4 results on '"J. A. Gullón Blanco"'
Search Results
2. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project:External Validation of the Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer
- Author
-
Kari Chansky, Frank C. Detterbeck, Andrew G. Nicholson, Valerie W. Rusch, Eric Vallières, Patti Groome, Catherine Kennedy, Mark Krasnik, Michael Peake, Lynn Shemanski, Vanessa Bolejack, John J. Crowley, Hisao Asamura, Ramón Rami-Porta, Peter Goldstraw, David Ball, David G. Beer, Ricardo Beyruti, John Crowley, Frank Detterbeck, Wilfried Ernst Erich Eberhardt, John Edwards, Françoise Galateau-Sallé, Dorothy Giroux, Fergus Gleeson, James Huang, Jhingook Kim, Young Tae Kim, Laura Kingsbury, Haruhiko Kondo, Kaoru Kubota, Antoon Lerut, Gustavo Lyons, Mirella Marino, Edith M. Marom, Jan van Meerbeeck, Alan Mitchell, Takashi Nakano, Anna Nowak, Thomas Rice, Kenneth Rosenzweig, Enrico Ruffini, Valerie Rusch, Nagahiro Saijo, Paul Van Schil, Jean-Paul Sculier, Kelly Stratton, Kenji Suzuki, Yuji Tachimori, Charles F. Thomas, William Travis, Ming S. Tsao, Andrew Turrisi, Johan Vansteenkiste, Hirokazu Watanabe, Yi-Long Wu, Paul Baas, Jeremy Erasmus, Seiki Hasegawa, Kouki Inai, Kemp Kernstine, Hedy Kindler, Lee Krug, Kristiaan Nackaerts, Harvey Pass, David Rice, Conrad Falkson, Pier Luigi Filosso, Giuseppe Giaccone, Kazuya Kondo, Marco Lucchi, Meinoshin Okumura, Eugene Blackstone, F. Abad Cavaco, E. Ansótegui Barrera, J. Abal Arca, I. Parente Lamelas, A. Arnau Obrer, R. Guijarro Jorge, D. Ball, G.K. Bascom, A. I. Blanco Orozco, M. A. González Castro, M.G. Blum, D. Chimondeguy, V. Cvijanovic, S. Defranchi, B. de Olaiz Navarro, I. Escobar Campuzano, I. Macía Vidueira, E. Fernández Araujo, F. Andreo García, K.M. Fong, G. Francisco Corral, S. Cerezo González, J. Freixinet Gilart, L. García Arangüena, S. García Barajas, P. Girard, T. Goksel, M. T. González Budiño, G. González Casaurrán, J. A. Gullón Blanco, J. Hernández Hernández, H. Hernández Rodríguez, J. Herrero Collantes, M. Iglesias Heras, J. M. Izquierdo Elena, E. Jakobsen, S. Kostas, P. León Atance, A. Núñez Ares, M. Liao, M. Losanovscky, G. Lyons, R. Magaroles, L. De Esteban Júlvez, M. Mariñán Gorospe, B. McCaughan, C. Kennedy, R. Melchor Íñiguez, L. Miravet Sorribes, S. Naranjo Gozalo, C. Álvarez de Arriba, M. Núñez Delgado, J. Padilla Alarcón, J. C. Peñalver Cuesta, J.S. Park, H. Pass, M. J. Pavón Fernández, M. Rosenberg, E. Ruffini, V. Rusch, J. Sánchez de Cos Escuín, A. Saura Vinuesa, M. Serra Mitjans, T.E. Strand, D. Subotic, S. Swisher, R. Terra, C. Thomas, K. Tournoy, P. Van Schil, M. Velasquez, Y.L. Wu, K. Yokoi, van Meerbeeck, Jan, et al., and IASLC Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee
- Subjects
Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Pathology ,Lung Neoplasms ,Multivariate analysis ,Staging ,UICC ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,International database ,Internal medicine ,Validation ,Humans ,Medicine ,Stage (cooking) ,Lung cancer ,Neoplasm Staging ,AJCC ,business.industry ,Confounding ,External validation ,Reproducibility of Results ,Cancer ,medicine.disease ,Survival Analysis ,National Cancer Database ,030104 developmental biology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,Human medicine ,Lung cancer staging ,business - Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Revisions to the TNM stage classifications for lung cancer, informed by the international database (N = 94,708) of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee, need external validation. The objective was to externally validate the revisions by using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) of the American College of Surgeons.METHODS: Cases presenting from 2000 through 2012 were drawn from the NCDB and reclassified according to the eighth edition stage classification. Clinically and pathologically staged subsets of NSCLC were analyzed separately. The T, N, and overall TNM classifications were evaluated according to clinical, pathologic, and "best" stage (N = 780,294). Multivariate analyses were carried out to adjust for various confounding factors. A combined analysis of the NSCLC cases from both databases was performed to explore differences in overall survival prognosis between the two databases.RESULTS: The databases differed in terms of key factors related to data source. Survival was greater in the IASLC database for all stage categories. However, the eighth edition TNM stage classification system demonstrated consistent ability to discriminate TNM categories and stage groups for clinical and pathologic stage.CONCLUSIONS: The IASLC revisions made for the eighth edition of lung cancer staging are validated by this analysis of the NCDB database by the ordering, statistical differences, and homogeneity within stage groups and by the consistency within analyses of specific cohorts.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Methodology and Validation Used in the Development of Proposals for Revision of the Stage Classification of NSCLC in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer
- Author
-
Frank C. Detterbeck, Kari Chansky, Patti Groome, Vanessa Bolejack, John Crowley, Lynn Shemanski, Catherine Kennedy, Mark Krasnik, Michael Peake, Ramón Rami-Porta, Peter Goldstraw, Hisao Asamura, David Ball, David G. Beer, Ricardo Beyruti, Frank Detterbeck, Wilfried Ernst Erich Eberhardt, John Edwards, Françoise Galateau-Sallé, Dorothy Giroux, Fergus Gleeson, James Huang, Jhingook Kim, Young Tae Kim, Laura Kingsbury, Haruhiko Kondo, Kaoru Kubota, Antoon Lerut, Gustavo Lyons, Mirella Marino, Edith M. Marom, Jan van Meerbeeck, Alan Mitchell, Takashi Nakano, Andrew G. Nicholson, Anna Nowak, Thomas Rice, Kenneth Rosenzweig, Enrico Ruffini, Valerie Rusch, Nagahiro Saijo, Paul Van Schil, Jean-Paul Sculier, Kelly Stratton, Kenji Suzuki, Yuji Tachimori, Charles F. Thomas, William Travis, Ming S. Tsao, Andrew Turrisi, Johan Vansteenkiste, Hirokazu Watanabe, Yi-Long Wu, Paul Baas, Jeremy Erasmus, Seiki Hasegawa, Kouki Inai, Kemp Kernstine, Hedy Kindler, Lee Krug, Kristiaan Nackaerts, Harvey Pass, David Rice, Conrad Falkson, Pier Luigi Filosso, Giuseppe Giaccone, Kazuya Kondo, Marco Lucchi, Meinoshin Okumura, Eugene Blackstone, F. Abad Cavaco, E. Ansótegui Barrera, J. Abal Arca, I. Parente Lamelas, A. Arnau Obrer, R. Guijarro Jorge, D. Ball, G.K. Bascom, A. I. Blanco Orozco, M. A. González Castro, M.G. Blum, D. Chimondeguy, V. Cvijanovic, S. Defranchi, B. de Olaiz Navarro, I. Escobar Campuzano, I. Macía Vidueira, E. Fernández Araujo, F. Andreo García, K.M. Fong, G. Francisco Corral, S. Cerezo González, J. Freixinet Gilart, L. García Arangüena, S. García Barajas, P. Girard, T. Goksel, M. T. González Budiño, G. González Casaurrán, J. A. Gullón Blanco, J. Hernández Hernández, H. Hernández Rodríguez, J. Herrero Collantes, M. Iglesias Heras, J. M. Izquierdo Elena, E. Jakobsen, S. Kostas, P. León Atance, A. Núñez Ares, M. Liao, M. Losanovscky, G. Lyons, R. Magaroles, L. De Esteban Júlvez, M. Mariñán Gorospe, B. McCaughan, C. Kennedy, R. Melchor Íñiguez, L. Miravet Sorribes, S. Naranjo Gozalo, C. Álvarez de Arriba, M. Núñez Delgado, J. Padilla Alarcón, J. C. Peñalver Cuesta, J.S. Park, M. J. Pavón Fernández, M. Rosenberg, E. Ruffini, V. Rusch, J. Sánchez de Cos Escuín, A. Saura Vinuesa, M. Serra Mitjans, T.E. Strand, D. Subotic, S. Swisher, R. Terra, C. Thomas, K. Tournoy, P. Van Schil, M. Velasquez, Y.L. Wu, K. Yokoi, Ramon Rami-Porta, Dorothy J. Giroux, William D. Travis, Paul van Schil, Marcin Zielinski, Wilfried Eberhardt, Jan van Meeerbeeck, Andrew Nicholson, Kouru Kubota, Alex Bankier, Mary Beth Beasley, Douglas B. Flieder, Jin Mo Goo, Heber MacMahon, David Naidich, Charles A. Powell, Mathias Prokop, Yasushi Yatabe, Douglas A. Arenberg, Jessica S. Donington, Wilbur A. Franklin, Nicolas Girard, Peter J. Mazzone, Valerie W. Rusch, Lynn T. Tanoue, and Eberhardt, Wilfried (Beitragende*r)
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Oncology ,Stage classification ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Lung Neoplasms ,Databases, Factual ,Medizin ,1102 Cardiovascular Medicine And Haematology ,Metastasis ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,International database ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Histologic type ,Humans ,Oncology & Carcinogenesis ,Stage (cooking) ,Lung cancer ,Neoplasm Staging ,business.industry ,External validation ,1103 Clinical Sciences ,medicine.disease ,Prognosis ,Surgery ,030104 developmental biology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Lung cancer staging ,business - Abstract
Introduction Stage classification provides a consistent language to describe the anatomic extent of disease and is therefore a critical tool in caring for patients. The Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer developed proposals for revision of the classification of lung cancer for the eighth edition of the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) classification, which takes effect in 2017. Methods An international database of 94,708 patients with lung cancer diagnosed in 1999–2010 was assembled. This article describes the process and statistical methods used to refine the lung cancer stage classification. Results Extensive analysis allowed definition of tumor, node, and metastasis categories and stage groupings that demonstrated consistent discrimination overall and within multiple different patient cohorts (e.g., clinical or pathologic stage, R0 or R-any resection status, geographic region). Additional analyses provided evidence of applicability over time, across a spectrum of geographic regions, histologic types, evaluative approaches, and follow-up intervals. Conclusions An extensive analysis has produced stage classification proposals for lung cancer with a robust degree of discriminatory consistency and general applicability. Nevertheless, external validation is encouraged to identify areas of strength and weakness; a sound validation should have discriminatory ability and be based on an independent data set of adequate size and sufficient follow-up with enough patients for each subgroup.
- Published
- 2016
4. [Community-acquired pneumonia: influence of the duration of intravenous antibiotic therapy on hospital stay and the cost-benefit ratio]
- Author
-
R, Fernández Alvarez, J A, Gullón Blanco, G, Rubinos Cuadrado, A, Jiménez Sosa, C, Hernández García, A, Medina Gonzálvez, and I, González Martín
- Subjects
Community-Acquired Infections ,Male ,Time Factors ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,Injections, Intravenous ,Humans ,Female ,Pneumonia ,Length of Stay ,Middle Aged ,Aged ,Anti-Bacterial Agents - Abstract
Intravenous antibiotic therapy (IVAT) is usually prescribed for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Studies have associated prolonged IVAT with longer hospital stays and higher costs. The aim of this study was to determine the factors that influence the expense generated by and mean stay of patients hospitalized for pneumonia, with special attention to the influence of IVAT duration.One hundred twenty-five CAP patients admitted to the respiratory medicine wards of our hospital were randomly assigned to five different staff physicians. IVAT was prescribed following the norms of the Spanish Society of Respiratory Medicine and Chest Surgery (SEPAR). IVAT was withdrawn when the attending physician considered it appropriate. We collected epidemiological, comorbidity, clinical and analytical data. Complications were recorded and severity of CAP was classified using the model proposed by Fine. Follow-up care was given at an outpatient clinic until symptoms disappeared and chest films resolved. Multivariate analysis determined the factors predicting mean hospital stay and high cost. Costs were calculated based on data issued by the billing department.The mean cost of care was 307,274 pesetas, mean duration of IVAT was 5.8 days and mean hospital stay was 9.4 days. Multivariate analysis showed that cost was related to mean hospital stay and IVAT. Mean hospital stay was associated with IVAT, the presence of respiratory insufficiency and the day of the week when admission took place (with weekend admission leading to longer stays).The duration of IVAT in CAP influences mean hospital stay and cost, without adding any evident therapeutic benefit (in the group of patients selected). Recommendations for diagnosing and treating CAP may be advisable.
- Published
- 2001
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.