important matter in daily practice. Methods ONCOSARS-1 was a single-center, academic observational study. Adult patients with solid tumors treated in the oncology day unit with systemic anti-cancer therapy during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium were prospectively included. All patients (n = 363) underwent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) serological testing after the first peak of the pandemic in Belgium. Additionally, 141 of these patients also had a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test during the pandemic. The main objective was to retrospectively determine the safety of systemic cancer treatment, measured by the rate of adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients compared with SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. Results Twenty-two (6%) of the 363 eligible patients were positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR and/or serology. Of these, three required transient oxygen supplementation, but none required admission to the intensive care unit. Hematotoxicity was the only adverse event more frequently observed in SARS-CoV-2 -positive patients than in SARS-CoV-2-negative patients: 73% vs 35% (P
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF