1. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in neonates and infants is safe and efficient
- Author
-
S. Langreen, B. Ludwikowski, J. Dingemann, B. M. Ure, A. D. Hofmann, and J. F. Kuebler
- Subjects
laparoscopic pyeloplasty ,laparoscopy in infants ,ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) ,laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infant and neonates ,pyeloplasty pediatrics ,UPJO infants ,Pediatrics ,RJ1-570 - Abstract
IntroductionDismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) is a well-accepted treatment modality for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children. However, its efficacy and safety in infants, particularly neonates, remain uncertain. To address this significant knowledge gap, we aimed to compare outcomes between a cohort of neonates and infants undergoing LP vs. open pyeloplasty (OP) at less than 6 months and 6 weeks of age.Material and methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of data from patients who underwent primary pyeloplasty at our institution between 2000 and 2022. Only patients aged 6 months or less at the time of surgery were included, excluding redo-procedures or conversions. Ethical approval was obtained, and data were assessed for redo-pyeloplasty and postoperative complications, classified according to the Clavien–Madadi classification. A standard postoperative assessment was performed 6 weeks postoperatively. This included an isotope scan and a routine ultrasound up to the year 2020.ResultsA total of 91 eligible patients were identified, of which 49 underwent LP and 42 underwent OP. Patients receiving LP had a median age of 11.4 (1–25.4) weeks, compared to 13.8 (0.5–25.9) weeks for those receiving OP (p > 0.31). Both groups in our main cohort had an age range of 0–6 months at the time of surgery. Nineteen patients were younger than 6 weeks at the time of surgery. The mean operating time was longer for LP (161 ± 43 min) than that for OP (109 ± 32 min, p
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF