Search

Background Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is indicated as second-line treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic or unresectable locally advanced breast cancer, after progression on trastuzumab and a taxane-based chemotherapy. We wished to determine if the line of treatment in which T-DM1 is administered has an impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and in particular, if prior treatment with capecitabine/lapatinib or pertuzumab modifies PFS of further treatment with T-DM1. Patients and methods We performed a multicenter retrospective study in 3 Belgian institutions. We evaluated PFS with T-DM1 in patients treated for HER2 positive metastatic or locally advanced unresectable breast cancer between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2016. Results We included 51 patients. The median PFS was 9.01 months. The line of treatment in which T-DM1 (1st line, 2nd line, 3rd line or 4+ lines) was administered had no influence on PFS (hazard ratio 0.979, CI95: 0.835–1.143). There was no significant difference in PFS whether or not patients had received prior treatment with capecitabine/lapatinib (9.17 vs 5.56 months, p-value 0.875). But, patients who received pertuzumab before T-DM1 tended to exhibit a shorter PFS (3.55 months for T-DM1 after pertuzumab vs 9.50 months for T-DM1 without pretreatment with pertuzumab), even if this difference was not statistically significant (p-value 0.144). Conclusion Unlike with conventional chemotherapy, the line of treatment in which T-DM1 is administered does not influence PFS in our cohort of patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer.

Treatment of patients with cancer in hospitals or clinics is resource-intensive and imposes a burden on patients. ‘Flexible care’ is a term that can be used to describe treatment administered outside the oncology ward, oncological outpatient clinic or office-based oncologist setting. Programmes that reduce travel burden by bringing cancer treatment to the patient's home, workplace or closer to the patient's home, in the form of satellite clinics or mobile cancer units, expand treatment capacity and are well received. Clinical trial data show that, compared with intravenous administration, subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of trastuzumab is preferred by patients with breast cancer (BC), saves healthcare professionals' (HCPs) time, reduces drug preparation and administration time and reduces direct and indirect costs. As such, s.c. trastuzumab is well suited to flexible care. The results of a Belgian study (BELIS) show that home administration of s.c. trastuzumab is feasible and preferred by patients with BC. Numerous programmes and pilot studies in Europe show that s.c. trastuzumab can be administered effectively in the patient's home, in primary care settings or local hospitals. Such programmes require planning, training, careful patient selection and technology to link patients, caregivers and specialists in oncology clinics. Once these elements are in place, flexible care offers patients with BC a choice of how treatment may be delivered and lead to improved quality of life, while reducing pressure on HCPs and hospitals. The concept of flexible care is particularly relevant amid the COVID-19 pandemic where guidelines have been developed encouraging remote care., SCOPUS: re.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Background: TAK-228 is an investigational, oral and highly selective ATP-competitive inhibitor of TORC1/2. Targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway with the dual TORC1/2 inhibitor TAK-228 may restore sensitivity to endocrine therapies in patients (pts) with breast cancer who have progressed on the combination of an endocrine agent plus a TORC1 inhibitor. Here we report data from the phase 2 portion of a phase 1b/2 study of TAK-228 plus exemestane (E) or fulvestrant (F). Methods: Postmenopausal women with ER+ and HER2-, inoperable or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) following everolimus (EVE) plus E or F after progression, received oral TAK-228 (4 mg QD) plus E (25 mg QD) or F (500 mg monthly) for 28-day cycles until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity (NCT02049957). Pts were enrolled into parallel cohorts based on prior response to EVE plus E or F and were given the same prior therapy (E or F) at their established dose: EVE-sensitive, defined as disease progression after complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or ≥6 mos stable disease (SD); or EVE-resistant, defined as disease progression without a CR or PR, or after Results: From Oct 2015 to Dec 2017, 94 pts were enrolled. Median age was 58 y (range 32–83). At baseline, most pts (67%) had stage IV disease and others were stage IA–IIIC (24%), other (3%) or unknown (5%); 94% of EVE-sensitive (93% E vs 100% F) and 88% of EVE-resistant pts (91% E vs 75% F) had received ≥4 prior lines of therapy. Pts received a median of 3 cycles (1–15) of TAK-228. At data cutoff (24 Apr 2018), 98% of pts had discontinued treatment, mainly due to PD (76%) or adverse events (AEs; 14%). CBR-16 was 41% (n=21) in EVE-sensitive and 26% (n=11) in EVE-resistant pts (table). CBR-24 was 24% in EVE-sensitive (19% E vs 50% F) and 23% in EVE-resistant (23% E vs 25% F) pts. Eleven of 21 pts who achieved CBR-16 also achieved CBR-24 (6 SD, 5 PR) in the EVE-sensitive cohort and 8 of 11 pts in the EVE-resistant cohort (6 SD, 2 PR). The ORR was 12% in EVE-sensitive pts and 9% in EVE-resistant pts (table). Median PFS (95% CI) was 4.1 mos (2.2–5.5) and 3.4 mos (1.9–5.4), and median OS (95% CI) was 15.9 mos (14.1–19.5) and 14.0 mos (13.0–16.0) in the EVE-sensitive and -resistant cohorts, respectively. Drug-related any grade and grade ≥3 AEs were seen in 90% and 29% of pts, respectively. Most common drug-related any grade AEs were nausea (50%), fatigue (38%), hyperglycemia and diarrhea (each 29%); 22% of pts reported a serious AE. No deaths were reported. Treatment is ongoing in two pts. Conclusion: TAK-228 plus E or F showed modest clinical benefit in pts with previously treated, EVE-sensitive or -resistant MBC, with an acceptable safety profile. EVE-sensitive (N=51)EVE-resistant (N=43) TAK-228+TAK-228+Best response, n (%)E (n=43)F (n=8)E (n=35)F (n=8)ORR=CR+PR4 (9)2 (25)3 (9)1 (13)CR001 (3)0PR4 (9)2 (25)2 (6)1 (13)CBR-1617 (40)4 (50)9 (26)2 (25) Citation Format: Diamond JR, Potter D, Salkeni M, Silverman P, Haddad T, Forget F, Awada A, Canon J-L, Danso M, Lortholary A, Bourgeois H, Tan-Chiu E, Patel C, Neuwirth R, Leonard EJ, Lim B. Phase 2 safety and efficacy results of TAK-228 in combination with exemestane or fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with ER-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer previously treated with everolimus [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-09.

Background Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is a monoclonal antibody targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) receptors, conjugated with a cytotoxic component (a microtubule inhibitor). It is indicated as second-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic or unresectable locally advanced breast cancer, after progression on trastuzumab and a taxane-based chemotherapy. In HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, progression-free survival (PFS) declines with each line of therapy, while patients with HER2-positive disease receive the most lines of chemotherapy and the longest duration for every line. We wished to investigate whether the line of treatment in which T-DM1 is administered has an impact on PFS. We also wished to explore whether prior treatment with capecitabine / lapatinib or pertuzumab had an impact on PFS, as none of the patients included in the registration trial had received these treatments before their inclusion in the trial. Methods This is a multicenter retrospective study performed in 3 Belgian institutions. All patients received T-DM1 for HER2 positive metastatic or unresectable locally advanced breast cancer. The primary outcome was PFS with T-DM1, defined as the period between the first administration of T-DM1 and the first radiological or clinical assessment demonstrating progression of the disease. Results We included 51 patients. One patient had to be excluded from the analyses because she no longer had HER positive disease. The median PFS was 9.01 months. The line of treatment in which T-DM1 was administered had no influence on PFS (hazard ratio 0.976, CI95 0.835-1.142). There was no statistically significant difference in PFS between patients who had not received capecitabine / lapatinib before T-DM1 and those who had (9.11 vs 8.91 months, p-value 0.466). Median PFS was 10.07 months when T-DM1 was administered prior to pertuzumab, and 5 months when administered after pertuzumab. Patients who received pertuzumab before T-DM1 thus tended to exhibit a shorter PFS. However, this difference is not statistically significant (p-value 0.096). Conclusions Unlike with conventional chemotherapy, the line of treatment in which T-DM1 is administered does not influence PFS in metastatic breast cancer patients. Citation Format: Duhoux FP, Dufour V, van Maanen A, Berliere M, Taylor D, Canon J-L. Impact of the line of treatment on progression-free survival in patients treated with T-DM1 for metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-17-32.

Background Palbociclib is a CDK4/6 inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy and safety in combination with endocrine therapy in advanced luminal breast cancer (LBC). We evaluated the respective efficacy and safety of chemotherapy and letrozole–palbociclib (LETPAL) combination as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with high-risk LBC. Patients and methods NeoPAL (UCBG10/4, NCT02400567) is a randomised, parallel, non-comparative phase II study. Patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, Prosigna®-defined luminal B, or luminal A and node-positive, stage II–III breast cancer, not candidate for breast-conserving surgery, were randomly assigned to either letrozole (2.5 mg daily) and palbociclib (125 mg daily, 3 weeks/4) during 19 weeks, or to FEC100 (5FU 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2)×3 21-day courses followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2×3 21-day courses. Primary end point was residual cancer burden (RCB 0–I rate). Secondary end points included clinical response, proliferation-based markers, and safety. Results Overall, 106 patients were randomised [median Prosigna® ROR Score 71 (22–93)]. RCB 0–I was observed in four and eight patients in LETPAL [7.7% (95% CI 0.4–14.9)] and chemotherapy [15.7% (95% CI 5.7–25.7)] arms, respectively. Pathological complete response rates were 3.8% and 5.9%. Clinical response (75%) and breast-conserving surgery rates (69%) were similar in both arms. Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index 0 scores (breast cancer-specific survival) were observed in 17.6% and 8.0% of patients in LETPAL and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Safety profile was as expected, with 2 versus 17 serious adverse events (including 11 grade 4 serious AEs in the chemotherapy arm). Conclusion LETPAL combination was associated with poor pathological response but encouraging clinical and biomarker responses in Prosigna®-defined high-risk LBC. Contemporary chemotherapy regimen was associated with poor pathological and biomarker responses, with a much less favourable safety profile. LETPAL combination might represent an alternative to chemotherapy in early high-risk LBC. Clinical Trial Number NCT02400567.

Purpose:Incidence of LRs in patients (pts) treated for HR+ HER2- localized BC and distribution overtime have not been described in recent years after introduction of new generation of adjuvant therapies and more extensive use of radiotherapy. We evaluated the incidence and distribution overtime of LRs in pts with HR+ HER2- N+ BCs who entered PACS 01 and PACS04 trials. Patients and Methods: Data were analyzed from 2909 pts with HR+/HER2- BC out of 5008 included in both trials. Pts underwent mastectomy or lumpectomy plus axillary dissection for a localized N+ BC and, according to study design, were randomized to: 6 cycles of FE100C (standard arm) versus FE100C x 3 cycles followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2 x 3 cycles (FEC-D) (PACS01) or 6 cycles of Epirubicin 75mg/m2 and Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (ED75)(PACS04). Loco-regional radiotherapy was mandatory after lumpectomy and recommended in other cases. All pts received 5 years of hormone therapy (HT). A competing risk multivariate analysis was conduct using Fine and Gray model to identify risk factors associated to isolated LRs. Competing events were nodal recurrence, contralateral BC, distant metastasis and death. Cumulative incidence associated to each event was estimated by a Kablfleish-Prentice estimator. Results: Pts' median age was 50 (22-65); 67.2% underwent lumpectomy, 32.8% mastectomy; 67.6% had 1 to 3 N+, 32.4% more than 3 N+; 45.7% had lymphovascular invasion; 49.5% received FE100C, 35.8% ET75, 14.7% had FEC-D; while radiotherapy was given to 97.3% and HT to 92.2%, of whom 90.5% received tamoxifen. At a median follow-up of 9.1 years, 60 pts (2.1%) experienced LR as first event. The 5-year and 10-year cumulative incidence of LRs were 1.04% and 2.53%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of LRs increased from the 5th year, and the annual risk tended to remain constant over time. Multivariate analysis of competing risk showed that younger age, conservative surgery and omission of HT (not prescribed or non-adherence) were independently associated with risk of developing LRs. Table 1. Multivariate analysis on competing risk of predictors of LRsVariablesHR 95%CIP valueAge at entry ( 20mm, ≤20 mm0.68 [0.37; 1.24]0.203N+ >3, 1-31.73 [0.99; 3.02]0.055Grade II/III, I1.06 [0.50; 2.24]0.885PR+,PR-1.78 [0.70; 4.53]0.223Type of chemotherapy 3FEC-3D, 6FEC/6ET1.32 [0.65; 2.69]0.446Number of cycles 6, Conclusion: Our analysis showed that incidence of LRs in pts with HR+ N+ BCs treated within PACS trials were considerably lower as compared to earlier studies. These findings may reflect differences in treatment era, as the more extensive use of radiotherapy and new generation of adjuvant chemotherapy. Despite current adjuvant strategies, young age at diagnosis and omission of HT remain independent risk factors of LRs. Citation Format: Pistilli B, Filleron T, Mazouni C, Zingarello A, Lacroix-Triki M, Rivera S, Coudert B, Serin D, Canon J-L, Campone M, Bachelot T, Goncalves A, Levy C, Cottu P, Petit T, Eymard J-C, Tunon De Lara C, Roché H, Roca L, Lemonnier J, Delaloge S. Overtime distribution and predictors of local recurrences (LRs) in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR+) and node positive (N+) breast cancers (BCs): 10 -year follow-up analysis of UNICANCER-PACS 01 and PACS04 trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-07.

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Background Microsatellite-stable metastatic colorectal cancer is typically unresponsive to immunotherapy. This phase 3 study was designed to assess atezolizumab plus cobimetinib in metastatic colorectal cancer. Here, we report the comparison of atezolizumab plus cobimetinib or atezolizumab monotherapy versus regorafenib in the third-line setting. Methods IMblaze 370 is a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial, done at 73 academic medical centres and community oncology practices in 11 countries. Patients aged at least 18 years with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1, and disease progression on or intolerance to at least two previous systemic chemotherapy regimens were enrolled. We used permuted-block randomisation (block size four) to assign patients (2:1:1) via an interactive voice and web response system to atezolizumab (840 mg intravenously every 2 weeks) plus cobimetinib (60 mg orally once daily for days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle), atezolizumab monotherapy (1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks), or regorafenib (160 mg orally once daily for days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle). Stratification factors were extended RAS status (wild-type vs mutant) and time since diagnosis of first metastasis (

Background Patients (pts) with RM SCCHN progressing after platinum have a median overall survival (OS) of 7-8 months with nivolumab or pembrolizumab. No other drug has shown meaningful activity in this setting. HLA-E is a non-classical MHC molecule that is highly expressed in 70% of SCCHN. By binding to the NKG2A receptor expressed on NK cells and T-lymphocytes, HLA-E inhibits their cytotoxic function. Monalizumab (mona) is a human IgG4 antibody targeting the NKG2A receptor. Methods The UPSTREAM trial is a biomarker-driven umbrella trial of several targeted therapies and immunotherapy for RM SCCHN (post platinum, ECOG 0-1, measurable disease). The immunotherapy 1 (I1) cohort was a phase II, single arm, proof-of-concept substudy evaluating the efficacy of single agent mona. Non-eligible pts for the biomarker-driven cohorts were included in the I1 cohort. Mona was given as an infusion (10 mg/kg) on day 1 of each cycle (14 days). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (RECISTv1.1) during the first 16 weeks. A two-stage Simon design was used (H1 15%, H0 3%, α 8%, power 90%) with planned interruption of accrual if no response was seen after 25 pts. Secondary endpoints included toxicity (CTCAEv4.03), progression-free survival (PFS), response duration and OS. Results 27 RM SCCHN pts were included in the 1st stage (median age: 62 yrs, oral cavity (26%), oropharynx (41%), hypopharynx (26%), larynx (7%)). 16 (59%) were pretreated with anti-PD(-L)1 compounds. No objective response was recorded. Stable disease was observed in 6 pts (22%). Disease progression was recorded in all but one patient and the median PFS was 7.4 wks (95% CI: 6.6-7.9 wks). Based on 16/27 deaths currently recorded, median OS was 27.7 wks (95% CI: 13-53.9 wks). Mona showed a favorable safety profile: 59% pts reported grade >/= 3 adverse events, none of them treatment-related. The final results of these preliminary data will be presented at ESMO. Conclusions The substudy of mona in monotherapy did not meet its primary objective and was closed at interim for futility. Median PFS was 7.4 wks. Mona has a favorable safety profile and is under investigation in combination with durvalumab within the UPSTREAM trial. Clinical trial identification NCT03088059. Legal entity responsible for the study EORTC. Funding EORTC, Innate Pharma. Disclosure R. Galot: Advisory / Consultancy: Innate Pharma; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Amgen; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas. C. Le Tourneau: Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck-Serono; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Nanobiotix. C. Even: Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck Serono; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Innate Pharma. L.F. Licitra: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): EISAI; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck-Serono; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Debiopharm; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sobi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, For teaching in medical meetings: Incyte Biosciences Italy srl; Advisory / Consultancy: Doxa Pharma; Honoraria (self), For public speaking in medical meetings: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: Nanobiotics; Advisory / Consultancy: GSK; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Exelixis; Research grant / Funding (institution): IRX Therapeutics; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer. M. Kaminsky-Forrett: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: EMD Serono. J. Machiels: Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Innate Pharma; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck Serono; Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Honoraria (institution), Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy, Data safety monitoring board with honoraria: Debio; Advisory / Consultancy, Data safety monitoring board with honoraria: Nanobiotix; Non-remunerated activity/ies, investigator and study coordinator: EORTC. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background: Genetic predisposition to docetaxel (Doc) toxicity contributes to unacceptable toxicity and reduced dose intensity, and may influence disease outcomes. We previously reported variants associated with Doc toxicity in candidate gene single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associations in a breast cancer treatment setting (Damaraju et al. Eur J Cancer (suppl); Vol 8 (7), page 175, 2010) and the identified variants were confirmed in an independent validation study (Damaraju et al, J Clin Oncol Vol 33, Issue 15 suppl, 2015: 540). Others have reported candidate SNP (Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2011 SWOG 0221 study) and GWAS (Clin Cancer Res 2012 CALGB 40101 study) identified variants associated with paclitaxel mediated peripheral neuropathy. However, the overlap on the variants identified thus far between Doc and paclitaxel are limited, prompting a genome wide search to find variants contributing to Doc specific toxicity. Methods: TRIO-012 is a double blinded, multinational trial that randomized 1,144 patients with advanced breast cancer to receive first-line Doc in combination with ramucirumab (RAM) or placebo (Mackey et al. J Clin Oncol Jan 10, 2015:141-148). Study subjects (n=719) in the Doc+RAM or Doc+placebo arm with available germline DNA are being genotyped; all subjects provided ethics-committee approved prospective consent for this genetic study. Genotyping are being performed with Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays. Genotype data will be filtered for deviations from Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium and minor allele frequency of >0.05. Doc-induced adverse events (AEs) are based on CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.1) toxicity grades. Toxicities >2 scored for fatigue (n=96), myalgia (n=22), peripheral neuropathy (n=17) will be analysed as individual phenotypes in comparison with the no toxicity group (toxicity grades 0-1) and in a combined analysis of all Doc induced toxicities (0-1, n=599 vs. >2, n=120). Dominant genotypic model is assumed; Chi-square test, FDR and/or 10000 permutations were employed using SVS v8.3 and p Results and conclusions: We expect to reconfirm the associations of loci reported in candidate SNP and previous GWAS studies; XKR4 (rs4737264) for peripheral neuropathy, CYP3A5*3 (rs776746) with fatigue, and FACND2 (rs7637888) with myalgia in addition to the potential novel variants distinct from paclitaxel AE GWAS studies. Fine mapping around these loci may help identify potential causal variants. Both candidate SNP and GWAS identified variants may aid in developing risk stratification models. The GWAS identified loci and the flanking genes will be interrogated using the ingenuity pathway analysis for insights in to the biological roles in the drug metabolism. We expect to complete the analysis by mid-November 2015. Citation Format: Damaraju S, Gorbunova V, Gelmon K, García-Saenz J, Morales-Murillo S, AbiGerges D, Canon J-L, Kiselev I, Cohen GL, Jerusalem G, Thireau F, Fresco R, Houé V, Press MF, Kumaran M, Mackey JR. Genome wide association study (GWAS) of genetic variants associated with docetaxel toxicity in the ROSE/TRIO-012 trial. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-13-03.

Background: Ixabepilone, an epothilone B analog, has demonstrated single-agent activity in metastatic and neoadjuvant settings. The PACS08 trial aimed to compare adjuvant FEC100-Docetaxel regimen to FEC100-Ixabepilone in poor prognosis early breast cancer (BC) composed of patients presenting with triple-negative (TN) [i.e. estrogen receptor (ER)-/progesterone receptor (PR)-/HER2-] or ER+/PR-/HER2- tumor, which are subgroups significantly associated with worse prognosis. Patients and methods: Between 2007 and 2010, 762 patients with unilateral TNBC (n=592, 78%) or node-positive ER+/PR-/HER2- BC (n=170, 22%) were enrolled. Recruitment was interrupted due to BMS decision to stop ixabepilone development in adjuvant setting. Main inclusion criteria were: age Results: Main pts characteristics were well balanced between the 2 arms. As of September 2014, the median follow-up was 36 months. The safety profile indicates that Docetaxel is more often associated to significant haematological toxicities whereas both neurotoxicities and haematological toxicities are reported in Ixabepilone arm. Log-Rank tests indicate no difference between two arms in terms of both DFS and OS (HR=1.2, 95%CI (0.864-1.728), p=0.256 and HR=1.8, 95%CI (0.751-1.855), p=0.473, respectively). Pathological analysis of the PACS08 collection showed that TNBC displayed significantly higher proliferative activity as shown by mitotic count and Ki67 index (p Conclusions: Our results indicate that Ixabepilone doesn't show higher efficiency compared to Docetaxel in adjuvant setting in poor prognosis early breast cancer. We have an unusual biological collection associated to our clinical data which will allow us to correlate efficacy data to breast cancer subgroups. Other several translational researches are still ongoing. Citation Format: Campone M, Lacroix-Triki M, Roca L, Spielmann M, Wildiers H, Cottu P, Kerbrat P, Levy C, Mayer F, Bachelot T, Wiston T, Eymard J-C, Uwer L, Machiels J-P, Verhoeven D, Jaubert D, Facchini T, Orfeuvre H, Canon J-L, Asselain B, Lemonnier J, Roché H. UCBG intergroup: 3-years efficacy results of the Unicancer-PACS08 trial including poor prognosis patients treated with docetaxel or ixabepilone in adjuvant setting. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-06.

Background: Optimal preoperative treatment before colorectal cancer metastases (CRCM) resection remains unclear. This study evaluated pathological responses (pR) in CRCM resected after chemotherapy alone or combined with angiogenesis or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. Methods: Pathological response was retrospectively evaluated on 264 resected metastases from 99 patients. The proportion of responding metastases after different preoperative treatments was reported and compared. Patient's progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared based on pR. Results: The combination of anti-angiogenics with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy resulted in more pR than when they were combined with irinotecan-based chemotherapy (80% vs 50% P

Background Long term information on the risk/benefit ratio of currently available therapies remains crucial for treatment decisions. In the PACS04 phase III trial, patients (pts) with node-positive (N+) breast cancer (BC) were double-randomized to concomitant taxane-anthracycline versus standard FEC, as well as 1-year trastuzumab versus nill in the HER2+ subpopulation. Methods 3009 pts (20% HER2+, 12% triple negative (TNBC) BC) were randomly assigned to receive 6 cycles of fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 (FEC) or epirubicin 75mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (ED). Pts with HER2+ tumors were randomized to either trastuzumab (TRA) for one year, or observation (OBS). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Results After a median 115-month follow-up, DFS was not different in the ED compared to the FEC arm (70% vs 68% respectively, HR = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.77-1.01]; p = 0.064), nor was OS: 80% with FEC and 81% with ED (HR = 0.97 [95% CI: 0.81-1.16]; p = 0.729). Subgroup analysis suggested better DFS with ED in non-TNBC pts [HR = 0.82 (0.71-9.96) p = 0.02]. In the 528 pts with HER2+ BC, there was trend for a higher DFS in the TRA arm (68%; [95% CI: 61-74]) versus the OBS arm (60%; [95% CI: 54-66]); HR = 0.77 [95% CI:0.57-1.03]; p = 0.079 (intent to treat population). In the per protocol population, DFS, but not OS, was significantly higher in the TRA arm (HR: 0.69 [95%CI: 0.51-0.94]; p = 0.0156). ED led to more neurological and hematological toxicities (31% vs 11% febrile neutropenia) and led to 5 versus 1 treatment-related deaths. During follow-up, 75 pts developed a second non-breast primary cancer (43 with FEC and 32 with ED); 12 were hematologic malignancies (7 with FEC and 5 with ED). Long term cardiac deaths were rare (3 with FEC and 1 with ED). Conclusions This study did not show superiority of the concomitant anthracycline-taxane arm, which was more toxic in high-risk N+ BC pts. Long-term results of the HER2+ subpopulation are in line with the other adjuvant TRA trials but less striking probably due to lack of power. Long term cardiac toxicity and second primary cancer rate are similar to what has been reported by others. Clinical trial identification NCT00054587. Legal entity responsible for the study UNICANCER. 101 rue Tolbiac, 75013 Paris, France. Funding Roche, Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Background: Hsp90 is a molecular chaperone protein required for the stabilization and activation of many proteins, referred to as Hsp90 ‘clients’, such as HER2, HIF1-a, EGFR, ER, PI3K, AKT, P53 and VEGFR. The drug candidate, ganetespib is a novel triazolone inhibitor of Hsp90, with over 700 patients treated to date. Ganetespib has shown activity in preclinical models of HER2+, ER+/PR+ and TNBC. Early clinical trials documented ganetespib single agent activity in heavily pretreated HER2+ and TNBC patients. Ganetespib has been well tolerated in clinical trials with a favorable safety profile. This efficacy-screening study is designed to provide further evidence of ganetespib activity and identify potentially predictive biomarkers in metastatic breast cancer (BC). Methods: The ENCHANT-1 Trial is an international, first-line 2-cohort Phase 2 study in BC patients: Cohort A, HER2 amplified (n = 35), and Cohort B, TNBC (n = 35). Patients who present with previously untreated metastatic disease are eligible for treatment with ganetespib at 150 mg/m2 twice weekly on 3 out of 4 wks, for a total of up to 12 wks. Primary endpoint: ORR assessed using RECIST1.1 criteria. Key secondary endpoints include metabolic response as assessed by PET/CT at wk 3 utilizing modified EORTC criteria. Disease progression (PD) at wk 3 by PET imaging indicates discontinuation of study therapy, and is performed to quickly offer patients with metabolic PD a standard of care treatment. The study is designed as Simon 2-stage requiring at least one OR in 15 patients for the respective cohort to expand to 35 patients. A Steering Committee is established to oversee the overall study and review the interim results. Results: The study was initiated in 23 centers globally. At the time of submission, a total of 17 patients had been enrolled; TNBC (n = 15) and HER2 (n = 2). Here we report the interim analysis in the TNBC cohort. The median age was 54 years (range 30 -77) with ECOG PS 0 (n = 7/15). Most patients (n = 9) presented with de novo metastatic disease. 5 patients were not evaluable for PET assessment (3 had not yet reached wk 3 and 2 withdrawn before wk 3 for clinical progression), and 9 patients were not evaluable for objective response at wk 6 (3 withdrawn before or at wk 3 for clinical progression and 6 had not yet reached wk 6 evaluation). In the 10 patients with evaluable PET imaging, 9 patients achieved metabolic (m) response (2 mPR, 4 mSD with dominant tumor shrinkage and 3 SD) and one patient with mPD. In the 6 patients evaluable for OR at wk 6, one patient achieved PR, 2 SD and 3 PD. Treatment with ganetespib was well tolerated; the most common AEs were mild or moderate diarrhea (8/15, 53%), fatigue (5/15, 33%), decreased appetite (4/15, 27%), insomnia (4/15, 27%), and nausea (4/15, 27%). Conclusion: Ganetespib single agent was generally well tolerated and showed anti-tumor activity TNBC patients as early as 3 weeks following treatment. PET seems to be a good tool to screen antitumor activity of new agents in early settings rather that in heavily pretreated patients. The TNBC cohort has met the protocol criteria for proceeding to stage 2. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P2-16-23.

Background: This phase II study assessed the safety and efficacy of everolimus, an oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor in advanced transitional carcinoma cell (TCC) after failure of platinum-based therapy. Patients and methods: Thirty-seven patients with advanced TCC received everolimus 10 mg/day until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was the disease control rate (DCR), defined as either stable disease (SD), partial response (PR), or complete response at 8 weeks. Angiogenesis-related proteins were detected in plasma and changes during everolimus treatment were analyzed. PTEN expression and PIK3CA mutations were correlated to disease control. Results: Two confirmed PR and eight SD were observed, resulting in a DCR of 27% at 8 weeks. Everolimus was well tolerated. Compared with patients with noncontrolled disease, we observed in patients with controlled disease a significant higher baseline level of angiopoietin-1 and a significant early plasma decrease in angiopoietin-1, endoglin,and platelet-derived growth factor-AB. PTEN loss was observed only in patients with PD. Conclusions: Everolimus showed clinical activity in advanced TCC. The profile of the plasma angiogenesis-related proteins suggested a role of the everolimus antiangiogenic properties in disease control. PTEN loss might be associated with everolimus resistance.

Background: Docetaxel and irinotecan chemotherapy have shown good efficacy in the treatment of advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. This randomised phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity profile of two non-platinum docetaxel-based doublet regimens in advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer were randomised to receive either 3-weekly DI (docetaxel 60 mg m−2 plus irinotecan 250 mg m−2 (Day 1)) or 3-weekly DF (docetaxel 85 mg m−2 (Day 1) followed by 5-fluorouracil 750 mg m−2 per day as a continuous infusion (Days 1–5)). Results: A total of 85 patients received DI (n=42) or DF (n=43). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). The ORR and time to progression (TTP) in the evaluable population (n=65) were 37.5% (DI) vs 33.3% (DF), and 4.2 months vs 4.4 months, respectively. In the intent-to-treat population, the observed ORR, TTP and median overall survival were similar between the two groups. Grade 3–4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and diarrhoea were more frequent in the DI arm as compared with the DF arm (83.3% vs 69.8%, 40.5% vs 18.6%, and 42.9% vs 16.3%, respectively). Conclusion: Both docetaxel-based doublet regimens show comparable efficacy; however, the DF regimen was associated with a better toxicity profile and is an alternative treatment option for patients in whom platinum-based regimens are unsuitable.

Background The cardiac safety of trastuzumab concurrent with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in an adjuvant breast cancer treatment regimen is unknown. Patients and methods Women with resected node-positive or intermediate-risk node-negative HER2 overexpressing breast cancer and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥55% were randomized (1 : 2) to doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 (A) + cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (C) every 21 days (q21d) for four cycles or PLD 35 mg/m2 + C q21d + trastuzumab 2 mg/kg weekly (H) for 12 weeks. Both groups then received paclitaxel (Taxol, T) 80 mg/m2 with H for 12 weeks followed by H to complete 1 year. The primary end point was cardiac event rate or inability to administer 1 year of trastuzumab. Results Of 181 randomized patients, 179 underwent cardiac analysis. The incidence of cardiac toxicity or inability to administer trastuzumab due to cardiotoxicity was 18.6% [n = 11; 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.7% to 30.9%] with A + C → T + H and 4.2% (n = 5; 95% CI 1.4% to 9.5%) with PLD + C + H → T + H (P = 0.0036). All events, except one, were asymptomatic systolic dysfunction or mildly symptomatic heart failure. Mean absolute LVEF reduction at cycle 8 was greater with doxorubicin (5.6% versus 2.1%; P = 0.0014). Conclusion PLD + C + H → T + H is feasible and results in lower early cardiotoxicity rates compared with A + C → T + H.

Purpose: PACS 01 trial demonstrated that the sequential adjuvant chemotherapy with FEC100 followed by docetaxel (D) significantly improves disease-free and overall survival in node-positive(N+) early breast cancer (BC). However, Triple negative (TN) and ER+/ PR-/HER2− subgroups are significantly associated to a worse prognosis even after adjunction of D. As Ixabepilone (Ixa) has notable preclinical and clinical activity in these subgroups, the PACS 08 trial aims to compare standard FEC100-D regimen to 3 cycles of FEC100 followed by 3 cycles of Ixa. We report the preliminary results of the toxicity profile. Patients and methods: Patients (pts) had localized resectable unilateral ER-/PR-/HER2− or ER+/PR-/HER2− BC. Main inclusion criteria were: age Conclusion: Our results indicate that D arm is more often associated to significant haematological toxicities, whereas both neurotoxicities and haematological toxicities are reported in the Ixa arm. Although significantly more pts discontinued treatment due to adverse events in Ixa arm compared to D arm, Ixa may still represent a promising therapeutic option for pts in the adjuvant setting especially for poor prognosis BC. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-18-04.

The aim of this study is to provide relevant and accurate information on prevalence and treatment patterns of anaemia in Belgian cancer patients.The Anaemia Day 2008 survey was a single visit, multi-centre, non-interventional study in adult cancer patients under systemic therapy (chemotherapy, hormonal, immunological and/or targeted therapy) and/or radiotherapy. Efforts were made to enroll the maximum number of patients seen in each centre that day. Patients signed an informed consent and relevant data were collected from their files, i.e. disease and disease stage, cancer therapy and anti-anaemic treatment, including transfusions and the use of erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA). A blood count of each included patient was performed. Haemoglobin (Hb) values (grams per decilitre) were classified into four categories to assess the severity of anaemia, as defined by WHO: no anaemia: Hb ≥ 12 g/dL; mild 10 ≤ Hb ≤ 11.9 g/dL; moderate 8 ≤ Hb ≤ 9.9 g/dL; severe Hb8 g/dL. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out with anaemia as the dependent variable.A total of 1,403 eligible patients aged 63 ± 13 years (mean age ± SD) were enrolled in 106 oncology or haematology centres. The mean Hb level (± SD) was 11.6 g/dL (± 1.8 g/dL) and the prevalence of anaemia (Hb12 g/dL) was 55.7% (95% CI, 53.1-58.3%), respectively, 35.9% mild, 17.8% moderate and 2.1% severe anaemia. Anaemia was more frequent in females than in males, and in patients with haematological malignancies (73.4%) than in those with solid tumours (51.4%; p0.001). Anaemia prevalence was higher in hospitalised patients (75.5%) compared to those seen in one-day-clinic (54.3%) or in consultation (33.9%; p0.001), and in patients treated with chemotherapy (61.3%) compared to those receiving radiotherapy (34.4%) or hormonal therapy (19.5%; p0.001). There was a clear correlation between severity of anaemia and WHO performance status (p0.001). Among anaemic patients, 53.1% received no treatment (mean Hb 10.8 ± 0.9 g/dL). Among the anaemic patients who received therapy for their anaemia (mean Hb 9.7 ± 1.1 g/dL), the most frequent treatments were RBC transfusions (42%), ESA (34.6%), transfusions + ESA (12%), ESA + iron (7.9%) and iron alone (3.5%). Comparison to the ECAS survey shows that there has been no major change in attitude towards anaemia management in the last decade.This survey shows that cancer-related anaemia is still frequently observed in cancer patients. Even if in our study ESA were used more frequently than about 10 years ago, still a large amount of anaemic patients who could be treated for anaemia according to EORTC guidelines, were not.

The aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that antiangiogenic treatment with sunitinib consolidation can prolong remissions induced by taxane-based chemotherapy in women with metastatic breast cancer. The method involves a two-arm open-label (2:1 randomization) multicenter, randomized phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of sunitinib (arm A) versus no therapy (arm B) in patients with HER-2-negative metastatic breast cancer who achieved an objective response to taxane-based chemotherapy. The results of this study indicates that the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) > or =5 months was achieved in 10 of 36 patients (28%) in arm A and 4 of 19 patients (21%) in arm B. The median PFS was 2.8 and 3.1 months, respectively. A protocol amendment to the sunitinib dosing schedule was made because 53% (17/32) of patients treated at a starting dose of 50 mg (4 weeks on/2 weeks off) required dose reduction. Changing the starting dose to sunitinib 37.5 mg continuously resulted in dose reductions in 44% (7/16) of patients. Grades III-IV toxicity occurred in 69% of patients in arm A (fatigue 31%, musculoskeletal pain 11%, neutropenia and thrombopenia 8%) and 11% in arm B. The proof-of-principle study does not confirm the hypothesis that sunitinib consolidation therapy can lead to a predefined clinically relevant proportion of patients with PFS of > or =5 months after an objective response to taxanes. Furthermore, toxicity was significant.

INTRODUCTION: We report here two cases of Agrobacterium radiobacter bacteremia. These cases were observed at the same institution over a short time period (3 months). CASE REPORTS: The first patient was a female cancer patient receiving third-line chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma. When she developed bacteremia, she was neutropenic and had an indwelling catheter that was removed as part of the treatment. The second case was a geriatric patient admitted from home with bacteremia, clinical signs of septic shock, and concomitant acute cholecystitis. OUTCOME: Both patients responded promptly and completely to antibiotherapy. No recurrence was observed.

We report the case of a 62-year-old patient who developed a carcinomatous meningitis while on second-line chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Cytologic analyses confirmed that carcinomatous cells of ovarian origin were present in cerebrospinal fluid. Carcinomatous meningitis is a very rare event in the natural history of ovarian carcinoma. We discuss the specificity of our case in the light of the literature. In addition, we present some relevant radiologic and pathologic documents illustrating this rare entity.

BACKGROUND: To assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy, capecitabine, and cetuximab in the preoperative treatment of patients with rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with rectal cancer (T3-T4, and/or N+, endorectal ultrasound) received preoperative radiotherapy (1.8 Gy, 5 days/week for 5 weeks, total dose 45 Gy, three-dimensional conformal technique) in combination with cetuximab [initial dose 400 mg/m(2) intravenous given 1 week before the beginning of radiation followed by 250 mg/m(2)/week for 5 weeks] and capecitabine for the duration of radiotherapy (650 mg/m(2) orally twice daily, first dose level; 825 mg/m(2) twice daily, second dose level). RESULTS: Four and six patients were treated at the first and second dose level of capecitabine, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred. Thirty additional patients were treated with capecitabine at 825 mg/m(2) twice daily. The most frequent grade 1/2 side-effects were acneiform rash (87%), diarrhea (65%), and fatigue (57%). Grade 3 diarrhea was found in 15%. Three grade 4 toxic effects were recorded: one myocardial infarction, one pulmonary embolism, and one pulmonary infection with sepsis. Two patients (5%) had a pathological complete response. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative radiotherapy in combination with capecitabine and cetuximab is feasible with some patients achieving pathological downstaging.

Certain familial breast and/or ovarian cancers, specially those diagnosed early, are dominantly heritable and have been linked to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. We have tested 30 women selected from 25 different families with specific criteria. Blood samples were always taken with the informed consent and preliminary interview of the patient by a physicologist specialized in presymptomatic testing. Mutation detection were performed by protein truncation test (PTT), gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and subsequent sequencing. The results showed four frameshift mutations among which three induced truncation of the BRCA1 protein and one of the BRCA2 protein. One of the BRCA1 mutations and the only BRCA2 mutation are prevelant among caucasians. Interestingly, one BRCA1 mutation is shared both by Dutch and French families and another one has not yet been reported. Furthermore, a new unclassified varient was identified. Conclusion: by using specific selection criteria, we have been able to detect BRCA mutations in four out of the 25 families tested. One of the mutations seems to be found only in Belgium. Genetic counselling is being offered to their relatives. (C) 1998 Rapid Science Ltd.

PURPOSE This study evaluated tropisetron (Navoban; Sandoz Pharma, Basle, Switzerland)-based combination therapy in patients who had incomplete control of chemotherapy-induced nausea or vomiting when using tropisetron as a single antiemetic agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS One thousand seventy-two patients, who were scheduled to receive at least two identical cycles of emetogenic chemotherapy, were treated with 5 mg tropisetron once daily in their first chemotherapy course. A 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design was used to evaluate three additional treatments to the recommended 5 mg once daily (intravenously [i.v.] on day 1; orally on days 2 through 6) tropisetron regimen during course 2 in those patients who had shown incomplete control of nausea and/or vomiting on any day of course 1. Four hundred forty-five patients were centrally randomized to receive, in addition, open-label dexamethasone (day 1, 0.2 mg/kg i.v.; days 2 through 6, 8 mg orally) and/or open-label alizapride (day 1, 100 mg i.v. and 4 x 50 mg orally; days 2 through 6, 4 x 50 mg orally) and/or double-blind tropisetron (ie, doubling the dose to 10 mg once daily) or corresponding placebo. RESULTS Complete response rates (no nausea and no vomiting) were 72% for day 1 and 48% for days 1 through 6 of course 1. During course 2, more complete responders were observed when dexamethasone was added, both for day 1 (76% v 66%, P = .020) and for days 1 through 6 (50% v 34%, P = .0004). A moderate increase in the complete response rate was seen with the addition of conventional-dose alizapride (day 1, 75% v 68%, P = .14; days 1 through 6: 47% v 37%, P = .041). Doubling the dose of tropisetron did not change the complete response rate. CONCLUSION The addition of dexamethasone significantly increases the complete response rate of both acute and delayed emesis in patients who have incomplete disease control with tropisetron alone.

Background: BIBW 2992 (Tovok™*) is a novel, oral, irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/ human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)1 and HER2 inhibitor. It has promising preclinical activity in HER2-negative MDA-MB-453 and triple-negative SUM 149-PT cell lines, and showed clinical Phase I activity. First results of a Phase II study of BIBW 2992 in patients with HER2-negative, hormone receptor (HR)-positive or triple-negative breast cancer who have progressed following no more than two prior lines of chemotherapy are presented. The trial was conducted as a multi-institutional, open-label study in Germany and Belgium.Methods: Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with progression following no more than two prior lines of chemotherapy. No prior EGFR-targeted therapy was allowed and measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2 and an adequate organ function were required. Patients received 50 mg BIBW 2992 once-daily until disease progression. Tumor assessment was performed every other treatment course (one course is 28 days). The primary endpoint was objective response rate by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria in patients with HR-positive and triple-negative MBC. The latter was changed to clinical benefit, i.e. objective response (OR) or stable disease (SD) on treatment for at least four cycles for patients with triple-negative disease. Safety data were collected and analyses are still ongoing.Results: A total of 56 patients were enrolled with 50 actually starting treatment on the trial, including 29 patients with triple-negative and 21 patients with HER2-negative and HR-positive MBC. No ORs were observed in either cohort. Three patients in the triple-negative cohort had SD for at least 4 treatment cycles, one of them for 12 cycles. The most frequently observed side-effects at snapshot date (on 49 patients) are diarrhea (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Grade 3 in 18 patients [36.7%]) and Grade 3 skin rash in two patients [4.1%]). These were managed by symptomatic treatments and dose reductions.Conclusion: Long-term oral administration of BIBW 2992 was safe in HER2-negative MBC patients. Side effects mainly affected the skin and gastrointestinal tract, and were manageable. Clinical benefit was achieved in a fraction of triple-negative MBC patients.*Trade name not FDA approved. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 5062.

Background: Immunotherapy through stimulatory antibodies targeting the CTLA-4 or PD-1 pathways has a clear clinical efficacy in a fraction of patients with various cancers. It is likely that the main immune effectors of these therapies are CD8+ cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL) recognizing tumor-specific antigens. The antigenicity of human tumors has been demonstrated with studies conducted mostly on melanomas. However the genetic mechanisms leading to antigenicity, notably point mutations in the tumor cells, apply to all cancer types. Thus primary breast carcinoma cells do certainly bear tumor-specific antigens, even though the extent of this antigenicity is unknown. Most melanomas, which are highly antigenic tumors, are also immunogenic, i.e. they stimulate spontaneous anti-tumor CTL responses. This immunogenicity, of which the presence of tumor-infiltrating T cells (TILs) is probably a surrogate marker, might be a predictive marker for clinical benefit to immunostimulatory antibodies. Whether primary breast carcinomas are immunogenic is not known, mainly due the absence of autologous tumor cell lines to analyze patients' T cells. However even in the absence of T-cell aimed immunotherapy the amounts of TILs have been positively correlated with patients' survival. Here we wished to obtain evidence for the presence of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells in TILs from primary breast carcinomas. Methods: From each tumor we isolated TILs and derived a random set of ±100 CD8+ clones maintained in culture by stimulation with anti-CD3 antibodies, thus irrespective of their antigenic specificity. We screened these clones for recognition of tumor-specific antigens present on the autologous tumor. In the absence of autologous tumor lines we restricted our analysis to mutated antigens selected on the basis of tumor exome sequencing and gene expression profiling. Indels and non-synonymous base substitutions were selected to synthesize candidate mutated peptides. Results: Thus far we have analyzed two hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative primary carcinomas. For one patient we screened 144 T cell clones for recognition of 40 candidate mutated peptides, without any positive result. For the other patient, 6 out of 98 T cell clones recognized 4 out of 119 candidate mutated peptides. Two peptides were recognized by two different T cell clones, i.e. with different T cell receptor sequences. These 4 'antigenic' mutations appear to be passenger, i.e. the four genes have a low published mutation frequency. Conclusions: We conclude that some human primary breast carcinomas are immunogenic, as one tumor contained at least 6% of tumor-specific T cells among the CD8+ TILs. It suggests that the corresponding patient could benefit from the currently used immunostimulatory antibodies. More work is required to understand the reasons for the negative results in the first patient. We are pursuing the work on 2 HER2-positive and 2 triple-negative tumors, in which TILs are better correlated with prognosis. Our results warrant more investigations on the activation or inhibition of tumor-specific T cells at early stages of human breast cancer development. Citation Format: Schröder DJ, Bricard O, Hames G, Remy N, Carrasco J, Canon J-L, Berlière M, Galant C, Coulie PG. Presence of tumor-specific cytolytic T cells in human primary breast carcinoma: Consequences for immunotherapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-04-08.

BACKGROUD: The immunogenicity of some human tumors towards T lymphocytes is well established. Recently, encouraging results have been obtained with immunotherapies inhibiting immune checkpoints in cancers such as melanoma, NSCLC and bladder cancer. Fewer studies explored these treatments in breast cancer (BC) as these tumors are often considered to be poorly immunogenic. METHODS: We analysed the T cell receptor β-chains variable genes (TCRBV) repertoires of tumor-infiltrating T cells in 17 early BC. We looked for clonally amplified T cells as their presence is an expected consequence of tumor immunogenicity. RNA was extracted and reverse-transcribed from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissues. A short random sequence was added to the cDNA and used as a unique molecular identifier (UMI) for each cDNA molecule. cDNA encoding TCRBV genes was then amplified and sequenced using high throughput sequencing. Usage of UMIs during this procedure strongly improved the accuracy of the analysis by avoiding amplification biases inherent to the construction of the TCRBV library and by allowing an absolute quantification of TCRBV mRNA molecules normalized with the RPP30 housekeeping gene. TCRBV sequences were aligned using IMGT/HighV-QUEST. The Simpson's index was used to evaluate TCRBV repertoires diversity (ranging from 0 = infinite diversity to 1 = no diversity). For 3 patients, the same procedure was applied on blood T cells collected a few days before tumor resection and the analysis was also carried out on 3 normal tissues obtained from breast reduction surgery. RESULTS: T cell infiltration varied strongly from one tumor to another ranging from 5 to 2498 TCRBV/103 RPP30 mRNA molecules. TCRBV repertoires analysis indicated that infiltrated T cells corresponded to oligoclonal populations. We observed 3 clonotypes in the smaller repertoire and 74 in the largest one and the Simpson's index ranged from 0.01 to 0.65. Most tumors (16/17) contained at least one clonotype that made up ≥10% of the infiltrating T cells, with the highest observed proportions reaching 80%. Normal breast samples were infiltrated by a more diverse repertoire: 130 to 368 clonotypes were identified in those tissues and Simpson's index ranged from 0.002 to 0.008. Highest observed frequency among those clonotypes was 2%. For 3 BC patients, the frequencies of the most prevalent clonotypes in the tumor were compared to those of the same clonotypes in blood prior to surgery. These T cell clones were 250 to >34000 times more frequent in the tumor than in the blood. CONCLUSIONS: Some early BC are infiltrated by oligoclonal T cell populations that are highly enriched relative to the blood. Quantitative T cell repertoire analysis allows to distinguish 3 types of BC: (1) tumors without T cell infiltration, (2) tumors with a high T cell infiltration and a small T cell repertoire, and (3) tumors with a high T cell infiltration and a large repertoire. Our observations suggest that anti-tumor T cell responses are ongoing in some early BC and this warrants boosting such responses with immune checkpoint inhibitors in selected patients. T cell repertoire evaluation could be used as a predictive biomarker to identify patients who will benefit from this treatment. Citation Format: Carrasco J, Schröder D, Coulie PG, Godelaine D, Berlière M, Theate I, Delrée P, Vannuffel P, Galant C, Duhoux FP, Machiels J-P, Canon J-L. Early-stage breast carcinomas are infiltrated by oligoclonal T cell populations highly enriched relative to the blood. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-04-10.

Background: A phase 3 study demonstrated that panitumumab, a human monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody, significantly prolonged progression-free survival versus best supportive care (BSC) in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and methods: This open-label extension study evaluated panitumumab monotherapy in BSC patients with radiographically documented disease progression in the phase 3 study. Patients received panitumurnab 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks. The primary end point was safety; efficacy was also evaluated. Results: One hundred and seventy-six patients were randomly assigned to the BSC arm of the phase 3 study received >= 1 panitumumab dose in this extension study. Panitumumab was well tolerated. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were skin toxic effects. Three (2%) patients had a grade 4 treatment-related adverse event. There were no infusion reactions. One (0.6%) patient had a complete response; 19 (11%) patients had a partial response; and 58 (33%) patients had stable disease. Median progression-free survival time was 9.4 [95% confidence interval (Cl): 8.0-13.4) weeks. Median overall survival time was 6.3 (95% Cl: 5.1-6.8) months. Anti-panitumumab antibodies were detected in 3 (4.2%) of 71 patients with a post-baseline sample. Conclusions: These findings are comparable to those from the phase 3 study and support panitumumab monotherapy for chemorefractory colorectal cancer.

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors represent a new treatment option for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This retrospective study examined to what extent previous clinical trial experience matches large-scale Western community implementation of this treatment. In the Belgian expanded access programme, the data from 513 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, not suitable for further chemotherapy and receiving oral gefitinib 250 mg.day(-1) until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity, were analysed. The median (range) duration of gefitinib treatment was 2.3 months (0.0-32.7). Its use was predominantly in second- or third-line treatment. The overall response and disease control rates were 8.9 and 41.2%, respectively. In univariate analysis, response was more common in females and never-smokers. In multivariate analysis, female sex was the only significant predictive factor (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI)) 0.329 (0.129-0.839)). Symptom improvement was reported in 108 patients of whom 32 (29.6%) had an objective response, 66 (61.1%) experienced disease stabilisation and 10 (9.3%) progressed. Gefitinib was well tolerated; only 7.8% of the patients reported grade 3 or 4 toxicity. The overall median survival was 4.7 months, with a 1-yr survival rate of 21%. Survival was strongly influenced by a better performance status (PS) (good PS: hazard ratio (HR) (95%CI) 0.110 (0.077-0.157)) and adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma features histology (HR (95%CI) 0.483 (0.279-0.834)). In conclusion, the activity of gefitinib was confirmed in the present large Western community implementation study. Response, present in a small subgroup, led to a rewarding survival and could be predicted by sex only. Baseline performance status and adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma features histology were significant factors for survival.

Forty-six previously untreated patients with advanced breast cancer were eligible for the present randomised phase I study. It aimed to evaluate the toxicity and activity of a therapeutic sequence with epirubicin on day 1 followed by paclitaxel on day 2 (sequence A) or the reverse sequence, ie., paclitaxel on day 1 followed by epirubicin on day 2 (sequence B). The starting doses of epirubicin and paclitaxel, administered either according to sequence A or B, (level 1 cohort) were 90 mg/m2 and 175 mg/m2, respectively. Per cohort of 3 patients, the dose of paclitaxel was increased by 25 mg/m2 (levels 2 and 4) and of epirubicin by 10 mg/m2 (levels 3 and 5). Treatment was repeated with 3-week intervals. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was achieved at level 1 in sequence B (paclitaxel first) and level 3 (epirubicin 100 mg/m2 followed by paclitaxel 200 mg m2) in sequence A. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia (+/- febrile) in both sequences. Cardiac events occurred in 28% of the patients; significant decrease in left ventricular ejection function (LVEF) was observed in 8/33 and in 2/13 patients in sequence A and B, respectively. This was associated with 5 and 1 cardiac heart failure (CHF), respectively. In 43 evaluable patients, 10 CR and 25 PR were observed (overall response rate 81%). In the 20 patients with locally advanced disease (LABC), the respective numbers were 7 CR and 11 PR; in the 23 metastatic (MBC) patients, 3 CR and 14 PR were recorded. The median survival of the both groups was not reached at 33 + months. In conclusion , the combination of epirubicin and paclitaxel has significant activity in breast cancer. The recommended sequence of both drugs in combination therapy, mainly to avoid neutropenia, is epirubicin day 1 followed by paclitaxel on day 2. Cardiac toxicity remains problematic in either sequence of administration.

Background: Triple Negative Breast Cancers (TNBC) represent 12% to 20% of total Breast Cancers (BC) and have a worse outcome compared with other breast cancer subtypes. TNBC often show a deficiency in DNA double strand break repair mechanisms. This deficiency is generally related to inactivation of a repair enzymatic complex involving BRCA1 caused either by genetic mutations, epigenetic modifications, or by post-transcriptional regulations. The identification of BC presenting a BRCA1 deficiency could be useful to select patients that could benefit from PARP inhibitors, alkylant agents or platinum-based chemotherapy. In this study, we have identified by Comparative Genomic Hybridization array (CGH-array) a recurrent gain in 17q25.3 characteristic of BRCA1 mutated or methylated TNBC. Methods: 130 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumours including TNBC (unknown-BRCA1-status, BRCA1 mutated and non-mutated), Luminal A, Luminal B, Her2-neu amplified (Her2+) BC and BRCA1-mutated non-TNBC (mutated-Luminal A, Luminal B, Her2+) were obtained from our local tumour collection. DNA was extracted and genomic copy-number alterations were analysed by CGH-array (Agilent, SuperPrint G3 Human CGH 8×60K Oligo Microarrays). FISH analyses were performed on section from FFPE samples to validate some chromosomal aberrations belonging to the 17q25.3 amplified region evidenced by CGH-array. The study of BRCA1 promoter methylation status in all tumours was carried out by MDxHealth (Liege, Belgium). Results: In this study, we have identified by CGH-array a genomic region (17q25.3) amplified in 90% of the BRCA1 mutated tumours (29/32). This chromosomal gain was studied in other subtypes of BC by CGH-array and it was only evidenced in 30% (6/20) of BRCA1 non-mutated TNBC, 26.67% (4/15) of unknown-BRCA1-status TNBC, 13.64% (3/22) of Luminal B, 19.05% (4/21) of Her2+ and 0% (0/20) of Luminal A breast cancers. FISH assays confirmed these chromosomal amplifications and evidenced like CGH array analyses a significant difference between BRCA1 mutated and non-mutated BC for the 17q25.3 gain. BRCA1 methylation was found only in TNBC (11/58) and was not found in the BRCA1-mutated BC cohort, nor in the Luninal A, Luminal B and Her2+ samples. In BRCA1 non-mutated TNBC, the methylation was found in 8 cases including 4 with 17q25.3 amplification. In the unknown-BRCA1-status TNBC, 3 methylated samples were found with 1 case with co-amplification of the 17q25.3 region. Recurrence of 17q25.3 amplification in BRCA1 mutated tumours as well as its detection in BC having a methylation in BRCA1 promoter suggests that the 17q25.3 gain could be a marker of the BRCA1 deficiency. Identification of relevant genes whose expression is up-regulated within the recurrently gained region is underway. Conclusions: The CGH signature observed in 17q25.3 chromosomal region and FISH assay developed in this study could allow the identification of “BRCAness” breast tumours, improving the diagnostic performance and orienting the selection of the appropriate therapy. The up-regulated genes themselves might also represent potential therapeutic targets. Acknowledgements: This work was financed through the “Plan National Cancer-Action 29” (Belgium) and supported by the UNICANCER-PACS08 trial (France). Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-04-04.

Background Irinotecan (IR) or oxaliplatin (OX)-based regimens optionally combined with anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR Target Therapies (TT) are used as preoperative treatment for metastatic colorectal patients before resection of CRCM. Best combination remains unclear. The study purpose was to compare PR observed on resected CRCM after different preoperative treatments. Methods 114 patients engaged for CRCM resection after 2005 were included in this retrospective analysis. PR was evaluated on 296 resected CRCM according to the pathological Tumor Regression Grading scale (TRG), grading PR from complete (TRG1) to absent (TRG5). Mean TRG of resected metastasis was compared based on Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests. Cumulative PFS were calculated by Kaplan-Meir method and compared by log-rank test. Results 92/114 patients were preoperatively treated. Mean TRG after OX without TT was better than mean TRG after IR without TT (p = .044). No difference was observed between mean TRG after chemotherapy alone compared to mean TRG after chemotherapy + anti-VEGF (p = .53) or to mean TRG after chemotherapy + anti-EGFR (p = .39). Subgroup analysis revealed that mean TRG after IR + anti-EGFR was better than mean TRG after OX + anti-EGFR (p = .031), and that mean TRG after OX + anti-VEGF was better than mean TRG after IR + anti-VEGF (p = .001). PFS analysis for the 92 preoperatively treated patients revealed that 13 patients with major PR (TRG ≤ 2), had a significantly improved PFS compared to 79 patients with minor or no PR (TRG > 2) (median PFS= 33.7 vs 22.9 month p= .018). Conclusion PR observed on resected CRCM after a preoperative treatment does not seem to be linked to the TT (anti-VEGF or anti-EGFR) but rather to the chemotherapy/TT association with a significant advantage for OX + anti-VEGF or IR + anti-EGFR combinations. Preoperative strategy Patients (n) Metastases (n) TRG mean 95% CI No treatment 22 54 4.33 4.11- 4.55 Chemo alone 38 86 3.19 2.95 - 3.43 OX 28 68 3.16 2.89-3.43 IR 8 11 3.91 3.44-4.38 Other 2 7 ND ND Anti-VEGF + chemo 38 120 3.32 3.10 - 3.54 OX 8 27 2.63 2.18 - 3.08 IR 29 80 3.53 3.27 - 3.78 Other 1 13 ND ND Anti-EGFR + chemo 16 36 2.97 2.50 - 3.44 OX 9 16 3.56 2.98 - 4.15 IR 6 19 2.47 1.77 - 3.18 Other 1 1 ND ND Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Aim: In vitro, NSCLC cell lines with PIK3CA mutations have shown increased sensitivity to the oral pan-PI3K inhibitor buparlisib (BKM120). BASALT-1 is an open-label, two-stage, Phase II study to assess the safety and efficacy of buparlisib in patients (pts) with pre-treated metastatic NSCLC (squamous [sq] and non-squamous [non-sq] histology) and activated PI3K pathway (NCT01297491). Here we report results from the Stage 1 futility analysis (FA) for each histology. Methods: Pts (≥18 yrs) with previously treated, metastatic NSCLC (sq or non-sq histology) with activated PI3K pathway (defined as PIK3CA mutation and/or PTEN mutation and/or PTEN-negative staining [ Results: Thirty pts had been treated in each histologic group at the time of FA (>1200 pts screened). In the sq group, 21 pts were male (median age: 65.5 yrs); in the non-sq group, 19 pts were male (median age: 62.0 yrs). Median treatment exposure was 6.9 (sq group) and 7.2 (non-sq group) wks. Median PFS was 2.79 (95% CI: 1.38, 4.11) and 2.69 (95% CI: 1.41, 2.89) months for the sq and non-sq groups, respectively. PFS rate at 12 wks was 23.3% (95% CI: 9.9, 42.3) for the sq group and 20.0% (95% CI: 7.7, 38.6) for the non-sq group. Best overall responses (RECIST 1.1): partial response (1 pt [3.3%] in each group), stable disease (14 pts [46.7%] in each group), progressive disease (7 pts [23.3%] sq / 9 pts [30.0%] non-sq), unknown (8 pts [26.7%] sq / 6 pts [20.0%] non-sq). Most common (≥30%) AEs possibly related to study drug: hyperglycemia (36.7%), pruritus (33.3%), diarrhea (30%), and nausea (30%) for sq, and asthenia (30%) for non-sq. Conclusions: In this PI3K pathway-activated group of NSCLC pts, the futility criterion in Stage 1 was met in both histology groups. Thus, enrollment of Stage 2 was not initiated. Results of this study are in line with previous observations where single agents targeting the PI3K pathway have shown marginal activity. Studies of buparlisib in combination with docetaxel in pts with sq NSCLC are ongoing. Disclosure: J. Soria: - Research funds from Novartis (Instititution) - Compensated advisory board Novartis F. Grossi: Novartis advisory board; E. Felip: Advisory Board: BI, Novartis, Roche, BMS, Lilly; M. Thomas: AD-Board honoraria: Novartis, Roche, Lilly, BMS Speaker honoraria: BMS, Lilly; P. Roussou: - Novartis employee - Shares in Novartis; G. Atalla-Vidam: Novartis employee; P. Aimone: Novartis employee. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

366 patients fully resected from a Dukes B2 or C colorectal cancer were randomised to receive 6 courses of systemic chemotherapy comprising either 5-fluorouracil (5 FU) alone (arm A: 450 mg/m2/day-5/21 days) or combined folinic acid (FOL) and 5 FU (arm B: respectively 200 mg/m2 racemic form or 100 mg/m2-l-form and 370 mg/m2/day-5/21 days). 173 patients had also been initially randomised to receive one course of intraportal chemotherapy just after surgery or no portal treatment. Oral levamisole (150 mg/day; 3 days every other week) was given to all patients for one year. A significantly higher incidence of leuco-granulocytopenia was observed in the arm A (5 FU alone) inducing more frequent dose delays and adaptations as well as levamisole's withdrawal. Then dose-intensities and dose-intensity products were lower in this arm but the dose intensity expressed in mg/m2/week remained higher (631 +/- 107 vs 557 +/- 99; p0.001). The median follow-up in the study was 4.5 years. Relapse free (RFS) and overall survivals (OAS) were prolonged in the 5 FU alone group peculiarly in those patients who had not been randomised for portal treatment. Curves diverged progressively with longer follows-up (at 8 years; RFS in arm A: 67-71% vs 59-53% in arm B; OAS in arm A: 72-74% vs 56-46% in arm B). Patients suffering from a colon or a Dukes C cancer benefited the most from the treatment with 5 FU alone. The results are discussed in the light of other recent adjuvant trials. Well dosed 5 FU over a short period of time without folinic acid may be a valuable and inexpensive adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer. Levamisole may no longer be recommended in this setting.